Environmental campaigns against forest companies: What are the campaigns trying to achieve?

D. Gritten, J.R. González-Olabarría, B. Mola-Yudego, G. Dominguez

Abstract


Campaigns by environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs) can have far reaching consequences in determining the policies of governments and corporations. This paper examines campaigns targeting forestry companies to determine what makes a successful campaign. Over forty ENGOs completed a questionnaire defining what they perceive to constitute a successful campaign. The responses were analysed using Analytical Hierarchy Process. The results showed that campaigns by ENGOs have two main targets: changes in laws and the target group implementing the campaign’s recommendation(s). Achieving these targets, for most, constitute a successful campaign. Subsequently, representatives of seven ENGOs were questioned to attain their perspectives of the results in comparison to campaigns they are conducting against forest enterprises. They supported the results of the questionnaire, but also felt that there are various other factors that need to be considered (e.g. the campaign’s timeframe and the possibility of having hidden targets) that increase the issue’s complexity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amenta, E., Young, M. 1999. Making an impact: Conceptual and methodological implications of the collective goods criterion. In: (Eds.) Giugni, M., McAdam, D., Tilly, C. How social movements matter. Minnesota. USA. pp. 22-41.

Amenta, E., Carruthers, B., Zylan, Y. 1992. A hero for the aged? The Townsend movement, the political mediation model and the US old-age policy. AM J Sociol 98: 308-339.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230010

Banaszak, L. 1996. Why movements succeed or fail: Opportunity, culture, and the struggle for Woman suffrage. Princeton University Press.
PMid:11624959

Brulle, R., Turner, L., Jenkins, J., Carmichael, J. 2007. Measuring SMO populations: A comprehensive census of environmental movement organizations. Mobilization 12(3): 195-211.

Choo, E., Wedley, W. 2004. A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Comput Oper Res 31: 893-908.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00042-X

Dalton, R. Kuechler, M, Bürklin, W. 2005. The challenge of new movements. In: (Ed.) Wiarda, H. Comparative politics: Critical concepts in political science. Critical concepts in political sciences. Vol. 2. Routledge.

Deephouse, D. 2000. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource- based theories. J Manage, 26(6): 1091-1112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600602

Della porta, D., Diani, M. 2006. Social movements: An introduction. 2nd ed. Blackwell.

Della Porta, D., Rucht, D. 2002. The dynamics of environmental campaigns. Mobilization. 7(1): 1-14.

Den Hond, F., de Bakker, F. 2007. Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence the corporate social change activities. Acad Manage Rev 32(3): 901-924.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275682

De-Shalit, A. 2001. Ten commandments of how to fail in an environmental campaign. Environ Polit 10(1): 111-137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714000516

Gamson W. 2004. Bystanders, public opinion and the media. In: (Eds.) Snow, D., Soule, S., Kriesi, H. 2006. The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell.

Gamson, W. 1990. The strategy of social protest. Wadsworth, Belmont.

Gerlach, L. 2001. The structure of social movements: Environmental activism and its Opponents pp. 289-309. In: (Eds) Arquilla, J., Ronfeldt, D., Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, Rand.

Goodwin, J., Jasper J. 2004. Rethinking social movements: Structure, meaning and emotion. Rowman and Littlefield.

González J.R., Kolehmainen O., Pukkala T., 2007. Using expert knowledge to model forest stand vulnerability to fire. Comput. Electron. Agric. 55: 107-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2006.12.005

Gritten, D., Kant. P. 2007. Assessing the impact of environmental campaigns against the activities of a pulp and paper company in Indonesia. Int For Rev. 30(4): 819-834.

Gritten, D., Mola-Yudego, b. 2010. Blanket campaign: A response of environmental groups to the globalising forest industry. International Journal of the Commons 4(2): 729-757.

Gritten, D., Saastamoinen, O. 2011. The Roles of Legitimacy in Environmental Conflict: An Indonesian Case Study. Soc Natur Resour 24(1): 49-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802713580

Gritten, D., Mola-Yudego, B., Delgado-Matas, C. 2012. Media coverage of forest conflicts: a reflection of the conflicts’ intensity and impact? Scand J Forest Res. 27(2): 143-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.635074

Guigni, M. 1998. Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annu Rev Sociol. 24: 371-393.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.371

Guigni, M. 1999. How social movements matter: Past research, present problems, future developments. In: (Eds.) Guigni, M., McAdam, D., Tilly, C. How social movements matter. Minnesota. USA:xiii-xxxiii.

Humphreys, D., 2006. Logjam: Deforestation and the crisis of global governance. Earthscan, London. UK. 302 pp.

John, S., Thomson, S. 2003. New activism and the corporate response. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jurgens, E. 2006. Learning lessons to promote certification and combat illegal logging in Indonesia: September 2003 to June 2006. Cifor, Indonesia.

King, B. 2008. A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business and Society 47(1): 21-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650307306636

Kyllönen, S., Colpaert, A., Heikkinen, H., Jokinen, M., Kumpula, J., Marttunen, M., Muje, K., Raitio, K. 2006. Conflict management as a means to the sustainable use of natural resources. Silva Fenn 40(4): 687-728.

Lawrence, R. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility, supplychains and Saami claims: Tracing the political in the Finnish forestry industry. Geogr Res 45(2): 167-176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00448.x

Manheim, J. 2001. The Death of a thousand Cuts: Corporate Campaigns and the Attack on the Corporation. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. New Jersey.

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., Zald, M. 1996. Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes — toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements. In: McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., Zald, M. (eds.) Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures and cultural framings. Cambridge Uni Press, Cambridge, UK.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803987.002

McCarthy, J., Zald, M., 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. Am J Sociol. 82(6): 1212-1241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226464

Millet, I. 1998. Ethical decision-making using the analytical hierarchy process. J Bus Ethics 17: 1197-1204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005700314298

Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Wood, O. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of how and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev. 22(4): 853-886.

Murphy, D., Bendell, J. 1997. In the company of partners: business, environmental groups and sustainable development post-Rio. The Policy Press: UK.

Naudé, P., Lockett, G., Gisbourne, S. 1993. Market analysis via judgemental modelling. Eur J Marketing (27)3: 5-22.

Raitzer, D. 2008. Assessing the impact of Cifor’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector. Impact Assessment Paper. Cifor. Indonesia.

Rohrschneider, R., Dalton, R. 2002. A global network? Transnational cooperation among environmental groups. J Polit. 64(2): 510-533.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00137

Rootes, C. 2004. Environmental movements. In: (Eds.) Snow, D.A., Soule, S.A., Kriesi, H. The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell.

Rucht, D. 1990. The strategies and action repertoires of new movements. In: (Eds.) Dalton, R.J. Kuechler M. Challenging the political order: New social and political movements in western democracies. Cambridge Polity Press.

Rucht, D. 1999. The impact of environmental movements in western societies. In: (Eds.) Giugni, M., McAdam, D., Tilly, C. How social movements matter. Minnesota. USA.

Ruggie, J. 2003. Taking embedded liberalism global: Corporate connection. In: (Eds) Held, D., Koenig, M. Taming globalization: Frontiers of governance. Cambridge Polity Press.

Saaty T. 1980. The analytical hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saaty T. 2008. Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 1(1): 83-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Sarkki, S., Heikkinen, H, 2010. Social movements’ pressure strategies during forest disputes in Finland. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 2(3): 281-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2010.487991

Sonnenfeld, D. 2002. Social movements and ecological modernization: The transformation of pulp and paper manufacturing. Dev Change. 33(1): 1-28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00238

Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics, Cambridge University Press.

Tilly. C. 1999. From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In: (Eds.) Guigni, M., McAdam, D., Tilly, C. How social movements matter. Minnesota. USA.

Varis, O. 1989. The analysis of preferences in complex environmental judgements—a focus on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. J Environ Manage. 28: 283-294.

WWF. 2007. Does WWF greenwash companies? http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/forests/our_solutions/responsible_forestry/news/index.cfm?uNewsID=104520 Retrieved: 25/09/2010.




DOI: 10.5424/fs/2012212-02664

Webpage: www.inia.es/Forestsystems