Effect of number of oocytes and embryos on in vitro oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryo development in bovine

I. Salvador, A. Cebrian-Serrano, D. Salamone, M. A. Silvestre

Abstract


The aim of this study was to identify the in vitro development stage at which the culture of a single or low number (n = 5 or 10) of oocytes/embryos could impair development in comparison with culture in group (n = 50). In the Experiment 1, it was confirmed that single in vitro embryo production yielded lower cleavage and blastocyst rates than in group (49.4 vs. 83.0%; 0% vs. 37.8%, respectively; p < 0.05). In Experiment 2 and 3, it was observed no effect on embryo development of culturing single or low number of oocytes during maturation and fertilization, respectively. In Experiment 4, it was observed a detrimental effect on blastocyst rate when cultured single or low number of embryos during post-fertilization in vitro culture (2.9; 10.2-10.8; 33.2% in single, low number of embryos (5-10), and controlgrouped, respectively; p < 0.05). In Experiment 5, it was observed that the last part of the culture period (day 3 onwards) seemed to be more affected by the low number of embryos placed in culture. In conclusion, post-fertilization culture, especially on days 3 to 7 after fertilization, seems to be the most important stage for embryo development on single and/or low number (5-10) of embryos culture.

Keywords


single/low embryo culture.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Araki N., Sato K., Hayashi K., Miyamoto A., Fukui Y., 1998. Relationships among follicular fluid estradiol-17® concentration, morphology of cumulusoocyte complex and developmental capacity of individually matured fertilized and cultured bovine oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Dev 44, 359-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.44.359

Blondin P., Sirard M.A., 1995. Oocyte and follicular morphology as determining characteristics for evelopmental competence in bovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 41, 54-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080410109 PMid:7619506

Canseco R.S., Sparks A.E., Pearson R., Gwazdauskas F.C., 1992. Embryo density and medium volume effects on early murine embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet 9, 454-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01204051 PMid:1482840

Carolan C., Lonergan P., Khatir H., Mermillod P., 1996. In vitro production of bovine embryos using individual oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 45, 145-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199610)45:2<145::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-T

Chaubal S.A, Molina J.A., Ohlrichs C.L., Ferre L.B., Faber D.C., Bols P.E.J., Riesen J.W., Tian X., Yang X., 2006. Comparison of different transvaginal ovum pick-up protocols to optimise oocyte retrieval and embryo production over a 10-week period in cows. Theriogenology 65, 1631-1648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.07.020 PMid:16243385

Contramaestre A.P., Sifontes F., Marín R., Camejo M.I., 2008. Secretion of stem cell factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by mouse embryos in culture: influence of group culture. Zygote 16, 297-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199408004760 PMid:18578951

De Moraes A.A., Hansen P.J., 1997. Granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 57, 1060-1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.5.1060 PMid:9369171

Donnay I., Van Langendonckt A., Auquier P., Grisart B., Vansteenbrugge A., Massip A., DESSY F., 1997. Effects of co-culture and embryo number on the in vitro development of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 47, 1549-1561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00160-X

Eyestone W.H., First N.L., 1991. Characterization of developmental arrest in early bovine embryos cultured in vitro. Theriogenology 35, 613-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90457-O

Feng W.G., Sui H.S., Han Z.B., Chang Z.L., Zhou P., Liu D.J., Bao S., Tan J.H., 2007. Effects of follicular atresia and size on the developmental competence of bovine oocytes: a study using the well-in-drop culture system. Theriogenology 67, 1339-1350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.01.017 PMid:17420040

Ferry L., Mermillod P., Massip A., Dessy F., 1994. Bovine embryos cultured in serum-poor oviduct-onditioned medium need cooperation to reach the blastocyst stage. Theriogenology 42, 445-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90682-9

Fujita T., Umeki H., Shimura H., Kugumiya K., Shiga K., 2006. Effect of group culture and embryoculture conditioned medium on development of bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev 52, 137-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.16084 PMid:16293943

Goovaerts I.G.F., Leroy J.L.M.R., Van Soom A., De Clercq J.B.P., Andries S., Bols P.E., 2009. Effect of cumulus cell coculture and oxygen tension on the in vitro developmental competence of bovine zygotes cultured singly. Theriogenology 71, 729-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.038 PMid:18962875

Gordon I., 2003. Laboratory production of cattle embryos, 2th ed. Biotechnology in Agriculture Series, No. 27. CAB international.

Hagemann L.J., Weilert L.L., Beaumont S.E., Tervit H.R., 1998. Development of bovine embryos in single in vitro production (sIVP) systems. Mol Reprod Dev 51, 143-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199810)51:2<143::AID-MRD3>3.0.CO;2-Q

Hoelker M., Rings F., Lund Q., Ghanem N., Phatsara C., Griese J., Schellander K., Tesfaye D., 2009. Effect of the microenvironment and embryo density on developmental characteristics and gene expression profile of bovine preimplantative embryos cultured in vitro. Reproduction 137, 415-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0370 PMid:19098140

Holm P., Booth P.J., Schmidt M.H., Greve T., Callesen H., 1999. High bovine blastocyst development in a static in vitro production system using SOFaa medium supplemented with sodium citrate and myoinositol with or without serum-proteins. Theriogenology 52, 683-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00162-4

Jewgenow K., Heerdegen B., Müller K., 1999. In vitro development of individually matured bovine oocytes in relation to follicular wall atresia. Theriogenology 51, 745-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00023-0

Kato Y., Tsunoda Y., 1994. Effects of the culture density of mouse zygotes on the development in vitro and in vivo.Theriogenology 41, 1315-1322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90490-A

Keefer C.L., Stice S.L., Paprocki A.M., Golueke P., 1994. In vitro culture of bovine IVM-IVF embryos:cooperative interaction among embryos and the role of growth factors. Theriogenology 41, 1323-1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90491-Z

Lane M., Gardner D.K., 1992. Effect of incubation volume and embryo density on the development and viability of mouse embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod 7, 558-562. PMid:1522203

Lim J.M., Hansel W., 1996. Roles of growth factors in the development of bovine embryos fertilized in vitro and cultured singly in a defined medium. Reprod Fertil Dev, 1199-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD9961199 PMid:8981645

Lonergan P., Rizos D., Kanka J., Nemcova L., Mbaye A.M., Kingston M., Wade M., Duffy P., Boland M.P., 2003. Temporal sensitivity of bovine embryos to culture environment after fertilization and the implications for blastocyst quality. Reproduction 126, 337-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1260337 PMid:12968941

Nagao Y., Iijima R., Saeki K., 2008. Interaction between embryos and culture conditions during in vitro development of bovine early embryos. Zygote 16, 127-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199408004644 PMid:18405433

O'doherty E.M., Wade M.G., Hill J.L., Boland M.P., 1997. Effects of culturing bovine oocytes either singly or in groups on development to blastocysts. Theriogenology 48, 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00199-4

Oyamada T., Fukui Y., 2004. Oxygen tension and medium supplements for in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes cultured individually in a chemically defined medium.J Reprod Dev 50, 107-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.50.107 PMid:15007208

Oyamada T., Iwayama H., Fukui Y., 2004. Additional effect of epidermal growth factor during in vitro matura-tion for individual bovine oocytes using a chemically defined medium. Zygote 12, 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199404002710 PMid:15460109

Palma G.A., Brem G., 1995. Effect of growth factors IGFI, TGF-〈, EGF and PDGF on development of in vitro produced bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 43, 291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)92445-F

Palma G.A., Clement-Sengewald A., Berg U., Brem G., 1992. Role of the embryo number in the development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 37, 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90340-W

Paria B.C., Dey S.K., 1990. Preimplantation embryo development in vitro: cooperative interactions among embryos and role of growth factors. J Reprod Dev 87, 4756-4760.

Parrish J.J., Susko-Parrish J.L., Winer M.A., First N.L., 1988. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod 38, 1171-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod38.5.1171 PMid:3408784

Parrish J.J., Krogenaes A., Susko-Parrish J.L., 1995. Effect of bovine sperm separation by either swimup or Percoll method on success of in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development. Theriogenology 44, 859-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00271-9

Paula-Lopes F.F., De Moraes A.A., Edwards J.L., Justice J.E., Hansen P.J., 1998. Regulation of preimplantation development of bovine embryos by interleukin-1beta. Biol Reprod 59, 1406-1412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod59.6.1406 PMid:9828185

Pereira D.C., Dode M.A.N., Rumpf R., 2005. Evaluation of different culture systems on the in vitro production of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 63, 1131-1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.008 PMid:15710198

Rizos D., Ward F., Duffy P., Boland M.P., Lonergan P., 2002. Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization or early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. Mol Reprod Dev 61, 234-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1153 PMid:11803560

Rizos D., Burke L., Duffy P., Wade M., Mee J.F., O'farrell K.J., Macsiurtain M., Boland M.P., Lonergan P., 2005. Comparisons between nulliparous heifers and cows as oocyte donors for embryo productionin vitro. Theriogenology 63, 939-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.05.008 PMid:15629810

Sirard M.A., Blondin P., 1996. Oocyte maturation and IVF in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 42, 417-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(96)01518-7

Stokes P.J., Abeydeera L.R., Leese H.J., 2005. Development of porcine embryos in vivo and in vitro; evidence for embryo "cross talk" in vitro. Dev Biol 284, 62-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.001 PMid:15963973

Thibodeaux J.K., Myers M.W., Hansel W., 1995. The beneficial effects of incubating bovine embryos in groups are due to platelet-derived growth factor. Theriogenology 43, 336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)92490-Z

Vajta G., Peura T., Holm P., Páldi A., Greve T., Trounson A.O., Callesen H., 2000. New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos:the well of the well (WOW) system. Mol Reprod Dev 55, 256-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200003)55:3<256::AID-MRD3>3.0.CO;2-7

Vajta G., Korösi T., Du Y., Nakata K., Ieda S., Kuwayama M., Nagy Z.P., 2008. The well-of-the-well system: an efficient approach to improve embryo development. Reprod Biomed Online 17, 73-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60296-9

Van Soom A., Ysebaert M.T., Kruif A., 1997. Relationship between timing of development, morula morphology, and cell allocation to inner cell mass and trophectoderm in in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 47, 47-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199705)47:1<47::AID-MRD7>3.0.CO;2-Q

Van Wagtendonk-De Leeuw A.M., 2006. Ovum pick up and in vitro production in the bovine after use in several generations: a 2005 status. Theriogenology 65, 914-925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.007 PMid:16253322

Ward F.A., Lonergan P., Enright B.P., Boland M.P., 2000. Factors affecting recovery and quality of oocytes for bovine embryo production in vitro using ovum pickup technology. Theriogenology 54, 433-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00360-5




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/20110903-374-10