Analysis of National Forest Programs for REDD+ Implementation in six South and Southeast Asia countries

Abrar J Mohammed, Makoto Inoue, Ganesh P Shivakoti, Tapan K Nath, Mohammed Jashimuddin, Mangala De Zoysa, Hari Kaskoyo, Juan M Pulhin, Rose J Peras

Abstract


Aim of study: To facilitate REDD+ implementation and identify relevant attributes for robust REDD+ policies, this study evaluated and synthesized information from national forest programs in South and Southeast Asian countries.

Area of study: Data was collected from six countries: Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Philippines, India and Thailand.

Methods: The data sources for the evaluation was an in-depth desk review of relevant documents and focus group discussion among experts from each study country.  

Main Results: We found out that diverse factors may influence program feasibility and the ability to achieve ‘triple benefits’: the nature of the forest targeted by the policy, the characteristics of the population affected by the policy, attributes of the policy instrument and the different actors involved.

Research highlights: We argue that national policies and programs targeted for REDD+ implementation should focus on the identified features to achieve REDD+ goals.

Keywords: policy evaluation; policy instruments; triple benefits; Southeast Asia.


Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


References

Angelsen A, Brockhaus M, Kanninen M, Sills E, Sunderlin W D, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, 2009. Realizing REDD+: National strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

Angelsen A, Rudel TK, 2013. Designing and Implementing Effective REDD+ Policies: A Forest Transition Approach. REEP 7(1): 91–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/res022

Busch J, Godoy F, Turner WR, Harvey CA, 2010. Biodiversity co-benefits of reducing emissions from deforestation under alternative reference levels and levels of finance. Conserv Lett 4: 101–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00150.x

Fischer R, Hargita Y, Gunter S, 2015. Insights from the ground level? A content analysis review of multi-national REDD+ studies since 2010. For Policy Econ. In press.

Gardner TA, Burgess ND, Aguilar-Amuchastegui N, Barlow J, Berenguer E, Clements T, Danielsen F, Ferreira J, Foden W, Kapos V, Khan SM et al., 2012. A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD+ programmes. Biol Conserv 154: 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.018

GCCA, 2012. Building an alliance with developing countries to tackle poverty and climate change. Global Climate Change Alliance, European Commission.

Goetz S, Hansen M, Houghton RA, Walker W, Laporte NT, Busch J, 2015. Measurement and Monitoring for REDD+: The Needs for current technology capabilities and future potential. Working Paper #392. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.

Gupta J, Shin HY, Matthews R, Meyfroid P, Kuik O, 2013. The forest transition: the drivers of deforestation and governance approaches. In: Gupta J, Van der Grijp N, Kuik O (eds) Climate Change, Forests and REDD: Lesson for Institutional Design. Routledge, London, UK, pp 25-51.

Harvey CA, Dickson B, Kormos C, 2010. Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD. Conserv Lett 3: 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00086.x

Hossain S, 1998. Participatory forest management in Bangladesh. In: Proc. of the 2nd IGES International Workshop on Forest Conservation Strategies for the Asia and Pacific Region; Isozaki H, Inoue M. (Eds.). pp. 22–32. Institute of Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan.

Inoue M, 2012. Simple Method for the Local Stakeholders to Evaluate and Select National REDD-Plus Program: A Case Study of Indonesia. J Forest Sci 28: 194-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2012.28.3.194

IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014. Working Group III: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Islam SS, 1998. Community forestry in Bangladesh – A case study of Betagi–Pomra community forestry model. Thai J Forest 17: 139–146.

Kanowski PJ, McDermott CL, Cashore BW, 2011. Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environ Sci Policy 14: 111–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.007

Kaskoyo H, Mohammed AJ, Inoue M, 2014. Present State of Community Forestry (Hutan Kemasyarakatan /HKm) Program in a Protection Forest and Its Challenges: Case Study in Lampung Province, Indonesia. JFES 30(1): 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/jfs.2014.30.1.15

Kindermann G, Obersteiner M, Sohngen B, Sathaye J, Androsko K, Rametsteiner E, Schlamadinger B, Wunder S, Beach R, 2011. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(30): 10302 – 10307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710616105

Magnago LFS, Magrach A, Laurance WF, Martins SV, Meira-Neto AA, Simonelli M, Edwards DP, 2015. Would protecting tropical forest fragments provide carbon and biodiversity co-benefits under REDD+? Glob Change Biol 21(9): 3455–3468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12937

Matthews RB, van Noordwijk M, Lambin E, Meyfroidt P, Gupta J, Verchot L, Hergoualc'h K, Veldkamp E, 2014. Implementing REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation): evidence on governance, evaluation and impacts from the REDD-ALERT project. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 19: 907–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9578-z

Mayo-Anda G, Torres JNV, 2014. The political economy of corruption and REDD+: Lessons from the Philippines' pilot sites. U4 Issue, October2014, No 7.

Miles L, Kapos V, 2008. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320: 1454–1455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155358

Mohammed AJ, Inoue M, Peras RJ, Nath TK, Jashimuddin M, Pulhin JM, 2016. Transformation Strategy for Managing Coupled Socio-Ecological Systems: Case Studies from Bangladesh and the Philippines. Small Scale For 15(2): 213-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9318-6

Murray JP, Grenyer R, Wunder S, Raes N, Jones JPG, 2015. Spatial patterns of carbon, biodiversity, deforestation threat, and REDD+ projects in Indonesia. Conserv Biol 29(4): 1434–1445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12500

Nijnik N, Nijnik A, Bergsma E, Matthews R, 2014. Heterogeneity of experts' opinion regarding opportunities and challenges of tackling deforestation in the tropics: a Q methodology application. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 19: 621–640. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9529-0

Ostrom E, 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Panfil SN, Harvey CA, 2015. REDD+ and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review of the Biodiversity Goals, Monitoring Methods, and Impacts of 80 REDD+ Projects. Conservation Letters. In press.

Pasgaard M, 2013. The challenge of assessing social dimensions of avoided deforestation: Examples from Cambodia, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 38, 64–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.002

Peras RJJ, Pulhin JM, Inoue M, 2015. Local stakeholders' assessment of community-based forest management and the implications for REDD Plus implementation in the Philippines. Asia Life Sciences 24(1): 1-33.

Phelps J, Friess DA, Webb EL, 2012. Win-win REDD+ approaches belie carbon-biodiversity trade-offs. Biological Conservation 154: 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.031

Phelps J, Webb E, Agrawal A, 2010. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328: 312–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1187774

Pulhin JM, Dizon JI, Cruz RVO, Gevana DJ, Dahal G, 2008. Tenure Reform on Philippine Forest Lands: Assessment of Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts. University of the Philippines Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.

Putz FE, Romero C, 2012. Helping curb tropical forest degradation through linking REDD+ with other conservation interventions: a view from the forest. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4: 670–677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.003

Reimer F, Asner GP, Joseph S, 2015. Advancing reference emission levels in subnational and national REDD+ initiatives: a CLASlite approach. Carbon Balance Manag, 10: 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-015-0015-8

Sandbrook C, Nelson F, Adams WM, Agrawal A, 2010. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx 44: 330–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310000475

Sikor T, Stahl J, Enters T, Ribot JC, Singh NM, Sunderlin WD, Wollenberg E, 2010. REDD-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance. Global Environ Chang 20: 423–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.007

Strassburg B, Turner RK, Fisher B, Schaeffer R, Lovett A, 2009. Reducing emissions from deforestation – the "combined incentives" mechanism and empirical simulations. Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions 19: 265–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.004

Thompson MC, Baruah M, Carr ER, 2011. Seeing REDD+ as a Project of Environmental Governance. Environ Sci Policy 14: 100–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.006

UNFCCC, 2009. Decision -/CP.15, Copenhagen Accord. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1.

UNFCCC, 2010. Decision -/CP.15, Cancun Accord. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun (México) from 29 November to 10 December 2010. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1.




DOI: 10.5424/fs/2016252-08801

Webpage: www.inia.es/Forestsystems