Short communication. Bid affiliation in repeated random nth price auction

  • F. Akaichi Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness. University of Arkansas.
  • J. M. Gil Center for Agro-food Economy and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia. Castelldefels (Barcelona)
  • R. M. Jr. Nayga Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness. University of Arkansas.
Keywords: consumer experience, posted prices

Abstract

In most experimental auctions, it is a common practice to carry out several bidding rounds for the same product and to post the winning price at the end of each round. This practice can lead to an affiliation of participants’ bids and biased value estimates if bids between subjects are inter-dependent. In this paper, the effect of posted prices on bidders’ willingness to pay for a good using a random nth price auction is examined. The auctioned good was one kilogram of the Protected Designation Origin (PDO) ‘Mongeta del Ganxet Vallés Maresme’ white bean, stored in a cloth bag. In general, results indicate that bid affiliation is not an issue in the random nth price mechanism. However, consumers’ experience of the auctioned product matters. Experienced subjects are positively influenced by high posted prices while inexperienced subjects tend to decrease their bids when the posted price is low. Interestingly, low posted prices do not influence bids of experienced subjects and high posted prices do not influence bids of inexperienced subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfnes F., Rickertsen K., 2003. European consumers' willingness to pay for US beef in experimental auction markets. Am J Agr Econ 85, 396-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00128

Bernard J.C., 2005. Evidence of affiliation of values in a repeated trial auction experiment. Appl Econ Lett 12, 687-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504850500181823

Corrigan J.R., Rousu M.C., 2006. Posted prices and bid affiliation: evidence from experimental auctions. Am J Agr Econ 88, 1078–1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00917.x

Harrison G.W., Harstad R.M., Rutström E.E., 2004. Experimental methods and elicitation of values. Exp Econ 7, 123–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026975.48587.f0

Hayes D., Shogren J., Shin S., Kliebenstein J.B., 1995. Valuing food safety in experimental auction market. Am J Agr Econ 77, 40-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243887

Hoffman E., Menkhaus D.J., Chakravarti D., Field R.A., Whipple G.D., 1993. Using laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research: A case study of new packaging for fresh beef. Market Sci 12, 318-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.3.318

Kagel J.H., Harstad R.M., Levin D., 1987. Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study. Econometrica 55, 1275-1304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913557

Krishna V., 2002. Auction theory. Academic Press, London, UK.

List J., Shogren J.F., 1999. Price information and bidding behavior in repeated second-price auctions. Am J Agr Econ 81, 942–949. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244336

Lusk J., Rousu M., 2006. Market price endogeneity and accuracy of value elicitation mechanisms. Experimental methods in environmental and resource economics (List J. ed). Edward Elgar Publ, USA.

Lusk J., Shogren J.F., 2007. Experimental auctions: methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611261

Lusk J., Feldkamp T., Schroder T.C., 2004. Experimental auction procedure: impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods. Am J Agr Econ 86, 389-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00586.x

Mcafee R., Mcmillan J., 1987. Auctions and bidding. J Econ Lit 25, 699-738.

Parkhurst G., Shogren J.F., Dickinson D.L., 2004. Negative values in Vickrey auctions. Am J Agr Econ 86, 222–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00574.x

Riley J.G, Samuelson W.F., 1981. Optimal auctions. Am Econ Rev 71, 381-392.

Rutstrom E.E., 1998. Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design. Int J Game Theory 27, 427–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001820050082

Shogren J., Margolis M., Koo C., List J., 2001a. A random nth-price auction. J Econ Behav Organ 46, 409-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00165-2

Shogren J., Cho S., Koo C., List J., Park C., Polo P., Wilhelmi R., 2001b. Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA. Resour Energy Econ 23, 97–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00038-5

Vickrey W., 1961. Counter speculation, auction, and competitive sealed tenders. J Financ 16, 8-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

How to Cite
Akaichi, F., Gil, J. M., & Nayga, R. M. J. (1). Short communication. Bid affiliation in repeated random nth price auction. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110901-087-10
Section
Agricultural economics