Evaluating two irrigation controllers under subsurface drip irrigated tomato crop

Hussein M. Al-Ghobari, Fawzi S. Mohammad, Mohamed S. A. El Marazky


Smart systems could be used to improve irrigation scheduling and save water under Saudi Arabia’s present water crisis scenario. This study investigated two types of evapotranspiration-based smart irrigation controllers, SmartLine and Hunter Pro-C2, as promising tools for scheduling irrigation and quantifying plants’ water requirements to achieve water savings. The effectiveness of these technologies in reducing the amount of irrigation water was compared with the conventional irrigation scheduling method as a control treatment. The two smart irrigation sensors were used for subsurface irrigation of a tomato crop (cv. Nema) in an arid region. The results showed that the smart controllers significantly reduced the amount of applied water and increased the crop yield. In general, the Hunter Pro-C2 system saved the highest amount of water and produced the highest crop yield, resulting in the highest water irrigation efficiency compared with the SmartLine controller and the traditional irrigation schedule. It can be concluded that the application of advanced scheduling irrigation techniques such as the Hunter controller under arid conditions can realise economic benefits by saving large amounts of irrigation water.


smart irrigation; ET controllers; subsurface irrigation; automatic controllers; irrigation water use efficiency; arid region; tomato yields

Full Text:



Alexopoulos AA, Kondylis A, Passam HC, 2007. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting. J Food Agric Environ 5 (1): 178-179. http://world-food.net/download/journals/2007-issue_1/a10.pdf

Al-Ghobari HM, Mohammad FS, 2011. Intelligent irrigation performance: evaluation and quantifying its ability for conserving water in arid region. Appl Water Sci 1: 73-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13201-011-0017-y

Allen GR, Pereira SL, Dirk R, Martin S, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements FAO irrigation and drainage. FAO Irrig Drain Paper No 56, Rome, pp: 7-28.

Al-Omran AM, AL-Harbi AR, Wahb-Allah M, Nadeem MA, AL-Eter A, 2010. Impact of irrigation water quality, irrigation systems, irrigation rates and soil amendments on tomato production in sandy calcareous soil. Turk J Agric For 34: 59-73.

Ayars JE, Phene CJ, Hutmacher RB, Davis KR, Schoneman RA, Vail SS, Mead RM, 1999. Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: A review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory. Agric Water Manage 42: 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00025-6

Baiamonte G, Provenzano G, Rallo G, 2015. Analytical approach determining the optimal length of paired drip laterals in uniformly sloped fields. J Irrig Drain Eng 141 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000768

Cammalleri C, Rallo G, Agnese C, Ciraolo G, Minacapilli M, Provenzano G, 2013. Combined use of eddy covariance and sap flow techniques for partition of ET fluxes and water stress assessment in an irrigated olive orchard. Agric Water Manage 120: 89-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.003

Davis SL, Dukes MD, Miller GL, 2010. Irrigation scheduling performance by evapotranspiration-based controllers. Agric Water Manage 98: 19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.006

Douh B, Boujelben A, 2011. Improving water use efficiency for a sustainable productivity of agricultural systems with using subsurface drip irrigation for maize (Zea mays L.). J Agr Sci Technol 1: 881-888.

El Marazky MSA, Mohammad FS, Al-Ghobari HM, 2011. Evaluation of soil moisture sensors under intelligent irrigation systems for economical crops in arid regions. Am J Agr Biol Sci 6: 287-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2011.287.300

Elmaloglou S, Diamantopoulos E, Diamantopoulos N, 2010. Comparing soil moisture under trickle irrigation modeled as a point and line source. Agric Water Manage 49: 426-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.11.003

Evett SR., 2007. Soil water and monitoring technology. In: Irrigation of agricultural crops; Lascano RJ & Skoja RE (eds.), pp. 25-84. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, USA.

Fares A, Alva AK, 2000. Evaluation of capacitance probe for monitoring soil moisture content in a sandy Entisol profile with citrus trees. Irrig Sci 19: 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002710050001

Jones H, 2004. Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant based methods. J Exp Bot 55: 2427-2436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh213

Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Di Tommaso T, 2007. Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric Water Manage 92: 73-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.05.005

Mailhol JC, Ruelle P, Walserb S, Schützeb N Dejeana C, 2011. Analysis of AET and yield predictions under surface and buried drip irrigation systems using the Crop Model PILOTE and Hydrus-2D. Agric Water Manage 98: 1033-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.01.014

McCready MS, Dukes MD, Miller GL, 2009. Water conservation potential of smart irrigation controllers on St. Augustine grass. Agric Water Manage 96: 1623-1632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.007

Mguidiche A, Provenzano G, Douh B, Khila S, Rallo G, Boujelben A, 2015. Assessing HYDRUS-2D model to simulate water content and salt accumulation in a soil irrigated with a subsurface drip system: Application in a semiarid area of central Tunisia. Irrig Drain 64 (2): 263-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ird.1884

MOA, 2012. Agriculture Statistical Year Book. Agricultural Research and Development Affaires, Department of Studies Planning and Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture, Saudi Arabia.

Mohammad FS, Al-Ghobari HM, El Marazky MSA, 2013. Adoption of intelligent irrigation scheduling technique and its effect on water use efficiency of tomato crops in arid regions. Aust J Crop Sci 7: 305-313.

Muñoz-Carpena R, Dukes MD, 2005. Automatic irrigation based on soil moisture for vegetable crops. Fact Sheet ABE 356, Dept. of Agr. & Biol. Eng., University of Florida. http://irrigationtoolbox.com/ReferenceDocuments/Extension/Florida/AE35400.pdf

Papanikolaou C, Sakellariou-Makrantonaki M, 2013. The effect of an intelligent drip irrigation method on sorghum biomass, energy and water savings. Irrig Sci 31: 807-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-012-0344-2

Provenzano G, Rodriguez-Sinobas L, Tarquis AM, 2013. Soil and irrigation sustainability practices. Agric Water Manage 120: 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.01.001

Provenzano G., Rallo G., Ghazouani H, 2015. Assessing field and laboratory calibration protocols for the Diviner 2000 Probe in a range of soils with different textures. J Irrig Drain Eng 142 (2).

Rallo G., Agnese C, Minacapilli M, Provenzano G, 2012. Comparison of SWAP and FAO agrohydrological models to schedule irrigation of wine grapes. J Irrig Drain Eng 138 (1): 581-591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000435

SAS, 2008. The SAS System for Windows, Release 9. 0. Stat Anal Syst Inst, Cary, NC, USA.

Schlegel J, Stone LR, Dumler TJ, Lamm FR, 2012. Managing diminished irrigation capacity with preseason irrigation and plant density for corn production. T ASABE 55: 525-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.41394

Steel RG, Torrie JH, 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, NY.

Thompson RB, Gallardo M, Aguera T, Valdez LC, Fernande MD, 2006. Evaluation of the watermark sensor for use with drip irrigated vegetable crops. Irrig Sci 24: 185-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0009-5

DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2016144-8615