Replacing an oriental beech forest with a spruce plantation impacts nutrient concentrations in throughfall, stemflow, and O layer

Pedram Attarod, Parisa Abbasian, Thomas Grant-Pypker, Mohammad Taghi Ahmadi, Ghavamoddin Zahedi-Amiri, Hamid Soofi-Mariv, Vilma Bayramzadeh

Abstract


Aim of study: To measure the nutrient leaching from canopy and the O layer in a natural oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest and a Norway spruce (Picea abies) plantation.

Materials and methods: From mid-July to early November, 2013, we measured throughfall (TF) (n=45), stemflow (SF) (n=12) and leaching from the O layer (n = 30) in a 0.5 ha sample plot in the Caspian region, Mazandaran province in northern Iran.

Main results: Concentrations of PO43-, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and K+ in the throughfall and the O layer in both beech and spruce forests significantly increased relative to gross rainfall. Concentrations of Ca2+ and Na+ in TF and SF were significantly higher in the spruce forest compared with the beech forest. Furthermore, in both forests, cumulative fluxes of all studied elements (with the exception of NH4+ and NO3-) during the study period were statistically different from those of GR (P<0.05).

Research highlights: This study demonstrates that changing from a natural beech forest to a spruce plantation significantly alters nutrient fluxes exiting the canopy and the O layer. This information provides essential information on how planting exotic species will affect nutrient cycles in this region.

Keywords: Beech forest; Norway spruce plantation; Throughfall; Nutrient leaching; O layer.


Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Abbasian P, Attarod P, Sadeghi SMM, Van Stan II JT, Hojjati SM, 2015. Throughfall nutrients in a degraded indigenous Fagus orientalis forest and a Picea abies plantation in the North of Iran. Forest Syst 24(3): e035. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015243-06764

Adriaenssens S, Hansen K, Staelens J, Wuyts K, De Schrijver A, Baeten L, Boeckx P, Samson R, Verheyen K, 2012. Throughfall deposition and canopy exchange processes along a vertical gradient within the canopy of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst). Sci Total Environ 420: 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.029

Ashagrie Y, Zech W, 2010. Dynamics of dissolved nutrients in forest floor leachates: comparison of a natural forest ecosystem with monoculture tree species plantations in south-east Ethiopia. Ecohydrology Hydrobiology 10(2-4): 183-190. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-011-0015-6

Attarod P, Sadeghi SMM, Pypker TG, Bagheri H, Bagheri M, Bayramzadeh V, 2015. Needle-leaved trees impacts on rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity in an arid environment. New Forest 46(3): 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9464-2

Balestrini R, Arisci S, Brizzio MC, Mosello R, Rogora M, Tagliaferri A, 2007. Dry deposition of particles and canopy exchange: Comparison of wet, bulk and throughfall deposition at five forest sites in Italy. Atmos Environ 41(4): 745-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.002

Bhat S, Jacobs JM, Bryant ML, 2011. The chemical composition of rainfall and thoughfall in five forest communities: a case study in Fort Benning, Georgia. Water Air Soil Pollut 218: 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0644-1

Bernhard-Reversat F, 1975. Nutrients in Throughfall and their quantitative importance in rain forest mineral cycles. In: Golley FB, Medina E. (eds) Tropical Ecological Systems. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis), Vol. 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88533-4_13

Bulcock HH, Jewitt GPW, 2012. Modelling canopy and litter interception in commercial forest plantations in South Africa using the Variable Storage Gash model and idealised drying curves. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 16(12): 4693-4705. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4693-2012

Carlyle-Moses DE, Laureano JF, Price AG, 2004. Throughfall and throughfall spatial variability in Madrean oak forest communities of northeastern Mexico. J Hydrol 297(1-4): 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.007

Cattan P, Ruy SM, Cabidoche YM, Findeling A, Desbois P, Charlier JB, 2009. Effect on runoff of rainfall redistribution by the impluvium-shaped canopy of banana cultivated on an Andosol with a high infiltration rate. J Hydrol 368 (1-4): 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.020

Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, 1996. Exotic tree plantations and the regeneration of natural forests in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Biol Conserv 76(3): 253-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00124-7

Chiwa M, Crossley A, Sheppard LJ, Sakugawa H, Cape JN, 2004. Throughfall chemistry and canopy interactions in a Sitka spruce plantation sprayed with six different simulated polluted mist treatments. Environ Pollut 127(1): 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00259-8

Chuyong GB, Newbery DM, Songwe NC, 2004. Rainfall input, throughfall and stemflow of nutrients in a central African rain forest dominated by ectomycorrhizal trees. Biogeochemistry 67(1): 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOG.0000015316.90198.cf

De Schrijver A, Geudens G, Augusto L, Staelens J, Mertens J, Wuyts K, Gielis L, Verheyen K, 2007. The effect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux: a review. Oecologia 153(3): 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0776-1

De Schrijver A, Nachtergale L, Staelens J, Luyssaert S, De Keersmaeker L, 2004. Comparison of throughfall and soil solution chemistry between a high-density Corsican pine stand and a naturally regenerated silver birch stand. Environ Pollut 131(1): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.01.019

Dezzeo N, Chacón N, 2006. Nutrient fluxes in incident rainfall, throughfall, and stemflow in adjacent primary and secondary forests of the Gran Sabana, southern Venezuela. Forest Ecol Manag 234(1-3): 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.003

Douglas A, Schaefer, A, William A, Richard K, 1988. Factors controlling the chemical alteration of throughfall in a subalpine balsam fir canopy. Environ Exp Bot 28(3): 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(88)90027-5

Draaijers GPJ, Van Ek R, Meijers R, 1992. Research on the impact of forest stand structure on atmospheric deposition. Environ Pollut 75(2): 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(92)90046-D

Eaton JS, Likens GE, Bormann FH, 1973. Throughfall and stemflow chemistry in a northern hardwood forest. J Ecol 61(2): 495-508. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259041

Edmonds RL, Thomas TB, Rhodes JJ, 1991. Canopy and soil modification of precipitation chemistry in a temperate rain-forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55(6): 1685-1693. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500060031x

Fan SX, Yan H, Qishi MY, Bai WL, Pi DJ, Li X, Dong L, 2015. Dust capturing capacities of twenty-six deciduous broad-leaved trees in Beijing. China J Plant Ecol 39(7): 736-745. https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2015.0070

Fernández V, Eichert T, 2009. Uptake of hydrophilic solutes through plant leaves: current state of knowledge and perspectives of foliar fertilization. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28(1-2): 36-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680902743069

Hanchi A, Rapp M, 1997. Stemflow determination in forest stands. Forest Ecol Manag 97(3): 231-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00066-2

Herbst M, Roberts JM, Rosier PT, Taylor ME, Gowing DJ, 2007. Edge effects and forest water use: a field study in a mixed deciduous woodland. Forest Ecol Manag 250(3): 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.013

Hermann BA, Scherer LJ, Housecroft CE, Constable EC, 2006. Self‐Organized Monolayers: A Route to Conformational Switching and Read‐out of Functional Supramolecular Assemblies by Scanning Probe Methods. Adv Funct Mat 16(2): 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200500264

Hojjati SM, Hagen-Thorn A, Lamersdorf NP, 2009. Canopy composition as a measure to identify patterns of nutrient input in a mixed European beech and Norway spruce forest in central Europe. Eur J For Res 128(1): 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0235-5

Hongve D, Van Hees PAW, Lundström US, 2000. Dissolved components in precipitation water percolated through forest litter. Eur J Soil Sci 51(4): 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2000.00339.x

Houle D, Ouimet R, Paquin R, Laflamme JG, 1999. Interactions of atmospheric deposition with a mixed hardwood and a coniferous forest canopy at the Lake Clair Watershed (Duchesnay, Quebec). Can J For Res 29(12):1944-1957. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-29-12-1944

Iida SI, Tanaka T, Sugita M, 2005. Change of interception process due to the succession from Japanese red pine to evergreen oak. J Hydrol 315(1-4): 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.024

Levia DF, Frost EE, 2003. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. J Hydrol 274(1-4): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00399-2

Levia DF, Herwitz SR, 2002. Winter chemical leaching from deciduous tree branches as a function of branch inclination angle in central Massachusetts. Hydrol Process 16(14): 2867-2879. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1077

Ling-hao L, Peng L, 1998. Throughfall and stemflow nutrient depositions to soil in a subtropical evergreen broad leaved forest in the Wuyi Mountains. J Environ Sci 10(4): 426-432.

Liu W, Fox JE, Xu Z, 2003. Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in a montane moist evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountains, SW China. Plant Ecol 164(2): 157-170.

Llorens P, Domingo F, 2007. Rainfall partitioning by vegetation under Mediterranean conditions. A review of studies in Europe. J Hydrol 335(1-2): 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.032

Lovett GM, Lindberg SE, 1984. Dry deposition and canopy exchange in a mixed oak forest as determined by analysis of throughfall. J Appl Ecol 21(3): 1013-1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405064

Lu J, Zhang S, Fang J, Yan H, Li J, 2017. Nutrient Fluxes in Rainfall, Throughfall, and Stemflow in Pinus densata Natural Forest of Tibetan Plateau. Clean Soil Air Water 85: 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201600008

Michopoulos P, Baloutsos G, Nakos G, Economou A, 2001. Effects of bulk precipitation pH and growth period on cation enrichment in precipitation beneath the canopy of a beech (Fagus moesiaca) forest stand. Sci Total Environ 281(1-3): 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00837-3

Muoghalu JI, Oakhumen A, 2000. Nutrient content of incident rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in a Nigerian secondary lowland rainforest. Appl Veg Sci 3(2): 181-188. https://doi.org/10.2307/1478996

Parker GG, 1983. Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Adv Ecol Res13:57-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60108-7

Polkowska Ż, Astel A, Walna B, Małek S, Mędrzycka K, Górecki T, Siepak J, Namieśnik J, 2005. Chemometric analysis of rainwater and throughfall at several sites in Poland. Atmos Environ 39(5): 837-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.026

Robson AJ, Neal C, Ryland GP, Harrow M, 1994. Spatial variations in throughfall chemistry at the small plot scale. J Hydrol 158(1-2): 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90048-5

Rodrigo A, Avila A, Rodà F, 2003. The chemistry of precipitation, throughfall and stemflow in two holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) forests under a contrasted pollution environment in NE Spain. Sci Total Environ 305(1-3): 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00470-9

Sadeghi SMM, Attarod P, Van Stan JT, Pypker TG, 2016. The importance of considering rainfall partitioning in afforestation initiatives in semiarid climates: A comparison of common planted tree species in Tehran, Iran. Sci Total Environ 568: 845-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.048

Sagheb-Talebi K, Pourhashemi M, Sajedi T, 2014. Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future. Springer Netherlands, 152 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7371-4

Santa Regina I, Tarazona T, 2001. Nutrient pools to the soil through organic matter and throughfall under a Scots pine plantation in the Sierra de la Demanda, Spain. Eur J Soil Biol 37(2): 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01072-X

Schaubroeck T, Deckmyn G, Neirynck J, Staelens J, Adriaenssens S, Dewulf J, Muys B, Verheyen K, 2014. Multilayered modeling of particulate matter removal by a growing forest over time, from plant surface deposition to wash off via rainfall. Envir Sci Tech 48(18): 10785-10794. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5019724

Shachnovich Y, Berliner PR, Bar P, 2008. Rainfall interception and spatial distribution of throughfall in a pine forest planted in an arid zone. J Hydrol 349(1-2): 168-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.051

Shen W, Ren H, Jenerette D, Hui D, Ren H, 2013. Atmospheric deposition and canopy exchange of anions and cations in two plantation forests under acid rain influence. Atmos Environ 64: 242-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.015

Stachurski A, Zimka JR, 2002. Atmospheric deposition and ionic interactions within a beech canopy in the Karkonosze Mountains. Environ Pollut 118(1): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00238-X

Staelens J, De Schrijver A, Verheyen K, 2007. Seasonal variation in throughfall and stemflow chemistry beneath a European beech (Fagus sylvatica) tree in relation to canopy phenology. Can J For Res 37(8): 1359-1372. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-003

Toba T, Ohta T, 2005. An observational study of the factors that influence interception loss in boreal and temperate forests. J Hydrol 313(3-4): 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.003

Tukey HB, 1970. Leaching of substances from plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 21: 305- 324. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.21.060170.001513

Wang QG, Kang Y, Liu HJ, Liu SP, 2006. Method for measurement of canopy interception under sprinkler irrigation. J Irrig Drain E 32(2): 185-187. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:2(185)




DOI: 10.5424/fs/2019282-14782

Webpage: www.inia.es/Forestsystems