Broadening the genetic base of Abyssinian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) through introgression of genes from related allotetraploid species

Farooq A. Sheikh, Sashi Banga, Surindar S. Banga

Abstract


Brassica carinata (BBCC, 2n=34) has still to emerge as a major oilseed crop owing to poor agronomic attributes like long stature, long maturity duration and low seed yield. The restricted amount of genetic variability available in natural B. carinata necessitates utilization of new sources of variability for broadening its genetic base. Interspecific hybridization followed by selection in selfed and back cross progenies was employed to generate useful variability into B. carinata cv ˈPC5ˈ from elite lines of Brassica napus (AACC, 2n=38) and Brassica juncea (AABB, 2n=36). The morphological evaluation of 24 stable introgressed progenies revealed wide range of variability for key economic traits. The progenies with mean maturity duration of 161 ± 2.1 days, short stature of 139.5 ± 6.5 cm and seed yield per plant of 18.6 ± 2.0 g in comparison to the corresponding figures of 168 ± 4.6 days, 230.6 ± 12.7 cm and 12.0 ± 2.4 g in ˈPC5ˈ (recurrent parent) were recovered. Diversity analysis at morphological level revealed that 22 out of 24 stable introgressed progenies were grouped with B. carinata ˈPC5ˈ at average taxonomic distance of 1.19. The diversity at molecular level using 25 polymorphic and reproducible RAPD primers revealed that 19 out of 21 introgressed progenies grouped with B. carinata ˈPC5ˈ at a similarity coefficient of 0.68. The clusters in general represent a wide range of genetic diversity in the back cross lines of B. carinata as a result of introgression of genes from elite lines of B. napus and B. juncea parents.

Keywords


interspecific hybridization; gene introgression; variability; genetic relatedness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alemaheyu N, Becker H, 2002. Genotypic diversity and patterns of variation in a germplasm material of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun). Genet Resources Crop Evol 49: 573-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021204412404

Attia T, Robbelen G, 1986. Cytogenetic relationship within cultivated Brassica analyzed in amphidiploids from the three diploid ancestors. Can J Gent Cytol 28: 323-329.

Axelsson T, Bowmann CM, Sharpe AG, Lydiate DJ, Lagercrantz U, 2000. Amphidiploid Brassica juncea contains conserved progenitor genomes. Genome 43: 679-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/gen-43-4-679

Barro F, Fernandez Escobar J, de la Vega M, Martin A, 2003. Modification of glucosinolate and erucic acid contents in doubled haploid lines of Brassica carinata by UV treatment of isolated microspores. Euphytica 129: 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021578318098

Bhaskar PB, Ahuja I, Juneja HS, Banga SS, 2002. Intergeneric hybridization between Erucastrum canariense and Brassica rapa. Genetic relatedness between E and A genomes. Theor Appl Genet 105: 754-758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0915-3

Choudhary BR, Joshi P, Ramarao S, 2000. Interspecific hybridization between Brassica carinata and Brassica rapa. Plant Breed 119: 417-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00503.x

Getinet A, Rakow G, Downey RK, 1996. Agronomic performance and seed quality of Abyssinian mustard in Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 76: 387-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps96-069

Getinet A, Rakow G, Downey RK, 1997. Glucosinolate content in interspecific cross of Brassica carinata with B. juncea and B. napus. Plant Breed 116: 39-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1997.tb00972.x

Kumar P, Singh K, Vikal Y, Randhawa LS, Chahal GS, 2003. Genetic diversity studies of elite cotton germplasm lines using RAPD markers and morphological characteristics. Indian J Genet 63: 5-10.

Li M, Liu J, Wrang Y, Yu L, Meng J, 2007. Production of partial new-typed Brassica napus by introgression of genomic components from B. rapa and B. carinata. J Genet Genomics 34: 460-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60050-2

Namai H, Sarashima M, Hosoda T, 1980. Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization breeding in Japan. In: Brassica crops and wild allies: biology and breeding (Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez- Campo C, eds). Japan Scientific Societies, Tokyo. pp: 191-203.

Pradhan AK, Prakash S, Mukhopadhyay A, Pental D, 1992. Phylogeny of Brassica and allied genera based on variation in chloroplasts and mitochondrial DNA patterns molecular and taxonomic classification are incongruous. Theor Appl Genet 85: 331-340.

Prakash S, 1973. Non homologous meiotic pairing in the A and B genomes of M Brassica: its breeding significance in the production of variable amphidiploids. Genet Res 21: 133-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300013318

Prakash S, Hinata K, 1980. Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassicas, a review. Opera Botanica 55: 1-57.

Prakash S, Chopra VL, 1988. Introgression of resistance to shattering in Brassica napus from Brassica juncea through non-homologous recombination. Plant Breed 101: 167-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00283.x

Prakash S, Chopra VL, 1990. Reconstruction of allopolyploid Brassicas through non- homologous recombination: Introgression of resistance to pod shatter in Brassica napus. Genet Res Camb 56: 1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300028810

Prakash S, Chopra VL, 1991. Cytogenetics of crop Brassicas and their allies. In: Chromosome engineering in plants: Genetics, breeding, evolution (Tsuchiya T, Gupta PK, eds) Part B, Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp: 161-180.

Qian W, Meng J, Li M, Frauen M, Sass O, Noack J, Jung C, 2006. Introgression of genomic components from Chinese Brassica rapa contributes to widening the genetic diversity in apeseed (B. napus L.), with emphasis on the evolution of Chinese rapeseed. Theor Appl Genet 113: 49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0269-3

Rao MVB, Rama Kumar PV, Murthy VVA, 1993. Introgression of earliness in Brassica napus. II. An interspecific B. napus and B. carinata cross. Int J Trop Agri II: 20-26.

Roebbelen G, 1960. Beitrage Zur Analyse des Brassica- Genome. Chromosome II: 205-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00328652

Rohlf FJ, 1998. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate version 1.80. Exeter software, Setauket, NY, USA.

Sneath PHA, Sokal RR, 1973. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practices of numerical classification. W H Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp: 573.

Sokal RR, Michener CD, 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin. pp: 1409-1438.

Song K M, Osborn TC, Williams PH, 1988. Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs): 1. Genome evolution of diploid and amphiploid species. Theor Appl Genet 75: 784-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00265606

Song KM, Tang K, Osborn TC, 1993. Development of synthetic Brassica amphiploids by reciprocal hybridization and comparison to natural amphidiploids. Theor Appl Genet 86: 811-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00212606

Song KM, Lu P, Tang K, Osborn TC, 1995. Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implication for polyploidy evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci 92:7719-7723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719

Szestowicka B, Sparibionek S, Krzymanski J, 1995. Use of interspecific hybrids between Brassica napus and B. carinata in breeding to improve quality in Swede rape. Rosliny Oleiste 16: 63-68.

U N, 1935. Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japanese J Bot 7: 389-452.




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2014123-5365