Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at candidate genes involved in abiotic stress in two Prosopis species of hybrids

  • Maria F. Pomponio Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA Castelar). Buenos Aires.
  • Susana Marcucci Poltri Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA Castelar). Buenos Aires.
  • Diego Lopez Lauenstein Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA Castelar). Córdoba.
  • Susana Torales Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA Castelar). Buenos Aires.

Abstract

Aim of the study: Identify and compare SNPs on candidate genes related to abiotic stress in Prosopis chilensis, Prosopis flexuosa and interspecific hybrids

Area of the study: Chaco árido, Argentina.

 Material and Methods: Fragments from 6 candidate genes were sequenced in 60 genotypes. DNA polymorphisms were analyzed.

Main Results: The analysis revealed that the hybrids had the highest rate of polymorphism, followed by P. flexuosa and P. chilensis, the values found are comparable to other forest tree species.

Research highlights: This approach will help to study genetic diversity variation on natural populations for assessing the effects of environmental changes.

Keywords: SNPs; abiotic stress; interspecific variation; molecular markers.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria F. Pomponio, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA Castelar). Buenos Aires.
Investigadora, Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (INTA)

References

Almoguera C, Coca MA, Jordano J, 1993. Tissue-specific expression of sunflower heat shock proteins in response to water stress. The plant journal 6: 947-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04060947.x

Derory J, Scotti-Saintagne C, Bertocchi E, Le Dantec L, Graignic N, Jauffres A, et al., 2012. Contrasting relations between diversity of candidate genes and variation of bud burst in natural and segregating populations of European oaks. Heredity. 105: 401–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2009.170

Elmeer R K, Almalki A, 2011. DNA Finger Printing of Prosopis cineraria and Prosopis juliflora Using ISSR and RAPD Techniques. American Journal of Plant Sciences 2: 527-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2011.24062

Fukuda T, Yokoyama J, Nakamura T, Song I, Ito T, Ochiai T, et al., 2005. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genes in legumes. BMC Plant Biolog5,6. Available in http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/5/6

George S, Parida A, 2011. Over-expression of a Rab family GTPase from phreatophyte Prosopis juliflora confers tolerance to salt stress on transgenic Tobacco. MolBiol Rep 38: 1669–1674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11033-010-0278-9

González-Martínez SC, Ersoz E, Brown GR, Wheeler NC, Neale DB, 2006. DNA Sequence variation and selection of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms at candidate genes for drought-stress response in Pinus taedaL. Genetics. 172: 1915-1926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047126

Ismail M, Ingvarsson PK, Guy RD, Jansson S, Silim SN, El-Kassaby YA, 2012. Comparative nucleotide diversity across North American and European Populus species. J Mol Evol. 74: 257-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-012-9504-5

Kariola T, Brader G, Helenius E, Li J, Heino P, Palva ET, 2006. Early responsive to dehydration 15, a negative regulator of abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 142: 1559-1573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.086223

Librado P, Rozas J, 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphims data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187

Mottura MC, 2006. Development of microsatellites in Prosopis spp. And their application to study the reproduction system . University of Göttingen, Germany.

Neale DB, Kremer A, 2011. Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications. Nature reviews 12: 111-122.

Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ, 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol, 132: 365-386.

Sablok G, Shekhawat NS, 2008. Bioinformatics Analysis of Distribution of Microsatellite Markers (SSRs) / Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNPs) in Expressed Transcripts of Prosopis Juliflora: Frequency and Distribution. J.Comput. Sci. Syst. Biol.1: 087-091.

Saidman BO,Vilardi JC, Montoya S, Dieguez MJ, Hopp HE, 1998. Molecular markers: a tool for understanding the relationships among species of Prosopis (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae). In: Tree Improvement: Applied Research and Technology Transfer (Puri S, eds). Science Pub Inc, Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp. 311-324.

Sang T, Donoghue MJ, Zhang D, 1997. Evolution of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Genes in Peonies (Paeonia):Phylogenetic Relationships of Putative Nonhybrid Species.Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 994-1007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025716

Su H, Golldack D, Zhao C, Bohnert HJ, 2002. The expression of HAK-type K(+) transporters is regulated in response to salinity stress in common ice plant.Plant Physiol. 129: 482-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.001149

Suja AG, Venkataraman G, Parida A, 2007. Identification of stress-induced genes from the drought-tolerant plant Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) D. C. Through analysis of expressed sequences tags. Genome 50: 470-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/G07-014

Wachowiak W, Salmela MJ, Ennos RA, Iason G, Cavers S, 2011. High genetic diversity at the extreme range edge: nucleotide variation at nuclear loci in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Scotland. Heredity 106: 775–787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.118

Wei W, Huang J, HaoYJ, Zou HF, Wang HW, Zhao JY, et al., 2009. Soybean GmPHD-Type Transcription Regulators Improve Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants. PLoS ONE 9, e7209. Available in http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0007209

Published
2014-12-01
How to Cite
Pomponio, M. F., Marcucci Poltri, S., Lopez Lauenstein, D., & Torales, S. (2014). Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at candidate genes involved in abiotic stress in two Prosopis species of hybrids. Forest Systems, 23(3), 490-493. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2014233-05437
Section
Resource communications