Evaluation of direct and indirect methods for modelling the joint distribution of tree diameter and height data with the bivariate Johnson’s SBB function to forest stands
Abstract
Aim of study: In this study, both the direct and indirect methods by conditional maximum likelihood (CML) and moments for fitting Johnson’s SBB were evaluated. To date, Johnson’s SBB has been fitted by either indirect (two-stage) method using well-known procedures for the marginal diameter and heights, or direct methods, where all parameters are estimated at once. Application of bivariate Johnson’s SBB for predicting height and improving volume estimation requires a suitable fitting method.
Area of study: E. globulus, P. pinaster and P. radiata stands in northwest Spain.
Material and methods: The data set comprised of 308, 184 and 96 permanent sample plots (PSPs) from the aforementioned species. The suitability of the method was evaluated based on height and volume prediction. Indices including coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square Error (RMSE), model efficiency (MEF), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQC) were used to assess the model predictions. Significant difference between observed and predicted tree height and volumes were tested using paired sample t-test at 5% level for each plot by species.
Main results: The indirect method by CML was the most suitable method for height and volume prediction in the three species. The R2 and RMSE for height prediction ranged from 0.994 – 0.820 and 1.454 – 1.676, respectively. The percentage of plot in which the observed and predicted heights were significant was 0.32%. The direct method was the least performed method especially for height prediction in E. globulus.
Research highlights: The indirect (two-stage) method, especially by conditional maximum likelihood, was the most suitable method for the bivariate Johnson’s SBB distribution.
Keywords: conditional maximum likelihood; moments; two-stage method; direct method; tree volume.
Downloads
References
Burkhart HE, Tomé M, 2012. Modeling Forest Trees and Stands (2nd Ed). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York, 271 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3170-9
Castedo-Dorado F, Ruiz-Gonzalez AD, Álvarez-González JG, 2001. Modelización de la relación altura-diámetro para Pinus pinaster Ait. en Galicia mediante la función de densidad bivariante SBB. Invest Agrar: Sist Recur For 10(1): 111-125.
Clutter JL, Allison BJ, 1974. A growth and yield model for Pinus radiata in New Zealand, pp. 136-160. In: Growth models for tree and stand simulation, Fries J (Ed). Department of Forest Yield Research Note 30, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Sweden.
Diéguez-Aranda U, Rojo-Alboreca A, Castedo-Dorado F, Ávarez-González JG, Barrio-Anta M, Crecente-Campo F, González- González JM, Pérez-Cruzado C, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, López-Sánchez CA, et al. 2009. Herramientas selvicolas para la gestión forestall sostenible en Galicia. Conselleria do Medio Rural, Xunta de Galicia. 268 pp.
Gaffrey D, 1996. Sortenorientiertes Bestandeswachstum-Simulationsmodell auf der Basis intraspezifischen, konkurrenzbedingten Einzelbaumwachstums - insbesondere hinsichtlich des Durchmessers - am Beispiel der Douglasie. In: Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme: Reihe A, 133: 413 pp.
García-Villabrille JD, 2015. Modelización del crecimiento y la producción de plantaciones de Eucalyptus globulus Labill. en el NO de Espa-a. Doctoral thesis. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain. [in Spanish].
Gorgoso-Varela JJ, Garcia-Villabrille JD, Rojo-Alboreca A, von Gadow K, Alvarez-Gonzalez JG, 2016. Comparing Johnson's SBB, Weibull and Logit-Logistic bivariate distributions for Modeling tree diameters and heights using copulas. Forest Syst, 25(1) 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2016251-08487
Gorgoso JJ, Rojo A, Camara-Obregon A, Dieguez-Arenda U, 2012. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull, Johnson's SB and beta functions to Pinus pinaster, Pinus radiata and Pinus sylvestris stands in northwest Spain. Forest Syst, 21(3): 446-459. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2012213-02736
Hafley WL, Buford MA, 1985. A bivariate model for growth and yield prediction. For Sci, 31: 237-247.
Johnson NL, 1949a. Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika, 36: 149-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.1-2.149
Johnson NL, 1949b. Bivariate distributions based on simple translation systems. Biometrika, 36:297-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/36.3-4.297
Kalbi S, Fallah A, Bettinger P, Shataee S, Yousefpour R, 2017. Mixed-effects modelling for tree height prediction models of Oriental beech in the Hyrcanian forets. J For Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0551-z
Knoebel BR, Burkhart HE, 1991. A bivariate distribution approach to modelling forest diameter distributions at two points in time. Biometrics, 47: 241-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532509
Li F, Zhang L, Davis CJ, 2002. Modelling the joint distribution of tree diameters and heights by bivariate generalized beta distribution. For Sci, 48(1): 47-58.
Mayer DG, Butler DG, 1993. Statistical validation. Ecol Model, 68:21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(93)90105-2
MMAMRM, 2011. Cuarto Inventario Forestal Nacional [Fourth National Forest Inventory]. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Galicia, Spain, pp. 52. [in Spanish].
Mønness E, 2015. The bivariate power-normal and the bivariate Johnson's system bounded distribution in forestry, including height curves. Can J For Res, 45: 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2014-0333
Nelder JA, Mead R, 1965. A simplex algorithm for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7: 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
Ogana FN, 2018a. Evaluation of four methods of fitting Johnson's SBB for height and volume predictions. J For Sci, 64: 187 - 197. https://doi.org/10.17221/151/2017-JFS
Ogana FN, 2018b. Comparison of a modified log-logistic distribution with established models for tree height prediction. J Res For Wild Environ, 10(2): 49 - 55.
Ogana FN, Osho JSA, Gorgoso-Varela JJ, 2018. An approach to modelling the joint distribution of tree diameter and height data. J Sustain For, 37(5):475-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1422434
R Core Team 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
Schreuder HT, Hafley WL, 1977. A useful bivariate distribution for describing stand structure of tree heights and diameters. Biometrics, 33:471-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529361
Siipilehto J, 1996. Metsikön läpimitta- ja pituusjakauman kuvaaminen kaksiulotteisen todennäköisyysfunktion avulla. Licentiate's thesis. University of Helsinki.
Siipilehto J, 2000. A comparison of two parameter prediction methods for stand structure in Finland. Silva Fenn 34(4): 331-349. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.617
Tewari VP, Singh B, 2018. Total wood volume equation for Tectona grandis Linn F. stands in Gujarat, India. J For Environ Sci, 34(4): 313-320.
Tewari VP, von Gadow K, 1999. Modelling the relationship between tree diameters and heights using SBB distribution. For Ecol Manage, 119: 171-176.
Tewari VP, von Gadow K, 1997. Fitting a bivariate distribution to diameter-height data of forest trees. Indian Forester, 123(9): 815-820.
Wang M, Rennolls K, Tang S, 2008. Bivariate distribution modelling with tree diameter and height: dependency modelling using copulas. For Sci 54(3): 284-293.
Wang M, Rennolls K, 2007. Bivariate distribution modeling with tree diameter and height data. For Sci, 53(1):16-24
Wang M, 2005. Distributional Modelling in forestry and remote sensing. PhD thesis, Univ. of Greenwich, UK, 187 pp.
Zucchini W, Schmidt M, von Gadow K, 2001. A model for the diameter-height distribution in an uneven-aged beech forest and a method to assess the fit of such models. Silva Fenn, 35(2): 169-183. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.594
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
