Regulatory patterns in international pork trade and similarity with the EU SPS/TBT standards

  • Jurgen Peci Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agraolimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Avda Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza
  • Ana I. Sanjuán Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agraolimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Avda Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), CITA-Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-7528
Keywords: trade policy, NTMs, policy harmonization, trade agreements

Abstract

Aim of study: With the increasing protagonism of non-tariff measures (NTMs) in trade policy, better indexes are needed to depict the prevalence and similarity of NTMs across countries for further use in trade impact assessments.

Area of study: Worldwide, with special focus on the European Union (EU)

Material and methods: Using the TRAINS database on NTMs, we calculated and proposed some indicators, stressing both regulatory intensity and diversity, as well as similarity of regulatory patterns between trade partners. Our application focuses on pork trade and main importers, amongst which, the EU is singled out.

Main results: We found a high level of heterogeneity in NTMs’ application, both, in the number and variety of measures. The bilateral similarity was relatively low, such as only 30% of sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) and 20% of technical barriers to trade were shared, providing ground and incentive for discussing trade policy harmonization. Our analysis suggests that SPS regulations prevail in those sectors and countries more engaged in trade, while a negative correlation with tariffs raises protectionism concerns. Our bilateral indicators rank country pairs according to the similarity of their regulatory patterns. The EU, for instance, is closer in SPS regulations to China or USA than to Canada or New Zealand, which will require actions in the context of the bilateral trade agreements in course.

Research highlights: The low similarity of regulatory patterns evidence the challenges faced by policy makers to streamline technical regulations. For an accurate representation of regulatory patterns and their impact on trade, both uni- and bilateral indicators need to be considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarestrup FM, Wegener HC, Collignon P, 2008. Resistance in bacteria of the food chain: epidemiology and control strategies. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Therap 6 (5): 733-750. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.6.5.733

Aisbett E, Pearson L, 2012. Environmental and health protections, or new protectionism? Determinants of SPS Notifications by WTO Members. Australian National University. Canberra, Australia. Crawford School Research Working Papers, No. 1213 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2196193

Arita S, Beckman J, Mitchell L, 2017. Reducing transatlantic barriers on U.S.-EU agri-food trade: What are the possible gains? Food Policy 68: 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.006

Beghin J C, Xiong B 2016. Economic Effects of Standard-Like Nontariff Measures: Analytical and Methodological Dimensions. Center for Agricultural and Rural Deelopment, Iowa State University. CARD Working Paper No. 595.

Boqvist S, Dekker A, Depner K, Grace D, Hueston W, Stärk KDC, Sternberg Lewerin S,2014. Contagious animal diseases: The science behind trade policies and standards. The Veterinary Journal 202(1): 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.06.020

Cadot O, Asprilla A, Gourdon J, Knebel C, Peters R, 2015. Deep Regional Integration and Non-Tariff Measures: A Methodology for Data Analysis. UNCTAD. Geneva, Switzerland. UNCTAD/ITCD/TAB/71.

Cadot O, Gourdon J, 2016. Non-tariff measures, preferential trade agreements, and prices: new evidence. Rev World Econ 152(2): 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-015-0242-9

Cadot O, Gourdon J, van Tongeren F, 2018. Estimating Ad Valorem Equivalents of Non-Tariff Measures: Combining Price-Based and Quantity-Based Approaches. OECD Publishing. Paris, Fance. OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 215

De Frahan BH, Vancauteren M, 2006. Harmonisation of food regulations and trade in the Single Market: evidence from disaggregated data. Eur Rev Agric Econ 33(3): 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurrag/jbl015

DEFRA, 2018. African swine fever in pigs in Central and Eastern Europe. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/african-swine-fever-in-pigs-in-poland-lithuania-and-latvia [13 September 2018]

EC, 2018a. CETA chapter by chapter. European Commission, DG Trade. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/ceta-chapter-by-chapter/index_en.htm [5 October 2018]

EC, 2018b. New Zealand. European Commission, DG Trade. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/new-zealand/ [5 October 2018]

Ederington J, Ruta M, 2016. Non-Tariff Measures and the World Trading System. World Bank Group. Washingnton D.C., USA. Policy Research Working paper WPS 7661. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7661

FAO, 2018. FAO's Animal Production and Health Division: Pigs and Animal Production. FAO. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/Ag/againfo/themes/en/pigs/production.html [22 January 2018].

Ferro E, Otsuki T, Wilson JS, 2015. The effect of product standards on agricultural exports. Food Policy 50: 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.10.016

Gourdon J, 2014. CEPII NTM-MAP: A Tool for Assessing the Economic Impact of Non-Tariff Measures Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales. Paris, France. Working paper 2014/24.

Harrus S, Baneth G, 2005. Drivers for the emergence and re-emergence of vector-borne protozoal and bacterial diseases. Int J Parasitol 35(11-12): 1309-1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.06.005

Junker F, Komorowska J, van Tongeren F, 2009. Impact of Animal Disease Outbreaks and Alternative Control Practices on Agricultural Markets and Trade: The case of FMD. OECD Publishing. Paris, France. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers No. 19.

Kee HL, Nicita A, Olarreaga M, 2009. Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices. Econ J 119 (534): 172-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02209.x

Knight-Jones TJD, Rushton J, 2013. The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease - what are they, how big are they and where do they occur? Prev Vet Med 112(3-4): 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.07.013

Li Y, Beghin JC, 2014. Protectionism indices for non-tariff measures: An application to maximum residue levels. Food Policy 45: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.005

Melo(de) J, Nicita A, 2018. Non-Tariff Measures: Data and Quantitative Tools of Analysis. Fondation pour les études et recherches sur le développement international (FERDI). Clermont-Ferrand, France. Working paper P218.

Niu Z, Liu C, Gunessee S, Milner C, 2018. Non-tariff and overall protection: evidence across countries and over time. Rev World Econ 154(4): 675-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-018-0317-5

OECD-FAO, 2016. Agricultural Outlook 2016‑2025. OECD Publishing. Paris, France.

Perrings C, 2016. Options for managing the infectious animal and plant disease risks of international trade. Food Secur 8(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0523-0

Piermartini R, Budetta M, 2009. A mapping of regional rules on technical barriers to trade. In: Regional Rules in the Global Trading System; Estevadeordal A, Suominen K, Tech R (eds.). pp: 250-315. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814334.006

Sofos JN, 2008. Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century. Meat Sci 78(1-2): 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.027

Swinnen J, 2017. Some Dynamic Aspects of Food Standards. Am J Agr Econ 99(2): 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax022

Trefler D, 1993. Trade liberalization and the theory of endogenous protection: an econometric study of US import policy. J Political Econ 101(1): 138-160. https://doi.org/10.1086/261869

UN Comtrade, 2018. UN Comtrade - International Trade Statistics Database. United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland. https://comtrade.un.org/ [13 August 2018]

UNCTAD, 2010. Non-Tariff Measures: Evidence from Selected Developing Countries and Future Research Agenda. United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland. UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/2009/3.

UNCTAD, 2017a. TRAINS NTMs: the Global Database on Non-Tariff Measures. United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland. https://trains.unctad.org/Forms/Analysis.aspx [18 September 2018]

UNCTAD, 2017b. Non-Tariff Measures in Mercosur: Deepening Regional Integration and Looking Beyond. United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland. UNCTAD/ DITC/TAB/2016/1.

UNCTAD, 2018. Non-Tariff Measures: Economic Assessment and Policy Options for Development. United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland. UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/2017/2.

UNCTAD, 2019. International Classification of Non-Tariff Measures. 2019 Version. United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland. UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/2019/5.

Winchester N, Rau ML, Goetz C, Larue B, Otsuki T, Shutes K, Wieck C, Burnquist HL, Pinto de Souza MJ, de Faria RN, 2012. The Impact of Regulatory Heterogeneity on Agri-food Trade. World Econ 35(8): 973-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01457.x

WTO, 2018a. Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). World Trade Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.wto.org [12 March 2018].

WTO, 2018b. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). World Trade Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.wto.org [11 March 2018].

WTO, 2018c. Trade Monitoring Database. World Trade Organization. Geneva, Switzerland. http://tmdb.wto.org/SearchMeasures.aspx?lang=en-US [25 March 2018].

Published
2020-04-22
How to Cite
Peci, J., & Sanjuán, A. I. (2020). Regulatory patterns in international pork trade and similarity with the EU SPS/TBT standards. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 18(1), e0102. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020181-15005
Section
Agricultural economics