Analysis of Spain´s competitiveness in the European tomato market: An application of the Constant Market Share method

Mercedes Capobianco-Uriarte, Juan Aparicio, Jaime De Pablo-Valenciano

Abstract


This paper presents a quantitative analysis of the competitiveness of Spanish tomato export compared with its major competitors in the European Union market countries (EU28). The methodological framework is implemented through Constant Market Share to analyze variations in exports, allowing the portion attributable to competitiveness and segregation into general or specific competitiveness to be quantified. This analysis was carried out with the 2005-2009 and 2010-2014 periods to see if there had been a recovery from the global financial and economic crisis of 2007 in the Spanish tomato trade. Before the global economic and financial crisis, Spain had a positive structural effect of exports which contributed significantly to the growth of tomato sales to the EU, but had a negative change in the volume of exports to the EU28, mainly due to the negative effect of the competitiveness component. According to the segregation effect of competitiveness, a marked general negative competitive effect was evident, that cannot be offset by the positive effect of specific competitiveness. Since 2010, Spain has experienced a positive change in the volume of its tomato exports to the EU28, the competitiveness component also being positive, due to positive investment of the component of general competitiveness and whose greatest contribution was the positive effect of specific competitiveness. Within the group of competitors, Spain is the only country supplying tomatoes to the EU28 that has experienced a positive change in volume when comparing business performance of 2010-2014 vs 2005-2009.

Keywords


constant market share; tomato-exporting countries; European market; Netherlands; Morocco; France; Spain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi-Esfahani FZ, 1995. Wheat market shares in the presence of Japanese import quotas. J Pol Model 17 (3): 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0161-8938(94)00036-F

Avendaño Ruiz BD, Acosta Martínez AI, 2009. Midiendo los resultados del comercio agropecuario mexicano en el contexto del TLCAN. Estud Soc [Hermosillo, Mexico] 17 (33): 41-81.

Ávila-Arce A, González-Milán DDJ, 2012. Competitiveness of Mexican strawberries (Fragaria spp.) in the national, regional and U.S.A. market. Agr Soc Desar 9 (1): 17-27.

Balassa B, 1965. Trade liberalisation and "revealed" comparative advantage. The Manch Sch 33 (2): 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x

Charles V, Zegarra LF, 2014. Measuring regional competitiveness through Data Envelopment Analysis: A Peruvian case. Expert Syst Appl 41 (11): 5371-5381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.003

Chavarría H, Rojas P, Sepúlveda S, 2002. Competitividad cadenas agroalimentarias y territorios rurales: elementos conceptuales. IICA, San José, Costa Rica.

COMTRADE, 2016. United Nations Database. International Trade Statistics (Import/Export Data). http://comtrade.un.org/data/. [31/7/2016].

Contreras-Castillo JM, 1999. La competitividad de las exportaciones mexicanas de aguacate: un análisis cuantitativo. Rev Chapingo Serie Horticultura 5: 393-400.

De Pablo J, Perez Mesa JC, 2004. The competitiveness of Spanish tomato export in the European Union. Span J Agric Res 2 (2): 167-180. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2004022-71

De Pablo J, Giacinti MA, 2009. Nuevos parámetros del comercio internacional del tomate: repercusión para Almería (España). Analistas Económicos de Andalucía, Málaga.

De Pablo J, Román Sánchez I, Uribe Toril J, 2012. España: competitividad revelada en el caso del tomate. Comercio Exterior (Ed. Español) 62: 50-59.

EC, 2012. Monitoring Agri-trade Policy: The EU and major world players in Fruit and Vegetable Trade. Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis Unit. July 2012. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/trade-analysis/map_en [05/06/2017].

González GH, Valls LB, Picardi MS, 2014. Desempeño competitivo argentino reciente en el mercado internacional del aceite de oliva. Revista de Economía Agrícola [Sao Paulo] 60 (1): 41-53.

González R, Maesso M, 2006. Las relaciones exteriores de la Unión Europea. In: Política socioeconómica en la Unión Europea. Ed. Delta, Publicaciones universitarias (Madrid), pp: 371-424.

Gracia AB, 2000. El análisis de cuotas de mercado constantes en la literatura económica internacional. Análisis e Investigaciones Sociales 10: 197-215.

Jepma CJ, 1989. Extensions of the constant-market-shares analysis with an application to long-term export data of developing countries. The balance between industry and agriculture in economic development. Int Econ Assoc Ser, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp: 129-143.

Macías Macías A, 2010. Competitividad de México en el mercado de frutas y hortalizas de Estados Unidos de América, 1989-2009. Agroalimentaria 16 (31): 31-48.

Richardson JD, 1971. Constant market shares analysis of export growth. J Int Econ 1: 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(71)90058-4

Santeliz A, Contreras J, 2016. Evolución del comercio exterior de Venezuela: 1995-2009. Banco Central de Venezuela: Colección Economía y Finanzas. Serie Documentos de Trabajo 1: 153.

Sterimberg EG, 2004. Diseño de un sistema de indicadores socio ambientales para el Distrito Capital de Bogotá. CEPAL - Serie estudios y perspectivas (Vol. 3). UN Publications.

Tyszynski H, 1951. World trade in manufactured commodities, 1899–1950. The Manchester School of Economics and Socials Studies 19 (3): 272-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1951.tb00012.x

Trichet JC, 2006. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Monetary Dialogue with Jean-Claude Trichet of the European Central Bank (pursuant to Article 113(3) of the EC Treaty). Bruseels, 10 Oct.

World Bank, 2014. Export competitiveness: indicators and methodologies. Decomposition of export share growth. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/TRADE/EXTEXPCOMNET/0,,contentMDK:21781889~menuPK:4228621~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:2463594,00.html. [14/06/2016].

WSRW, 2016. Agricultores: productos saharauis no entran en el acuerdo. Western Sahara Resource Watch. http://wsrw.org/a110x3378[03/02/2016].




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2017153-10629