A comparative study between parametric and artificial neural networks approaches for economical assessment of potato production in Iran

M. Zangeneh, M. Omid, A. Akram

Abstract


Potatoes are the single most important agricultural commodity in Hamadan province of Iran, where 25,503 ha of this crop were planted in 2008 under irrigated conditions. This paper compares results of the application of two different approaches, parametric model (PM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), for assessing economical productivity (EP), total costs of production (TCP) and benefit to cost ratio (BC) of potato crop. In this comparison, Cobb-Douglas function for PM and multilayer feedforward for implementing ANN models have been used. The ANN, having 8-6- 12-1 topology with R2 = 0.89, resulted in the best-suited model for estimating EP. Similarly, optimal topologies for TCP and BC were 8-13-15-1 (R2 = 0.97) and 8-15-13-1 (R2 = 0.94), respectively. In validating the PM and ANN models, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used as performance indicator. The ANN approach allowed to reduce the MAPE from –184% for PM to less than 7% with a +30% to –95% variability range. Since ANN outperformed PM model, it should be preferred for estimating economical indices.


Keywords


artificial neural networks; benefit to cost ratio; Cobb-Douglas production function; economical productivity; estimation error; Solanum tuberosum; total cost of production

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen P.G., 1994. Economic forecasting in agriculture. Int J Forecasting 10(1), 81-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(94)90052-3

Asiedu Y., Besant R.W., Gu P., 2000. Simulation-based cost estimation under economic uncertainty using kernel estimators. Int J Prod Res 38(9), 2023-2035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002075400188474

Bode J., 2000. Neural networks for cost estimation: simulation and pilot applications. Int J Prod Res 38(6), 1231-1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002075400188825

Cavalieri S., Taisch M., 1996. Neural networks in hybrid intelligent manufacturing systems. Proc APMS In Conf on Advances in Production Systems. 4-6 November, Kyoto, Japan. pp. 591-596.

Cavalieri S., Garetti M., Taisch M., 1995. A predictive neural network modeling system for process plants. Proc 13 Int Conf on Production Research 6-10 August Jerusalem. pp. 571-573.

Cavalieri S., Rabe M., Taisch M., 1997. A neura network approach to the plant design problem. Proc I Int Conf on Engineering Design and Automation. 18-21 March, Bangkok PMCid:23537

Cavalieri S., Maccarrone P., Pinto R., 2004. Parametric vs. neural network models for the estimation of production costs: a case study in the automotive industry. Int J Prod Econ 91, 165-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.005

Chester J., 1993. Neural networks, a tutorial. Prentice Hall, NY. PMCid:2393479

Church K.B., Curram S.P., 1996. Forecasting consumers' expenditure: a comparison between econometric and neural network models. Int J Forec 12(2)255-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(95)00631-1

Dean E.P., 2005. Parametric cost deployment. Proc 7th Symp Quality Function Deployment. June, USA. pp. 27-34.

Foussier P.M.M., 2006a. From product description to cost: a practical approach, vol. 1: The parametric approach. Springer, Berlin.

Foussier P.M.M., 2006b. From product description to cost: a practical approach, vol. 2: Building a specific model. Springer, Berlin.

Hatirli S.A., Ozkan B., Fert C., 2005. An econometric analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture. Renew Sust Energ Rev 9, 608-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.07.001

Hatirli S.A., Ozkan B., Fert C., 2006. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renew Energ 31, 427-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.04.007

Hill T., Marquez L., Oconnor M., Remus W., 1994. Artificial neural network models for forecasting and decision making. Int J Forecast 10(1), 5-15. HORNIK K., STINCHCOMBE M., WHITE H., 1989. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2, 359-366.

Mason A.K., Smith A.E., 1997. Cost estimation predictive modeling: regression versus neural network. The Eng Econ 42(2), 137-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00137919708903174

Seo K.K., Park J.H., Jang D.S., Wallace D., 2002. Prediction of the life cycle cost using statistical and artificial neural network methods in conceptual product design. Int J Com Integ Manu 15(6), 541-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09511920210143417

Shields M.D., Young S.M., 1991. Managing product life cycle cost of an organizational model. J Cost Manage (Fall), 39-51.

Shtub A., Zimmermann Y., 1993. A neural network based approach for estimating the cost of assembly systems. Int J Prod Econ 32(2), 189-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(93)90068-V

Singh G., Singh S., Singh J., 2004. Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energ Convers Manage 45, 453-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00155-9

Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G., 1989. Statistical th methods, 8 ed. Iowa State Press, USA.

Tegene A., Kuchler F., 1994. Evaluating forecasting models of farmland prices. Int J Forecast 10(1), 65-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(94)90051-5

Verlinden B., Duflou J.R., Collin P., Cattrysse D., 2008. Cost estimation for sheet metal parts using multiple regression and artificial neural networks: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 111, 484-492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.004

Zhang G., Eddy Patuwo B., Hu M.Y., 1998. Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int J Forecast 14(1), 35-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7

Zhang Y.F., Fuh J.Y., 1998. A neural network approach for early cost estimation of packaging products. Comput Ind Eng 34(2), 433-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(97)00141-1

Zhang Y.F., Fuh J.Y., Chan W.T., 1996. Feature-based cost estimation for packaging products using neural networks. Comput Ind 32, 95-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(96)00059-0

Zangeneh M., Omid M., Akram A., 2010. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 35, 2927-2933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.024




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/20110903-371-10