Is a combination of different natural substances suitable for slug (Arion spp.) control?

Žiga Laznik, Stanislav Trdan

Abstract


In a laboratory study we investigated the contact and barrier efficacy of different natural substances (wood ash, sawdust, hydrated lime, and diatomaceous earth) against slugs of the genus Arion, an important agricultural pest. Natural substances were tested individually and in combination with each other. The experiment was carried out in plastic petri dishes and in glass insectaria. Moistened tampons and fresh leaves of lettuce were placed into both experimental arenas. The slugs were starved for 48 hours prior to the experiment. Six categories of behaviour were identified for slugs in the presence of the natural substances: (1) slug survived the experiment, (2) slug died during the experiment, (3) slug crossed the barrier, (4) slug did not cross the barrier, (5) slug fed on the lettuce, and (6) slug did not feed on the lettuce. The effect of different treatments (natural substances) was significant. The results of our study have shown that hydrated lime had the best contact efficacy on slugs (the mortality of slugs was 100%), both individually and in combination with other substances. The treatments with hydrated lime also proved to be the most efficient barrier preventing slugs from feeding on lettuce. Hydrated lime shows great potential in Arion control in our investigation; however, further research is needed to investigate the practical value (how to avoid the problem when the substance becomes wet), safety and economics of hydrated lime used in this way.


Keywords


slugs; Lactuca sativa; barrier; contact efficacy; diatomaceous earth; hydrated lime; sawdust; wood ash

Full Text:

PDF HTML XML

References


Ahmadi E, 2004. A faunal study on snails and slugs on canola as a second cropping in paddy fields in Guilan and Mazandaran provinces. J Agric Sci 1: 69-82 [In Persian].

Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Economou LP, Dimizas CB, Vayias BJ, Tomanović Ž, Milutinović M, 2005. Persistence and efficacy of three diatomaceous earth formulations against Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on wheat and barley. J Econ Entomol 98: 1404-1412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-98.4.1404

Barker GM, 1991. Biology of slugs (Agriolimacidae and Arionidae: Mollusca) in New Zealand hill country pastures. Oecologia 85: 581-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00323771

Barker GM, 2002. Gastropods as pests in New Zealand pastoral agriculture, with emphasis on Agrilimacidae, Arionidae and Milacidae. In: Molluscs as crop pests; Barker GM (ed.), pp: 361-421. CAB Int, Wallingford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851993201.0361

Bohinc T, Vayias BJ, Bartol T, Trdan S, 2013. Assessment of insecticidal efficacy of diatomaceous earth and powder of common lavander and field horsetail against bean weevil adults. Neotrop Entomol 42: 642-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0168-7

Boiteau G, Singh RP, Mccarthy PC, 2012. Wood ash potential for Colorado potato beetle control. Am J Potato Res 89: 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12230-012-9234-7

Frank T, 1998. Slug damage and numbers of the slug pests, Arion lusitanicus and Deroceras reticulatum, in oilseed rape grown beside sown wildflower strips. Agric Ecosyst Environ 67: 67-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00108-4

Gebauer J, 2002. Effects of different nitrogen contents in wheat leaves on the food choice and feeding activity of the grey field slug, Deroceras reticulatum (Müller) under laboratory conditions. J Plant Dis Protect 109: 421-429.

Hammond RB, Beck T, Smith JA, Amos R, Barker J, Moore R, Siegrist H, Slates D, Ward B, 1999. Slugs in conservation tillage corn and soybeans in the Eastern corn belt. J Entomol Sci 4: 467-478.

Hata TY, Hara AH, Hu BKS, 1997. Molluscicides and mechanical barriers against slugs Vaginula plebeia Fischer and Veronicella cubensis (Pfeiffer) (Stylommatophora:Veronicellidae). Crop Prot 16: 501-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(97)00034-3

Henderson I, Triebskorn R, 2002. Chemical control of terrestrial gastropods. In: Molluscs as crop pests; Barker GM (Ed.), pp: 1-31. CABI Publ., Wallingford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851993201.0001

Hoshmand AR, 2006. Design of experiments for agriculture and the natural science, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. 456 pp.

Hunter PJ, Symonds BV, 1970. The distribution of bait pellets for slug control. Ann Appl Biol 65: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1970.tb04555.x

Laznik Ž, Križaj D, Trdan S, 2011. The effectiveness of electrified fencing using copper electrodes for slug (Arion spp.) control with direct electric current and voltage. Span J Agric Res 9: 894-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110903-412-10

Marston A, Hostettmann K, 1985. Plant molluscicides. Phytochemistry 24: 639-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84870-0

Martin TJ, 1993. The ecobiological effects of arable cropping including the non-target effects of pesticides with special reference to methiocarb pellets (Draza, Mesurol) used for slug control. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr Bayer 46: 49-102.

Port GR, Port CM, 1986. The behaviour of slugs in relation to crop damage and control. Agric Zool Rev 1: 255-299.

Prior DJ, 1985. Water regulatory behaviour in terrestrial gastropods. Biol Rev 60: 403-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1985.tb00423.x

Prior DJ, Uglem GL, 1984. Analysis of contact-rehydration in terrestrial gastropods: absorption of C-inulin through the epithelium of the foot. J Exp Biol 111: 75-80.

Purvis G, 1996. The hazard posed by methiocarb slug pellets to carabid beetles: understanding population effects in the field. In: Slug and snail pests in agriculture; Henderson IF (ed), pp. 189-196. British Crop Production Council Monograph No. 66.

Radwan MA, El-Zemity SR, 2007. Naturally occurring compounds for control of harmful snails. Pakistan J Zool 39: 339-344.

Reidenbach JM, Vala JC, Ghamizi M, 1989. The slugkilling Sciomyzidae (Diptera): potential agents in the biological control of crop pest molluscs. In: Slugs and snails in world agriculture; Henderson I (Ed.), pp. 273-280. British Crop Protection Council Monograph No. 41.

Rojht H, Horvat A, Athanassiou CG, Vayias BJ, Tomanović Ž, Trdan S, 2010. Impact of geochemical composition of diatomaceous earth on its insecticidal activity against adults of Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Pest Sci 83: 429-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10340-010-0313-6

Ryder TA, Bowen ID, 1977. The slug foot as a site of uptake of copper molluscicide. J Invertebr Pathol 30: 381-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2011(77)90149-5

Schüder I, Port G, Bennison J, 2003. Barriers, repellents and antifeedants for slug and snail control. Crop Prot 22: 1033-1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00120-0

Singh SK, Yadav RP, Singh A, 2010. Molluscicides from some common medicinal plants of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. J Appl Toxicol 30: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.1498

Symondson WOC, 1989. Biological control of slugs by carabids. In: Slugs and snails in world agriculture; Henderson I (Ed.), pp. 295-300. British Crop Protection Council Monograph No. 41.

Wilson MJ, Glen DM, George SK, Butler RC, 1993. The rhabditid nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, as a potential biocontrol agent for slugs. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3: 503-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583159309355306

Young AG, Port GR, 1989. The effect of microclimate on slug activity in the field. In: Slugs and snails in world agriculture; Henderson I (Ed.), pp: 263-269. British Crop Protection Council Monograph No. 41.




DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2016143-9053