Biomass accumulation and allocation in seedlings of three Nothofagus species at the edges of a light gradient in canopy gaps of a Subantarctic forest
Abstract
Models of optimal partitioning and shade-tolerance propose that a proportional high aerial biomass contributes to plant persistence in light-limited environments. In this context, biomass accumulation and allocation in 4-year saplings of Nothofagus dombeyi, N. nervosa, and N. obliqua, growing at the edges of an irradiance gradient in canopy gaps of a Subantarctic forest, was compared. Within the gap, relative mean light transmittance for summer was 5% in the northern periphery and 36% in the centre. Total saplings biomass (B) increased with light availability. Nothofagus nervosa tend to exhibit the higher B under the reduced sunlight of the northern periphery, probably due to its less lightdemanding character. Although N. dombeyi in the adult stage is a fast-growing species, saplings accumulated less biomass than those of N. nervosa and N. obliqua, probably influenced by its comparatively lower seed nutrient content. Conversely, leaf biomass (H) was equivalent in all species. For each species, leaf mass fraction (H/B) was similar in both light conditions. This pattern is not consistent with the prediction based on optimal resource partitioning: plants invested less in the organ that would cause the strongest growth limitation at low irradiance. Nothofagus dombeyi allocated more assimilates to leaves compared to N. nervosa and N. obliqua, despite its extremely light-demanding character. Such a result does not comply with the hypothesis of a proportionally high leaf mass in species adapted to shade. This research may improve the understanding of an ecosystem encompassing trees with divergent light responses, and dependent on spatial and temporarily heterogeneous gaps for regeneration.Downloads
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.