Influence of thinning intensity and canopy type on Scots pine stand and growth dynamics in a mixed managed forest
Abstract
Aim of the study: We analysed the effects of thinning intensity and canopy type on Scots pine growth and stand dynamics in a mixed Scots pine-beech forest. Area of the study: Western Pyrenees.
Material and methods: Three thinning intensities were applied in 1999 (0, 20 and 30% basal area removed) and 2009 (0, 20 and 40%) on 9 plots. Within each plot, pure pine and mixed pine-beech patches are distinguished. All pine trees were inventoried in 1999, 2009 and 2014. The effects of treatments on the tree and stand structure variables (density, basal area, stand and tree volume), on the periodic annual increment in basal area and stand and tree volume, and on mortality rates, were analysed using linear mixed effects models.
Main Results: The enhancement of tree growth was mainly noticeable after the second thinning. Growth rates following thinning were similar or higher in the moderate than in the severe thinning. Periodic stand volume annual increments were higher in the thinned than in the unthinned plots, but no differences were observed between the thinned treatments. We observed an increase in the differences of the Tree volume annual increment between canopy types (mixed < pure) over time in the unthinned plots, as beech crowns developed.
Research highlights: Moderate thinning is suggested as an appropriate forest practice at early pine age in these mixed forests, since it produced higher tree growth rates than the severe thinning and it counteracted the negative effect of beech on pine growth observed in the unthinned plots.
Keywords: competition; Fagus sylvatica L.; Pinus sylvestris L.; forest management; mortality; Mediterranean forest.
Downloads
References
References
Andrew I, 1986. Simple experimental design for forestry trials. FRI Bull 71. Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. 50 pp.
Aussenac G, 2000. Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: Ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Ann For Sci 57: 287–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2000119
Blanco JA, 2004. La práctica de las claras forestales y su influencia en el ciclo interno de nutrientes en dos bosques de pino silvestre de los Pirineos Navarros. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Pública de Navarra, Spain.
Blanco JA, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ, 2008. Nutrient return via litterfall in two contrasting Pinus sylvestris forests under different thinning intensities. For Ecol Manage 256: 1840-1852.
Blanco JA, Zavala MÁ, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ, 2005. Sustainability of forest management practices: Evaluation through a simulation model of nutrient cycling. For Ecol Manage 213: 209–228.
Bolte A, Czajkowski T, Kompa T, 2007. The north-eastern distribution range of European beech- a review. Forestry 80: 413–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpm028
Bréda N, Granier A, Aussenac G, 1995. Effects of thinning on soil and tree water relations, transpiration and growth in an oak forest (Quercus petraea Matt.) Liebl.). Tree Physiol 15: 295–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/15.5.295
Burnham KP, Anderson DR, 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York. 488 pp.
Crecente-Campo F, Pommerening A, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, 2009. Impacts of thinning on structure, growth and risk of crown fire in a Pinus sylvestris L. plantation in northern Spain. Forest Ecol Manage 257: 1945–1954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.009
Curt T, Prevosto B, 2003. Rooting strategy of naturally regenerated beech in Silver birch and Scots pine woodlands. Plant Soil 255: 265–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026132021506
Von Ende CN, 2001. Repeated-measures analysis: Growth and other time dependent measures. In: The design and analysis of ecological experiments (Scheiner SM, Gurevitch I, eds). Oxford University Press, New York. pp: 134–157.
Gobierno de Navarra, 2010. Mapa de cultivos y aprovechamientos. Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra, Pamplona (Spain).
Kelty MJ, 1992. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species forests (Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD, eds). Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp: 125–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8052-6_8
Larson PR, Kretschmann DE, Clark AI, Isebrands JG, 2001. Formation and properties of juvenile wood in southern pines. A synopsis. USDA. Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Madison. 42 pp.
Ma SY, Concilio A, Oakley B, North M, Chen JQ, 2010. Spatial variability in microclimate in a mixed-conifer forest before and after thinning and burning treatments. Forest Ecol Manage 259: 904–915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.030
Mäkinen H, Hynynen J, Isomäki A, 2005. Intensive management of Scots pine stands in southern Finland: First empirical results and simulated further development. Forest Ecol Manage 215: 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.069
Mäkinen H, Isomäki A, 2004. Thinning intensity and growth of Scots pine stands in Finland. Forest Ecol Manage 201: 311–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.016
MCPFE, 1993. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 16-17 June 1993, Helsinki- Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Finland.
Molina AJ, del Campo AD, 2012. The effects of experimental thinning on throughfall and stemflow: A contribution towards hydrology-oriented silviculture in Aleppo pine plantations. Forest Ecol Manage 269: 206–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.037
Montero G, Cañellas I, Ortega C, Rio M del, 2001. Results from a thinning experiment in a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) natural regeneration stand in the Sistama Ibérico Mountain Range (Spain). Forest Ecol Manage 145: 151–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00582-X
Novak J, Slodicak M, Dusek D, 2011. Thinning effects on forest productivity and site characteristics in stands of Pinus sylvestris in the Czech Republic. Forest Syst 20: 464–474. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/fs/20112003-11074
Pinheiro JC, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar S, Team RDC, 2009. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3. 1–104.
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM, 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York. 528 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1
Pretzsch H, Block J, Dieler J, Dong PH, Kohnle U, Nagel JJ, Spellmann H, Zingg A, 2010. Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient. Ann For Sci 67: 712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010037
Pretzsch H, Schütze G, 2009. Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. Eur J For Res 128: 183–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0215-9
Pretzsch H, 2005. Diversity and productivity in forests: Evidence from long-term experimental plots. In: Forest Diversity and Function: Temperate and Boreal Systems (Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze ED, eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp: 41–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26599-6_3
Primicia I, Camarero JJ, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ, 2013. Effects of thinning and canopy type on growth dynamics of Pinus sylvestris: inter-annual variations and intra-annual interactions with microclimate. Eur J For Res 132: 121–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0662-1
Primicia I, Imbert JB, Traver MC, Castillo FJ, 2014. Inter-specific competition and management modify the morphology, nutrient content and resorption in Scots pine needles. Eur J For Res 133: 141–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0753-7
Puertas F, 2001. Sitios de ensayo de claras de masas de pino silvestre en Navarra (Garde y Aspurz). Gobierno de Navarra, Pamplona (Spain).
Puertas F, 2003. Scots pine in Navarre: Economic importance and production. Proc. IUFRO Conf Silviculture and Sustainable Management in Mountain Forests in the Western Pyrenees. Navarre (Spain), September 15–19.
R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Río M del, Montero G, 2001. Modelo de simulación de claras en masas de Pinus sylvestris L. Monografías I.N.I.A. Forestal No. 3, Madrid.
Río M del, Calama R, Cañellas I, Roig S, Montero G, Calma R, Roig D, 2008. Thinning intensity and growth response in SW-European Scots pine stands. Ann For Sci 65: 308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008009
Río M del, Condés S, Pretzsch H, 2014. Analyzing size-symmetric vs. size-asymmetric and intra- vs. inter-specific competition in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) mixed stands. Forest Ecol Manage 325: 90–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.047
Sabaté S, Gracia CA, Sánchez A, 2002. Likely effects of climate change on growth of Quercus ilex, Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica forests in the Mediterranean region. Forest Ecol Manage 162: 23–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00048-8
Schwinning S, Weiner J, 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050397
Smith D, 1986. The practice of silvicutulre. Wiley, New York. 527 pp.
Spiecker H, 2003. Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone. J Environ Manage 67: 55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00188-3
Valinger E, 1992. Effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilization on stem growth and stem form of Pinus sylvestris trees. Scand. J For Res 7: 219–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827589209382714
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM, Savelieve AA, 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer-Verlag, New York. 574 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.