Mechanized harvesting and primary processing of Calendula officinalis L. inflorescences

  • Branislav Veselinov Dept. Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Technical Sciences. University of Novi Sad. Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad
  • Dusan Adamovic Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops. Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000 Novi Sad
  • Milan Martinov Dept. Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Technical Sciences. University of Novi Sad. Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad
  • Miodrag Viskovic Dept. Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Technical Sciences. University of Novi Sad. Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad
  • Marko Golub Dept. Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Technical Sciences. University of Novi Sad. Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad
  • Savo Bojic Dept. Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Technical Sciences. University of Novi Sad. Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad
Keywords: marigold, virtual rotating comb, separation, sieves

Abstract

Manual harvesting of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) inflorescences results in superior quality, but requires enormous manpower. The objectives of the research were to examine the possibility of mechanized harvesting of marigold inflorescences by virtual rotating comb-type chamomile harvester, widely used in South Eastern Europe, and to develop the mechanical separator for the inflorescences from the harvested mass. The impact of coefficient R, ratio of the harvester’s penetration into the inflorescences horizon and the width of inflorescences band (i.e. the average value of the highest and lowest inflorescences span) on the harvest yield, was tested first. Separation was performed by a bespoke separator that uses five cascades of oscillating sieves made of longitudinally situated rods. Influence of oscillation frequencies and rod distances on separation efficiency was investigated. It was found that, for coefficient R value of 1.3, an average of 97% of the total inflorescences yield can be harvested. The proportion of inflorescences with stem length up to 2 cm was 65% and 35% for stems over 2 cm. The result of mechanized harvest was the reduction in both the number of succeeding harvests and the yield, due to bud damages and elimination. The highest separation efficiency was obtained by using 2.7 Hz oscillation frequency and combination of 6/8 mm rods’ distances in sieves. After three passes of the harvested mass through the device, approximately 92% of inflorescences were separated. Future investigations should be directed towards solving the issue of mechanical shortening of the inflorescences stems and evaluating the economic viability of mechanized harvesting within the proposed procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Branislav Veselinov, Dept. Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Technical Sciences. University of Novi Sad. Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad

 

 

References

Armstrong PR, Stone ML, Brusewitz GH, 2002. Marigold petal threshing with open versus sectored rotary dryers. Appl Eng Agr 18(2): 213-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.7779

Brabandt H, Ehlert D, 2011. Chamomile harvesters: A review. Ind Crop Prod 34: 818-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.017

Britton BD, Armstrong, PR, Brusewitz GH, Stone ML, 2001. Marigold petal removal with a plate thresher. Appl Eng Agr 17(1): 63-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.1923

Brown EC, 1996. Selective harvesting machine. US Patent No: 5,501,067, Date of Patent: Mar. 26.

Dachler M, Pelzmann H, 1999. Arznei- und Gewürzpflanzen (Anbau, Ernte, Aufbereitung). Agrarferlag, Wien, Austria. 352 pp.

Hecht H, Mohr T, Lambrecht S, 1992. Mechanisierung der Blütendrogenemte. Landtechnik 47: 276-280.

Herold M, Pank F, Menzel E, Kaltofen H, Loogk E, Rust H, 1989. Verfahrenstechnische Entwicklungen zum Anbau von Chamomila recutia L. (Rauschert) und Calendula officinalis L. für die Gewinnung von Blütendrogen. Drogenreport 2: 43-62.

Jantschi L, Jantschi GA, Balan MC, Duda MM, Bolboaca SD, 2008. On about design and implementation of harvester for French and English marigold. Bulletin UASVM, Horticulture 65(1): 192-197.

Khalid KA, Teixeira da Silva JA, 2012. Biology of Calendula officinalis Linn.: Focus on pharmacology, biological activities and agronomic practices. Med Aromat Plant Sci Biotechnol 6(1): 12-27.

Khan MU, Rohilla A, Bhatt D, Afrin S, Rohilla S, Ansari SH, 2011. Diverse belongings of Calendula officinalis: an overview. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res 3(3): 173-177.

Kisgeci J, Adamovic D, 1994. Gajenje lekovitog bilja. Nolit, Beograd, Srbija. 213 pp.

Martinov M, Oluski L, 1998. Machines and equipment for chamomile production – Twenty years after. Med Plant Rep 5: 37-49.

Martinov M, Adamovic D, 2002. Mechanised harvesting of pyrethrum (Pyrethrum cinerariaefolium Trev.) – First Testing. Med Plant Rep 9: 23-27.

Martinov M, Konstantinovic M, 2007. Harvesting. In: Medicinal and aromatic crops. Harvesting, drying, and processing (Öztekin S, Martinov M, eds.). The Haworth Press Inc., NY (USA), pp: 56-84.

Mohr T, 2002. Untersuchung und Weiterentwicklung einer Erntemaschine für Heilpflanzen. Z Arznei- Gewürzpflanzen 7 (Sonderausgabe): 96-202.

Veselinov B, Adamovic D, Martinov M, 2008. Investigation of possibility of mechanised marigold inflorescences harvesting. Bull Hops Sorghum Med Plant 81: 22-33.

Willoughby RA, Solie JB, Whitney RW, Maness NO, Buser MD, 2000. A mechanical harvester for marigold flowers. Proc ASAE Annu Int Meeting, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 9-12 July. pp: 1-14.

Zimmer S, Müller J, 2004. Erntetechnologie von Arznei – und Gewürzpflanzen. Gülzow Fachgespräche 22, 100 pp.

Published
2014-04-10
How to Cite
Veselinov, B., Adamovic, D., Martinov, M., Viskovic, M., Golub, M., & Bojic, S. (2014). Mechanized harvesting and primary processing of Calendula officinalis L. inflorescences. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(2), 329-337. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014122-4876
Section
Agricultural engineering