Simulating future wheat yield under climate change, carbon dioxide enrichment and technology improvement in Iran. Case study: Azarbaijan region

  • Hamed Mansouri Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agronomy. Mashhad
  • Yaghoub Raei University of Tabriz, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Ecophysiology. Tabriz
  • Abdolreza Nokhbe Zaeim Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agronomy. Mashhad
Keywords: DSSAT, general circulation model, SRES, crop model

Abstract

Climate change and technology development can affect crop productivity in future conditions. Precise estimation of crops yield change as affected by climate and technology in the future is an effective approach for management strategies. The aim of this study was to estimate the impacts of climate change, technology improvement, CO2 enrichment, and overall impacts on wheat yield under future conditions. Wheat yield was projected for three future time periods (2020, 2050 and 2080) compared to baseline year (2011) under two scenarios of IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) including SRES-A2 as regional economic scenario and SRES-B1 as global environmental scenario in Azarbaijan region (NW of Iran). A linear regression model, describing the relationship between wheat yield and historical year, was developed to investigate technology development effect. The decision support system for agro-technology transfer (DSSAT4.5) was used to evaluate the influence of climate change on wheat yield. The most positive effects were found for wheat yield as affected by technology in all studied regions. Under future climate change, the SRES projected a decrease in yield, especially in West Azarbaijan region. When the effects of elevated CO2 were considered, all regions resulted to increase in wheat yield. Considering all components effect in comparison with baseline (2011), yield increase would range from 5% to 38% across all times, scenarios and regions. According to our findings, it seems that we may expect a higher yield of wheat in NW Iran in the future if technology development continues as well as past years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadinezhad R, Najafi N, Aliasgharzad N, Oustan SH, 2013. Effects of organic and nitrogen fertilizers on water use efficiency, yield and the growth characteristics of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Alvand). J Water Soil Sci 23(2): 177-194 [In Persian with English abstract].

Amthor JS, 1998. Perspective on the relative insignificance of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration to crop yield. Field Crops Res 58: 109-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00089-6

Amthor JS, 2001. Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration on wheat yield: review of results from experiments using various approaches to control CO2 concentration. Field Crops Res 73: 1-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00179-4

Austin RB, 1999. Yield of wheat in the United Kingdom: recent advances and prospects. Crop Sci 39: 1604-1610. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961604x

Bannayan M, Crout NMJ, Hoogenboom G, 2003. Application of the CERES-wheat model for within-season prediction of wheat yield in United Kingdom. Agron J 95: 114-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0114

Bannayan M, Hoogenboom G, 2008. Weather analogue: A tool for real-time prediction of daily weather data realizations based on a modified k-nearest neighbor approach. Environ Model Soft 3: 703-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.09.011

Bannayan M, Kobayashi K, Kim HY, Liffering M, Okada M, Miura S, 2005. Modelling the interactive effects of CO2 and N on rice production performance. Field Crops Res 14: 237-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.003

Bannayan M, Tojo Soler CM, Garcia A, GarciaY, Guerra LC, Hoogenboom G, 2009. Interactive effects of elevated [CO2] and temperature on growth and development of a short- and long-season peanut cultivar. Clim Change 96: 389-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9510-1

Battenfield SD, Klatt AR, Raun WR, 2013. Genetic yield potential improvement of semi dwarf winter wheat in the Great Plains. Crop Sci 53: 946-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0158

Borlaug NE, 2000. Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiol 124: 487-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.2.487

Chartzoulakis K, Psarras G, 2005. Global change effects on crop photosynthesis and production in Mediterranean: the case of Crete, Greece. Agric Ecosyst Environ 106: 147-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.10.004

Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ, 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408: 184-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35041539

De Costa WAJM, Weerakoon WMW, Herath HMLK, Amaratunga KSP, Abeywardena RMI, 2006. Physiology of yield determination of rice under elevated carbon dioxide at high temperatures in a sub-humid tropical climate. Field Crops Res 96: 336-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.002

Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Langenfelds R, Francey RJ, Barnola JM, Morgan V. 1996. Natural and anthropogenic changes in atmospheric CO2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn. J Geophys Res 101: 4115-4128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JD03410

Evans LT, 1997. Adapting and improving crops: the endless task. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond: Biol Sci 352: 901-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0069

Ewert F, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Metzger MJ, Leemans R, 2005. Future scenarios of European agricultural land use I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107: 101-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.003

Eyshi Rezaie E, Bannayan M, 2012. Reinfed wheat yields under climate change in northeastern Iran. Meteorol Appl 19: 346-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/met.268

Gordon C, Cooper C, Seinor CA, Banks H, Gregory JM, Johns TG, Mitchell JFB, Wood RA, 2000. The simulation of SST, seas ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Center coupled model without flux adjustment. Clim Dynam 16: 147-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003820050010

Huang Y, Yu Y, Zhang W, Sun W, Liu S, Jiang J, Wu J, Yu W, Yang Z, 2009. Agro-C: A biogeophysical model for simulating the carbon budget of agroecosystems. Agr Forest Meteorl 149: 106-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.07.013

IMAGE-Team, 2001, The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES: a comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK.

Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT, 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18: 235-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7

Keeling CD, Whorf TP, 2000. Atmospheric CO2 records from the SIO air sampling network. In: Trends: A compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

Koocheki A, Nassiri M, 2008.Impacts of climate change and CO2 concentration on wheat yield in Iran and adaptation strategies. Iranian J Field Crops Res 6: 139-153 [In Persian with English abstract].

Koocheki A, Nassiri M, Sharifi HR, Soltani A, Kamali GA, Rezvani-Moghaddam P, 2003. Simulation of changes in climatic parameters of Iran under doubled CO2 concentration using general circulation models. Desert 8: 178-190 [In Persian with English abstract].

Lawlor DW, Mitchell RAC, 1991. The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity: a review of field studies. Plant Cell Environ 14: 807-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01444.x

Lobell DB, Cassman KG, Field CB, 2009. Crop yield gaps: their importance, magnitudes, and causes. Annu Rev Environ Res 34: 179-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.041008.093740

Loomis RS, Amthor JS, 1999. Yield potential, plant assimilatory capacity, and metabolic efficiencies. Crop Sci 39: 1584-1596. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961584x

MAJ, 2009. Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture of the I.R. of Iran. http://www.maj.ir/Portal/english/Statistic/Default.asp?p0statistic. [20 September 2014].

Mall RK, Lal M, Bhatia VS, Rathore LS, Singh R, 2004. Mitigating climate change impact on soybean productivity in India: a simulation study. Agric For Meteorol 121:113–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00157-6

Miflin B, 2000. Crop improvement in the 21st century. J Exp Bot 51: 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.342.1

Mitchell JFB, Johns TC, Gregory JM, Tett S, 1995. Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases as sulphate aerosols. Nature 376: 501-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/376501a0

Mohammaddoust Chamanabad HR, Hemmati KH, Asghari A, Barmaki M, 2013. Effect of nitrogen and weed interference on some agronomic traits, five cultivars wheat yield and yield components. J Agri Sci Sus Proc 23(4): 131-140 [In Persian with English abstract].

Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grubler A, Jung TY, Kram T et al., 2000. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. IPCC, Cambridge University Press, UK.

Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV, 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10: 282-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

Nassiri M, Koocheki A, 2010. Agroecological zoning of wheat in Khorasan provinces: Estimating yield potential and yield gap. Iranian J Field Crops Res 7: 695-709 [In Persian with English abstract].

Palosuo T, Kersebaum KC, Angulo C, Hlavinka P, Moriondo M, Olesen JE, Patil RH, Ruget F, Rumbaur C, Takac J et al., 2011. Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: a comparison of eight crop growth models. Eur J Agron 35:103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.05.001

Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Fischer G, Livermore M, 1999. Climate change and world food security: a new assessment. Glob Environ Change 9 (S1): S51-S67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00018-7

Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Gischer G, 2004. Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change 14: 53-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.008

Pecetti L, Hollington PA, 1997. Application of the CERES-Wheat simulation model to durum wheat in two diverse Mediterranean environments. Eur J Agron 6: 125-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02039-4

Prudhomme C, Wilby RL, Crooks S, Kay AL, Reynard NS, 2010. Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: Application to flood risk. J Hydrol 390: 198-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.043

Reynolds MP, Rajaram S, Sayre KD, 1999. Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post-green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci 39: 1611-1621. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961611x

Rinaldi M, 2004. Water availability at sowing and nitrogen management of durum wheat: a seasonal analysis with the CERES-Wheat model. Field Crops Res 89: 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.024

Semenov MK, Brooks RJ, 1999. Spatial interpolation of the LARS-WG stochastic weather generator in Great Britain. Clim Res 11: 137-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr011137

Semenov MK, Stratonovitch A, 2010. Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Clim Res 41: 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr00836

Tubiello FN, Ewert F, 2002. Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. Eur J Agron 18 (1-2): 57-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00097-7

Viglizzo EF, Roberto ZE, Lertora F, Gay EL, Bernardos J, 1997. Climate term and land-use previous change term in field-crop ecosystems of Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 66: 61-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00079-0

Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, 1996. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 1995: Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-Technical Analyses Contribution of Working Group II to the 2nd Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK.

Wetterhall F, Bardossy A, Chen D, Halldin SCXU, 2009. Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation over Sweden using GCM output. Theor Appl Climatol 96: 95-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-008-0038-0

Yaffee RA, McGee M, 2000. An introduction to time series analysis and forecasting: with applications of SAS and SPSS. Academic Press.

Yang JC, Zhang JH, 2006. Grain filling of cereals under soil drying. New Phytologist 169: 223-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01597.x

Yoon ST, Hoogenboom G, Bannayan M, 2009. Growth and development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in response to CO2 enrichment under two different temperature regimes. Environ Exp Bot 67 (1): 178-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.015

Published
2015-12-02
How to Cite
Mansouri, H., Raei, Y., & Nokhbe Zaeim, A. (2015). Simulating future wheat yield under climate change, carbon dioxide enrichment and technology improvement in Iran. Case study: Azarbaijan region. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(4), e0306. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015134-6970
Section
Agricultural environment and ecology