An automatic and non-intrusive hybrid computer vision system for the estimation of peel thickness in Thomson orange

Hossein Javadikia, Sajad Sabzi, Juan I. Arribas

Abstract


Orange peel has important flavor and nutrition properties and is often used for making jam and oil in the food industry. For previous reasons, oranges with high peel thickness are valuable. In order to properly estimate peel thickness in Thomson orange fruit, based on a number of relevant image features (area, eccentricity, perimeter, length/area, blue component, green component, red component, width, contrast, texture, width/area, width/length, roughness, and length) a novel automatic and non-intrusive approach based on computer vision with a hybrid particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA) and artificial neural network (ANN) system is proposed. Three features (width/area, width/length and length/area ratios) were selected as inputs to the system. A total of 100 oranges were used, performing cross validation with 100 repeated experiments with uniform random samples test sets. Taguchi’s robust optimization technique was applied to determine the optimal set of parameters. Prediction results for orange peel thickness (mm) based on the levels that were achieved by Taguchi’s method were evaluated in several ways, including orange peel thickness true-estimated boxplots for the 100 orange database and various error parameters: the sum square error (SSE), the mean absolute error (MAE), the coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error (RMSE), and the mean square error (MSE), resulting in mean error parameter values of R2=0.854±0.052, MSE=0.038±0.010, and MAE=0.159±0.023, over the test set, which to our best knowledge are remarkable numbers for an automatic and non-intrusive approach with potential application to real-time orange peel thickness estimation in the food industry.


Keywords


machine learning; neural network; particle swarm optimization; stochastic analysis; peel thickness, skin

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Adelkhani A, Beheshti B, Minaei S, Javadikia P, Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M, 2013. Taste characterization of orange using image processing combined with ANFIS. Measurement 46: 3573-3580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.052

Blasco J, Aleixos N, Molto E, 2003. Machine vision system for automatic quality grading of fruit. Biosyst Eng 85 (4): 415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00088-6

Fan FH, Ma Q, Ge J, Peng QY, Riley WW, Tang SZ, 2013. Prediction of texture characteristics from extrusion food surface images using a computer vision system and artificial neural networks. J Food Eng 118: 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.04.015

Fu L, Sun S, Li R, Wang S, 2016. Classification of kiwifruit grades based on fruit shape using a single camera. Sensors 16: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16071012

Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL, 2004. Digital image processing using MATLAB. Prentice Hall.

Homutova I, Blazek J, 2006. Differences in fruit skin thickness between selected apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars assessed by histological and sensory methods. Hort Sci (Prague) 33 (3): 108-113. https://doi.org/10.17221/3747-HORTSCI

Jafari A. Fazayeli A, Zarezadeh MR, 2014. Estimation of orange skin thickness based on visual texture coarseness. Biosys Eng 117: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.08.010

Karimi N, Zandieh M, Najafi AA, 2011. Group scheduling in flexible flow shops: a hybridised approach of imperialist competitive algorithm and electromagnetic-like mechanism. Int J Prod Res 49 (16): 4965-4977. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.481644

Karimi H, Navid H, Mahmoudi A, 2015. Online laboratory evaluation of seeding-machine application by an acoustic technique. Span J Agric Res 13 (1): e0202. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015131-6050

Leiva-Valenzuela GA, Lu R, Aguilera JM, 2013. Prediction of firmness and soluble solids content of blueberries using hyperspectral reflectance imaging. J Food Eng 115: 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.10.001

Liu S, Xu L, Li D, Li Q, Jiang Y, Tai H, Zeng L, 2013. Prediction of dissolved oxygen content in river crab culture based on least squares support vector regression optimized by improved particle swarm optimization. Comput Electron Agr 95: 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.03.009

Marchal PC, Gila DM, García JG, Ortega JG, 2013. Expert system based on computer vision to estimate the content of impurities in olive oil samples. J Food Eng 119: 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.05.032

Mellit A, Kalogirou SA, 2014. MPPT-based artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic systems and its implementation into field programmable gate array chips: Review of current status and future perspectives. Energy 70: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.102

Mitchell M, 1999. An introduction to genetic algorithms. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/introduction-genetic-algorithms

Modenes AN, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Trigueros DEG, Pietrobelli JM, Lavarda FL, Ravagnani MA, Bergamasco R, 2012. Binary adsorption of a Zn(II)-Cu(II) mixture onto Egeria densa and Eichhornia crassipes: Kinetic and equilibrium data modeling by PSO. Sep Sci Technol 47: 875-885. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2011.627407

Mohapatra A, Shanmugasundaram S, Malmathanraj R, 2017. Grading of ripening stages of red banana using dielectric properties changes and image processing approach. Comput Electron Agr 143: 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.010

Morgan KT, Rouse RE, Roka FM, Futch SH, Zerri M, 2005. Leaf and fruit mineral content and peel thickness of 'Hamlin' orange. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 118: 19-21.

Mottaghitalab M, Nikkhah M, Darmani-Kuhi H, López S, France J, 2015. Predicting methionine and lysine contents in soybean meal and fish meal using a group method of data handling-type neural network. Span J Agric Res 13 (1): e0601. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015131-5877

Naganur HG, Sannakki SS, Rajpurohit VS, Arunkumar R, 2012. Fruits sorting and grading using fuzzy logic. Int J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol 1 (6): 117-122.

Phadke MS, 1989. Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

Rio-Segade S, Giacosa S, Gerbi V, Rolle L, 2011. Berry skin thickness as main texture parameter to predict anthcyanin extractability in winegrapes. Food Sci Technol 44: 192-398.

Rungpichayapichet P, Nagle M, Yuwanbun P, Khuwijitjaru P, Mahayothee B, Muller J, 2017. Prediction mapping of physicochemical properties in mango by hyperspectral imaging. Biosyst Eng 159: 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.04.006

Sabzi S, Javadikia P, Rabani H, Adelkhani A, 2013. Mass modeling of Bam orange with ANFIS and SPSS methods for using in machine vision. Measurement 46: 3333-3341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.005

Shin JS, Lee WS, Ehsani R, 2012. Postharvest citrus mass and size estimation using a logistic classification model and a watershed algorithm. Biosyst Eng 113: 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.06.005

Shokrollahpour E, Zandieh M, Dorri B, 2011. A novel imperialist competitive algorithm for bi-criteria scheduling of the assembly flowshop problem. Int J Prod Res 49: 3087-3103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903536155

Thendral R, Suhasini A, 2017. Automated skin defect identification system for orange fruit grading based on genetic algorithm. Current Sci 112 (8): 1704-1711. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i08/1704-1711

Tong JH, Li JB, Jiang HY, 2013. Machine vision techniques for the evaluation of seedling quality based on leaf area. Biosyst Eng 115: 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.02.006

Wen Sun D, 2006. Thermal food processing. Taylor & Francis, NY.

Williams VL, Witkowski ETF, Balkwill K, 2007. Relationhip between bark thickness and diameter at breast height of six tree species used medicinally in South Africa. S Afr J Bot 73: 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2007.04.001

Yuan J, He C, Gao W, Lin J, Pang Y, 2014. A novel hard decision decoding scheme based on genetic algorithm and neural network. Optik 125 (14): 3457-3461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.035




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2018164-11185