The effects of three techniques that change the wetting patterns over subsurface drip-irrigated potatoes

  • Mohammad N. Elnesr Alamoudi Chair for Water Research, King Saud University, Riyadh
  • Abdurrahman A. Alazba Alamoudi Chair for Water Research, King Saud University, Riyadh
Keywords: intermittent application, subsurface drip irrigation, dual-lateral drip, physical barrier, water movement in the soil, Solanum tuberosum L.

Abstract

 

Wetting pattern enhancement is one of the goals of irrigation designers and researchers. In this study, we addressed three techniques (dual-lateral drip, intermittent flow and physical barrier methods) that change the wetting pattern of subsurface drip irrigation. To study their effect on the yield and water-use efficiency (WUE) of potatoes, field experiments were conducted for four seasons, during which the soil-water balance was continuously monitored using a set of capacitance probes. The results of the soil water patterns showed that both the dual-lateral and intermittent techniques increased lateral water movement and eliminated deep percolation, whereas the physical barrier had a limited effect on the top soil layer. The crop results indicated that the yield and WUE increased significantly in response to the application of the dual-lateral drip (up to 30%); the intermittent application also positively affected the yield (~10%) and the WUE (~14%), but these effects were not statistically significant according to the statistical model. The physical barrier showed a non-significant negative effect on the yield and WUE. These findings suggest the following recommended practices: the use of dual-lateral drip technique due to its beneficial results and its potential for increasing yields and reducing water consumption; the application of intermittent flow with more than three surges; and restricting the use of physical barriers to soils with high permeability.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelraouf RE, Abou-Hussein SD, Marzouk NM, 2013. Effect of pulse drip irrigation technology on the economical parameters of potato production under organic agriculture. J Appl Sci Res 9: 601-611.

Allan JA, 1998. Virtual water: a strategic resource global solutions to regional deficits. Ground Water 36: 545-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02825.x

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Paper 56. Available in http://www.fao.org/docrep/x0490e/x0490e00.htm.

Awady M, Wassif M, Abd-El-Salam M, El-Farrah M, 2008. Moisture distribution from subsurface dripping using saline water in sandy soil. 15th Annu Conf Misr Soc Agr Eng, pp: 477-496.

Bakeer G, El-Ebabi F, El-Saidi M, 2009. Effect of pulse drip irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of potato crop under organic agriculture in sandy soils. Misr J Agr Eng 26: 736-765.

Barth H, 1995. Resource conservation and preservation through a new subsurface irrigation system. Proc 5th Intl Microirrigation Congress. Lamm F, ed. ASABE, Orlando, FL, USA. pp: 168-174.

Brown K, Thomas J, Friedman S, Meiri A, 1996. Wetting patterns associated with directed subsurface irrigation. Proc Intl Conf. on Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling; Camp CR, Sadler EJ & Yoder, RE, eds. Am Soc Agric Eng, San Antonio, TX, USA. pp: 806-811.

Du Plessis HF, 2004. Row-spacing effects on drip irrigated potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ms Thesis, Tshwane Univ Technol, Dept Agric Manage, Pretoria, South Africa. 304 pp.

EC, 1999. Methods of assessment for potatoes and potato products. Official J. of the European Union 2718: 327-337.

Eid AR, Bakry BA, Taha MH, 2013. Effect of pulse drip irrigation and mulching systems on yield, quality traits and irrigation water use efficiency of soybean under sandy soil conditions. Agricultural Sciences 4: 249-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.45036

Elawady M, Abd-El-Salam M, Elnawawy M, El-Farrah M, 2003. Surface and subsurface irrigation effects on spinach and sorghum. 4th Annu Conf of Misr Soc Agric Eng, Oct 2003. pp: 118–130.

Elmaloglou S, Diamantopoulos E, 2008. The effect of intermittent water application by surface point sources on the soil moisture dynamics and on deep percolation under the root zone. Comput Electron Agr 62: 266-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.01.008

Elnesr MN, 2012. Subsurface drip irrigation development and modeling of wetting pattern. Lambert Acad Publ, 212 pp.

Elnesr MN, Alazba AA, El-Farrah MA, 2013a. Correcting inaccurately recorded data due to faulty calibration of a capacitance water content probe. Appl Env Soil Sci 2013: 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/530732

Elnesr MN, Alazba AA, Simunek J, 2013b. Dual-drip subsurface irrigation system: can it act as a hydraulic barrier? In: HYDRUS software applications to subsurface flow and contaminant transport problems. PC-Progress, Prague, Czech Republic, pp: 77-86.

Elnesr MN, Alazba AA, Šimůnek J, 2014. HYDRUS simulations of the effects of dual-drip subsurface irrigation and a physical barrier on water movement and solute transport in soils. Irrig Sci 32: 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0417-x

Glenn DM, 2000. Physiological effects of incomplete root-zone wetting on plant growth and their implications for irrigation management. HortScience 35: 1041-1043.

Haase NU, 2004. Estimation of dry matter and starch concentration in potatoes by determination of under-water weight and near infrared spectroscopy. Potato Res 46: 117-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02736081

Harmanto, Salokhe VM, Babel MS, Tantau HJ, 2005. Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment. Agr Water Manage 71: 225-242.

Horst MG, Shamutalov SS, Gonçalves JM, Pereira LS, 2007. Assessing impacts of surge-flow irrigation on water saving and productivity of cotton. Agr Water Manage 87: 115-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.014

Ismail S, Zien-El-Abedin T, Wassif M, Elnesr MN, 2006. Physical and hydraulic barriers under surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems. Misr J Agr Eng Res of the MSAE 23: 1001-1016.

Kenig E, Mor E, Oron G, 1995. Pulsating microirrigation for optimal water use and control in the soil. 5th Intl Microirrigation Cong, ASABE, Orlando, FL, USA. pp: 615-620.

King B, Stark J, Love S, 2003. Potato production with limited water supplies. The Idaho Center for Potato Research and Education, ID, USA. Available in http://goo.gl/J5fkjQ.

Levy D, 1986. Tuber yield and tuber quality of several potato cultivars as affected by seasonal high temperatures and by water deficit in a semi-arid environment. Potato Res 29: 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02361984

Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY, 2011. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15: 1577-1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011

Mirzaei F, Hatami M, Mousazadeh F, 2009. A simple model to estimate wetted soil volume from the trickle by use of the dimensional analysis technique. In: Advances in water resources and hydraulic engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp: 345-352. Available in http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_62 [12 January 2014].

Monserrat J, Vilaró J, Casalí J, Barragán J, 1993. Advantages of subsurface drip irrigation for processing tomatoes. Acta Hort (ISHS) 335: 455-460.

New L, Roberts RE, 2012. Drip irrigation for greenhouse vegetable production. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension. Available in http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/greenhouse/hydroponics/drip.html.

Niessen M, 1955. The weight of potatoes in water. Am Potato J 32: 332-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02898423

NIVAP, 2011. Netherlands catalogue of potato varieties. Netherlands Potato Consultative Foundation. Available in http://j.mp/1sTL6Ht.

Pelletier G, Tan CS, 1993. Determining irrigation wetting patterns using time domain reflectometry. HortScience 28: 338-339.

Phene C, Davis K, Hutmacher R, Barragán J, 1987. Advantages of subsurface drip irrigation for processing tomatoes. Acta Hort (ISHS) 200: 101-113.

Raoof M, Pilpayeh A, 2013. Estimating soil wetting profile under saturated infiltration process by numerical inversion solution in land slopes. Middle-East J Sci Res 13: 732-736.

Samadianfard S, Sadraddini AA, Nazemi AH, Provenzano G, Kisi Ö, 2012. Estimating soil wetting patterns for drip irrigation using genetic programming. Span J Agric Res 10: 1155-1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012104-502-11

Souza CF, Matsura EE, 2003. Multi-wire time domain reflectometry (TDR) probe with electrical impedance discontinuities for measuring water content distribution. Agr Water Manage 59: 205-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00133-6

Subbaiah R, 2013. A review of models for predicting soil water dynamics during trickle irrigation. Irrig Sci 31: 225-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0309-x

Vyrlas P, Sakellariou M, 2005. Intermittent water application through surface and subsurface drip irrigation. ASAE Annu Intl Meeting, Tampa, FL, USA. Available in http://goo.gl/3Gn7xb.

Wang XY, Xie HT, Linag WJ, Wen DZ, 2004. Rice yield and water use as affected by soil management practices. Pedosphere 14: 331-337.

Welsh D, Kreuter U, Byles J, 1995. Enhancing subsurface drip irrigation through vector flow. Proc 5th Intl Microirrigation Cong, Lamm F, ed. ASABE, Orlando, FL, USA. pp: 688-693.

Zin El-Abedin T, 2006. Effect of pulse drip irrigation on soil moisture distribution and maize production in clay soil. 14th Annu Conf of the Misr Soc Agr Eng, 22 Nov. pp: 1032-1050. Available in http://www.mjae.eg.net/pdf/2006/nov/19.pdf.

Published
2015-08-28
How to Cite
Elnesr, M. N., & Alazba, A. A. (2015). The effects of three techniques that change the wetting patterns over subsurface drip-irrigated potatoes. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(3), e1204. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015133-7102
Section
Water management