Men’s and women’s attitudes toward organic food consumption. A Spanish case study

R. Olivas, R. Bernabéu

Abstract


The study of the behaviour of food consumers in general and of organic food in particular, is revealed as the key element for agrofood business in its strategy to accommodate supply to consumer needs and desires. In research on organic food consumer behaviour, various papers suggest the existence of differences between men and women in their preferences, purchase, consumption and willingness to pay. Proposing to determine whether differences between men and women in the consumption of organic food come from their lifestyles, a series of surveys was conducted in the metropolitan area of Madrid in December, 2006. The results obtained through structural equation analysis indicates the model for men (χ2/df=1.76 p<0.01, CFI=0.907) as well as the model for women (χ2/df=1.87 p<0.01, CFI=0.857) can be considered acceptable, they suggest that women are more proactive in the consumption of organic food. While women are more motivated due to eating a healthy diet, men are more influenced by their social circumstances. In conclusion the basic commercial strategy for increasing organic food consumption in Spain would be for businesses as well as the government to conduct communication campaigns addressed basically to women, the clear promoters of healthy eating in the home.

Keywords


consumer behaviour; gender; marketing strategy; modelling; structural equation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguirre MS, Aldamiz-Echevarria C, Charterina J, Vicente A, 2003. El consumidor ecológico. Un modelo de comportamiento a partir de la recopilación y análisis de la evidencia empírica. Distribución y Consumo 67: 41-54. [In Spanish].

Anderson JC, Gerbing DW, 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103: 411-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Armstrong G, Farley H, Gray J, Durkin M, 2005. Marketing health-enhancing foods: implications from the dairy sector. Market Intelligence Plann 23(7): 705-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02634500510630221

Bagozzi P, Yi Y, 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci 16(1): 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Bandura A, 1977. Social learning theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

Bandura A, 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.

Bandura A, 1989. Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol.6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Bearden WO, Netemeyer RC, Teel JE, 1989. Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. J Consum Res 15(4): 473-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209186

Benbrook C, 2009. The impacts of yield on nutritional quality: Lessons from organic farming. HortScience 44(1): 12-14.

Benbrook C, Zhao X, Yáñez J, Davies N, Andrews P, 2008. New evidence confirms the nutritional superiority of plant-based organic food [on line]. State of Science Review, the Organic Center. Available at: http://www.organic-center.org/reportfiles/5367_Nutrient_Content_SSR_FINAL_V2.pdf [4 June 2009].

Bourne D, Prescott J, 2002. A comparison of the nutritional value, sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally produced foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42(1): 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408690290825439 PMid:11833635

Brugarolas M, Rivera LM, 2001. Comportamiento del consumidor valenciano ante los productos ecológicos e integrados. Rev Estud Agrosoc Pesqu 192: 105-121. [In Spanish].

Brugarolas M, Bernabéu R, Martínez-Poveda A, Martínez-Carrasco L, Díaz M, 2008. Herramientas para la aceptación de un vino ecológico: Health claims and green claims. XXXI World Congress of Vine and Wine. International Organisation of Vine and Wine. Verona, Italy, June 15-20.

Byrne BM, 2001. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, USA.

Byrne BM, 2006. Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA.

Chang HS, Zepeda L, 2004. Demand for organic food: focus group discussions in Armidale, NSW [on line]. Working Paper Series in Agricultural and Resource Economics: 6. Available at: http://www.une.edu.au/febl/EconStud/wps.htm [1 July 2005].

Cheah I, Phau I, 2005. Toward a framework of consumers’ willingness to purchase environmentally friendly products: a study of antecedents and moderator. In: Broadening the boundaries (Purchase S, ed), Univ of Western Australia, pp: 39-46.

Chryssohoidis GM, Krystallis A, 2005. Organic consumers’ personal values research: testing and validating the list of values, LOV scale and implementing a value-based segmentation task. Food Qual Prefer 16: 585-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.01.003

Costa-Font M, Gil JM, 2009. Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study. Food Qual Prefer 20: 399-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.011

De Boer J, Helms M, Aiking H, 2006. Protein consumption and sustainability: diet diversity in EU-15. Ecol Econ 59: 267-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.011

De Magistris T, Gracia A, 2008. The decision to buy organic food products in Southern Italy. Brit Food J 110(9): 929-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700810900620

Fagerli RA, Wandel M, 1999. Gender differences in opinions and practices with regard to a healthy diet. Appetite 32: 171–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0188 PMid:10097024

Fuentes C, López De Coca E, 2008. El consumo de productos ecológicos. Distribución y Consumo 99: 5-24. [In Spanish].

Gil JM, Gracia A, Sánchez M, 2000. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. Int Food Agribus Manage Rev 3: 207-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00040-4

Grankvist G, Biel A, 2001. The importance of beliefs and purchase criteria in the choice of eco-labeled food products. J Environ Psychol 21: 405-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0234

Grunert SC, Juhl HJ, 1995. Values, environmental attitudes and buying of organic food. J Econ Psychol 16: 39-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(94)00034-8

Grunert KG, Bredahl L, Scholderer J, 2003. Four questions on European consumers’ attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in foodproduction. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 4(4): 435-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1466-8564(03)00035-3

Hair J, Anderson E, Tathan R, Black W, 1999. Análisis multivariante. Prentice Hall Iberia, Madrid. [In Spanish].

Honkanen P, Verplanken B, 2004. Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: the role of values and attitudes strength. J Consum Policy 27(4): 401-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2524-9

INE, 2006. Encuesta de población activa [on line]. National Statistics Institute. Available at: http://www.ine.es [21 September 2006]. [In Spanish].

Isenhour C, Ardenfors M, 2009. Gender and sustainable consumption: policy implica-tions. Int J Innov Sust Develop 4(2/3): 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2009.028068

Kim R, Boyd M, 2004. Japanese consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to GM food products: analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM). 8th Int Consort on Agric Biotechnol Res (ICABR), July 8-11, Ravello, Italy.

Kline R., 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. The Guilford Press, NY.

Lockie S., 2002. The invisible mouth: mobilizing ‘the consumer’ in food production-consumption networks. Sociologia Ruralis 42(4): 278-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00217

Lockie S, Lyons K, Lawrence G, Mummery K, 2002. Eating ‘green´: motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociologia Ruralis 42: 23-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00200

Magkos F, Arvaniti F, Zampelas A, 2003. Organic food: nutritious food or food for thought? A review of the evidence. Int J Food Sci Nutr 54(5): 357-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09637480120092071 PMid:12907407

Magnusson MK, Arvola A, Hursti UK, Aberg L, Sjödén PO, 2003. Choice of organic food is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 40(2): 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00002-3

Martinez-Poveda A, Brugarolas M, Del Campo FJ, Martinez-Carrasco L, 2009. Consumer-perceived risk model for the introduction of genetically modified food in spain. Food Policy 34: 519-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.08.001

McCarty JA, Shrum LG, 1994. The recycling of solid wastes: personal values, value orientations and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behaviour. J Bus Res 30(1): 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90068-X

MCOAC, 2006. Datos estadísticos [on line]. Madrid Community Organic Agriculture Committee. Available at: http://www.caem.es/estadisticas.htm [3 Sept 2006]. [In Spanish].

MCSI, 2006. Estructura y evolución de la población [on line]. Madrid Community Statistical Institute. Available at: http://www.madrid.org/desvan/almudena/arbolalmudenalista.jsp [11 Sept 2006]. [In Spanish].

Napolitano F, Braghieri A, Piasentier E, Favotto S, Naspetti S, Zanoli R, 2010. Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay. Food Qual Prefer 21(2): 207-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.007

Osterhuis TL, 1997. Pro-social consumer influence strategies: when and how do they work? J Marketing 61: 16-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252084

Padel S, Foster C, 2005. Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour. Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. Brit Food J 107: 606-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700510611002

Parasuraman A, 1991. Marketing Research. 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, NY.

Ramanaiah NV, Clump M, Sharpe JP, 2000. Personality profiles of environmentally responsible groups. Psychol Rep 87: 176-178. PMid:11026408

Rappoport L, Peters GR, Downey R, McCann T, Huff-Corzine L, 1993. Gender and age differences in food cognition. Appetite 20: 33-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1993.1004 PMid:8452376

Raykov T, 1998. Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Appl Psychol Measure 22(4): 375-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662169802200407

Rimal AP, Moon W, Balasubramanian S, 2005. Agro-biotechnology and organic food purchase in the United Kingdom. Brit Food J 107: 84-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700510579162

Roitner-Schobesberger B, Darnhofer I, Somsook S, Vogl CR, 2008. Consumer perceptions of organic food in Bangkok, Thailand. Food Policy 33: 112-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.09.004

Sanjuán AI, Sanchez M, Gil JM, Gracia A, Soler F, 2003. Brakes to organic market enlargement in Spain: consumers’ and retailers’ attitudes and willing to pay. Int J Consum Stud 27(2): 134-144.

Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H, 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures [on line]. Available at: http://user.unifrankfurt.de/~moosbrug/schermelleh/mpr_Schermelleh.pdf [21 Jan 2008].

Schifferstein HNJ, Oude Ophuis PAM, 1998. Health related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Qual Prefer 9(3): 119-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00044-X

Soler F, Gil JM, Sánchez M, 2002. Consumers’ acceptability of organic food in Spain: results from an experimental auction market. Brit Food J 104(8): 670-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425921

SPSS Inc., 2009. SPSS categories. Vers 17.0. Chicago, USA.

Squires L, Juric B, Bettina-Cornwell T, 2001. Level of market development and intensity of organic food consumption: cross-cultural study of Danish and New Zealand consumers. J Consum Market 18(5): 392-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07363760110398754

Steenkamp JB, Baumgartner H, 1998. Assessing measurement invariance in crossnational consumer research. J Consum Res 25: 78-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209528

Torjusen H, Lieblein G, Wandel M, Francis CA, 2001. Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway. Food Qual Prefer 12(3): 207-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00047-1

Triandis HC, 1993. Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Crosscultural Res 27(3): 155-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106939719302700301

Ureña F, Bernabéu R, Olmeda M, 2008. Women, men and organic food: differences in their attitudes and willingness to pay. A Spanish case study. Int J Consum Stud 32(1): 18-26.

Willer H, Yussefi M, 2007. The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2007 [on line]. International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements IFOAM. Available at: http://orgprints.org/10506/03/willer-yussefi-2007-world-of-organic.pdf [23 Nov 2008].

Yee W, Traill WB, Lusk JL, Jaeger SR, House LO, Moore M, Morrow JL, Valli C, 2008. Determinants of consumers' willingness to accept GM foods. Int J Biotechnol 10(2/3): 240-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBT.2008.018356

Yiridoe E, Bonti-Ankomah S, Ralph C, 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: a review and update of the literature. Renew Agric Food Syst 20: 193-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/RAF2005113

Zanoli R, 2004. The European consumer and organic food. In: Organic marketing initiatives and rural development, 4. School of Management and Business, Aberystwyth.

Zanoli R, Naspetti S, 2002. Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: a means-end approach. Brit Food J 104(8): 643-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425930




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2012102-507-11