Species richness of vascular plants along the climatic range of the Spanish dehesas at two spatial scales

  • Jose M. Garcia del Barrio Departamento de Ecología y Genética Forestal. INIA-CIFOR. Madrid.
  • Rafael Alonso Ponce Grupo de Investigación ECOGESFOR. U. D. Ecología. Escuela de Ingeniería Forestal y del Medio Natural. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Madrid.
  • Raquel Benavides University of Freiburg. Faculty of Biology. Freiburg
  • Sonia Roig Departamento de Silvopascicultura. Grupo de Investigación ECOGESFOR. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Madrid.

Abstract

Aims of study: The goals of this paper are to summarize and to compare plant species richness and floristic similarity at two spatial scales; mesohabitat (normal, eutrophic, and oligotrophic dehesas) and dehesa habitat; and to establish guidelines for conserving species diversity in dehesas.
Area of study: We considered four dehesa sites in the western Peninsular Spain, located along a climatic and biogeographic gradient from north to south.
Main results: Average alpha richness for mesohabitats was 75.6 species, and average alpha richness for dehesa sites was 146.3. Gamma richness assessed for the overall dehesa habitat was 340.0 species. The species richness figures of normal dehesa mesohabitat were significantly lesser than of the eutrophic mesohabitat and lesser than the oligotrophic mesohabitat too. No significant differences were found for species richness among dehesa sites. We have found more dissimilarity at local scale (mesohabitat) than at regional scale (habitat). Finally, the results of the similarity assessment between dehesa sites reflected both climatic and biogeographic gradients.
Research highlights: An effective conservation of dehesas must take into account local and regional conditions all along their distribution range for ensuring the conservation of the main vascular plant species assemblages as well as the associated fauna.

Keywords: Agroforestry systems; mesohabitat; non-parametric estimators; alpha richness; gamma richness; floristic similarity; climatic and biogeographic range.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jose M. Garcia del Barrio, Departamento de Ecología y Genética Forestal. INIA-CIFOR. Madrid.
Researcher at Forest Ecology and Genetic Deparatament

References

Arnone III, JA, Jasoni RL, Lucchesi AJ, Larsen JD, Leger EA, Sherry RA, Luo Y, Schimel DS, Verburg PSJ, 2011. A climatically extreme year has large impacts on C4 species in tallgrass prairie ecosystems but only minor effects on species richness and other plant functional groups. Journal of Ecology 99: 678-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01813.x

Aronson J, Shmida A, 1992. Plant species diversity along a Mediterranean-desert gradient and its correlation to interannual rainfall fluctuations. Journal of Arid Environment 23: 235-247.

Campos P, 1992. Reunión internacional sobre sistemas agroforestales de dehesas y montados. Agricultura y Sociedad 62: 197-202.

Colwell RK, 2005. EstimateS. Statistical estimation of especies richness and shared species from samples. In: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates

Chandy S, Gibson DJ, Robertson PA, 2006. Additive partitioning of diversity across hierarchical spatial scales in a forested landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 792-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01178.x

Chao A, 1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11: 265-270.

Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Shen TJ 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters 8: 148-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00707.x

Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR, 1998. Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. In: Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modelling: conceptual background and old world case studies (Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA, eds). Parthenon Press, Paris, France. pp: 285-309.

Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, 2007. Regional climate projections. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis (Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. pp: 847-943.

Díaz M, 2008. La biodiversité de la dehesa. In: Systémes agroforestiers comme technique pour le gestion durable du territoire (Mosquera MR, Fernández JL, Rigueiro A, eds). Programa Azahar. AECI. Madrid, Spain. pp: 183-201.

Díaz M, Hidalgo R, Garrido B, Marañón T, 1999. Componentes de biodiversidad en bosques y pastos del Parque Natural de Los Alcornocales (Cádiz-Málaga). Actas de la XXXIX Reunión Científica de la Sociedad Espa-ola para el Estudio de los Pastos, Almería (Spain). pp: 69-74.

Díaz M, Pulido F, Marañón M, 2003. Diversidad biológica y sostenibilidad ecológica y económica de los sistemas adehesados. Ecosistemas A-o XII n° 3.

Forrest J, Inouye DW, Thomson JD, 2010. Flowering phenology in subalpine meadows: does climate variation influence community co-flowering patterns? Ecology 91: 431-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/09-0099.1

García del Barrio JM, Ortega M, Vázquez A, Elena-Roselló R, 2006. The influence of linear elements on plant species diversity of mediterranean rural landscapes: assessment of different indices and statistical approaches. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 119: 137-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9019-2

García Pérez A, 2005. Métodos avanzados de estadística aplicada. Métodos robustos y de remuestreo. UNED, Madrid, Spain. 255 pp.

Gering JC, Crist TO, Veech JA, 2003. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation biodiversity. Conservation Biology 17: 488-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01465.x

Gonzalo J, 2010. Diagnosis fitoclimática de la Espa-a Peninsular. Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, Spain. 441 pp.

Hellmann JJ, Fowler GW, 1999. Bias, precision, and accuracy of four measures of species richness. Ecological Applications 9: 824-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0824:BPAAOF]2.0.CO;2

Jaccard P, 1908. Nouvelles recerches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat 44: 223-270.

Joffre R, Rambal S, Ratte JP, 1999. The dehesa system of southern Spain and Portugal as a natural ecosystem mimic. Agroforestry Systems 45: 57-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006259402496

Jonas T, Rixen C, Sturm M, Stoeckli V, 2008. How alpine plant growth is linked to snow cover and climate variability. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: G03013 (10 pp).

Lande R, 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, an similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545743

Laughlin DC, Grace JB, 2006. A multivariate model of plant species richness in forested systems: old-growth montane forests with a long history of fire. Oikos 114: 60-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.14424.x

MAPYA, 2004. Anuario de Estadística Agroalimentaria. MAPYA, Madrid, Spain.

Marañón T, 1985. Diversidad florística y heterogeneidad ambiental en una dehesa de Sierra Morena. Anales de Edafología y Agrobiología 77: 1183-1197.

Marañón T, 1986. Plant species richness and canopy effect in the savanna-like "dehesa" of SW Spain. Ecologia Mediterránea 12: 131-114.

Marañón T, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM, 2009. Mediterranean-climate oak savannas: the interplay between abiotic environment and species interactions. Web Ecology 9: 30-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/we-9-30-2009

Matesanz S, Brooker RW, Valladares F, Klotz S, 2009. Temporal dynamics of marginal steppic vegetation over a 26-year period of substantial environmental change. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 299-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05489.x

Montalvo J, Casado MA, Levassor C, Pineda FD, 1993. Species diversity patterns in Mediterranean grasslands. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 213-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236107

Montero G, San Miguel A, Cañellas I, 1998. System of Mediterranean silviculture "la dehesa". In: Agricultura sostenible (Jiménez Díaz RM, Lamo de Espinosa J, eds). Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, Spain. pp: 519-554.

Moreno G, Pulido F, 2008. The functioning, management and persistence of dehesas. In: Agroforestry in Europe. Current status and future prospects (Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, McAdam J, Mosquera-Losada MR, eds). Springer Netherlands. pp: 127-160.

Naveh Z, Whittaker RH, 1979. Structural and floristic diversity of shrublands and woodlands in northern Israel and other Mediterranean areas. Vegetatio 41: 171-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00052445

Ojeda F, Marañón T, Arroyo J, 2000. Plant diversity patterns in the Aljibe Mountains (S. Spain): a comprehensive account. Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 1323-1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008923213321

Ortega M, Elena-Roselló R, García del Barrio JM, 2004. Estimation of plant diversity at landscape level: a methodological approach applied to three Spanish rural areas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 95: 97-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000029893.27432.1c

Papanastasis VP, 2004. Vegetation degradation and land use changes in agrosilvopastoral systems. In: Advances in GeoEcology 37: sustainability of agrosilvopastoral systems (Schnabel S, Ferreira A, eds). Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen, Germany. pp: 1-12.

Pausas JG, 2004. Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian peninsula (Mediterranean basin). Climatic Change 63: 357-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018508.94901.9c

Peco B, De Pablos I, Traba J, Levassor C, 2005. The effect of grazing abandonment on species composition and functional traits: the case of dehesa grasslands. Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 175-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.002

Peinado Lorca M, Rivas-Martínez S, 1987. La vegetación de España. Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. 544 pp.

Pereira HM, Domingos T, Vicente L (eds), 2004. Portugal millennium ecosystem assessment: state of the assessment report. Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Pineda FD, Nicolás JP, Ruiz M, Peco B, Bernáldez FG, 1981. Succession, diversitè et amplitude de niche dans les pâturages du centre de la Péninsula Ibérique. Vegetatio 47: 267-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00118404

Plieninger T, Wilbrand C, 2001. Land use, biodiversity conservation, and rural development in the dehesas of Cuatro Lugares, Spain. Agroforestry Systems 51: 23-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006462104555

Puerto A, Rico M, Matías MD, García JA, 1990. Variation in structure and Diversity in Mediterranean grasslands related to trophic status and grazing intensity. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 445-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235777

Pulido FJ, Díaz M, 2005. Regeneration of a Mediterranean oak: a whole-cycle approach. Ecoscience 12: 92-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2980/i1195-6860-12-1-92.1

Pulido FJ, Díaz M, De Trucios SJH, 2001. Size structure and regeneration of Spanish holm oak Quercus ilex forests and dehesas: effects of agroforestry use on their long-term sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 146: 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00443-6

R Development Core Team 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Ramírez JA, Díaz M, 2008. The role of temporal shrub encroachment for the maintenance of Spanish holm oak Quercus ilex dehesas. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1976-1983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.019

Rice B, Westoby M, 1983. Plant species richness at the 0.1 hectare scale in Australian vegetation compared to other continents. Vegetatio 52: 129-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00044988

San Miguel A, 1994. La dehesa española. Origen, tipología, características y gestión. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar, Madrid, Spain. 96 pp.

Sánchez de Ron D, Elena Roselló R, Roig S, García del Barrio JM, 2007. Los paisajes de dehesa en España y su relación con el ambiente geoclimático. Cuadernos de la SECF 22,171-176.

Stevens MHH, 2006. Placing local plant species richness in the context of environmental drivers of metacommunity richness. Journal of Ecology 94: 58-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01091.x

Stohlgren TJ, Falkner MB, Schell LD, 1995. A modified- Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 117: 113-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00045503

Stohlgren TJ, Chong GV, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD, 1997. Rapid assessment of plant diversity patterns: a methodology for landscapes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 48: 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005796618823

Stohlongren TJ, 2007. Measuring plant diversity. Lessons from the field. Oxford University Press. 390 pp.

Tárrega R, Calvo L, Taboada A, García-Tejero S, Marcos, E, 2009. Abandonment and management in Spanish dehesa systems: effects on soil features and plant species richness and composition. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 731-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.004

Thornthwaite CW, 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38: 55-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/210739

Wagner HH, Wildi O, Ewald KC, 2000. Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecology 15: 219-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008114117913

Walter H, Lieth H, 1960. Klimadiagramm Weltatlas. Gustav Fischer, Jena. 253 pp.

Walther H, Moore JL, 2005. The concept of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness stimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28: 815-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04112.x

Published
2014-04-01
How to Cite
Garcia del Barrio, J. M., Alonso Ponce, R., Benavides, R., & Roig, S. (2014). Species richness of vascular plants along the climatic range of the Spanish dehesas at two spatial scales. Forest Systems, 23(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2014231-04521
Section
Research Articles