Retroactive comparison of operator-designed and computer-generated skid-trail networks on steep terrain

  • Marco Antonio Contreras Universidad Austral de Chile http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0518-1037
  • David L Parrott Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Kentucky, 105 T.P. Cooper Bldg, 730 Rose Street, Lexington.
  • Jeffrey W Stringer Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Kentucky, 105 T.P. Cooper Bldg, 730 Rose Street, Lexington.

Abstract

Aim of the study: Quantify potential economic benefits of implementing computer-generated skid-trail networks over the traditional operator-designed skid-trail networks on steep terrain ground-based forest operations.

Area of study: A 132-ha harvest operation conducted at the University of Kentucky’s Robinson Forest in eastern Kentucky, USA.

Materials and methods: We compared computer-generated skid-trail network with an operator-designed network for a 132-ha harvest. Using equipment mounted GPS data and a digital elevation model (DEM), we identified the original operator-designed skid-trail network. Pre-harvest conditions were replicated by re-contouring terrain slopes over skid-trails to simulate the natural topography and by spatially distributing the harvestable volume based on pre-harvest inventories and timber harvest records. An optimized skid-trail network was designed using these pre-harvest conditions and compared to the original, operator-designed network.

Main results: The computer-generated network length was slightly longer than the operator-designed network (53.7 km vs. 51.7 km). This also resulted in a slightly longer average skidding distance (0.71 km vs. 0.66 km) and higher total harvesting costs (5.1 $ ton-1 vs. 4.8 $ ton-1).  However, skidding costs of the computer-generated network were slightly lower (4.2 $ ton-1 vs. 4.3 $ ton-1).  When comparing only major skid-trails, those with ≥ 20 machine passes, the computer-generated skid-trail network was 28% shorter than the operator network (9.4 km vs. 13.1 km). 

Research highlight: This assessment offers evidence that computer-generated networks could be used to generate efficient skid-trails, help determine skidding costs, and assess further potential economic and environmental benefits.

Key words: timber harvesting; forest operations; network optimization; soil disturbances; cost minimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marco Antonio Contreras, Universidad Austral de Chile

Profesor Asociado de Operaciones Forestales
Instituto de Bosques y Sociedad
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Y Recursos Naturales
Universidad Austral de Chile

References

Avon C, Dumas Y, Bergès L, 2013. Management practices increase the impact of roads on plant communities in forests. Biol Conserv 159(0): 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.008

Beers TW, 1964. Cruising for pulwood by the ton without concern for tree diameter: point sampling with diameter obviation. Extension Mimeo F-49. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Bowker DW, 2013. Forest harvest equipment movement and sediment delivery to streams. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY p. 197.

Buckley DS, Crow TR, Nauertz EA, Schulz KE, 2003. Influence of skid trails and haul roads on understory plant richness and composition in managed forest landscapes in Upper Michigan, USA. For Ecol Manage 175: 509-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00185-8

Chung W, Sessions 2003. NETWORK 2000: A program for optimizing large fixed and variable cost transportation problems. In Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Edited by Greg J Arthaud, and Tara M Barrett. Springer Netherlands. pp. 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0307-9_12

Conrad JL, Ford WS, Groover MC, Bolding MC, Aust WM, 2012. Virginia Tech Forest road and bladed skid trail cost estimation method. Southern J Appl For 36(1): 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5849/sjaf.10-023

Contreras M, Parrott DL, Chung W, 2016. Designing skid-trail networks to reduce skidding costs and soil disturbances for ground-based timber harvesting operations. For Sci 62(1):48-58. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.14-146

Contreras M, Chung W, 2007. A computer approach to finding an optimal log landing location and analyzing influencing factors for ground-based timber harvesting. Can J For Res 37(2): 276-292. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-219

Croke J, Hairsine P, Fogarty P, 2001. Soil recovery from track construction and harvesting changes in surface infiltration, erosion and delivery rates with time. For Ecol Manage 143(1-3): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00500-4

Ezzati S, Najafi A, Yaghini M, Hashemi AA, Bettinger P, 2015. An optimization model to solve skidding problem in steep slope terrain. J For Econ 21(4):250-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2015.10.001

Garland JJ, 1983. Designated skid trails minimize soil compaction. In The Woodland Workbook EC 1110. Oregon State University Extension Service, Corvallis, OR.

Gumus S, Turk Y, 2016. A new skid trail pattern design for farm tractors using linear programming and geographical infoamtion systems. Forest 7(12) 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7120306

Halleux ORM, Greene WD, 2003. Setting analyst: An operational harvest planning tool. Int J For Eng 14(1):89 -101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2003.10702473

Han H-S, Page-Dumroese D, Han S-K, Tirocke J, 2006. Effects of slash, machine passes, and soil moisture on penetration resistance in a cut-to-length harvesting. Int J For Eng 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2006.10702532

Kellogg L, Bettinger P, Robe S, Steffert A, 1992. Mechanized harvesting: a compendium of research. Forest Research Laboratory, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 401 pp.

Lockaby BG, Vidrine CG, 1984. Effect of logging equipment traffic on soil density and growth and survival of young loblolly pine. Southern J Appl For 8(2): 109-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/8.2.109

Sawyer BC, Bolding MC, Aust WM, Laker WA, 2012. Effectiveness and implementation costs of overland skid trail closure techniques in the Virginia Piedmont. J Soil Water Conserv 67(4):300-310. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.4.300

Soman H, Kizha AR, Roth BE, 2019. Impacts of silvicultural prescriptions and implementation of best management practices on timber harvesting costs. Int J For Eng 30(1):14-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2019.1562691

Stückelberger JA, 2008. A weighted-graph optimization approach for automatic location of forest road networks. vdf Hochschulverlag AG, 127 pp.

US Forest Service, 2011. Cost Estimating Guide for Road Construction. USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Engineering. Available from http://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/r1/workingtogether/contracting/?cid=stelprdb5247346

Williamson J, Neilsen W, 2000. The influence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction and profile disturbance of skid trails during ground-based harvesting. Can J For Res 30(8): 1196-1205. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-041

Published
2020-05-14
How to Cite
Contreras, M. A., Parrott, D. L., & Stringer, J. W. (2020). Retroactive comparison of operator-designed and computer-generated skid-trail networks on steep terrain. Forest Systems, 29(1), eSC01. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2020291-15558
Section
Short communications