Review. Assessing uncertainty and risk in forest planning and decision support systems: review of classical methods and introduction of new approaches

  • M. Pasalodos-Tato Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria INIA. Madrid.
  • A. Mäkinen Simosol Oy, Asema-aukio 2, FI-11130 Riihimäki.
  • J. Garcia-Gonzalo Departamento de Engenharia Florestal - Instituto Superior de Agronomia. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa.
  • J.G. Borges Departamento de Engenharia Florestal - Instituto Superior de Agronomia. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa.
  • T. Lämås SLU, Dept. of Forest Resource Management- SLU. Umeå.
  • L.O. Eriksson SLU, Dept. of Forest Resource Management- SLU. Umeå.

Abstract

Aim: Since forest planning is characterized by long time horizon and it typically involves large areas of land and numerous stakeholders, uncertainty and risk should play an important role when developing forest management plans. The aim of this study is to review different methods to deal with risk and uncertainty in forest planning, listing problems that forest managers may face during the preparation of management plans and trying to give recommendations in regard to the application of each method according to the problem case. The inclusion of risk and uncertainty in decision support systems is also analyzed.

Area: It covers the temporal and spatial scale of forest planning, the spatial context, the participation process, the objectives dimensions and the good and services addressed.

Material and methods: Several hundreds of articles dealing with uncertainty and risk were identified regarding different forestry-related topics and approaches. Form them, around 170 articles were further reviewed, categorized and evaluated.

Main results: The study presents a thorough review and classification of methods and approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forest planning. Moreover, new approaches are introduced, showing the opportunities that their application present in forest planning.

Research highlights: The study can aid forest managers in the decision making process when designing a forest management plan considering risk and uncertainty.

Keywords: operations research; optimal alternative; stochastic risk; endogenous risk; stand level; forest level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda J, Herath G, 2003. Incorporating stakeholders values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 45 (1): 75-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00004-1

Alonso-Ayuso A, Escudero LF, Guignard M, 2012. Forestry management under uncertainty. Annals of Operations Research 190: 17–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0561-0

Ascough II J, Maier H, Ravalico J, Strudley M, 2008. Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecological Modelling 219: 383-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.015

Bare BB, Mendoza GA, 1992. Timber harvest scheduling in a fuzzy decision environment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 423–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x92-055

Beaudoin D, LeBel L, Frayret JM, 2007. Tactical supply chain planning in the forest product industry through optimization and scenario-based analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 37: 128-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x06-223

Ben-Haim Y, 2001. Information-gap decision theory: decisions under severe uncertainty. Academic Press, London.

Ben-Tal A, Nemirovski A. 2002. Robust Optimization - Methodology and Applications. Mathematical Programming Series B 92: 453-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s101070100286

Beyer HG, Schwefel HP, 2002. Evolution Strategies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Journal Natural Computing 1(1): 3-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015059928466

Birge JR, Louveaux FV, 1997. Introduction to stochastic programming. Berlin: Springer.

Bonazountas M, Kallidromitou D, Kassomenos P, Passas N, 2007. A decision support system for managing forest fire casualties. Journal of Environmental Management 84: 412–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.016 PMid:16928418

Borders AE, Harrison WM, Clutter ML, Shiver BD, Souter RA, 2008. The value of timber inventory information for management planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 2287–2294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X08-075

Borges JG, Hoganson HM, Rose DW, 1999. Combining a decomposition strategy with dynamic programming to solve spatially constrained forest management scheduling problem. Forest Science 45: 201-212.

Boychuck D, Martell DL, 1996. A Multistage Stochastic Programming Model for Sustainable Forest-Level Timber Supply Under Risk of Fire. Forest Science 42(1): 10-26.

Bullard SH, Sherali HD, Klemperer WD, 1985. Estimating optimal thinning and rotation for mixed-species timber stands using a random search algorithm. Forest Science 31(2): 303-315.

Buongiorno J, 2001. Generalization of Faustmann's Formula for Stochastic Forest Growth and Prices with Markov Decision Process Models. Forest Science 47 (4): 466-474.

Burke EK, Kendall G, 2005. Search Methodologies. Introductory tutorials in optimization and Decision Support Techniques. Springer, USA, 620 pp.

Burkhart H, Stuck R, Leuschner W, Reynolds M, 1978. Allocating inventory resources for multiple-use planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 8: 100–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x78-017

Cardin MA, Neufville R de. 2008. A survey of the state-of-the-art methodologies and a framework for identifying and valuing flexible design opportunities in engineering systems. Working paper. http://ardent.mit.edu/real_options/Real_opts_papers/WP-CardindeNeufville2008.pdf

Cardin MA, Nuttall WJ, de Neufville R, Dahlgren J. 2007. Extracting Value from Uncertainty: A Methodology for Engineering Systems Design, 17th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), San Diego. http://web.mit.edu/macardin/www/papers/Cardin_et_al2007-INCOSE.pdf

Carlin B, Louis T, 2000. Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, Texts in Statistical Science. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall 419 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420057669

Couture S, Reynaud A, 2008. Multi-stand Forest Management under a Climatic Risk: Do Time and Risk Preferences Matter? Environmental Modeling & Assessment 13: 181–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10666-007-9121-7

Duvemo K, 2009. The Influence of Data Uncertainty on Planning and Decision Processes in Forest Management. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Forest Resource Management, Faculty of Forest Sciences, SLU, Umeå.

Eid T, 2000. Use of Uncertain Inventory Data in Forestry Scenario Models and Consequential Incorrect Harvest Decisions. Silva Fennica 34(2): 89–100.

Eid T, Gobakken T, Naesset E, 2004. Comparing Stand Inventories for Large Areas Based on Photo-interpretation and Laser Scanning by Means of Cost-plus-loss Analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19: 512–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827580410019463

Eggenberg N, Salani M, Bierlaire M. 2011. Uncertainty Feature Optimization: an implicit paradigm for problems with noisy data. Networks 57(3): 270-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/net.20428

Ells A, Bulte E, van Kooten GC. 1997. Uncertainty and forest land use allocation in British Columbia: vague priorities and imprecise coefficients. Forest Science 43: 509–520.

Englin J, Boxall P, Hauer G, 2000. An Empirical Examination of Optimal Rotations in a Multiple-Use Forest in the Presence of Fire Risk. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25(1): 14-27.

Epstein R, Karlsson J, Rönnqvist M, Weintraub A, 2007. Harvest operational models in forestry. In: Handbook of operations research in Natural Resources (Weintraud A, Romero C, Bjorndal T, Epstein R, eds.) Springer US.

Eriksson LO, 2006. Planning under uncertainty at the forest level: A system approach. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21(1): 111-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14004080500486849

Ferreira L, Constantino M, Borges J. 2011. A stochastic approach to optimize Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stand management scheduling under fire risk. An application in Portugal. Annals of Operations Research. Online Firest. DOI 10.1007/s10479-011-0845-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0845-z

Ferreira L, Constantino M, Borges J, Garcia-Gonzalo J. 2012. Optimizing Eucalyptus globulus Labill stand management scheduling, under the risk of fire. Forest Science 58(4), 353-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/forsci.10-084

Ferson S, Ginzburg LR, 1996. Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 54: 133–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00071-3

Forsell N. 2009. Planning Under Risk and Uncertainty: Optimizing Spatial Forest Management Strategies. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Forest Resource Management, Faculty of Forest Sciences, SLU, Umeå.

Forsell N, Wikström P, Garcia F, Sabbadin R, Blennow K, Eriksson LO. 2011. Management of the risk of wind damage in forestry: a graph-based Markov decision process approach. Annals of Operations Research 190 (1): 57-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0522-7

Gadow Kv. 2000. Evaluating risk in forest planning models. Silva Fenn. 34(2), 181-191.

Garcia F, Sabbadin R. 2001. Solving large weakly coupled Markov Decision Processes: Application to forest management. In: Proceedings of International congress on modelling and simulation (MODSIM) (Ghassemi F, et al. eds.) Canberra pp. 1707-1712.

Garcia-Gonzalo J, Jäger D, Lexer MJ, Peltola H, Brice-o-Elizondo E, Kellomäki S. 2008. Does climate change affect optimal planning solutions for multi-objective forest management?. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung (AFJZ) – German Journal of Forest Research (GJFR). Volume 179 (5-6), 78-95.

Garcia-Gonzalo J, Pukkala T, Borges J. 2011a. Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal. Annals of Operational Research. In print.

Garcia-Gonzalo J, Marques S, Borges JG, Botequim B, Oliveira MM, Tomé J, Tomé M. 2011b. A three-step approach to post-fire mortality modelling in Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait) stands for enhanced forest planning in Portugal. Forestry. 84(2): 197-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpr006

Garcia-Gonzalo J, Borges JG, Palma J, Tomé M, Hilebrand W. Designing a Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under scenarios of climate change. An Application In Portugal. Submitted to Annals of Forest Science.

Gassmann HI, 1989. Optimal harvest of a forest in the presence of uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources 19: 1267–1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x89-193

González JR, Pukkala T, Palahí M. 2005. Optimising the management of Pinus sylvestris L. stand under risk of fire in Catalonia (northeast of Spain). Annals of Forest Science 62, 493-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005054

Gonzalez-Olabarria JR, Pukkala T. 2012. Integrating fire risk considerations in landscape level forest planning. Forest Ecology and Management. 261: 278-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.017

González-Olabarría JR, Palahí M, Pukkala T, Trasobares A. 2008. Optimising the management of Pinus nigra Arn. Stands under endogenous risk of fire in Catalonia. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 17 (1), 10-17.

Gunn EA, Rai AK, 1987. Modelling and decomposition for planning long-term forest harvesting in an integrated industry structure. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 17: 1507-1518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x87-233

Hamilton D, 1978. Specifying precision in natural resource inventories. In: Proceeding from the workshop: Integrated inventories of renewable natural resources. USDA Forest Service, Tucson, Arizona.

Hanewinkel M, Hummel S, Albrecht A. 2011. Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: a review. European Journal of Forest Research 130, 329-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0392-1

Heinonen T, 2007. Developing spatial optimization in forest planning. Dissertationes forestales 34. University of Joensuu. Faculty of forestry.

Heinonen T, Kurttila M, Pukkala T, 2007. Possibilities to aggregate raster cells through spatial optimization in forest planning. Silva Fennica 41(1): 89–103.

Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Ikonen V-P, Peltola H, Venälaäinen A, Dupont S. 2009. Integrating the risk of wind damage into forest planning. Forest Ecology and Management 258(7), 1567-1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.006

Hellander A, 2009. Stochastic Simulation and Monte Carlo Methods. Available in: http://www.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/bervet2/MCkompendium/mc.pdf

Hillier FS, Lieberman GJ, 1990. Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill, 5th edition.

Hof JG, Pickens JB. 1991. Chance-constrained and chance maximizing mathematical programs in renewable resource-management. Forest Science 37(1), 308–325.

Hof J, Haight R. 2007. Optimization of forest wildlife objectives. Harvest operational models in forestry In: Handbook of operations research in Natural Resources (Weintraud A, Romero C, Bjorndal T, Epstein R, eds.). Springer US.

Hof JG, Pickens JB, Bartlett ET. 1986. A max-min approach to non-declining yield timber harvest scheduling problems. Forest Science 32, 653–666.

Hof J, Bevers M, Pickens J. 1996. Chance-constrained optimization with spatially autocorrelated forest yields. Forest Science 42, 118–123.

Hoganson HM, Rose DW, 1987. A model for recognizing forest wide risk in timber management scheduling. Forest Science 33(2): 268-282.

Hoganson HM, Bixby J, Bergmann SS. 2003. Management scheduling for older forest interior space: three Minnesota test cases. Report to the Minnesota Forest Resources Council landscape committee.

Hoganson HM, Wei Y, Hokans RT. 2005. Integrating spatial objectives into forest plans for Minnesota's national forest (Bevers M, Barrets T, eds.). Systems Analysis in Forest Resources: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-656. Portland, OR. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 115-122 pp.

Holopainen M, Talvitie M, 2006. Effect of Data Acquisition Accuracy on Timing of Stand Harvests and Expected Net Present Value. Silva Fennica 40(3): 531–543.

Hooke R, Jeeves TA, 1961. "Direct Search" solution of numerical and statistical problems, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 8: 212-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/321062.321069

Hyytiainen K, Haight RG, 2010. Evaluation of forest management systems under risk of wildfire. European Journal of Forest Research. 129: 909-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0278-2

Ierapetitrou MG, Pistikopoulos EN, Floudas CA. 1996. Operational planning under uncertainty. Computers and Chemical Engineering 20 (12), 1499-1516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(95)00235-9

Insley M, Rollins K, 2005. On solving the multirotational timber harvesting problem with stochastic prices: a linear complementarity formultaion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(3): 735-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00759.x

Islam N, Kurttila M, Mehtätalo L, Haara A, 2009. Analyzing the Effects of Inventory Errors on Holding-Level Forest Plans: the Case of Measurement Error in the Basal Area of the Dominated Tree Species. Silva Fennica 43(1): 71–85.

Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ, 2003. A Danish example of optimal thinning strategies in mixed-species forest under changing growth conditions caused by climate change. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 375–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00652-7

Jactel H, Branco M, Duncker P, Gardiner B, Grodzki W, Långström B, Moreira F, Netherer S, Nicoll B, Orazio C, Piou D, Schelhaas M-J, Tojic K, 2012. A multi-criteria risk analysis to evaluate impacts of forest management alternatives on forest health in Europe. Ecology and Society 17 (4): 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04897-170452

Kaloudis S, Lorentzos N, Sideridis A, Yialouris C, 2005. A Decision Support System for Forest Fire Management. Operational Research: An International Journal 5(1): 141-152.

Kangas A, Kangas J. 2004. Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 6, 169-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00083-7

Kangas A, Kangas J, Pykäläinen J, 2001. Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fennica 35: 215–227.

Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M. 2008. Decision support for forest management. Managing Forest Ecosystems 16. Springer. 222 pp.

Kao C, 1982. Optimal stocking levels and rotation under risk. Forest Science 28(4): 711-719.

Kao C, 1984. Optimal stocking levels and rotation under uncertainty. Forest Science 30(4): 921-927.

Kaya I, Buongiorno J, 1987. Economic Harvesting of Uneven-Aged Northern Hardwood Stands Under Risk: A Markovian Decision Model. Forest Science 33(4): 889-907.

Kennedy J, Eberhart R. 1995. Particle swarm optimization, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1942–1948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968

Kim Y-H, Bettinger P, Finney M. 2009. Spatial optimization of the pattern of fuel management activities and subsequent effects on simulated wildfires. European Journal of Operational Research 197, 253–265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.025

Kivinen VP, 2004. A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Tree Bucking Optimization. Forest Science 50(5), 696-710.

Kivinen VP, Uusitalo J. 2002. Applying fuzzy logic to tree bucking control. Forest Science 48(4), 673–684.

Klenner W, Kurz W, Beukema S, 2000. Habitat patterns in forested landscapes: management practices and the uncertainty associated with natural disturbances. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27: 243–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00110-1

Knoke T. 2008. Mixed forests and finance — Methodological approaches. Ecological Economics 65 (3): 590-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.009

Kooten GCv, Kooten Rev, Brown GL, 1992. Modelling the effect of uncertainty on timber harvest: a suggested approach and empirical example. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(1): 162-172.

Koutsoukis N-S, Dominguez-Ballesteros B, Lucas C, Mitra G. 2000. A prototype decision support system for strategic planning under uncertainty. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 30, 640-660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030010346387

Kurttila M, Muinonen E, Leskinen P, Kilpeläinen H, Pykäläinen J. (Leskinen toimivapaalla SYKE:ssa). 2009. An approach for examining the effects of preferential uncertainty on the contents of forest management plan at stand and holding level. European Journal of Forest Research 128, 37-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0237-3

Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P, 1998. SMAA— stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 106: 137–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00163-X

Leskinen P, Kangas J, 1998. Analysing uncertainties of interval judgement data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plans. Silva Fennica 32: 363–372.

Leskinen P, Kangas J, 2001. Modelling future timber price development by using expert judgments and time series analysis. Silva Fennica 35(1): 93–102.

Leskinen P, Hujala T, Tikkanen J, Kainulainen T, Kangas A, Kurttila M, Pykäläinen J, Leskinen L, 2009. Adaptive decision analysis in forest management planning. Forest Science 55(2): 95-108.

Liang J, Buongiorno J, Monserud R, 2006. Bootstrap Simulation and Response Surface Optimization of Management Regimes for Douglas-Fir/Western Hemlock Stands. Forest Science 52 (5): 579-594.

Lin C-R, Buongiorno J, 1998. Tree Diversity, Landscape Diversity, and Economics of Maple-Birch Forests: Implications of Markovian Models. Management Science 44 (10): 1351-1366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.10.1351

Lohmander P, 1987. The economics of forest management under risk. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Forest Economics, Report 79 (Doctoral dissertation) p. 311.

Lohmander P, 2000. Optimal sequential forestry decisions under risk. Annals of operations research 95(1-4): 217-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018918627946

Lohmander P, 2007. Adaptive Optimization of Forest Management in a Stochastic World, in Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources (Weintraub A. et al eds.). Springer, Springer Science, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, New York, USA, pp 525-544.

Martell DL, 1980. The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 10: 30-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x80-006

MacLean D, Erdle T, MacKinnon W, Porter K, Beaton K, Cormier G, Morehouse S, Budd M. 2001. The Spruce Budworm Decision Support System: forest protection planning to sustain long-term wood supplies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1742-1757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x01-102

McCarthy MA, Possingham HP, Gill AM, 2001. Using stochastic dynamic programming to determine optimal fire management for Banksia ornata. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 585-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00617.x

McLain RJ, Lee RG, 1996. Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20: 437-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01474647 PMid:8661620

Meilby H, Strange N, Thorsen BJ. 2001. Optimal spatial harvest planning under risk of wind throw. Forest Ecology and Management 149, 15–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00542-9

Mendoza GA, Sprouse W. 1989. Forest planning and decision making in fuzzy environments: an overview and illustration. Forest Science 35, 481–502.

Mendoza GA, Bare BB, Zhou Z. 1993. A fuzzy multiple objective linear programming approach to forest planning under uncertainty. Agricultural Systems 41, 257–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(93)90003-K

Mitra K, Gudi RD, Patwardhan SC, Sadar G. 2008. Midterm Supply Chain Planning under Uncertainty: A Multiobjective Chance Constrained Programming Framework. Industrial Engineering & Chemistry Research 47, 5501–5511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie0710364

Miina J, Heinonen J. 2008. Stochastic simulation of forest regeneration establishment using a multilevel multivariate model. Forest Science 54(2), 206-219.

Mladenoff, D. 2004. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological Modelling 180, 7-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.016

Moilanen A, Wintle BA, Elith J, Burgman M. 2006. Uncertainty Analysis for Regional-Scale Reserve Selection. Conservation Biology 20 (6), 1688–1697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00560.x PMid:17181804

Moss RH, Schneider SH, 2000, 'Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to Lead Authors for more Consistent Assessment and Reporting', in Pachauri, R., Taniguchi, T., and Tanaka, K. (eds.), IPCC Supporting Material, Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, pp. 33–51.

Mowrer H, 2000. Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation, and importance. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27: 139–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00113-7

Mäkinen A, 2010. Uncertainty in forest simulators and forest planning systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences. Dissertationes Forestales 97.

Mäkinen A, Kangas A, Nurmi M, 2012. Using cost-plus-loss analysis to define optimal forest inventory interval and forest inventory accuracy. Silva Fennica 46(2): 211-226 .

Möykkynen T, Miina J, Pukkala T. 2000. Optimizing the management of a Picea abies stand under risk of butt rot. Forest Pathology 30, 65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0329.2000.00187.x

Naesset E, 2004. Practical Large-scale Forest Stand Inventory Using a Small-footprint Airborne Scanning Laser. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19: 164–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827580410019544

Nelder JA, Mead R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7: 308-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308

Neufville R. 2003. Real Options: Dealing With Uncertainty in Systems Planning and Design. Integrated Assessment 4 (1): 26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.1.26.16461

Öhman K. 2000. Creating contiguous areas of old forest in long term forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30, 1817-1823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x00-103

Öhman K. 2001. Forest planning with consideration to spatial relationships. Doctoral diss. Department.of Forest Resource Management and Geomatics, SLU. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae, Silvestria vol. 198. 32 pp.

Öhman K, Eriksson LO. 1998. The core area concept in forming contiguous areas for long-term forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28, 1032-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x98-076

Öhman K, Eriksson LO. 2002. Allowing for spatial consideration in long-term forest planning by linking linear programming with simulated annealing. Forest Ecology and Management 161, 221-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00487-X

Packalén P, 2009. Using airborne laser scanning data and digital aerial photographs to estimate growing stock by tree species, volume 77 of Dissertationes Forestales. Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Joensuu.

Packalén P, Heinonen T, Pukkala T, Vauhkonen J, Maltamo M. 2011. Dynamic Treatment Units in Eucalyptus Plantation. Forest Science 57 (5), 416-426.

Palma CD, Nelson JD. 2009. A robust optimization approach protected harvest scheduling decisions against uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39, 342–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X08-175

Pasalodos-Tato M, 2010. Optimising forest stand management in Galicia, North-Western Spain. Dissertationes Forestales (the Finish Society of Forest Science) 102.

Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, 2008. Assessing fire risk in stand-level management in Galicia (north-western Spain). In: Modelling, monitoring and management of forest fires (de las Heras J, Brebbia CC, Viegas D, Leone V, eds). Witpress, pp. 89-97.

Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Castedo-Dorado F, 2009. Models for the optimal management of Pinus radiata D. Don in Galicia (north-western Spain) under risk of fire. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung. 180 (11/12): 238-249.

Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Rojo Alboreca A, 2010. Optimal management of Pinus pinaster in Galicia (north-western Spain) under endogenous risk of fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(7): 937-948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WF08150

Peter B, Nelson J, 2005. Estimating harvest schedules and profitability under the risk of fire disturbance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 1378–1388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x05-073

Peterson C, 2000. Catastrophic wind damage to North American forests and the potential impact of climate change. Science of the Total Environment 262(3): 287-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00529-5

Pickens JB, Dress PE, 1988. Use of stochastic production coefficients in linear-programming models-objective function distribution, feasibility, and dual activities. Forest Science 34: 574–591.

Pickens JB, Hof JG. 1991. Fuzzy goal programming in forestry — an application with special solution problems. Fuzzy Sets Systems 39, 239–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(91)90095-8

Pickens JB, Hof JG, Kent BM, 1991. Use of chance-constrained programming to account for stochastic variation in the A-matrix of large-scale linear programs: a forestry application. Annals of Operations Research 31: 511–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02204867

Pietilä I, Kangas A, Mäkinen A, Mehtätalo L, 2010. Influence of growth prediction errors on the expected losses from forest decisions. Silva Fennica 44(5): 829–843.

Poso S, 1983. Basic features of forest inventory by compartments. Silva Fennica 17: 313– 343.

Pukkala T. 1998. Multiple risks in multi-objective forest planning: integration and importance. Forest Ecology and Management 111, 265–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00339-9

Pukkala T. 2009. Population-based methods in the optimization of stand management. Silva Fennica 43 (2), 261–274

Pukkala T, Kangas J, 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8: 560-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827589309382802

Pukkala T, Kangas J, 1996. A method for integrating risk and attitude toward risk into forest planning. Forest Science 42(2): 198–205.

Pukkala T, Miina J, 1997. A method for stochastic multiobjective optimization of stand management. Forest Ecology and Management 98: 189-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00081-9

Rebain S, McDill M. 2003. A mixed-integer formulation of the minimum patch size problem. Forest Science 49, 608-618.

Reckhow K, 1994. Water quality simulation modeling and uncertainty analysis for risk assessment and decision making. Ecological Modelling 72: 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(94)90143-0

Reed WJ. 1984. The effects of the risk of fire on the optimal rotation of a forest. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11 (2), 180-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(84)90016-0

Reed WJ, Errico D, 1986. Optimal harvest scheduling at the forest level in the presence of the risk of fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 266-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x86-047

Regan H, Ben-Haim Y, Langford B, Wilson WG, Lundberg P, Andelman SJ. 2005. Robust decision making under severe uncertainty for conservation management. Ecological Applications 15, 1471– 1477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-5419

Rockafellar RT, Wets R,1987. Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty, HASA Working Paper, WP-87-119.

Rollin F, Buongiorno J, Zhou M, Peyron JL. 2005. Management of mixed species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura: from stochastic growth and price models to decision tables. Forest Science 51(1): 64-75.

Rowe WD, 1994. Understanding uncertainty. Risk Analysis 14: 743–750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00284.x

Saaty TL, 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguese, and Chinese, Revised editions, Paperback (1996, 2000), Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Sabbadin R, Spring DA, Rabier CE. 2007. Dynamic reserve site selection under contagion risk of deforestation. Ecological Modelling 201, 75-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.036

Sahinidis NV, 2004. Optimization under uncertainty: State-of-the-art and opportunities. Computers & Chemical Engineering 28(6-7): 971-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.017

Sallnäs, O. and Eriksson, L.O. 1989. Management variation and price expectations in an intertemporal forest sector model. Natural Resource Modeling, 3: 385,398.

Schelhaas M, Nabuurs G, Schuck A, 2003. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biology 9(11): 1620-1633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00684.x

Scheller R, Domingo J, Sturtevant B, Williams J, Rudy A, Gustafson E, Mladenoff DJ. 2007. Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible spatial and temporal resolution. Ecological Modelling 201, 409–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.009

Sessions J. 1988. Making better tree-bucking decisions in the woods. Journal of Forestry 86(10), 43–45.

Sessions J, Olsen E, Garland J. 1989. Tree bucking for optimal stand value with log allocation constraints. Forest Science 35(1), 271–276.

Spring DA, Kennedy JOS. 2005. Existence value and optimal timber-wildlife management in a flammable multistand forest. Ecological Economics 55(3), 365-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.012

Spring DA, Kennedy JOS, Nally RM. 2005. Optimal management of a forested catchment providing timber and carbon sequestration benefits: Climate change effects. Global Environmental Change 15(3), 281-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.04.002

Spring DA, Kennedy JOS, Lindenmayer DB, McCarthy MA, Nally RM. 2008. Optimal management of a flammable multi-stand forest for timber production and maintenance of nesting sites for wildlife. Forest Ecology and Management 255(11), 3857-3865. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.033

Storn R, Price K. 1997. Differential Evolution - a Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11, 341-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328

Taha HA. 1992. Operations Research: An Introduction. Macmillan, 5th edition.

Taylor R, Fortson J, 1992. Optimum Plantation Planting Density and Rotation Age Based on Financial Risk and Return. Forest Science 37(3): 886-902.

Tecle A, Duckstein L, Korhonen P. 1994. Interactive, multiobjective programming for forest resources management. Applied Mathematics and Computing 63, 75–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(94)90151-1

Teeter L, Dyer A. 1986. A multiattribute utility model for incorporating risk in fire management planning. Forest Science 32, 1032–1048.

Thorsen BJ, Helles F, 1998. Optimal stand management with endogenous risk of sudden destruction. Forest Ecology and Management 108: 287–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00233-3

Tóth SF, McDill ME. 2009. Finding efficient harvest schedules under three conflicting objectives. Forest Science 55(2),117-131.

Tóth S, McDill M, Rebain S. 2006. Finding the Efficient Frontier of a Bi-Criteria, Spatially Explicit, Harvest Scheduling Problem. Forest Science 52(1), 93-107.

Valsta L, 1992. A scenario approach to stochastic anticipatory optimization in stand management. Forest Science 38(2): 430-447.

Valsta L, 1993. Stand management optimization based on growth simulators. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. Research Papers 453: 51-81.

Walker W, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs J, van Asselt MVA, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP, 2003 Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Journal of Integrated Assessment 4(1): 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466

Weintraub A, Vera J, 1991. A cutting plane approach for chance constrained linear-programs. Operations Research 39(5); 776–785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.39.5.776

Weintraub A, Abramovich A. 1995. Analysis of uncertainty of future timber yields in forest management. Forest Science 41, 217– 234.

Willett A, 1901. The Economic Theory of Risk and Insurance. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, USA. PMCid:PMC2400739

Williams D. 1991. Probability with Martingales. Cambridge Mathematical Textbooks, 251 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813658

Xu C, He H, Hu Y, Chang Y, Li X, Bu R. 2005. Latin hypercube sampling and geostatistical modeling of spatial uncertainty in a spatially explicit forest landscape model simulation. Ecological Modelling 185, 255-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.009

Yager, R. 2004. Uncertainty modeling and decision support. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 85, 341-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.022

Yousefpour R, Jacobsen J, Thorsen B, Meilby H, Hanewinke M, Oehler K, 2012. A review of decision-making approaches to handle uncertainty and risk in adaptive forest management under climate change. Annals of Forest Science 69 (1): 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0153-4

Zeng H, Pukkala T, Peltola H, 2007. The use of heuristic optimization in risk management of wind damage in forest planning. Forest Ecology and Management 241: 189–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.016

Zhou M, Liang J, Buongiorno J, 2008. Adaptive versus fixed policies for economic or ecological objectives in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 254: 178–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.035

Zimmermann HJ,1985. Fuzzy Set Theory—and its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 355 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7153-1

Published
2013-07-29
How to Cite
Pasalodos-Tato, M., Mäkinen, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Borges, J., Lämås, T., & Eriksson, L. (2013). Review. Assessing uncertainty and risk in forest planning and decision support systems: review of classical methods and introduction of new approaches. Forest Systems, 22(2), 282-303. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013222-03063
Section
TAXUS