Using the SUBER model for assessing the impact of cork debarking rotation on equivalent annual annuity in Portuguese stands

Joana A. Paulo, Margarida Tomé

Abstract


Aim of study: Use the SUBER model to evaluate the influence of the cork debarking rotation period (CDR) on equivalent annual annuity (EAA) value.

Area of study: Nine simulated stands, varying in site index (14.4, 15.6, 17.1) and cork quality characteristics (high, medium, low).

Material and methods: EAA values were computed considering CDR periods varying from 9 to 14 years, two contrasting structures of cork prices (high and low cork price scenarios), and three discount rate values (0.5%, 2% and 5%).

Main results: For discount rates of 0.5% and 2% the impact of different CDR on the EAA is similar. In stands characterized by high to average site index values or high to medium cork quality characteristics, CDR of 9 and 11 years are associated with similar values of EAA. The variation of the CDR in stands characterized by low site index values and/or low cork quality characteristics did not have a relevant effect on the variation of EAA. For the simulations carried out with a discount rate of 5% the EAA decreases with the increase of CDR, indicating that the minimum legal value of 9 years for CDR should be applied.

Research highlights: In stands characterized by high to average site index values or high to medium cork quality characteristics, a delay in the debarking may result in a significant increase of cork thickness and, as a result, of cork price. Detailed knowledge of cork and stand characteristics and updated information on cork prices structure and values are essential for the best usage of management tools such as the SUBER model, which can contribute to the decision-making process concerning the debarking operation.

 


Keywords


adaptive forest management; cork production; cork price; cork quality; growth and yield model; site index

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


References

Almeida A, Tomé J, Tomé M, 2010. Development of a system to predict the evolution of individual tree mature cork caliper over time. Forest Ecol Manag 260: 1303 – 1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.017

Almeida A, Tomé M, 2010. Field sampling of cork value before extraction in Portuguese 'montados'. Agr Syst 79: 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9260-8

APCOR, 2014. Anuário da Cortiça 2014. 78 pp. Available on line: http://www.apcor.pt/userfiles/File/Publicacoes/AnuarioAPCOR2014.pdf.

Borges JG, Oliveira AC, Costa MA, 1997. A quantitative approach to cork oak forest management. Forest Ecol Manag 97: 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00064-9

Campos P, Bonnieux F, Caparrós A, 2007a. Measuring total sustainable incomes from multifunctional management of Corsican Maritime Pine and Andalusian Cork oak Mediterranean forests. J Environ Plan Manag 50(1): 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560601048424

Campos P, Daly-Hassen H, Ovando P, 2007b. Cork Oak Forest Management in Spain and Tunisia: Two Case Studies of Conflicts between Sustainability and Private Income. Internat Forestry Rev 9 (2): 610-626. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.2.610

Campos P, Ovando P, Montero G, 2008. Does private income support sustainable agroforestry in Spanish dehesa? Land Use Policy 25(4): 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.005

Caritat A, Gutiérrez E, Molinas M, 2000. Influence of weather on cork-ring with. Tree Physiol 20: 893-900. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.13.893

Corticeira Amorim, 2013. Relatório e Contas 2013 – Corticeira Amorim, S.G.P.S., S.A. Mozelos. 142 pp. Available on: http://www.amorim.com/xms/files/Investidores/5_Relatorio_e_Contas/PT_R_C_Corticeira_Amorim2013.pdf.

Costa A, Oliveira A C, Vidas F, Borges JG, 2010. An approach to cork oak forest management planning: a case study in southwestern Portugal. Eur J Forest Res 129(2): 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0326-y

Davis LS, Johnson KN, Bettinger PS, Howard TE, 2001. Forest Management: To sustain ecological, economic and social values. Fourth edition. MacGraw-Hill series in forest resources. Boston. 804 pp.

Faias SP, Palma JHN, Barreiro SM, Paulo JA, Tomé M, 2012. Resource communication. sIMfLOR – platform for the Portuguese forest simulators. Forest Syst 21(3): 543 – 548. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2012213-02951

Fragoso R, Marques C, Lucas MR, Martins MB, Jorge R, 2011. The economic effects of common agricultural policy on Mediterranean montado/dehesa ecosystem. J Policy Model 33(2): 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.12.007

Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D, 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall. CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics. 481 pp.

Hidalgo PJ, Marín JM, Quijada J, Moreira JM, 2008. A spatial distribution model of cork oak (Quercus suber) in Southern Spain: A suitable tool for reforestation. Forest Ecol Manag 255: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.012

IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006. 2nd edition. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103, FAO, Rome, 133 pp.

Lacambra LCJ, Andray AB, Francés FS, 2010. Influence of soil water holding capacity on the potential distribution of forest species. A case study: the potential distribution of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) in central-western Spain. Eur J Forest Res 129: 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0251-5

Leal S, Nunes E, Pereira H, 2008. Cork oak (Quercus suber L.) wood growth and vessel characteristics variation in relation to climate and cork harvesting. Eur J Forest Res 127: 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0180-8

Montero G, 1992. Variacion del calibre del corcho medido a distintas alturas. Inv Agrar. Sis. Recur For 1(2): 181-188.

Oliveira G, Costa A, 2012. How resilient id Quercus suber L. to cork harvesting? A review and identification of knowledge gaps. Forest Ecol Manag 270: 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.025

Oliveira G, Martins-Loução MA, Correia O, 2002. The relative importance of cork harvesting and climate for stem radial growth of Quercus suber L. Ann Forest Sci 59: 439 – 443. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002018

Oliveira V, Knapic S, Pereira H, 2012. Natural variability of surface porosity of wine cork stoppers of different commercial classes. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 46(4): 331-340. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2012.46.4.1523

Palma JHN, Paulo JA, Faias SP, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Borges JG, Tomé M, 2015. Adaptive management and debarking schedule optimization of Quercus suber L. stands under climate change: case study in Chamusca, Portugal. Reg Environ Change 15(8): pp 1569-1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0818-x

Paulo JA, 2011. Desenvolvimento de um sistema para apoio à gestão sustentável de montados de sobro. PhD Thesis. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa, Portugal, 188 pp. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/3850

Paulo JA, Palma JHN, Gomes AA, Faias SP, Tomé J, Tomé M, 2015. Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal. New Forests 46(2): 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9462-4

Paulo JA, Pereira H, Tomé M, 2016. Analysis of variables influencing tree cork caliper in two consecutive cork extractions using cork growth index modelling. Agr Syst 90: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9922-2

Paulo JA, Tomé M, 2010. Predicting mature cork biomass with t years of growth based in one measurement taken at any other age. Forest Ecol Manag 259: 1993 – 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.02.010

Pereira H, 2007. Cork: biology, production and uses. Elsevier, Lisbon, 336 pp.

Ribeiro NA, Surový P, 2011. Growth modeling in complex forest systems: CORKFITS a tree spatial growth model for cork oak woodlands. Formath 10: 263 - 278 https://doi.org/10.15684/formath.10.263

Sánchez-González M, Tomé M, Montero G, 2005. Modelling height and diameter growth of dominant cork oak trees in Spain. Ann Forest Sci 62: 633 - 643. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005065

Sánchez-González M, Calama R, Cañellas I, Montero G, 2007. Management oriented growth models for multifunctional Mediterranean forests: the case of the cork oak (Quercus suber L.) In: Scientific tools and research needs for multifunctional Mediterranean forest ecosystem managemen (Palahí M., Birot Y.,Rois M., eds). EFI proceedings 56: 71-84.

Teixeira RT, Fortes AM, Pinheiro C, Pereira H, 2014. Comparison of good- and bad-quality cork: application of high-throughput sequencing of phellogenic tissue. J Exp Bot 65(17): 4887-4905 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru252

Tomé M, 2004. Modelo de crescimento e produção para a gestão do montado de sobro em Portugal. Projecto POCTI/AGR/35172/99. Relatório Final – Relatório de Execução Material (Volume I). Publicações GIMREF RFP 1/2004. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Instituto Superior Agronomia. Centro de Estudos Florestais. Lisboa. 89 pp. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/2355

Tomé M, Barreiro S, Paulo JA, Tomé J, 2006. Modelling tree and stand growth with growth functions formulated as age independent difference equations. Canadian J Forest Res 36(7): 1621-1630. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-065

Tomé M, Faias SP, 2014. State of the art, review of silviculture, models and decision support tools for multipurpose trees (MPT) and non-wood forest products (NWFP). Deliverable 2.1 of the StarTree project. 176 pp. http://star-tree.eu/images/deliverables/WP2/Deliverable2_1.pdf




DOI: 10.5424/fs/2017261-09931

Webpage: www.inia.es/Forestsystems