Imaging technologies to study the composition of live pigs: A review

Keywords: body composition, ultrasound, visual image analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance image

Abstract

Image techniques are increasingly being applied to livestock animals. This paper overviews recent advances in image processing analysis for live pigs, including ultrasound, visual image analysis by monitoring, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. The methodology for live pigs evaluation, advantages and disadvantages of different devices, the variables and measurements analysed, the predictions obtained using these measurements and their accuracy are discussed in the present paper. Utilities of these technologies for livestock purposes are also reviewed. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging yield useful results for the estimation of the amount of fat and lean mass either in live pigs or in carcasses. Ultrasound is not sufficiently accurate when high precision in estimating pig body composition is necessary but can provide useful information in agriculture to classify pigs for breeding purposes or before slaughter. Improvements in factors, such as the speed of scanning, cost and image accuracy and processing, would advance the application of image processing technologies in livestock animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aasmundstad T, Kongsro J, Wetten M, Dolvik NI, Vangen O, 2013. Osteochondrosis in pigs diagnosed with computed tomography: heritabilities and genetic correlations to weight gain in specific age intervals. Animal 7(10): 1576-1582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113001158

Aasmundstad T, Grindflek E, Nordbø Ø, Kongsro J, Vangen O, 2014. Osteochondrosis in Duroc pigs scored by computed tomography; heritabilities based on genomic and pedigree relationship matrices. Proc 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livest. Prod., Vancouver, Canada.

Afonso JJM, 1992. Factors affecting growth and body composition in sheep. PhD, University of New England, Armidale, New Zealand.

Allen P, Finnerty N, 2000. Objective beef carcass classification - A report of a trial of three VIA classification systems. The National Food Centre, Dublin.

Bahelka I, Oravcová M, Peškovičová D, Tomka J, Hanusová E, Lahučký R, Demo P, 2009. Comparison of accuracy of intramuscular fat prediction in live pigs using five different ultrasound intensity levels. Animal 3: 1205-1211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109004480

Bardera A, Martίnez R, Boada I, Font-i-Furnols M, Gispert M, 2012. VisualPork towards the simulation of a virtual butcher. Proc. 1st FAIM Conf., Dublin, Ireland.

Baulain U, 1997. Magnetic resonance imaging for the in vivo determination of body composition in animal science. Comput Electron Agr 17: 189-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(96)01304-X

Block J, 2014. Your guide to medical imaging equipment. http://info.blockimaging.com/bid/93368/GE-CT-Scanner-Cost-Price-Info [March 10th 2016].

Brethour JR, 1992. The repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound in measuring backfat of cattle. J Anim Sci 70(4): 1039-1044.

Brunton JA, Bayley HS, Atkinson SA, 1993.Validation and application of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mass and body composition in small infants. Am J Clin Nutr 58: 839-845.

Cann CE, 1988. Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 166(2): 509-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.166.2.3275985

Carabús A, Gispert M, Rodriguez P, Brun,A, Francàs C, Soler J, Font-i-Furnols M, 2011. Differences in body composition between pigs crossbreds of 30 kg measured in vivo by computed tomography. Book of Abstracts, 62 Ann Meeti Eur Fed Anim Sci 17: 104.

Carabús A, Gispert M, Brun A, Rodríguez P, Font-i-Furnols M, 2015a. In vivo computed tomography evaluation of the composition of the carcass and various cuts of growing pigs of three commercial crossbreeds. Livest Prod Sci 170: 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.10.005

Carabús A, Sainz RD, Oltjen JW, Gispert M, Font-i-Furnols M, 2015b. Predicting fat, lean and the weight of primal cuts of pigs of different genotypes and sexes using computed tomography. J Anim Sci 93(3): 1388-1397. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8697

Chang J, Jung J, Lee H, Chang D, Yoon J, Choi M, 2011. Computed tomographic evaluation of abdominal fat in minipigs. J Vet Sci 12: 91-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2011.12.1.91

Chmiel M, Lowinski M, Dasiewizc K, 2011. Application of computer vision systems for estimation of fat content in poultry meat. Food Control 22: 1424-1427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.03.002

Craigie CR, Navajas EA, Purchas RW, Maltin CA, Bünger L, Hoskin SO, Ross DW, Morris ST, Roehe R, 2012. A review of the development and use of video image analysis (VIA) for beef carcass evaluation as an alternative to the current EUROP system and other subjective systems. Meat Sci 92: 307-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.028

Cross HR, Gilliland DA, Durland PR, Seideman S, 1983. Beef carcass evaluation by use of a video image analysis system. J Anim Sci 57: 908-917.

Daumas G, Monziols M, 2011. An accurate and simple computed tomography approach for measuring the lean meat percentage of pig cuts. 57th Int Cong Meat Sci Technol, 7-12 August 2011, Ghent-Belgium.

Doeschl-Wilson AB, Green DM, Fisher AV, Carroll SM, Schofield CP, Whittemore CT, 2005. The relationship between body dimensions of living pigs and their carcass composition. Meat Sci 70: 229-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.01.010

Engel B, Lambooij E, Buist WG, Vereijken P, 2012. Lean meat prediction with HGP, CGM and CSB-Image-Meater, with prediction accuracy evaluated for different proportions of gilts, boars and castrated boars in the pig population. Meat Sci 90: 338-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.020

Ferell CL, Cornelius CG, 1984. Estimation of body composition of pigs. J Anim Sci 58: 903-912.

Fisher AV, Green DM, Whittemore CT, Wood JD, Schofield CP, 2003. Growth of carcass components and its relation with conformation in pigs of three types. Meat Sci 65: 639-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00266-8

Font i Furnols M, Gispert M, 2009. Comparison of different devices for predicting the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses. Meat Sci 83: 443-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.018

Font-i-Furnols M, Carabús A, Pomar C, Gispert M, 2015. Estimation of carcass and cuts composition from computed tomography images of growing live pigs of different genotypes. Animal 9: 166-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114002237

Fortin A, Wood JD, Whelehan OP, 1987. Breed and sex effects on the development, distribution of muscle, fat and bone, and the partition of fat in pigs. J Agric Sci 108: 141-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600064212

Fortin A, Tong AKW, Robertson WM, Zawadski,SM, Landry SJ, Robinson DJ, Liu T, Mockford RJ, 2003. A novel approach to grading pork carcasses: computer vision and ultrasound. Meat Sci 64: 451-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00104-3

Giles LR, Eamens GJ, Arthur PF, Barchia IM, James KJ, Taylor RD, 2008. Differential growth and development of pigs as assessed by X-ray computed tomography. J Anim Sci 87: 1648-1658. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1437

Gispert M, Font i Furnols M, Gil M, Velarde A, Diestre A, Carrión D, Sosnicki AA, Plastow GS, 2007. Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types. Meat Sci 77: 397-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.006

Gispert M, Oliver MA, Velarde A, Suárez P, Pérez J, Font-i-Furnols M, 2010. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of immunocastrated male, surgically castrated male, entire male and female pigs. Meat Sci 85: 664-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.021

Gjerlaug-Enger E, Kongsro J, Ødega J, Aass L, Vangen O, 2012. Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc. Animal 6: 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001455

Gotfredsen A, Borg J, Christiansen C, Mazess RB, 1984. Total body bone mineral in vivo by dual photon absorptiometry. I. Measurement procedures. Clin Physiol 4: 343-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.1984.tb00809.x

Humbert L, Whitmarsh T, Craene MD, Del Río Barquero LM, Frangi AF, 2012. Technical note: comparison between single and multiview simulated DXA configurations for reconstructing the 3D shape and bone mineral density distribution of the proximal femur. Med Phys 39(8): 5272-5276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4736540

Kistorp CN, Svendsen OL, 1998. Body composition results by DXA differ with manufacturer, instrument generation and software version. Appl Radiat Isot 49: 515-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(97)00063-8

Knox R, 2008. Using real-time ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis in swine. FactSheet. Pork Information Gateway. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Kohl G, 2005. The evolution and state-of-the-art principles of multislice computed tomography. Proc Am Thorac Soc Vol 2: 470-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/pats.200508-086DS

Kolstad K, 2001. Fat deposition and distribution measured by computer tomography in three genetic groups of pigs. Livest Prod Sci 67: 281-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00195-0

Kolstad K, Jopson NB, Vangen O, 1996. Breed and sex differences in fat distribution and mobilization in growing pigs fed at maintenance. Livest Prod Sci 47: 33-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(96)01001-9

Kongsro J, 2013. Development of a computer vision system to monitor pig locomotion. Open J Anim Sci 3: 254-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2013.33038

Kongsro J, Røe M, Kvaal K, Aastveit AH, Egelandsdal B, 2009. Prediction of fat, muscle and value in Norwegian lamb carcasses using EUROP classification, carcass shape and length measurements, visible light reflectance and computer tomography (CT). Meat Sci 81: 102-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.07.004

Kongsro J, Gjerlaug-Enger E, 2013. In vivo prediction of intramuscular fat in pigs using computed tomography. J Anim Sci 3: 321-325.

Kremer PV, Fernández-Fígares I, Förster M, Scholz AM, 2012. In vivo body composition in autochthonous and conventional pig breeding groups by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging under special consideration of Cerdo Ibérico. Animal 6: 2041-2047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001267

Kremer PV, Förster M, Scholz AM, 2013. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict the body composition of pigs in vivo. Animal 7: 879-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002340

Kusec G, Baulain U, Kallweit E, Glodek P, 2007. Influence of MHS genotype and feeding regime on allometric and temporal growth of pigs assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Livest Sci 110: 89-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.10.007

Lakshmanan S, Koch T, Brand S, Männicke N, Wicke M, Mörlein D, Raum K, 2012. Prediction of the intramuscular fat content in loin muscle of pig carcasses by quantitative time-resolved ultrasound. Meat Sci 90: 216-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.004

Lambe NR, Wood JD, McLean KA, Walling GA, Whitney H, Jagger S, Fullarton P, Bayntun J, Bünger L, 2013. Effects of low protein diets on pigs with a lean genotype 2. Compositional traits measured with computed tomography (CT). Meat Sci 95: 129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.038

Ley C, 2013. Pig genetics is all about sustainable profitability. Pig Int 43: 4-7.

Li J, Tan J, Martz FA, Heymann H, 1999. Image texture features as indicators of beef tenderness. Meat Sci 53: 17-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00031-5

Luiting P, Kolstad K, Enting H, Vangen O, 1995. Pig breed comparison for body composition at maintenance: analysis of computerized tomography data by mixture distributions. Livest Prod Sci 43: 225-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00044-L

Maignel L, Daigle JP, Gariépy C, Wilson D, Sullivan D, 2010. Prediction of intramuscular fat of live pigs using ultrasound technology and potential use in selection. 9th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, Germany, 1st-6th August.

Margeta V, Kralik G, Kušec H, Baulain U, 2007. Lean and fat development in the whole body and hams of hybrid pigs studied by magnetic resonance tomography. Czech J Anim Sci 52(5): 130-137.

McKeith RO, Lowe BK, Safko JA, Pitzer RM, Segers J R, Stelzleni AM, Azain MJ, Pringle TD, 2010. Prediction of carcass ad fat-free lean using ultrasound measures at the last and tenth rib in swine. 43rd Meeting of Midwest Am Soc Anim Sci, Des Moines, IA, 15-17 March.

Meek PD, 2012. Refining and improving the use of camera trap technology for wildlife management and research in Australia and New Zealand. The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia, Canberra.

Mitchell AD, Conway JM, Scholz AM, 1996. Incremental changes in total and regional body composition of growing pigs measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Growth Dev Aging 60: 95-105.

Mitchell AD, Scholz AM, Conway JM, 1998. Body composition analysis of pigs from 5 to 97 kg by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Appl Radiat Isot 49: 521-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(97)00066-3

Mitchell AD, Scholz AM, Wang PC, Song H, 2001. Body composition analysis of the pig by magnetic resonance imaging. J Anim Sci 79: 1800-1813.

Mitchell AD, Scholz A, Pursel V, 2002. Prediction of the in vivo body composition of pigs based on cross-sectional region analysis of dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Arch Tierz, Dummerstorf 45: 535-545.

Mohrmann M, Roehe R, Susenbeth A, Baulain U, Knap PW, 2006. Association between body composition of growing pigs determined by magnetic resonance imaging, deuterium dilution technique, and chemical analysis. Meat Sci 72: 518–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.08.020

Monziols M, Collewet G, Bonneau M, Mariette F, Davenel A, Kouba M, 2006. Quantification of muscle, subcutaneous fat and intermuscular fat in pig carcasses and cuts by magnetic resonance imaging. Meat Sci 72: 146-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.06.018

Mörlein D, Rosner F, Brand S, Jenderka KV, Wicke M, 2005. Non-destructive estimation of the intramuscular fat content of the longissimus muscle of pigs by means of spectral analysis of ultrasound echo signals. Meat Sci 69: 187-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.011

Newcom DW, Baas TJ, Lampe J, 2002. Prediction of intramuscular fat percentage in live swine using real-time ultrasound. J Anim Sci 80: 3046-3052.

Peppler WW, Mazess RB, 1981. Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photo absorptiometry. Theory and measurement procedure. Calcif Tissue Int 3: 353-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02409455

Pomar C, Rivest, J, 1996. The effect of body composition and data analysis on the estimation of body composition of pigs by dual energy X-ray absortiometry (DEXA). Ann Meet Can Soc Anim Sci, Lethbridge, Alberta, 7-11 July.

Romvári R, Szabó A, Kárpáti J, Kovách G, Bázár G, Horn P, 2005. Acta Vet Hung 53(2): 153-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/AVet.53.2005.2.1

Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O, 2004. OsiriX: An open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 17: 205-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6

Rozeboom KJ, Thomas MG, Hillman L, Chanetsa F, Lipsey RJ, Keisler DH, 1998. Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in estimating the carcass composition of wether lambs. J Anim Sci 76 (Suppl. 1): 149.

Schofield CP, 1990. Evaluation of image analysis as a means of estimating the weight of pigs. Agr Eng Res 47: 287-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(90)80048-Y

Schofield CP, 2007. Portable image-based pig weight monitoring systems. Eur Conf Precis Livestock Farm, Skiathos (Greece).

Scholz AM, Baulain U, 2009. Methods of determination of body composition in living animals. Zuechtungskunde 81: 86-96.

Scholz AM, Mitchell AD, 2010. Body composition: indirect measurement. Encyclopedia of Animal Science, 2nd Ed, 1: 152-156.

Scholz AM, Nüske S, Förster M, 2003. Body composition and bone mineralization in calves of different genetic origin by using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Acta Diabetologica 40 (Suppl. 1): S91-S94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00592-003-0037-7

Scholz AM, Bunger L, Kongsro J, Baulain U, Mitchell AD, 2015. Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review. Animal 9(7): 1250-1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000336

Schreiweis, M.A, Orban J, Ledur MC, Moody DE, Hester PY, 2005. Validation of dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry in live white leghorns. Poult Sci 84: 91-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.1.91

Silva SR, Alfonso JJ, Santos VA, Monteiro A, Guedes CM, Azevedo JMT, Dias-da-Silva A, 2006. In vivo estimation of sheep carcass composition using real-time ultrasound with two probes of 5 and 7.5 MHz and image analysis. J Anim Sci 84 (12): 3433-3439. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-154

Sun X, Chen KJ, Maddock-Carlin KR, Anderson VL, Lepper AN, Schwartz CA, Keller WL, Ilse BR, Magolski JD, Berg EP, 2012. Predicting beef tenderness using color and multispectral image texture features. Meat Sci 92: 386-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.030

Suster D, Leury BJ, Ostrowska E, Butler KL, Kerton DJ, Wark JD, Dunshea FR, 2003. Accuracy of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), weight and P2 back fat to predict whole body and carcass composition in pigs within and across experiments. Livest Prod Sci 84: 231-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00077-0

Swennen Q, Janssens GPJ, Geers R, Decuypere E, Buyse J, 2004. Validation of dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens. Poult Sci 83: 1348-1357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1348

Szabó CS, 2001. Determination of protein and fat content in growing and fattening pigs by the means of computed tomograph, using different lysine to digestible energy ratios in the diet. Doctoral (PhD) dissertation, University of Kaposvár, Hungary.

Szabó CS, Babinszky L, Verstegen MWA, Vangen O, Jansman AJM, Kanis E, 1999. The application of digital imaging techniques in the in vivo estimation of the body composition of pigs: a review. Livest Prod Sci 60: 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00050-0

Tothill P, Avenell A, Love J, Reid DM, 1994. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur J Clin Nutr 48: 781-794.

Walpert B, 2000. With ancillary services, you can do well by doing good. In: American College of Physicians Observer, October, 8.2.2011. http://www.acpinternist.org.

White RP, Schofield CP, Green DM, Parsons DJ, Whittemore CT, 2004. The effectiveness of a visual image analysis (VIA) system for monitoring the performance of growing/finishing pigs. Anim Sci 78: 409-418.

Published
2016-08-31
How to Cite
Carabús, A., Gispert, M., & Font-i-Furnols, M. (2016). Imaging technologies to study the composition of live pigs: A review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(3), e06R01. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016143-8439
Section
Animal production