Physico-mechanical characteristics of rose petals dealing with the pneumatic harvest of Rosa damascena

  • D. Yilmaz
  • K. Ekinci
Keywords: physico-mechanical properties, pneumatic harvest, rose mechanical harvest

Abstract

For the design of harvesting machines is important the study of characteristics dealing with the harvest of crops. This study focused on some physico-mechanical characteristics of rose petals, which are important for pneumatic harvest mechanization of Rosa damascena Mill. These characteristics are terminal velocity, picking force, mass, projection area, density, and drag coefficient of rose petals. The petals were handpicked at 06:30 a.m. (S1), 08:30 a.m. (S2), 10:30 a.m. (S3), and 12:30 p.m. (S4) at four different dates in 2009, June 5 (H1), June 11 (H2), June 17 (H3), and June 23 (H4), covering the potential flowering period. Terminal velocity of rose petals varied between 1.572 and 1.257 m s–1; the picking force from 0.501 to 1.005 N; the mass measured from 0.049 to 0.122 g; projection area from 13.830 cm2 for H1S4 to 7.071 cm2 for H4S1; drag coefficient from 0.790 for H2S1 to 0.287 for H1S4. The results of the study indicate that as far as terminal velocity of rose petals is concerned the harvest of R. damascena should be executed towards the end of H4 and S4. On the other hand, the magnitude of the picking force, the density, and the drag coefficient of rose petals decrease when the harvesting hour increases from H1 to H4 and the harvesting date increases from S1 to S4, which makes necessary to increase aspiration pressure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

D. Yilmaz

Department of Agricultural Machinery. Faculty of Agriculture. Süleyman Demirel University.
Cünür (Isparta). Turkey

K. Ekinci
Department of Agricultural Machinery. Faculty of Agriculture. Süleyman Demirel University.
Cünür (Isparta). Turkey

References

ASTM D1555, 2010. standard test method for calculation of volume and weight of industrial aromatic hydrocarbons and cyclohexane. Available in http://www.astm.org/Standards/D1555.htm [1 January 2010].

Akbolat D., Ekinci K., Demircan V., Gokdogan O., 2004. Isparta yöresinde gül tarımında uygulanan mekanizasyon is¸lemlerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir çalıs¸ma. Tarımsal Mekanizasyon 22. Ulusal Kongresi bildiri kitabı. pp. 223-230. [In Turkish].

Akbolat D., Ekinci K., Demircan V., 2006. Energy input-output and economic analysis of rose production in Turkey. J Agron 5, 570-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ja.2006.570.576

Ayik M., 1995. Ürün is¸ leme teknig˘ i. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No:1409, Ders Kitapları Yayın No. 407. [In Turkish].

Baydar H., 2006. Oil-bearing rose (Rosa damascene Mill.) Cultivation and rose oil industry in Turkey. Euro Cosmetics 14, 13-17.

Baydar H., 2009. Tıbbi ve aromatik bitkiler bilimi ve teknolojisi (Genis¸letilmis¸ 3. Baskı). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yayın No. 51 (ISBN: 975-7929-79-4) [In Turkish].

Baydar H., Baydar N.G., 2005. The effects of harvest date, fermentation duration and Tween20 treatment on essential oil content and composition of industrial oil rose (Rosa damascena Mill.). Ind Crop Prod 21, 251-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.004

Coskun M.B., 2002. Determination of relationships between various aerodynamics, physico-mechanical and fiber properties in cotton. Turk J Agric For 26, 363-368.

Demircan V., 2005. Isparta ilinde gülü üretim girdileri, maliyeti ve karlılıg˘ının belirlenmesi. SDU. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9-3. [In Turkish].

Eissa A.H., 2009. Physical and aerodynamic properties of flaxseeds for proper separation by using airstream. J Food Process Eng, published online: Sep 2, 2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00526.

Ercisli S., 2004. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet Resour Crop Eval 51, 787-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:GRES.0000023458.60138.79

Gudin S., 2000. Rose: genetics and breeding. Plant Breed Rev 17, 159-189.

Güzel E., Ulger P., Kayisoglu B., 1996. Ürün is¸leme ve deg˘erlendirme teknig˘ i. ÇÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yay›n No:145, Ders Kitapları Yayın No. 47, 248. [In Turkish].

Igeme, 2008. I˙hracatı Gelis¸tirme Merkezi. Essential oils reports. Available in http://www.igeme.gov.tr. [6 January 2010] [In Turkish].

Kazaz S., 1997. Hasat Zamanı ve Sonrası Sürenin Yag˘ Gülünde Yag˘ Miktarı ve Kalitesine Etkisi. SDÜ. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta. [In Turkish].

Kilickan A., Guner M., 2006. Pneumatic conveying characteristics of cotton seeds. Biosyst Eng 95, 537-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.015

Misra A., Sharma S., Singh A., Patra N.K., 2002. Influence of topographical and edaphic factors on rose. II. Flowering quality and quantity. Commun in Soil Sci Plant Anal 33, 2771-2780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120014479

Mohsenin N.N., 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials, 2nd ed. Gordon and Breach Sci Publ, NY.

Song H., Litchfield J.B., 1991. Predicting method of terminal velocity for grains. T ASAE 34, 225-231.

Tabak S., Wolf D., 1998. Aerodynamic properties of cotton seeds. J Agr Eng Res 70, 257-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0268

Tabak S.I., Biran A.B., Tabak I., Manor G., 2002. Airflow induced by falling cottonseed particles. Biosyst Eng 81, 395-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2001.0037

Yilmaz D., 2008. Kapalı kapsül susam bitkisi için pervazlı tip harmanlama düzeni parametrelerinin belirlenmesi ve prototipinin gelis¸tirilmesi. AÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Antalya. [In Turkish].

Zeinali H., Tabaei-Aghdaei S.R., Arzani A., 2009. A study of morphological variations and their relationship with flower yield and yield components in Rosa damascena. J Agric Sci Technol 11, 439-448.

Published
2011-05-19
How to Cite
Yilmaz, D., & Ekinci, K. (2011). Physico-mechanical characteristics of rose petals dealing with the pneumatic harvest of Rosa damascena. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(2), 389-394. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110902-204-10
Section
Agricultural engineering