Multi criteria analysis of the energy potential of agricultural residues: The case study of Međimurje County in Croatia

Sandra Golubić, Neven Voća, Stjepan Pliestić

Abstract


Aim of study: The utilization of agricultural residues may become one of the major sources for production of energy from biomass. The objective of this paper was to analyse the type and quantity of agricultural residues and to determine their energy potential.

Area of study: The Međimurje County (north Croatia).

Material and methods: The paper analyses three models of sustainable agricultural residues management applying the multi-criteria analysis. The assessment included potentially available quantities of residues in crops, fruit, viniculture and livestock production. For determining the most appropriate model of residues utilisation the multi-criteria analysis was applied.

Main results: The results show that total quantities of agricultural biomass amount to 323,912 t with energy potential of 1,092 TJ annually. The largest sustainably available potential of agricultural biomass consists of biomass from arable crops production, with total quantity of 33,670 t followed by 281,233 t of manure from livestock production. The lowest share of potential biomass are pruning residues in fruit and grapevine production with total available residual quantity of 8,109 t. Also, it results from the multi-criteria analysis that a central large scale plant for biogas production is the most feasible facility for such production.

Research highlights: The results of this paper provide ground for further development of the models for assessing the sustainability of using agricultural residues, and they can also serve as a basis for assessments of bioenergy projects in specific regions of the European Union.



Keywords


renewables; biomass; sustainability; energy utilization; county level; European Union

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Asakereh A, Omid M, Alimardani R, Sarmadian F, 2014. Spatial analysis the potential for energy generation from crop residues in Shodirwan, Iran. Sci Technol 7 (1): 275-284. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2014.7.1.25

Bilandzija N, Voca N, Kricka T, Matin A, Jurisic V, 2012. Energy potential of fruit tree pruned biomass in Croatia. Span J Agric Res 10 (2): 292-298. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012102-126-11

Bilandzija N, Voca N, Jelcic B, Jurisic V, Matin A, Grubor M, Kricka T, 2018. Evaluation of Croatian agricultural solid biomass energy potential. Renew Sust Energ Rev 93: 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.040

Brkic M, Janic T, 2011. Potential biomass for energy generation in Serbia. Cont Agr Eng 37 (3): 225-333.

Cantrell BK, Ducey T, Ro SK, Hunt GP, 2008. Livestock waste-to-bioenergy generation opportunities. Bioresour Technol 99: 7941-7953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.061

Celma AR, Rojas S, López-Rodríguez F, 2007. Waste-to-energy possibilities for industrial olive and grape by-products in Extremadura. Biomass Bioenerg 31: 522-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.08.007

Cigolotti, V 2012. Biomass and waste as sustainable resources, fuel cells in the waste-to-energy chain. Green Energy and Technology, Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2369-9_2

Croatian Bureau of Statistics. 2015. Statistical yearbook, Zagreb https://www.dzs.hr/Hrv/Publication/stat_year.htm

Daioglou V, Stehfest E, Wicke B, Faaij A, Van Vuuren DP, 2016. Projection of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry. GCB Bioenerg 8: 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12285

Dell'Antonia D, 2014. Preliminary study of biogas production from agricultural waste in Friuli Venezia Giulia (Nord-East of Italy). Environ Sci 2 (1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12988/es.2014.411

EC, 2010. Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020 final, European Commission, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF

Faaij APC, 2006. Bio-energy in Europe changing technology choices. Energy Policy 34: 322-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.03.026

Faaij A, Schlamadinger B, Solantausta Y, Wagener M 2002. Large scale international bio-energy trade. 12th Eur Conf on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp: 17-21.

Fernandes U, Costa M, 2010. Potential of biomass residues for energy production and utilization in a region of Portugal. Biomass Bioenerg 34: 661-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.009

Hillring B, 2002. Rural development and bioenergy - experiences from 20 years of development in Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg 23 (6): 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00084-3

Kaltschmitt M, 2011. Biomass for energy in Germany status, perspectives and lessons learned. Sustain Energ Environ, Special Issue, 1-10.

Kaur P, 2015. Assessment of crop residue potential for power generation using geographical information system - A review. Int J Eng App Sci Tech 1 (3): 12-15.

Kricka T, Bilandzija N, Jurisic V, Voca N, Matin A, 2012. Energy analysis of main residual biomass in Croatia. Afr J Agr Res 7 (48): 6383-6388. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.2477

Lam PS, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Lim CJ, Naimi LJ, Hoque M, Mani S, Womac AR, Ye XP, Narayan S, 2008. Bulk density of wet and dry wheat straw and switchgrass particles. App Eng Agr 24 (3): 351-358. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24490

McKendry P, 2002. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresource Technol 83: 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3

Monforti K, Bodis K, Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, 2013. The possible contribution of agricultural crop residues to renewable energy targets in Europe: a spatially explicit study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19: 666-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.060

Natural Resources Leadership Institute, 2018. Multi-criteria decision analysis. https://projects.ncsu.edu/nrli/decision-making/MCDA.php

Navickas K, Venslauskas K, Zuperka V, 2009. Potential and possibilities of biogas production from agricultural raw materials in Lithuania. Rural Development, Lithuanian University of Agriculture.

Office of State Administration in the Međimurje County, 2017. Međimurje County in numbers 2016. Cakovec Republic of Croatia.

Official Gazette 15/13. I. Action Program for protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, Republic of Croatia. http://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC131320

Pantaleo MA, Shah N, 2013. The logistics of bioenergy routes of heat and power. Biofuels - Economy, Environment and Sustainability, Zhen Fang, IntechOpen.

Rentizelas AA, Tolis AJ, Tatsiopoulos IP, 2009. Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13: 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.003

Rumenjak D, 2002. Cost benefit method used for environmental impact assessment. Waste Management Symposiui, Zagreb, pp: 761-774.

Sambra A, Sørensen CG, Kristensen EF, 2008. Optimized harvest and logistics for biomass supply chain. Univ Aarhus, Fac Agric Sci, Dept. Agric Eng Schüttesvej. Horsens, Denmark.

Sarkar N, Kumar Ghosh S, Bannerjee S, Aikat K, 2012. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: An overview. Renew Energ 37: 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.045

Searle YS, Malins JC, 2016. Waste and residue availability for advanced biofuel production in EU Member States. Biomass Bioenerg 89 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.008

Singh J, 2016. Management of the agricultural biomass on decentralized basis for producing sustainable power in India. J Clean Prod 142: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.056

Vesterinen P, Alakangas E, 2002. Report on a workshop on biomass trade in Europe. EUBIONET, Skelleftea, Sweden.

Voca N, Bilandzija N, Jurisic V, Matin A, Kricka T, Sedak I, 2016. Proximate, ultimate and energy values analysis of plum biomass by-products case study: Croatia's potential. J Agric Sci Tech-Iran 18 (6): 1655-1666.




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2019174-15140