Short Communication. Comparing flammability traits among fire-stricken (low elevation) and non fire-stricken (high elevation) conifer forest species of Europe: A test of the Mutch hypothesis

A. P. Dimitrakopoulos, I. D. Mitsopoulos, A. Kaliva

Abstract


Aim of study. The flammability of the main coniferous forest species of Europe, divided into two groups according to their fire regime and altitudinal distribution, was tested in an effort to detect species-specific differences that may have an influence on community-wide fire regimes.

Area of study. Conifer species comprising low- and high-elevation forests in Europe.

Materials and Methods. The following conifer species were tested: low elevation; Pinus halepensis (Aleppo pine), Pinus brutia (Turkish pine), Pinus pinaster (maritime pine), Pinus pinea (stone pine) and Cupressus sempervirens (cypress), high elevation (i.e., above 600 m a.s.l.); Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine), Abies alba (white fir), Picea excelsa (Norway spruce), Abies borissii regis (Macedonian fir) and Pinus nigra (black pine). Flammability assessment (time-to-ignition and ignition temperature) was conducted by an innovative ignition apparatus, heat content was measured with an IKA Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter and ash content by heating 5 g of plant material in a muffle furnace at 650ºC for 1 h. Differences among species was statistically analysed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test.

Main results. The results did not distinguish separate groups among traits between fire- and non-fire-stricken communities at the individual species level.

Research highlights. Differences in fire regimes among low and high elevation conifer forests could be attributed either to differences in flammability of the plant communities as a whole (i.e., fuelbed or canopy properties vs. individual fuel properties) or to other factors (climatic or anthropogenic).

Key words: flammability; ignitability; heat content; ash content; conifer species; Mutch hypothesis.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agee JK, 1998. Fire and pine ecosystems. In: Ecology and biogeography of pinus (Richardson DM, ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp: 193-218.

Anderson HE, 1970. Forest fuel ignitability. Fire Technol 6: 312-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02588932

Bond WJ, Midgley JJ, 1995. Kill thy neighbor - an individualistic argument for the evolution of flammability. Oikos 73: 79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545728

Dimitrakopoulos AP, Papaioannou KK, 2001. Flammability assessment of Mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technol 37: 143-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011641601076

Dimitrakopoulos AP, Mitsopoulos ID, 2006. Thematic report on forest fires in the Mediterranean Region. In: Global forest resources assessment 2005 (Vuorinen AP, ed). Forest Fire Management Working Paper 8, FAO. 43 pp.

Dimitrakopoulos AP, Vlahou M, Anagnostopoulou Ch, Mitsopoulos ID, 2011. Impact of drought on wildland fires in Greece: implications of climatic change? Clim Change 109: 331-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0026-8

ISO No. 5657-1986 (E). Cone calorimeter apparatus and instructions for measuring flammability in solids.

Kerr B, Schwilk DW, Bergman A, Feldman MW, 1999. Rekindling an old flame: a haploid model for the evolution and impact of flammability in resprouting plants. Evol Ecol Res 1: 807-833.

Martin RE, Gordon DA, Gutierrez ME, Lee DS, Molina DM, Schroeder RA, Sapsis DB, Stephens SL, Chambers M, 1994. Assessing the flammability of domestic and wildland vegetation. Proc 12th Conference on "Fire and Forest Meteorology", Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, USA.

Mutch RW, 1970. Wildland fires and ecosystems a hypothesis. Ecology 51: 1046-1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1933631

Ne'eman G, Trabaud L, 2000. Ecology, biogeography and management of Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.

Norusis MJ, 1997. SPSS 7.5 Guide to Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Pausas JG, Vallejo VR, 1999. The role of fire in European Mediterranean ecosystems. In: Remote sensing of large wildfires in the European Mediterranean basin (Chuvieco E, ed). Springer, Berlin. pp: 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60164-4_2

Pausas JG, 2004. Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean basin). Clim Change 63: 337-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018508.94901.9c

Pausas JG, Llovet J, Rodrigo A, Vallejo R, 2008. Are wildfires a disaster in the Mediterranean basin? - A review. Int J Wildland Fire 17: 713-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF07151

Philpot CW, 1970. Influence of mineral content on the pyrolysis of plant materials. For Sci 16: 461-471.

Quezel P, 2000. Taxonomy and biogeography of Mediterranean pine species. In: Ecology, biogeography and management of Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin (Ne'eman G, Trabaud L, eds). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. pp: 1-12.

Rundel PW, 1981. Structural and chemical components of flammability. In: Fire regimes and ecosystem properties. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-26, Washington DC. pp: 183-207.

Shafizadeh F, Chin PS, De Groot WF, 1977. Effective heat content of green forest fuels. For Sci 23: 81-89.

Schwilk DW, Caprio AC, 2011. Scaling from leaf traits to fire behaviour: community composition predicts fire severity in a temperate forest. Journal of Ecology 99: 970-980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01828.x

Snyder JR, 1984. The role of fire: mutch ado about nothing? Oikos 43: 404-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3544161

Vélez R, 1993. High intensity forest fires in the Mediterranean basin: natural and socioeconomic causes. Disaster Management 5: 16-20.




DOI: 10.5424/fs/2013221-02475

Webpage: www.inia.es/Forestsystems