Association mapping for morphological traits relevant to registration of barley varieties

Seyed H. Jamali, Seyed A. Mohammadi, Behzad Sadeghzadeh

Abstract


Elucidating marker-trait associations would have fruitful implications in distinctness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) tests of new varieties required for both variety registration and granting plant breeders’ rights. As the number of new varieties with narrow genetic bases increases, the necessity for deployment of molecular markers to complement morphological DUS traits gets particular attention. We used simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and sequence related amplification polymorphisms (SRAPs) markers in association mapping of morphological traits in a collection of 143 barley landraces and advanced breeding lines. This panel represented a diverse and uniform sample in terms of both quantitative and categorical traits whilst it was structurally partitioned by number of ear rows (six- and two-rowed) and seasonal growth habit (winter and spring types) characteristics. SSRs were more powerful compared with SRAPs in separating six- and two-rowed genotypes based on both model-based Bayesian and neighbor joining clustering methods. A number of associated SSR and SRAP markers were found for 15 out of 36 DUS traits after considering Bonferroni correction through linear models (GLM and MLM) and chi-square-based tests (SA and AAT). This is also the first report of association of awn roughness and grain color with molecular markers in barley. Moreover, SSR marker BMAC0113 appeared associated with time of ear emergence (TEE), confirming previous findings. These markers could be beneficial to complement and speed up DUS testing of new varieties, as well as for improving management of barley reference collections.


Keywords


LD mapping; Hordeum vulgare L.; DUS traits; SSRs & SRAPs markers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arens P, Mansilla C, Deinum D, Cavellini L, Moretti A, Rolland S, van der Schoot H, Calvache D, Ponz F, Collonnier C, et al., 2010. Development and evaluation of robust molecular markers linked to disease resistance in tomato for distinctness, uniformity and stability testing. Theor Appl Genet 120: 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1183-2

Astle W, Balding DJ, 2009. Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Stat Sci 24: 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS307

Balding DJ, 2006. A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nat Rev Genet 7: 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1916

Bernet GP, Bramardi S, Calvache D, Carbonell EA, Asins MJ, 2003. Applicability of molecular markers in the context of protection of new varieties of cucumber. Plant Breed 122: 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00838.x

Bonow S, Von Pinho EVR, Vieira MGC, Vosman B, 2009. Microsatellite markers in and around rice genes: Applications in variety identification and DUS testing. Crop Sci 49: 880-886. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.06.0380

Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES, 2007. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23: 2633-2635. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308

Cockram J, White J, Leigh FJ, Lea VJ, Chiapparino E, Laurie DA, Mackay IJ, Powell W, O'Sullivan DM, 2008. Association mapping of partitioning loci in barley BMC Genet 9: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-9-16

Cockram J, Norris C, O'Sullivan DM, 2009. PCR-based markers diagnostic for spring and winter seasonal growth habit in barley. Crop Sci 49: 403-410. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0398

Cockram J, White J, Zuluaga DL, Smith D, Comadran J, Macaulay M, Luo Z, Kearsey MJ, Werner P, Harrap D, 2010. Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107: 21611-21616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010179107

Cockram J, Jones H, Norris C, O'Sullivan DM, 2012. Evaluation of diagnostic molecular markers for DUS phenotypic assessment in the cereal crop, barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 125: 1735-1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1950-3

Cockram J, Horsnell R, Soh EH, Norris C, O'Sullivan DM, 2015. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of the alternative seasonal growth habit and flowering time in barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.). Mol Breed 35: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0359-5

Cooke RJ, Reeves JC, 2003. Plant genetic resources and molecular markers: variety registration in a new era. Plant Genet Res 1: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1079/PGR200312

CPVO, 2012. Protocol for distinctness, uniformity and stability tests, Hordeum vulgare L. sensu lato, barley. Community Plant Variety Office CPVO-TP/019/3 Final. http://www.cpvo.europa.eu/documents/TP/agricoles/TP_019-2_HORDEUM_VULGARE.pdf

Earl DA, vonHoldt BM, 2012. Structure Harvester: A website and program for visualizing structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Cons Genet Res 4: 359-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J, 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

George AW, Cavanagh C, 2015. Genome-wide association mapping in plants. Theor Appl Genet 128: 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2497-x

Giancola S, Poltri SM, Lacaze P, Hopp HE, 2002. Feasibility of integration of molecular markers and morphological descriptors in a real case study of a plant variety protection system for soybean. Euphytica 127: 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019923923805

Gunjaca J, Buhinicek I, Jukic M, Sarcevic H, Vragolovic A, Kozic Z, Jambrovic A, Pejic I, 2008. Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data. Euphytica 161: 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z

Hamblin MT, Close TJ, Bhat PR, Chao S, Kling JG, Abraham KJ, Blake T, Brooks WS, Cooper B, Griffey CA, 2010. Population structure and linkage disequilibrium in US barley germplasm: implications for association mapping. Crop Sci 50: 556-566. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0198

Ibañez J, Velez MD, de Andres MT, Borrego J, 2009. Molecular markers for establishing distinctness in vegetatively propagated crops: A case study in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet 119: 1213-1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1122-2

ISF, 2012. ISF View on Intellectual Property. International Seed Federation. http://www.worldseed.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/View_on_Intellectual_Property_2012.pdf

Jakob SS, Rodder D, Engler JO, Shaaf S, Ozkan H, Shaaf S, Özkan H, Blattner FR, Kilian B, 2014. Evolutionary history of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum) analyzed using multilocus sequence data and paleodistribution modeling. Genome Biol Evol 6: 685-702. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu047

Jones H, Norris C, Cockram J, Lee D, 2013. Variety protection and plant breeders' Rights in the 'DNA Era'. In: Diagnostics in Plant Breeding; Lübberstedt T, Varshney RK (eds.). pp: 369-402. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5687-8_18

Karsai I, Szűcs P, Mészáros K, Filichkina T, Hayes P, Skinner J, Láng L, Bedő Z, 2005. The Vrn-H2 locus is a major determinant of flowering time in a facultative× winter growth habit barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mapping population. Theor Appl Genet 110: 1458-1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1979-7

Komatsuda T, Pourkheirandish M, He C, Azhaguvel P, Kanamori H, Perovic D, Stein N, Graner A, Wicker T, Tagiri A, 2007. Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104: 1424-1429. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608580104

Kraakman ATW, Martinez F, Mussiraliev B, Van Eeuwijk FA, Niks RE, 2006. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of morphological, resistance, and other agronomically relevant traits in modern spring barley cultivars. Mol Breed 17: 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-005-1119-8

Kwon YS, Lee JM, Yi GB, Yi SI, Kim KM, Soh EH, Bae KM, Park EK, Song IH, Kim BD, 2005. Use of SSR markers to complement tests of distinctiveness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Mol Cells 19: 428-435.

Li G, Quiros C, 2001. Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 103: 455-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100570

Lombard V, Baril CP, Dubreuil P, Blouet F, Zhang D, 2000. Genetic relationships and fingerprinting of rapeseed cultivars by AFLP: Consequences for varietal registration. Crop Sci 40: 1417-1425. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4051417x

Matthies IE, van Hintum T, Weise S, Röder MS, 2012. Population structure revealed by different marker types (SSR or DArT) has an impact on the results of genome-wide association mapping in European barley cultivars. Mol Breed 30: 951-966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9678-3

Maurer A, Draba V, Pillen K, 2016. Genomic dissection of plant development and its impact on thousand grain weight in barley through nested association mapping. J Exp Bot 67: 2507-2518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw070

Morrell PL, Clegg MT, 2007. Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley (Hordeum vulgare) east of the Fertile Crescent. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104: 3289-3294. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611377104

Nei M, 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci 70: 3321-3323. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321

Noli E, Teriaca MS, Sanguineti MC, Conti S, 2008. Utilization of SSR and AFLP markers for the assessment of distinctness in durum wheat. Mol Breed 22: 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-008-9176-4

Pasam RK, Sharma R, Malosetti M, van Eeuwijk FA, Haseneyer G, Kilian B, Graner A, 2012. Genome-wide association studies for agronomical traits in a world wide spring barley collection. BMC Plant Biol 12: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-16

Peakall R, Smouse PE, 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x

Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP, 2006. DARwin software.

">http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin

Pillen K, Zacharias A, Léon J, 2003. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in barley (Hordeumvulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 107: 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1253-9

Pillen K, Zacharias A, Léon J, 2004. Comparative AB-QTL analysis in barley using a single exotic donor of Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1591-1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1586-z

PPV & FRA, 2011. Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Authority of Government of India. http://plantauthority.gov.in/pdf/DBarleyguidelines.pdf

Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D, 2006. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genet 38: 904-909. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1847

Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocusgenotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, Sham PC, 2007. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 81: 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/519795

Ramsay L, Macaulay M, DegliIvanissevich S, MacLean K, Cardle L, Fuller J, Edwards KJ, Tuvesson S, Morgante M, Massari A, 2000. A simple sequence repeat-based linkage map of barley. Genetics 156: 1997-2005.

Rohlf FJ, 1998. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.02. Exeter Software, NY.

Rotondi A, Magli M, Ricciolini C, Baldoni L, 2003. Morphological and molecular analyses for the characterization of a group of Italian olive cultivars. Euphytica 132: 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024670321435

Saghai Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW, 1984. Ribosomal DNA Spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 81: 8014-8018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014

SAS Inst. 2002. SAS/STAT user's guide, vers. 9. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

UPOV, 1991. International convention for the protection of new varieties of plants, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Publication No. 221 (E), March 19, Geneva. http://www.upov.int/export/sites/upov/upovlex/en/conventions/1991/pdf/act1991.pdf

UPOV, 1994. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, barley (Hordeum vulgare L. sensu lato). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, TG/19/10. http://www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/en/tg019.pdf

UPOV, 2013. Guidance on the use of biochemical and molecular markers in the examination of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, TGP/15. http://www.upov.int/edocs/tgpdocs/en/tgp_15.pdf

Varshney RK, Grosse I, Hähnel U, Siefken R, Prasad M, Stein N, Langridge P, Altschmied L Graner A, 2006. Genetic mapping and BAC assignment of EST-derived SSR markers shows non-uniform distribution of genes in the barley genome. Theor Appl Genet 113: 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0289-z

Varshney RK, Marcel TC, Ramsay L, Russell J, Röder MS, Stein N, Waugh R, Langridge P, Niks RE, Graner A, 2007. A high density barley microsatellite consensus map with 775 SSR loci. Theor Appl Genet 114: 1091-1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-007-0503-7

Varshney RK, Thiel T, Sretenovic-Rajicic T, Baum M, Valkoun J, Guo P, Grando S, Ceccarelli S, Graner A, 2008. Identification and validation of a core set of informative genic SSR and SNP markers for assaying functional diversity in barley. Mol Breed 22: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-007-9151-5

von Zitzewitz J, SzűcsP, Dubcovsky J, Yan L, Francia E, Pecchioni N, Casas A, Chen THH, Hayes PM, Skinner JS, 2005. Molecular and structural characterization of barley vernalization genes. Plant Mol Biol 59: 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-0351-2

Wang M, Jiang N, Jia T, Leach L, Cockram J, Waugh R, Ramsay L, Thomas B, Luo Z, 2012. Genome-wide association mapping of agronomic and morphologic traits in highly structured populations of barley cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 124: 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1697-2

Waugh R, Jannink J-L, Muehlbauer GJ, Ramsay L, 2009. The emergence of whole genome association scans in barley. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12: 218-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.007

Waugh R, Marshall D, Thomas B, Comadran J, Russell J, Close T, Stein N, Hayes P, Muehlbauer G, Cockram J, 2010. Whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. Genome 53: 967-972. https://doi.org/10.1139/G10-078

Wenzl P, Li H, Carling J, Zhou M, Raman H, Paul E, Hearnden P, Maier C, Xia L, Caig V, 2006. A high-density consensus map of barley linking DArT markers to SSR, RFLP and STS loci and agricultural traits. BMC Genom 7: 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-206

Würschum T, Maurer HP, Schulz B, Möhring J, Reif JC, 2011. Genome-wide association mapping reveals epistasis and genetic interaction networks in sugar beet. Theor Appl Genet 123: 1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1653-1

Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB, et al., 2006. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature Genet 38: 203-208. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1702




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2017154-10494