Cattle mortality due to poisoning in Spain: a cross-sectional epidemiological study
Abstract
The lack of nationwide public databases on poisoning in cattle makes it difficult to investigate this issue. Hence, we conducted an epidemiological study using the data on cattle poisoning provided by an insurance company (2000-2005), to determine the mortality rate due to poisoning in cattle in Spain and to assess the influence of the following variables: type of farming, age, sex, time of year, year and region. We observed a mortality rate of 23.25 per 100,000 animals in Spain with a higher rate in beef than dairy cattle (32.14 vs. 4.51 per 100,000 animals). There were also differences in the mortality rate between breeding cattle and future breeders, affecting dairy and beef cattle in a different way. In dairy cattle, we found differences between the years analysed. In beef cattle, the time of year with highest risk of poisoning was the last quarter (19.45 per 100,000 animals), while the lowest mortality rate was observed in the first quarter (1.33 per 100,000). There were pronounced differences between regions in beef cattle, differences being non-significant in dairy cattle. Lastly, in beef cattle, no differences were found between sexes. In summary, the mortality rate due to poisoning in cattle in Spain is low, and the risk of poisoning is determined by the farming system, animals’ stage of development, time of year and region.
Downloads
References
References
Benavides E, 2004. Causas de muerte súbita en los bovinos en pastoreo en las sabanas de América Tropical. Rev Colomb Cienc Pec 17(2): 182-192.
Berny P, Sadoul N, Dol S, Videman B, Kayser Y, Hafner H, 2002. Impact of local agricultural and industrial practices on organic contamination of little egret (Egretta garzetta) eggs in the Rhone Delta, southern France. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(3): 520-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210308
Berny P, Caloni F, Croubels S, Sachana M, Vandenbroucke V, Davanzo F, Guitart R, 2010. Animal poisoning in Europe. Part 2: Companion animals. Vet J 183(3): 255-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.034
Blanco FJ, 2012. Valores analíticos de ganado vacuno en régimen extensivo expuesto al consumo de helechos. Doctoral thesis. Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
Cortinovis C, Caloni F, 2013. Epidemiology of intoxication of domestic animals by plants in Europe. Vet J 197: 163-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.007
Crespo JM, 2011. Intoxicación por plantas en el toro bravo. X Simposium del Toro de Lidia. Edición digital de la revista del Symposium del Toro de Lidia. Zafra, Badajoz, Spain. Available in http://www.simposiotorozafra.org/ [14 May 2012].
Denogean F, Moreno S, Martín M, Ibarra F, 2008. Impacto económico de las plantas tóxicas para el ganado sobre la producción pecuaria en Sonora. Rev Mex Agronegocios XII(22): 538-549.
Esselmont RJ, Kossaibati MA, 1997. Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Vet Rec 140: 36-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.140.2.36
Frutos P, Pérez V, Benavides J, Mantecón AR, 2005. Intoxicación del ganado vacuno por el consumo de bellotas, a pesar de las advertencias. Albéitar 86: 42-44.
García-Rollán M, 1986. Plantas mortales en España. Colección Agricultura Práctica nº 38. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid, Spain. 126 pp.
Giorgi M, Mengozzi G, 2011. Malicius animal intoxications: poisoned baits. Vet Med-Czech 56(4): 173-179.
Giurgiu G, Mircean M, Scurtu I, Popovici C, 2008. Epidemiological, clinical and paraclinical investigations in cattle enzootic haematuria in area from N-W of Transilvania. Bulletin UASVM, Vet Med-US 65(2): 12-15.
Gonzalez M, Mazucchelli F, Blanco J, Parrilla G, González J, 1999. Intoxicaciones de origen vegetal en ganado vacuno. Producción Animal 140: 32-42.
Guitart R, Croubels S, Caloni F, Sachana M, Davanzo F, Vandenbroucke V, Berny P, 2010. Review. Animal poisoning in Europe. Part 1: Farm livestock and poultry. Vet J 183(3): 249-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.03.002
Hernández H, 1997. Aislamiento y cuantificación del agente cancerígeno del Pteridium aquilinum. Master’s thesis. Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, San José.
James LF, 1978. Overview of poisonous plants problems in the United Estates. In: Effects of poisonous plants on livestock (Keeler RF, Van Kampen KR, James LF, eds.). Acad Press, NY, pp: 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-403250-7.50007-8
Kellerman TS, Naudé TW, Fourie N, Onderstepoort J, 1996. The distribution, diagnoses and estimated economic impact of plant poisonings and mycotoxicosis in South Africa. Vet Res 63(2): 65-90.
Lucena R, Pierezan F, Kommers G, Irigoyen L, Fighera R, Barros C, 2010. Doenças de bovinos no Sul do Brasil: 6706 casos. Pesquisa Vet Brasil 30(5): 428-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2010000500010
MAGRAMA, 2008. Anuario de Estadística, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid. Available in: http://www.magrama.gob.es/estadistica/pags/anuario/2008/AE_2008_Completo.pdf [accessed 22/05/2009].
Mañosa S, Mateo R, Guitart R, 2001. A review of the effects of agricultural and industrial contamination on the Ebro delta biota and wildlife. Environ Monit Assess 71(2): 187-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017545932219
Marrero E, Bulnes C, Sánchez LM, Palenzuela I, Stuart R, Jacobs F, Romero J, 2001. Pteridium aquilinum (bracken fern) toxicity in cattle in the humid Chaco of Tarija, Bolivia. Vet Hum Toxicol 43(3): 156-158.
Mavangira V, Evans TJ, Villamil JA, Hahn AW, Chigerwe M, Tyler JW, 2008. Relationships between demographic variables and lead toxicosis in cattle evaluated at North American veterinary teaching hospitals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 233(6): 955-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.233.6.955
Nielsen DB, 1988. Economic impact of poisonous plants on the rangeland livestock industry. J Anim Sci 66(9): 2330-2333.
Novoa MC, Melgar MJ, García MA, Alonso J, Pérez-López M, 2012. Análisis de la casuística del Servicio de Atención Toxicológica Veterinaria (SATVe) en el período 2001-2007. Rev Toxicol 29(1): 29-35.
Riet-Correa F, Medeiros R, 2001. Intoxicações por plantas em ruminantes no Brasil e no Uruguai: importância econômica, controle e riscos para a saúde pública. Pesquisa Vet Brasil 21(1): 38-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2001000100008
Rodríguez L, Ríos E, Macció A, Merlo W, Lectora J, 2005. Intoxicación con Ipomoea fistulosa (aguapié, mandiyurá) en cabras. Efectos sobre el sistema nervioso. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas 2005 (resumen v-015) Argentina.
Rogel L, Tamayo R, 2007. Mortalidad de vacas en tres rebaños lecheros: estudio preliminar (1994-2004). Arch Med Vet 39(3): 255-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2007000300009
Sánchez-Villalobos AJ, 2006. Otras consideraciones etiopatológicas de la hematuria vesical bovina. 1er Encuentro Latinoamericano de Expertos en HVB, Zaruma, Ecuador. Memorias. pp: 1-24.
Schrader A, Schulz O, Völker H, Puls H, 2001. Recent plant poisoning in ruminants of northern and eastern Germany. Communication from the practice for the practice. Berl Munch Tierarztl 114(5-6): 218-221.
Sotillo JL, Vigil E, 1978. Bases fisiozootécnicas de la producción animal. Fac. Veterinaria, Univ. Oviedo, Mijares, León, Spain. 531 pp.
Tokarnia CH, Döbereiner J, Peixoto PV, 2002. Poisonous plants affecting livestock in Brazil. Toxicon 40(12): 1635-1660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00239-8
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1973. Cattle raising in the United States. US Dep Agr, Econ Res Serv, Agr Econ Rep no. 235.
Vandenbroucke V, Van Pelt H, de Backer P, Croubels S, 2010. Animal poisonings in Belgium: a review of past decade. Vlaams Diergen Tijds 79: 259-268.
Yeruham I, Avidar Y, Perl S, Yakobson B, Shlosberg A, Hanji V, Bogin E, 1998. Probable toxicosis in cattle in Israel caused by the oak Quercus calliprinos. Vet Hum Toxicol 40(6): 336-340.
Zorita E, 2001. La investigación zootécnica española. Las razones de un fracaso. Arch Zootec 50: 441-463.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.