Performance, behaviour and meat quality of beef heifers fed concentrate and straw offered as total mixed ration or free-choice
Abstract
Eighteen Simmental heifers were fed concentrate and barley straw offered as a total mixed ration (TMR) or separately as a free choice (FCH) to compare performance, behaviour, and meat quality. The heifers were assigned to treatments in a randomized complete block design. Animals were allotted to roofed pens with 3 animals per pen, and 3 pens per treatment. Intake of concentrate, average daily gain, and gain to feed ratio were not different between diets, being on average 7.6 kg/day, 1.38 kg/day and 0.18 kg/kg, respectively. Straw intake was greater in TMR than in FCH treatment (0.7 vs 0.3 kg/day, respectively; p<0.001). Crude protein intake, neutral detergent fibre intake and water consumption did not differ between treatments. Time spent eating was longer in FCH than in TMR (p=0.001), whereas time spent ruminating and total chewing time were longer (p<0.01) in TMR than in FCH. The number of displacements resulting from competition for feed in the main feeder in TMR treatment tended to be greater than in FCH treatment. There were no differences in the carcass characteristics and quality of meat of animals assigned to the different feeding methods, but the percentage of 18:2 n-6 was higher in FCH treatment. In summary, these results suggest that the use of TMR as a feeding method in beef cattle fed high concentrate diets did not affect performance and increased time spent ruminating with a potential decrease of ruminal acidosis incidence.
Downloads
References
Albertí P, Beriain MJ, Ripoll G, Sarriés V, Panea B, Mendizabal JA, Purroy A, Olleta JL, Sañudo C, 2014. Effect of including linseed in a concentrate fed to young bulls on intramuscular fatty acids and beef color. Meat Sci 96: 1258-1265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.11.009
AOAC, 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Arlington, VA, USA.
Atwood SB, Provenza FD, Wiedmeier RD, Banner RE, 2001. Influence of free-choice vs mixed-ration diets on food intake and performance of fattening calves. J Anim Sci 79: 3034-3040.
Bauman DE, Perfield IIJW, de Veth MJ, Lock AL, 2003. New perspectives on lipid digestion and metabolism in ruminants. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf., 65th annual meeting, East Syracuse, NY (USA), Oct 21-23. pp: 175-189.
Beam TM, Jenkins TC, Moate PJ, Kohn RA, Palmquist DL, 2000. Effects of amount and source of fat on the rates of lypolisis and biohydrogenation of fatty acids in ruminal contents. J Dairy Sci 83: 2564-2573. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75149-6
Beauchemin KA, Yang WZ, Rode LM, 2003. Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 86: 630-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73641-8
Devant M, Ferret A, Gasa J, Calsamiglia S, Casals R, 2000. Effects of protein concentration and degradability on performance, ruminal fermentation, and nitrogen metabolism in rapidly growing heifers fed high-concentrate diets from 100 to 230 kg body weight. J Anim Sci 78: 1667-1676.
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM, 2004. Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behaviour of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 87: 1432-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73293-2
Doreau M, Ferlay A, 1994. Digestion and utilization of fatty-acids by ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 45: 379-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90039-6
EC, 2007. Council Regulation No 1234/2007 establishing a common organization of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation). 22 October 2007.
EC, 2008. Commission Regulation No 1249/2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcases and the reporting of prices thereof. 10 December 2008.
Enser M, Hallett K, Hewett B, Fursey GAJ, Wood JD, 1996. Fatty acid content and composition of English beef, lamb and pork at retail. Meat Sci 44: 443-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)00037-2
Faleiro AG, González LA, Blanch M, Cavini S, Castells L, Ruíz de la Torre JL, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, 2011. Performance, ruminal changes, behaviour and welfare of growing heifers fed a concentrate diet with or without barley straw. Animal 5: 294-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110001904
FEDNA, 2008. Necesidades nutricionales para rumiantes de cebo. Normas FEDNA. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, Madrid. 54 pp.
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley S, 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497-509.
Friend TH, Polan CE, 1974. Social rank, feeding behavior, and free stall utilization by dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 57: 1214-1222. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(74)85040-X
González LA, Ferret A, Manteca X, Ruíz de la Torre JL, Calsamiglia S, Devant M, Bach A, 2008. Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place. J Anim Sci 86: 1446-1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0675
Iraira SP, Ruíz de la Torre JL, Rodríguez-Prado M, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, 2012. Effect of feeding method on intake and behaviour of individually reared beef heifers fed a concentrate diet from 115 to 185 kg of body weight. Animal 6: 1483-1490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000390
Kondo S, Hurnik JF, 1990. Stabilization of social hierarchy in dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 27: 287-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90125-W
Leonardi C, Armentano LE, 2003. Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 86: 557-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73634-0
Mach N, Devant M, Díaz I, Forn-Furnols M, Oliver MA, García JA, Bach A, 2006. Increasing the amount of n-3 fatty acids in meat from young Holstein bulls through nutrition. J Anim Sci 84: 3039-3048. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-632
Miller K, Wood-Gush DGM, 1991. Some effects of housing on the social behaviour of dairy cows. Anim Prod 53: 271-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100020262
Moloney AP, Keane MG, Dunne PG, Mooney MT, Troy DJ, 2008. Effect of concentrate feeding pattern in a grass silage/concentrate beef finishing system on performance, selected carcass and meat quality characteristics. Meat Sci 79: 355-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.018
Moya D, Mazzenga A, Holtshausen L, Cozzi G, González LA, Calsamiglia S, Gibb DG, McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein K, 2011. Feeding behaviour and ruminal acidosis in beef cattle offered a total mixed ration or dietary components separately. J Anim Sci 89: 520-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3045
NRC, 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Update 2000. Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC, USA. 232 pp.
Robles V, González LA, Ferret A, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, 2007. Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci 85: 2538-2547. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-739
Shackelford SD, Wheeler, Koohmaraie M, 1997. Tenderness classification of beef: I. Evaluation of beef Longissimus shear force at 1 or 2 days post-mortem as a predictor of aged beef tenderness. J. Anim Sci 75: 2417-2422.
Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI, 1996. Effect of pH on biohydrogenation of soyabean oil by rumen contents in vitro. Reprod Nutr Dev 36: 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19960105
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74: 3583-3597. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.