Short communication: Response of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to mirror images

Wendy M. Rauw, Luis A. García-Cortés, Morris Villarroel, Luis Gomez-Raya

Abstract


The response of cultured rainbow trout to their mirrored image was investigated. Thirty fish were placed individually in two novel aquariums consecutively for 10 min each. Walls in one aquarium were covered with mirrors on all four sides, whereas the walls of the other aquarium were non-transparent black. Because all four walls were covered with mirrors, the mirrored image of the fish was reproduced multiple times such that ‘a group’ of fish was created surrounding the individual. Half of the fish started in the aquarium with the mirrors, whereas the other half started in the mirrorless aquarium. Fish swim faster in the aquarium with mirrors than in the mirrorless aquarium (2.95 vs. 2.40 cm/s; p < 0.01), indicating a positive behavioural response towards their mirrored images. Fish did not show aggressive interactions towards their mirrored images. Being confronted with ‘a group’ of fish and not just one ‘opponent’ may have inhibited aggressive behavior, or individuals may not have considered the images to be fellow individuals. Fish that swam faster in the mirrorless aquarium also did so in the aquarium with mirrors (r = 0.73; p < 0.0001), indicating a persistent behavioural coping response (boldness) in response to the two novel environments. Mirrors may be used to influence social behaviour of fish in aquaculture; further research is needed to investigate the influence of mirror placement in tanks of group housed trout on growth and behaviour.


Keywords


activity; behaviour; fish; novel environment; speed

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Adams CE, Huntingford FA, Krpal J, Jobling M, Burnett SJ, 1995. Exercise, agonistic behaviour and food acquisition in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. Environ Biol Fish 43: 213-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002494

Bagley MJ, Bentley B, Gall GAE, 1994. A genetic evaluation of the influence of stocking density on the early growth of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 121: 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)90267-4

Balzarini V, Taborsky M, Wanner S, Koch F, Frommen JG, 2014. Mirror, mirror on the wall: the predictive value of mirror tests for measuring aggression in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68 (5): 871-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1698-7

Bégout Anras ML, Lagardère JP, 2004. Measuring cultured fish swimming behavior: first results on rainbow trout using acoustic telemetry in tanks. Aquaculture 240: 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.02.019

Coppens CM, De Boer SF, Koolhaas J, 2010. Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms. Philos T R Soc B 365 (1569): 4021-4028. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0217

Desjardins JK, Fernald RD, 2010. What do fish make of mirror images? Biol Letters 6 (6): 744-747. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0247

Ellis T, North B, Scott AP, Bromage NR, Porter M, Gadd D, 2002. The relationship between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 61 (3): 493-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb00893.x

Gregory TR, Wood CM, 1999. The effects of chronic plasma cortisol elevation on the feeding behaviour, growth, competitive ability, and swimming performance of juvenile rainbow trout. Physiol Biochem Zool 72 (3): 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1086/316673

Hemmings CC, 1966. Olfaction and vision in fish schooling. J Exp Biol 45: 449-464.

Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MA, Blokhuis HJ, 1999. Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci Biobehav R 23 (7): 925-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00026-3

Laursen DC, Silva PIM, Larsen BK, Höglund E, 2015. High oxygen consumption rates and scale loss indicate elevated aggressive behaviour at low rearing density, while elevated brain serotonergic activity suggests chronic stress at high rearing densities in farmed rainbow trout. Physiol Behav 122: 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.08.026

Liao JC, 2007. A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows. Philos T R Soc B 362 (1487): 1973-1993. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2082

McCarthy ID, Carter CG, Houlihan DF, 1992. The effect of feeding hierarchy on individual variability in daily feeding of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J Fish Biol 41: 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1992.tb02655.x

North BP, Turnbull JF, Ellis T, Porter MJ, Migaud H, Bron J, Bromage NR, 2006. The impact of stocking density on the welfare of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 255: 466-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.004

Peterssona E, Järvi T, 2000. Both contest and scramble competition affect the growth performance of brown trout, Salmo trutta, Parr of wild and of sea-ranched origins. Environ Biol Fish 59 (2): 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007645411586

Pitcher T, 1979. Sensory information and the organization of behaviour in a shoaling cyprinid fish. Anim Behav 27: 126-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(79)90133-7

Ros AFH, Becker K, Oliveira RF, 2006. Aggressive behavior and energy metabolism in a cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus. Physiol Behav 89 (2): 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.043

Rowland WJ, 1999. Studying visual cues in fish behavior: a review of ethological techniques. Environ Biol Fish 56 (3): 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007517720723

Sneddon LU, 2003. The bold and the shy: individual differences in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 62 (4): 971-975. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00084.x

Toms CN, Echevarria DJ, Jouandot DJ, 2010. A methodological review of personality-related studies in fish: focus on the shy-bold axis of behavior. Int J Comp Psych 23: 1-25.

Van der Waal F, 2016. Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? W.W. Norton & Company, NY.




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2017151-10136