Valoracion social de las propiedades estéticas de los hayedos en Cataluña
Abstract
Se aplican métodos ensayados en otros países (Scenic Beauty Estimation Method, SBE) para la determinación de las cualidades estéticas de masas forestales de interés recreativo a parcelas en diversas localizaciones del haya en Cataluña, abarcando diferencias significativas en estación, origen, edad y forma de masa. Las valoraciones se refieren a las cualidades estéticas de los rodales de haya vistos desde el interior del bosque, es decir, tal como son apreciados por parte de los visitantes de los montes. Las valoraciones se obtienen a través de paneles de observadores en sesiones fotográficas, se transforman a una escala común y se relacionan mediante análisis de regresión a las variables dasométricas tomadas en las parcelas de inventario. El desarrollo de modelos estadísticos que describen preferencias sociales permite medir la aportación de las diferentes variables dasométricas a la mejora estética de las masas de haya, y puede servir como guía en la ordenación de hayedos en que el uso público sea predominante o muy importante.Downloads
References
Agúndez D., Martín S., De Miguel J., Galera R.M., Jiménez M.P., Díaz-Fernández P., 1995. Las regiones de procedencia de Fagus sylvatica L. en España. Edit DGCONA.
Brown J.K., 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Serv General Technical Report INT-16. Ogden, Utah, USA. 34 pp.
Brown T.C., Daniel T.C., 1984. Modeling forest scenic beauty: concepts and application to ponderosa pine. USDA Forest Ser Res Pap RM-256.
Brown T.C., Daniel T.C., 1986. Predicting scenic beauty timber stands. Forest Science 32, 471-487.
Brown T.C., 1987. Production and costs of scenic beauty: examples for a ponderosa pine forest. Forest Science 33, 471-487.
Brown T.C., Daniel T.C., 1990. Scaling of ratings: Concepts and methods. USDA Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Res Pap RM-293.
Brush R.O., 1976. Perceived quality of scenic and recreational environments: some methodological issues. In: Perceiving environmental quality: research and application (Craik K.H., Zube E.H., eds). Plenum, New York. pp. 47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2865-0_3
Buhyoff G.J., Leuschner W.A., 1978. Estimating psychological disutility from damaged forest stands. Forest Science 24(3), 424-432.
Buhyoff G.J., Wellman, J.D., 1980. The specification of a non-linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions. Journal of Leisure Research 12, 257-272.
Buhyoff G.J., Hull R.B., Lien J.N., Cordell H.K., 1986. Prediction of scenic beauty for southern pine stands. Forest Science 32, 769-778.
Burriel M., 2002. Valoración social de las propiedades estéticas de los hayedos en Cataluña. Proyecto final de carrera. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agraria, Universidad de Lleida.
Caro F., Constantino M., Martins I., Weintraub A., 2003. A 2-Opt tabu search procedure for the multiperiod forest harvesting problem with adjacency, greenup, old growth, and even flow constraints. Forest Science 49, 738-751.
Daniel T.C., Boster R.S., 1976. Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Res Pap RM-167.
Daniel T.C., Vining J., 1983. Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In: Behaviour and the natural environment (Altman I.,Wohwill J., eds). Plenum Press. Chapter 2, 39-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_3
Gracia C., Burriel J.A., Ibáñez J.J., Mata T., Vayreda J., 2000. Inventari ecològic i forestal de Catalunya. Regió Forestal IV. CREAF, Departament de Medi Ambient, Generalitat de Catalunya.
Gracia C., Burriel J.A., Ibáñez J.J., Mata T., Vayreda J., 2002, 18 de abril. Inventari ecològic i forestal de Catalunya. Versió digital [en linea]. CREAF, Departament de Medi Ambient, Generalitat de Catalunya. [consultado: 1 de julio de 2002] Disponible en Internet: http://www.creaf.uab.es/iefc/
Helles F., 1975. Foresters' views on the recreational function of forests. Danks Skovforenings Tidsskrift 60(1), 46-60.
Hollenhorst S.J., Brock S.M., Freimund W.A., Twery M.J., 1993. Predicting the effects of gypsy moth on near-view aesthetic preferences and recreation appeal. Forest Science 39(1), 28-40.
Horne P., Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L., 2005. Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. Forest Ecology and Management 207, 189-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026
Hull R.B., Buhyoff G.J., Daniel T.C., 1984. Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgment and scenic beauty estimation procedures. Forest Science 30(4), 1084-1096.
Neter J., Wasserman W., Kunter M.H., 1990. Applied linear statistical models, 3rd ed. Irwin, Inc, Boston, MA.
Pâquet J., Bélanger L., 1997. Public acceptability thresholds of clearcutting to maintain visual quality of boreal balsam fir landscapes. Forest Science 43, 46-55.
Patton D.R., 1977. Managing southwestern ponderosa pine for the Albert squirrel. Journal of Forestry 75(5), 264-267.
Porta J., López-Acevedo M., Roquero C., 1994. Edafología para la agricultura y el medio ambiente. Ed Mundi-Prensa, Madrid. PMCid:44225
Prada A., Vázquez M.X., 2007. Aplicación de índices de preferencia paisajística a paisajes atlánticos de montaña. Revista Española de Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 214, 127-153.
Pukkala T., Kellomaki S., Mustonen E., 1988. Prediction of the amenity of a tree stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 3, 533-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827588809382538
Ribe R.G., 2005. Aesthetic perceptions of green-tree retention harvests in vista views. The interaction of cut level, retention pattern and harvest shape. Landscape and Urban Planning 73, 277-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.07.003
Ruddell E.J., Gramann J.H., Rudis V.A., Westphal J.M., 1989. The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models. Environment and Behaviour 21, 393-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916589214002
Rudis V.A., 1985. Screenometer: a device for sampling vegetative screening in forested areas. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15, 996-999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x85-159
Rudis V.A., Gramann J.H., Ruddell E.J., Westphal J.M., 1988. Forest inventory and management-based visual preference models of southern pine stands. Forest Science 34: 846-863.
Schroeder H.W., Brown T.C., 1983. Alternative functional forms for an inventory-based landscape perception model. Journal of Leisure Research 13, 156-163.
Schroeder H.W., Daniel T.C., 1981. Progress in predicting the perceived scenic beauty of forest landscapes. Forest Science 27, 71-80.
Sheppard S., Achiam C., Yd'eon R.G., 2004. Aesthetics: are we neglecting a critical issue in certification for sustainable forest management? Journal of Forestry 102(5), 6-11.
Sheppard S., Picard P., 2006. Visual-quality impacts of forest pest activity at the landscape level: a synthesis of published knowledge and research needs. Landscape and Urban Planning 77, 321-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.007
Vodak M.C., Roberts P.L., Wellman J.D., Buhyoff G.J., 1985. Scenic impacts of eastern hardwood management. Forest Science 31, 289-301.
Zube E.H., Pitt D., Anderson T., 1974. Perception and measurement of scenic resources in the southern Connecticut River Valley. Publ R-74-1. Inst. Man & Environ, Univ Mass, Amherst.
Zube E.H., Sell J.R., Taylor J.G., 1982. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 9, 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
