Sexual compatibility of the olive cultivar ‘Kalamata’ assessed by paternity analysis

  • E. Seifi Department of Horticulture, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Golestan
  • J. Guerin School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
  • B. Kaiser School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
  • M. Sedgley Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales
Keywords: Olea europaea L., polleniser, self-compatible, self-incompatibility

Abstract

Paternity analysis was used to assess the self-incompatibility of the olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar ‘Kalamata’ and to identify some compatible pollenisers under a Mediterranean-type climate. Eight microsatellite markers were used for genotyping three ‘Kalamata’ mother trees, 120 embryos, and all potential pollen donors. The identified alleles were analysed using FaMoz software and showed that ‘Kalamata’ was highly self-incompatible. Only three ‘Kalamata’ embryos were assigned to ‘Kalamata’ self-fertilisation, even though it was the most available pollen donor. The alleles were also analysed using NTSYS-pc (version 2.02 k) software and identified 54 potential pollen donors in the study site; however, not all of them were located within the effective pollination distance of the mother trees (30 m in olive). According to the results of this study, ‘Kalamata’ (as a host) was compatible with ‘Barnea’, ‘Benito’, and ‘Katsourela’ (six ‘Kalamata’ embryos assigned in each) but incompatible with ‘Arbequina’, ‘Azapa’, and ‘Picual’ (zero ‘Kalamata’ embryos assigned in each). The olive growers could use some of these compatible pollenisers with ‘Kalamata’ to guarantee good fruit set.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

J. Guerin, School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia

School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

B. Kaiser, School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
M. Sedgley, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia

References

Androulakis II, Loupassaki MH, 1990. Studies on the self-fertility of some olive cultivars in the area of Crete. Acta Hortic 286: 159-162.

Ayerza R, Coates W, 2004. Supplemental pollination - Increasing olive (Olea europea) yields in hot, arid environments. Exp Agric 40: 481-491.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479704002133

Blouin MS, 2003. DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 503-511.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8

Brookfield JFY, 1996. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol Ecol 5: 453-455.
PMid:8688964

Cipriani G, Marrazzo MT, Marconi R, Cimato A, Testolin R, 2002. Microsatellite markers isolated in olive (Olea europaea L.) are suitable for individual fingerprinting and reveal polymorphism within ancient cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 104: 223-228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001220100685
PMid:12582690

Conner DJ, Fereres E, 2005. The physiology of adaptation and yield expression in olive. Hortic Rev 31: 155-229.

Cuevas J, Diaz-Hermoso AJ, Galian D, Hueso JJ, Pinillos V, Prieto M, Sola D, Polito VS, 2001. Response to cross pollination and choice of pollinisers for the olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) 'Manzanilla de Sevilla', 'Hojiblanca' and 'Picual'. Olivae 85: 26-32.

De La Rosa R, James CM, Tobutt KR, 2002. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites in olive (Olea europaea L.) and their transferability to other genera in the Oleaceae. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 265-267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00217.x

De La Rosa R, James CM, Tobutt KR, 2004. Using microsatellites for paternity testing in olive progenies. HortScience 39: 351-354.

Diaz A, Martin A, Rallo P, Barranco D, De La Rosa R, 2006. Self-incompatibility of 'Arbequina' and 'Picual' olive assessed by SSR markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131: 250-255.

Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.

Ewen KR, Bahlo M, Treloar SA, Levinson DF, Mowry B, Barlow JW, Foote SJ, 2000. Identification and analysis of error types in high-throughput genotyping. Am J Hum Genet 67: 727-736.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/303048
PMid:10924406

Fabbri A, Bartolini G, Lambardi M, Kailis SG, 2004. Olive propagation manual. Landlinks, Collingwood, Vic, Australia.

Fernandez-Escobar R, Gomez-Valledor G, Rallo L, 1983. Influence of pistil extract and temperature on in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of olive cultivars. J Hortic Sci 58: 219-227.

Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A, 2003. FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes 3: 479-481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00439.x

Isagi Y, Kanazashi T, Suzuki W, Tanaka H, Abe T, 2004. Highly variable pollination patterns in Magnolia obovata revealed by microsatellite paternity analysis. Int J Plant Sci 16:, 1047-1053.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/423883

Jamieson A, Taylor SCS, 1997. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim Genet 28: 397-400.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00186.x
PMid:9616104

Kailis S, Davies G, 2004. Table olives. In: the new crop industries handbook (Salvin S, Bourke M, Byrne A, eds.). RIRDC, Australia, pp: 295-301.

Kloosterman AD, Budowle B, Daselaar P, 1993. PCR-amplification and detection of the human D1s80 Vntr locus - amplification conditions, population-genetics and application in forensic analysis. Int J Leg Med 105: 257-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01370382
PMid:8471543

Lavee S, Datt Z, 1978. The necessity of cross pollination for fruit set of Manzanillo olives. J Hortic Sci 53: 261-266.

Lavee S, Taryan J, Levin J, Haskal A, 2002. The significance of cross-pollination for various olive cultivars under irrigated intensive growing conditions. Olivae 91: 25-36.

Martin GC, Ferguson L, Sibbett GS, 2005. Flowering, pollination, fruiting, alternate bearing, and abscission. In: Olive production manual (Sibbett GS, Ferguson L, Coviello JL, Lindstrand M, eds.). Univ California, Agr Nat Resour, Oakland, CA, USA, pp: 49-54.

Mekuria GT, Collins GG, Sedgley M, 1999. Genetic variability between different accessions of some common commercial olive cultivars. J Hortic Sci Biotech 74: 309-314.

Mookerjee S, Guerin J, Collins G, Ford C, Sedgley M, 2005. Paternity analysis using microsatellite markers to identify pollen donors in an olive grove. Theor Appl Genet 111: 1174-1182.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0049-5
PMid:16133312

Morgante M, Rafalski A, Biddle P, Tingey S, Olivieri AM, 1994. Genetic-mapping and variability of 7 soybean simple sequence repeat loci. Genome 37: 763-769.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/g94-109
PMid:8001811

Nei M, 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 70: 3321-3323.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321

Oddou-Muratorio S, Houot ML, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F, 2003. Pollen flow in the wild service tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Mol Ecol 12: 3427-3439.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01989.x
PMid:14629357

Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Hughes CR, 1993. Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 285-288.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90256-O

Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L, 2005. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800542
PMid:15292910

Sefc KM, Lopes S, Mendonca D, Dos Santos MR, Machado MLD, Machado AD, 2000. Identification of microsatellite loci in olive (Olea europaea) and their characterization in Italian and Iberian olive trees. Mol Ecol 9: 1171-1173.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00954.x
PMid:10964237

Sweeney S, 2005. National olive variety assessment (NOVA) - stage 2. RIRDC Publication, Barton, Australia.

Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P, 2001. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10: 249-256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x
PMid:11251803

Wu SB, Collins G, Sedgley M, 2002. Sexual compatibility within and between olive cultivars. J Hortic Sci Biotech 77: 665-673.

Zapata TR, Arroyo MTK, 1978. Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 10: 221-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2387907

Published
2012-06-20
How to Cite
Seifi, E., Guerin, J., Kaiser, B., & Sedgley, M. (2012). Sexual compatibility of the olive cultivar ‘Kalamata’ assessed by paternity analysis. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(3), 731-740. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012103-501-11
Section
Plant breeding, genetics and genetic resources