Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterborne Copper Azole

  • A.M. Villasante Departamento de Ingenieria Agroforestal, ETSEA. Universidad de Lleida.
  • R. Laina Department of Forest Economy and Management, E.T.S.I. de Montes, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
  • J.A. Martinez Rojas Department of Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad de Alcala. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid.
  • I. Martinez Rojas Department of Forest Economy and Management, E.T.S.I. de Montes, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
  • S. Vignote Department of Forest Economy and Management, E.T.S.I. de Montes, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.

Abstract

Aim of study: To determine the effect on wood from Pinus sylvestris of treatment with preservatives on mechanical properties and to establish the relation between the penetration and compression strength.

Area of study: Spain

Material and Methods: 40 samples of defect-free wood from Pinus sylvestris L. were treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative (Vacsol Azure WR 2601) and 50 with waterborne Copper Azole (Tanalith E 3492). 40 control samples were not treated (water or preservative). Mechanical resistance to static bending, modulus of elasticity and compression strength parallel to the grain were compared with untreated wood. Regression analysis between the penetration and compression strength parallel was done with the samples treated with waterborne preservative.

Main results: The results indicate that the treated wood (with either product) presents a statistically significant increase in mechanical resistance in all three mechanical characteristics. The results obtained differ from earlier studies carried out by other authors.

There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation of the wood with waterborne Copper Azole . The most probable explanation for these results concerns changes in pressure during treatment.

The use of untreated control samples instead of samples treated only with water is more likely to produce significant results in the mechanical resistance studies.

Research highlights: Treated wood presents a statistically significant increase in MOE, modulus of rupture to static bending  and parallel compression strength.

There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation with waterborne preservative.

Keywords: Light Organic Solvent Preservative; MOE; parallel compression; static bending; waterborne Copper Azole; wood technology.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

A.M. Villasante, Departamento de Ingenieria Agroforestal, ETSEA. Universidad de Lleida.
Agroforestry Department.
R. Laina, Department of Forest Economy and Management, E.T.S.I. de Montes, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
Department of Forest Economy and Management
J.A. Martinez Rojas, Department of Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad de Alcala. Alcalá de Henares, Madrid.
Department of Signal Theory and Communications
I. Martinez Rojas, Department of Forest Economy and Management, E.T.S.I. de Montes, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
Department of Forest Economy and Management
S. Vignote, Department of Forest Economy and Management, E.T.S.I. de Montes, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
Department of Forest Economy and Management

References

Barnes HM, Lyon DE, Zahora A, Muisu F, 1993. Strength properties of ACQ-treated southern pine lumber. Proceedings of the American Wood-Preservers' Association 89. pp: 51-60.

Barnes HM, Maupin M, Lindsey GB, 2005. Bending properties of southern pine treated with waterborne copper naphthenate. Proceedings of the American Wood-Preservers' Association 101. pp: 64-73.

Barnes HM, Lindsey GB, Hill JM, Pompeo M, Hodge R, 2008. Bending properties of southern pine treated with micronized preservative systems. International Research Group on Wood Protection. IRG/WP 08-40414.

Barnes HM, Lindsey GB, 2009. Bending properties of wood treated with a new organic wood preservative system. Bioresour Technol 100: 778-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.055 PMid:18707874

Barnes HM, Lindsey GB, Hill JM, 2009. Effect of copper xyligen treatment on bending properties of wood. Holzforschung 63: 254-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/HF.2009.036

EN 15228, 2009. Structural timber – Structural timber preservative treated against biological attack. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

Forest Products Laboratory, 2010. Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190 ed. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Washington, USA.

GVSIG Association, 2011. gvSIG, ver. 1.10. GVSIG Association. [online]. Available in http://www.gvsig.org/web/. [7 September 2011].

Nicholas DD, Shi J, Schultz TP, 2009. Evaluation of variables that influence dynamic MOE in wood decay studies. International Research Group on Wood Protection. IRG/WP 09-20409. 8 pp.

Simsek H, Baysal E, Peker H, 2010. Some mechanical properties and decay resistance of wood impregnated with environmentally-friendly borates. Construction and Building Materials 24: 2279-2284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.028

UNE 56535, 1977. Características físico-mecánicas de la madera. Determinación de la resistencia a la compresión axial [Mechanical properties of Wood. Standars for measuring. Compressive strength parallel to grain]. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.

UNE 56537, 1979. Características físico-mecánicas de la madera. Determinación de la resistencia a la flexión estática [Mechanical properties of Wood. Standars for measuring. Static bending resistance]. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, Madrid, Spain.

Winandy JE, 1995. Effects of waterborne preservative treament on mechanical properties: a review. Proceedings of the American Wood-Preservers' Association 91. pp: 17-33.

Yildiz UC, Temiz A, Gezer ED, Yildiz S, 2004. Effects of the wood preservatives on mechanical properties of yellow pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood. Building and Environment 39: 1071-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.032

Published
2013-12-01
How to Cite
Villasante, A., Laina, R., Rojas, J. M., Rojas, I. M., & Vignote, S. (2013). Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterborne Copper Azole. Forest Systems, 22(3), 416-422. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857
Section
Research Articles