Towards the integration of research and monitoring at forest ecosystems in Europe

A. Danielewska, E. Paoletti, N. Clarke, J. Olejnik, M. Urbaniak, M. Baran, P. Siedlecki, K. Hansen, L. Lundin, W. de Vries, T. Nørgaard-Mikkelsen, S. Dillen, R. Fischer


Aim of study: The main aim of the work was to summarize availability, quality and comparability of on-going European Research and Monitoring Networks (ERMN), based on the results of a COST FP0903 Action questionnaire carried out in September 2010 and May 2012.

Area of study: The COST Action FP0903 involves 29 European countries and 4 non-COST institutions from USA, Morocco and Tunisia. In this study, the total of 22 replies to the questionnaire from 18 countries were included.

Materials and methods: Based on the feedback from the Action FP0903 countries, the most popular European Networks were identified. Thereafter, the access to the network database, available quality assurance/quality control procedures and publication were described. Finally, the so-called “Supersites” concept, defined as a “highly instrumented research infrastructure, for both research and monitoring of soil-plant-atmosphere interactions” was discussed.

Main results: The result of the survey indicate that the vast majority of the Action FP0903 countries participate in the International Cooperative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forest (ICP Forest). The multi-disciplinary International Cooperative Programme on Integrated Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Ecosystems (ICPIM) is the second most widespread forest programme.

Research highlights: To fully understand biochemical cycles in forest ecosystems, long-term monitoring is needed. Hence, a network of “Supersites”, is proposed. The application of the above infrastructure can be an effective way to attain a better integration of research and monitoring networks at forest sites in Europe.

Keywords: Supersites; European Research Monitoring Networks; Harmonization; Forest.

Full Text:



Arain MA, Black TA, Barr AG, Griffis TJ, Morgenstern K, Nesic Z, 2003. Year round observations of the energy and water vapour fluxes above a boreal black spruce forest. Hydrol Process 17: 3581-3600.

Aubinet M, Chermanne B, Vandenhaute M, Longdoz B, Yernaux M, Laitat E, 2001. Long term carbon dioxide exchange above a mixed forest in the Belgian Ardennes. Agr Forest Meteorol 108: 293-315.

Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu LH, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S et al., 2001. FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapour, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82: 2415-2434. 2.3.CO;2" target="_blank"><2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2

Barr AG, Griffis TJ, Black TA, Lee X, Staebler RM, Fuentes JD et al., 2002. Comparing the carbon budgets of boreal and temperate deciduous forest stands. Can J Fo Res 32: 813-822.

Carrara A, Kowalski AS, Neirynck J, Janssens IA, Yuste CJ, Ceulemans R, 2003. Net ecosystem CO2 exchange of mixed forest in Belgium over 5 years. Agr Forest Meteorol 119: 209-227.

Chojnicki BH, Urbaniak M, Józefczyk D, Augustin J, Olejnik J, 2007. Measurements of gas and heat fluxes at Rzecin wetland. In: Wetlands: monitoring, modeling and management (Okruszko, ed). Taylor & Francis Group, London: pp: 125-131.

Ciais P, Paris JD, Marland G, Peylin P, Piao SL, Levin I et al., 2010. The European carbon balance. Part 1: fossil fuel emissions. Glob Change Biol 16: 1395-1408.

Cieslik S, Paoletti E, Omasa K, 2009. Why and how terrestrial plants exchange gases with air. A review. Plant Biol 11: 24-34. PMid:19778365

Clarke N, Fischer R, DeVries W, Lundin L, Paoletti E, Merilä P et al., 2011. Availability, accessibility, quality and comparability of monitoring data for European forests for use in air pollution and climate change science. iForest 4: 162-166.

Danielewska A, Clarke A, Olejnik J, Hansen K, deVries W, Lundin L et al., 2013. A meta-database comparison from various European Research Networks dedicated to forest sites. iForest 6: 1-9.

Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon M, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J, 1994. Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystem. Science 263: 185-190. PMid:17839174

FAO, 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005, Main report. Progress Towards Sustainable Forest Management FAO Forestry paper 147, Rome, Italy.

Fischer R, Aas W, deVries W, Clarke N, Cudlin P, Leaver D et al., 2011.Towards a transnational system of supersites for forest monitoring and research in Europe – Sn overview on present state and future recommendations. iForest 4: 167-171.

Grace J, 2001. Carbon Cycle. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 1: 609-629.

Houghton RA, 2003. Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Glob Change Biol 9: 500-509.

Huntingford C, Lowe JA, Booth BBB, Jones CD, Harris GR, Gohar LK et al., 2009. Contributions of carbon cycle uncertainty to future climate projection spread. Tellus 61B: 355-360.

Ilvesniemi H, Levula J, Ojansuu R, Kolari P, Kulmala L, Pumpanen J et al., 2009. Long-term measurements of the carbon balance of a boreal Scots pine dominated forest ecosystem. Boreal Environ Res 14: 731-753.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC, 2001. Climate change 2001. The scientific basis. Contribution of Working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Houghton JT, Ding Y, Nogua M, Griggs D, Vander Linden P, Maskell K, eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests). Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests [on-line]. UNECE, ICP Forests, Hamburg; 2010.

Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F et al., 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137: 253-268.

Janssens IA, Freibauer A, Schlamadinger B, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ et al., 2005. The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale – A European case study. Biogeosciences 2: 15-26.

LaI R, 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manage 220: 242-258.

Launiainen S, Rinne J, Pumpanen J, Kulmala L, Kolari P, Keronen P et al., 2005. Eddy covariance measurements of CO2 and sensible and latent heat fluxes during a full year in a boreal pine forest trunk-space. Boreal Environ Res 10: 569-588.

Lund MA, Lafleur PM, Roulet NT, Lindroth A, Christensen TR, Aurela MD et al., 2010, Variability in exchange of CO2 across 12 northern peatland and tundra sites. Glob Change Biol 16(9): 2436-2448.

Luyssaert S, Ciais P, Piao SL, Schulze ED, Jung M, Zaehle S et al., 2010. The European carbon balance. Part 3: forests. Glob Change Biol 16: 1429-1450.

Marland G, 2008. Uncertainties in accounting for CO2 from fossil fuels. J Ind Ecol 12(2): 136-139.

Marland G, Hamal K, Jonas M, 2009. How uncertain are estimates of CO2 emissions? J Ind Ecol 13(1): 4-7.

Matyssek R, Wieser G, Calfapietra C, DeVries W, Dizengremel P, Ernst D, Jolivet Y et al., 2012. Forests under climate change and air pollution: Gaps in understanding and future directions for research. Environ Pollut 160: 57-65. PMid:22035926

Morgenstern K, Black TA, Humphreys ER, Griff is TJ, Drewitt GB, Cai T et al., 2004. Annual variations in carbon sequestration during an El Ni-o/La Ni-a cycle in a coastal Douglas-fir forest. Agr Forest Meteorol 123: 201-219.

Niu S, Luo Y, Fei S, Yuan W, Schimel D, Law BE et al., 2012. Thermal optimality of net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide and underlying mechanisms. New Physiol 194: 775-783. PMid:22404566

Reth S, Göckede M, Falge E, 2005. CO2 efflux from agricultural soils in Eastern Germany – Comparison of a closed chamber system with eddy covariance measurements. Theor Appl Climatol 80: 105-120.

Paoletti E, Tuovinen JP, 2011. COST Action FP0903: research, monitoring and modelling in the study of climate change and air pollution impacts on forest ecosystems. iForest 4: 160-161.

Paoletti E, DeVries W, Mikkelsen TN, Ibrom A, Larsen KS, Tuovinen JP et al. (in press). Key indicators of air pollution and climate change impacts at forest Supersites. In: Climate change, air pollution and global challenges: knowledge, understanding and perspectives from forest research (Matyssek R, Clarke N, Cudlin P, Mikkelsen TN, Tuovinen JP, Wieser G, Paoletti E, eds). Elsevier Physical Sciences Series "Developments in Environmental Science" (Krupa S, eds).

Schulze ED, Ciais P, Luyssaert S, Schrumpf M, Janssens IA, Thiruchittampalam B et al., 2010. The European carbon balance. Part 4: Integration of carbon and other trace-gas fluxes. Glob Change Biol 16: 1451-1469.

Serengil Y, Augustaitis A, Bytnerowicz A, Grulke N, Kozovitz AR, Matyssek R et al., 2011. Adaptation of forest ecosystems to air pollution and climate change: a global assessment on research priorities. iForest 4: 44-48.

Sottocornola M, Kiely G, 2009. Hydro-meteorological controls on the CO2 exchange variation in an Irish blanket bog. Agr Forest Meteorol 150(2): 287-297.

Valentini R, Matteucci G, Dolman AJ, Schulze ED, Rebmann C, Moors EJ et al., 2000. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 404: 861-865. PMid:10786790

Valentini R (ed), 2002. Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of European Forests. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

DOI: 10.5424/fs/2013223-03675