Genotype × environment interaction for fertility and milk yield traits in Canadian, Mexican and US Holstein cattle

Hugo H. Montaldo, Alejandra Pelcastre-Cruz, Héctor Castillo-Juárez, Felipe J. Ruiz-López, Filippo Miglior

Abstract


The objective of this study was to evaluate genotype × environment  interaction (G×E) between Canada, the United States and Mexico for fertility and milk yield traits using genetic correlations between countries estimated from genetic evaluations of sires. Genetic correlation between Mexican and Canadian Holsteins for age at first calving was ≤ 0.48 and lower than the simulated value obtained accounting for data structure and selection effects. For calving interval, genetic correlation between Mexico and Canada ranged from 0.48 to 0.69. Genetic correlation between calving interval in Mexico (multiplied by -1) and daughter pregnancy rate in the United States ranged from 0.64 to 0.73, and was lower than simulated and actual Canada-United States values. Genetic correlations between Mexico and Canada and the United States for milk yield traits were ≥ 0.83, similar to simulated genetic correlations, but lower than Canada-United States values (≥ 0.93). Heritability estimates for age at first calving, calving interval, milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, fat content, and protein content for the Mexican Holstein population were 0.06, 0.03, 0.18, 0.20, 0.19, 0.46, and 0.49, respectively. G×E interaction effects between Canada and Mexico for age at first calving were high, whereas G×E interaction effects between Canada and Mexico for calving interval and between daughter pregnancy rate in the United States and calving interval in Mexico were moderate. G×E interaction effects for milk yield traits between Canada or the United States with Mexico in registered Holsteins were low.


Keywords


genetic correlation; age at first calving; calving interval; daughter pregnancy rate; fat; protein

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Calo LL, McDowell RE, VanVleck LD, Miller PD, 1973. Genetic aspects of beef production among Holstein-Friesians pedigree selected for milk production. J Anim Sci 37: 676-682. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1973.373676x

Calus MPL, Carrick MJ, Veerkamp RF, Goddard ME, 2005. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk fat depression in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 88: 1166-1177. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72783-1

Canadian Dairy Network, 2009. Genetic evaluations. https://www.cdn.ca/home.php.

Carabaño MJ, Wade KM, Van Vleck LD, 1990. Genotype by environment interactions for milk and fat production across regions of the United States. J Dairy Sci 73: 173-180. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78661-4

Castillo-Juárez H, Oltenacu PA, Blake RW, McCulloch CE, Cienfuegos-Rivas EG, 2000. Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 83: 807-814. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74943-5

Cerón-Muñoz MF, Tonhati H, Costa CN, Maldonado-Estrada J, Rojas-Sarmiento D, 2004. Genotype x environment interaction for age at first calving in Brazilian and Colombian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 87: 2455-2458. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73369-X

Cienfuegos-Rivas EG, Blake RW, Oltenacu PA, Castillo-Juárez H, 2006. Fertility responses of Mexican Holstein cows to US sire selection. J Dairy Sci 89: 2755-2760. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72352-9

Cole JB, Null DJ, 2010. Age at first calving in Holstein cattle in the United States. J Dairy Sci 93(E Suppl 1): 594 (abstr W28).

Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R, 2009. ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, UK. 372 pp.

González-Recio O, Alenda R, Chang YM, Weigel KA, Gianola D, 2006. Selection for female fertility using censored fertility traits and investigation of the relationship with milk production. J Dairy Sci 89: 4438-4444. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72492-4

Haile-Mariam M, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME, 2003. Genetic and environmental relationship among calving interval survival persistency of milk yield and somatic cell count in dairy cattle. Livest Prod Sci 80: 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00188-4

Haile-Mariam M, Carrick MJ, Goddard ME, 2008. Genotype by environment interaction for fertility, survival and milk production traits in Australian dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 91: 4840-4853. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1084

Hammami H, Rekik B, Soyeurt H, Bastin C, Bay E, Stoll J, Gengler N, 2009. Accessing genotype by environment interaction using within- and across-country test-day random regression sire models. J Anim Breed Genet 126: 366-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00794.x

Hare E, Norman HD, Wright JR, 2006. Trends in calving ages and calving intervals for dairy cattle breeds in the United States. J Dairy Sci 89: 365-370. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72102-6

ICAR, 2013. Yearly enquiry on the situation of cow milk recording. Results of the years 2012-2013. International Committee for Animal Recording, Rome, Italy. http://www.icar.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Cow_Survey_Publication_2012-2013.pdf. [27 Jun 2014].

Interbull, 2013a. Interbull routine genetic evaluation for dairy production traits. International Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala, Sweden. http://www.interbull.org/web/static/mace_evaluations_archive/eval/prod-aug13.html

Interbull, 2013b. Description of national genetic evaluation systems for dairy cattle traits as applied in different Interbull member countries. International Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala, Sweden. http://www.interbull.org. [30 Apr 2013].

Interbull, 2013c. Interbull routine genetic evaluation for female fertility traits. International Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala, Sweden. http://www.interbull.org/web/static/mace_evaluations_archive/Female_fert/fert-apr13.html. [12 Sep 2015].

Jakobsen JH, Durr JW, Jorjani H, Forabosco F, Loberg A, Philipsson J, 2009. Genotype by environment interactions in international genetic evaluations of dairy bulls. Proc Assoc Adv Anim Breed Genetics: 133-142 (Barossa Valley, Australia).

Jamrozik J, Fatehi J, Schaeffer LR, 2005. Models for fertility traits with random herd-year effect: estimates of genetic parameters for Holsteins. Dairy Cattle Breeding and Genetics Committee Meeting, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.

Jorjani H, 2005. Preliminary report of Interbull pilot study for female fertility traits in Holstein populations. Interbull Bull 33: 34-44.

Jorjani H, 2006a. International genetic evaluation for female fertility traits. Interbull Bull 34: 57-64.

Jorjani H, 2006b. International genetic evaluation for female fertility traits. Interbull Bull 35: 42-46.

Mark T, 2004. Applied genetic evaluations for production and functional traits in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 87: 2641-2652. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73390-1

Miglior F, Sewalem A, Jamrozik J, Bohmanova J, Lefebvre DM, Moore RK, 2007. Genetic analysis of milk urea nitrogen and lactose and their relationships with other production traits in Canadian Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 90: 2468-2479. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-487

Montaldo HH, Núñez-Soto SG, Ruiz-López FJ, Castillo-Juárez H, 2009. Selection response for milk production in conventional production systems in Mexico using genetic evaluations of Holstein sires from Canada and the United States. J Dairy Sci 92: 5270-5275. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2145

Montaldo HH, Castillo-Juárez H, Valencia-Posadas M, Cienfuegos-Rivas EG, Ruiz-López FJ, 2010. Genetic and environmental parameters for milk production udder health and fertility traits in Mexican Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 93: 2168-2175. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2050

Montaldo HH, Pelcastre-Cruz A, 2012. Factors affecting genetic correlation estimates from dairy sires' genetic evaluations to assess genotype-environment interaction. Anim Sci Pap Rep 30: 309-315.

Mulder HA, Veerkamp RF, Ducro BJ, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P, 2006. Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction. J Dairy Sci 89: 1740-1752. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72242-1

Nilforooshan MA, Jakobsen JH, Fikse WF, Berglund B, Jorjani H, 2010. Application of a multiple-trait multiple-country genetic evaluation model for female fertility traits. J Dairy Sci 93: 5977-5986. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3437

Powell RL, Norman HD, Sanders AH, 2003. Progeny testing and selection intensity for Holstein bulls in different countries. J Dairy Sci 86: 3386-3393. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73942-3

Ruiz-Sánchez R, Blake RW, Castro-Gámez HMA, Sánchez F, Montaldo HH, Castillo-Juárez H, 2007. Changes in the association between milk yield and age at first calving in Holstein cows with herd environment level for milk yield. J Dairy Sci 90: 4830-4834. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0156

Stanton TL, Blake RW, Quaas RL, Van Vleck LD, Carabano MJ, 1991. Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico and Puerto Rico. J Dairy Sci 74: 1700-1714. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78333-1

USDA-ARS, 2009. Genetic evaluations. https://www.aipl.arsusda.gov/.

VanRaden PM, Sanders AH, Tooker ME, Miller RH, Norman HD, Kuhn MT, Wiggans GR, 2004. Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. J Dairy Sci 87: 2285-2292. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70049-1

Wall E, Brotherstone S, Woolliams JA, Banos G, Coffey MP, 2003. Genetic evaluation of fertility using direct and correlated traits. J Dairy Sci 86: 4093-4102. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74023-5




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2017152-10317