Foraging behaviour and performance of steers from two local breeds (Asturian Valley and Asturian Mountain) grazing in Cantabrian (N Spain) summer pastures
Abstract
Steer meat production in northern Spain is deficient to attend market demand. This research aimed to compare the foraging behaviour and production of yearling steers from two local breeds differing in body weight (BW), Asturian Valley (AV, 372 kg) and Asturian Mountain (AM, 307 kg), grazing in summer pastures consisting of 70% grassland and 30% heathland. Bodyweight gains from a total of 42 steers were recorded during four grazing seasons (from June to October). In two years, in July and September, plant community selection and diet composition were estimated by direct observation and using faecal markers, respectively. Grazing time increased from July to September (488 vs. 557 min/day; p<0.001) as sward height in the grassland decreased. Although AV steers grazed proportionally for longer on herbaceous pastures than AM steers (81.3 vs. 73.3%; p<0.05), no differences between breeds were found in diet composition. AM steers showed greater mean daily BW gains than AV steers (252 vs. 133 g/day; p<0.01). From June to August, steers from both breeds gained BW (487 vs. 360 g/day for AM and AV, respectively; p<0.01), but thereafter BW gains decreased (120 vs. –12 g/day for AM and AV, respectively; p<0.05), because of reduced availability of grassland herbage. Yearling steers from AM breed seem to be better suited to mountain conditions than those from AV breed, probably because of their smaller body size and lower total nutrient requirements for maintenance.Downloads
References
Aldezabal A, Garin I, García-González R, 1999. Activity rhythms and the influence of some environmental variables on summer ungulate behaviour in Ordesa-Monte Perdido National Park. Pirineos 153-154: 145-157. https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.1999.v153-154.110
AOAC, 2006. Official methods of analysis, 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Bailey DW, Dumont B, WallisDeVries MF, 1998. Utilization of heterogeneous grasslands by domestic herbivores: Theory to management. Ann Zootech 47: 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19980501
Barthram GT, 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO swardstick. In: The Hill Farming Research Organisation biennial report 1984-85. pp: 29-30. HFRO, Penicuik, UK.
Cañón J, Gutiérrez JP, Dunner S, Goyache F, Vallejo M, 1994. Herdbook analyses of the Asturiana beef cattle breeds. Genet Sel Evol 26: 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-26-1-65
Casasús I, Sanz A, Villalba D, Ferrer R, Revilla R, 2002. Factors affecting animal performance during the grazing season in a mountain cattle production system. J Anim Sci 80: 1638-1651. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.8061638x
Celaya R, Benavides R, García U, Ferreira LMM, Ferre I, Martínez A, Ortega-Mora LM, Osoro K, 2008. Grazing behaviour and performance of lactating suckler cows, ewes and goats on partially improved heathlands. Animal 12: 1818-1831. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108003224
Dove H, Mayes RW, 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as markers substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Aust J Agric Res 42: 913-957. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9910913
Dove H, Moore AD, 1995. Using a least-squares optimization procedure to estimate botanical composition based on the alkanes of plant cuticular wax. Aust J Agric Res 46: 1535-1544. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9951535
Dove H, Mayes RW, 2006. Protocol for the analysis of n-alkanes and other plant-wax compounds and for their use as markers for quantifying the nutrient supply of large mammalian herbivores. Nat Protoc 1: 1680-1697. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.225
Dumont B, Rook AJ, Coran C, Röver K, 2007. Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 2. Diet selection. Grass Forage Sci 62: 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00572.x
EC, 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1200/2009 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods, as regards livestock unit coefficients and definitions of the characteristics. 30 November 2009. Official Journal L 329: 15.12.2009, 1-28.
EC, 2010. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. 22 September 2010. Official Journal L 276: 20.10.2010, 33-79.
Erlinger LL, Tolleson DR, Brown CJ, 1990. Comparison of bite size, biting rate and grazing time of beef heifers from herds distinguished by mature size and rate of maturity. J Anim Sci 68: 3578-3587. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68113578x
Ferreira LMM, Garcia U, Rodrigues MAM, Celaya R, Dias-da-Silva A, Osoro K, 2007. The application of the n-alkane technique for estimating the composition of diets consumed by equines and cattle feeding on upland vegetation communities. Anim Feed Sci Technol 138: 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.007
Ferreira LMM, Celaya R, Benavides R, Jáuregui BM, García U, Santos AS, Rosa-García R, Rodrigues MAM, Osoro K, 2013. Foraging behaviour of domestic herbivore species grazing on heathlands associated with improved pasture areas. Livest Sci 155: 373-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.05.007
Ferrer Cazcarra R, Petit M, D'Hour P, 1995. The effect of sward height on grazing behaviour and herbage intake of three sizes of Charolais cattle grazing cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) swards. Anim Sci 61: 511-518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800014089
Fraser MD, Davies DA, Vale JE, Nute GR, Hallett KG, Richardson RI, Wright IA, 2009a. Performance and meat quality of native and continental cross steers grazing improved upland pasture or semi-natural rough grazing. Livest Sci 123: 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.10.008
Fraser MD, Theobald VJ, Griffiths JB, Morris SM, Moorby JM, 2009b. Comparative diet selection by cattle and sheep grazing two contrasting heathland communities. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129: 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.013
Funston RN, Kress DD, Havstad KM, Doornbos DE, 1991. Grazing behavior of rangeland beef cattle differing in biological type. J Anim Sci 69: 1435-1442. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6941435x
Gary LA, Sherritt GW, Hale EB, 1970. Behavior of Charolais cattle on pasture. J Anim Sci 30: 203-206. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.302203x
González Díaz JA, Celaya R, Fernández García F, Osoro K, Rosa García R, 2019. Dynamics of rural landscapes in marginal areas of northern Spain: Past, present, and future. Land Degrad Dev 30: 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3201
Gordon IJ, 1989. Vegetation community selection by ungulates on the isle of Rhum. II. Vegetation community selection. J Appl Ecol 26: 53-64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403650
Grant SA, 1981. Sward components. In: Sward measurement handbook; Hodgson J, Baker RD, Davies A, Laidlaw AS, Leaver JD (eds). pp: 71-92. Br Grassl Soc, Hurley, UK.
Grant SA, Torvell L, Smith HK, Suckling DE, Forbes TDA, Hodgson J, 1987. Comparative studies of diet selection by sheep and cattle: blanket bog ant heather moor. J Ecol 75: 947-960. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260306
Hessle A, Rutter M, Wallin K, 2008. Effect of breed, season and pasture moisture gradient on foraging behaviour in cattle on semi-natural grasslands. Appl Anim Behav Sci 111: 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.05.017
Hodgson J (ed), 1990. Grazing management: science into practice. John Wiley Longman, NY.
Illius AW, Gordon IJ, 1987. The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. J Anim Ecol 56: 989-999. https://doi.org/10.2307/4961
Liechti K, Biber JP, 2016. Pastoralism in Europe: characteristics and challenges of highland–lowland transhumance. Rev Sci Tech Int Off Epiz 35: 561-575. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.35.2.2541
Linnane MI, Brereton AJ, Giller PS, 2001. Seasonal changes in circadian grazing patterns of Kerry cows (Bos Taurus) in semi-feral conditions in Killarney National Park, Co. Kerry, Ireland. Appl Anim Behav Sci 71: 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00188-X
Mandaluniz N, Aldezabal A, Oregui LM, 2011. Diet selection of beef cattle on Atlantic grassland-heathland mosaic: Are heathers more preferred than expected? Livest Sci 138: 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.002
Mertens DR, 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85: 1217-1240.
Morris CA, Wilton W, 1976. Influence of body size on the biological efficiency of cows: A review. Can J Anim Sci 56: 613-647. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas76-076
Morris ST, Hirschberg SW, Michel A, Parker WJ, McCutcheon SN, 1993. Herbage intake and liveweight gain of bulls and steers continuously stocked at fixed sward heights during autumn and spring. Grass Forage Sci 48: 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01843.x
Osoro K, Fernández-Prieto E, Celaya R, Noval G, Alonso L, Castro P, 1999. Respuesta productiva de dos razas de ganado vacuno manejadas en dos cubiertas vegetales de montaña. ITEA-Inf Tecn Econ Agr 95A: 188-203.
Osoro K, Celaya R, Martínez A, Zorita E, 2000. Pastoreo de las comunidades vegetales de montaña por rumiantes domésticos: producción animal y dinámica vegetal. Pastos 30: 3-50.
Putman RJ, Pratt RM, Ekins JR, Edwards PJ, 1987. Food and feeding behaviour of cattle and ponies in the New Forest, Hampshire. J Appl Ecol 24: 369-380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403881
Realini CE, Hodgson J, Morris ST, Purchas RW, 1999. Effect of sward surface height on herbage intake and performance of finishing beef cattle. N Z J Agric Res 42: 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1999.9513365
Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ, 1981. The detergent system of analysis. In: The analysis of dietary fibre in food; James WPT, Theander O (eds). pp: 123-158. Marcel Dekker, NY.
Rodríguez-Ortega T, Oteros-Rozas E, Ripoll-Bosch R, Tichit M, Martín-López B, Bernués A, 2014. Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe. Animal 8: 1361-1372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000421
Román-Trufero A, Celaya R, Martínez A, García-Prieto V, Osoro K, 2015. Rendimientos productivos de terneros cebones de razas asturianas bajo dos estrategias de manejo. XVI Jornadas sobre Producción Animal, Zaragoza (Spain), May 19-20. pp: 33-35.
Rook AJ, Dumont B, Isselstein J, Osoro K, WallisDeVries MF, Parente G, Mills J, 2004. Matching type of livestock to desired biodiversity outcomes in pastures – a review. Biol Conserv 119: 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.010
Sæther NH, Sickel H, Norderhaug A, Sickel M, Vangen O, 2006. Plant and vegetation preferences for a high and moderate yielding Norwegian dairy cattle breed grazing semi-natural mountain pastures. Anim Res 55: 367-387. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2006033
Vieira C, Cerdeño A, Serrano E, Lavín P, Mantecón AR, 2007. Breed and ageing extent on carcass and meat quality of beef from adult steers (oxen). Livest Sci 107: 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.09.004
Winder JA, Walker DA, Bailey CC, 1996. Effect of breed on botanical composition of cattle diets on Chihuahuan desert. J Range Manage 49: 209-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/4002880
Wright IA, Whyte TK, 1989. Effects of sward surface height on the performance of continuously stocked spring-calving beef cows and their calves. Grass Forage Sci 44: 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb02163.x
Wright IA, Jones JR, Maxwell TJ, Russel AJF, Hunter EA, 1994. The effect of genotype × environment interactions on biological efficiency in beef cows. Anim Prod 58: 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800042508
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
