Comparison between sprinkler irrigation and natural rainfall based on droplet diameter

MaoSheng Ge, Pute Wu, Delan Zhu, Daniel P. Ames

Abstract


An indoor experiment was conducted to analyze the movement characteristics of different sized droplets and their influence on water application rate distribution and kinetic energy distribution. Radial droplets emitted from a Nelson D3000 sprinkler nozzle under 66.3, 84.8, and 103.3 kPa were measured in terms of droplet velocity, landing angle, and droplet kinetic energy and results were compared to natural rainfall characteristics. Results indicate that sprinkler irrigation droplet landing velocity for all sizes of droplets is not related to nozzle pressure and the values of landing velocity are very close to that of natural rainfall. The velocity horizontal component increases with radial distance while the velocity vertical component decreases with radial distance. Additionally, landing angle of all droplet sizes decreases with radial distance. The kinetic energy is decomposed into vertical component and horizontal component due to the oblique angles of droplet impact on the surface soil, and this may aggravate soil erosion. Therefore the actual oblique angle of impact should be considered in actual field conditions and measures should be taken for remediation of soil erosion if necessary.


Keywords


droplet size; velocity; landing angle; kinetic energy

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Atlas D, Ulbrich CW, 1977. Path-and area-integrated rainfall measurement by microwave attenuation in the 1-3 cm band. J Appl Meteorol 16 (12): 1322-1331.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016<1322:PAAIRM>2.0.CO;2

Beard KV, 1976. Terminal velocity of cloud and precipitation drops aloft. J Atmos Sci 33 (5): 851-864.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO;2

Clark GA, Srinivas K, Rogers DH, Stratton R, Martin VL, 2003. Measured and simulated uniformity of low drift nozzle sprinklers. T ASAE 46 (2): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.12983

Erpul G, Gabriëls D, Cornelis WM, Samray HN, Guzelordu T, 2008. Sand detachment under rains with varying angle of incidence. Catena 72 (3): 413-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.07.008

Faci JM, Salvador R, Playán E, Sourell H, 2001. Comparison of fixed and rotating spray plate sprinklers. J Irrig Drain Eng 127(4): 224-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:4(224)

Gunn R, Kinzer GD, 1949. The terminal fall velocity for water droplets in stagnant air. J Meteor 6(4): 243-248.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1949)006<0243:TTVOFF>2.0.CO;2

Kincaid DC, Solomon KH, Oliphant JC, 1996. Drop size distributions for irrigation sprinklers. T ASAE 39 (3): 839-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.27568

King BA, Bjorneberg DL, 2010. Characterizing droplet kinetic energy applied by moving spray-plate center-pivot irrigation sprinklers. T ASABE 53 (1): 137-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.29512

King BA, Winward TW, Bjorneberg DL, 2010. Laser precipitation monitor for measurement of drop size and velocity of moving spray-plate sprinklers. Appl Eng Agric 26 (2): 263-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.29551

Laws JO, Parsons DA, 1943. The relation of raindrop-size to intensity. Trans Am Geophys Union 24 (2): 452-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/TR024i002p00452

Low TB, List R, 1982. Collision, coalescence and breakup of raindrops. Part I: Experimentally established coalescence efficiencies and fragment size distributions in breakup. J Atmos Sci 39 (7): 1591-1606.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<1591:CCABOR>2.0.CO;2

Mccreery GE, Stoots CM, 1996. Drop formation mechanisms and size distributions for spray plate nozzles. Int J Multiphase Flow 22 (22): 431-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(95)00086-0

Mohammed D, Kohl RA, 1987. Infiltration response to kinetic energy. T ASAE 30 (1): 108-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.30410

Montero J, Tarjuelo JM, Carrión P, 2003. Sprinkler droplet size distribution measured with an optical spectropluviometer. Irrig Sci 22 (2): 47-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0069-3

Nuyttens D, Baetens K, Schampheleire MD, Sonck B, 2007. Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosys Eng 97 (3): 333-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.03.001

Salvador R, Bautista CC, Burguete J, Zapata N, Serreta A, Playan E, 2009. A photographic method for drop characterization in agricultural sprinklers. Irrig Sci 27(4): 307-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0147-2

Solomon KH, Kincaid DC, Bezdek JC, 1985. Drop size distributions for irrigation spray nozzles. T ASAE 28(6): 1966-1974. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.32550

Testik FY, Barros AP, 2007. Toward elucidating the microstructure of warm rainfall: a survey. Rev Geophys 45 (2): 2637-2655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000182

Thompson AL, James LG, 1985. Water droplet impact and its effect on infiltration. T ASAE 28 (5): 1506-1510. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.32468

Thompson AL, Regmi TP, Ghidey F, Gantzer CJ, Hjelmfelt AT, 2001. Influence of kinetic energy on infiltration and erosion [C]. Soil erosion research for the 21st century. Proc Int Symp Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, January 3-5. Am Soc Agric Eng, pp: 151-154.

Ulbrich CW, 1983. Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J Climate Appl Meteor 22 (10): 1764-1775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1764:NVITAF>2.0.CO;2

Villermaux E, Bossa B, 2009. Single-drop fragmentation determines size distribution of raindrops. Nature Phys 5 (9): 697-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys1340




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2016141-8076