Short communication: Concentrate supplementation strategies in ryegrass pasture for productive performance in lambs

  • Sthefany K. Santos Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, M.S Program in Veterinary Sciences http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6444-9822
  • Margarete K. Falbo Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, M.S Program in Veterinary Sciences Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Veterinary Medicine
  • Itacir E. Sandini Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, M.S Program in Veterinary Sciences
  • Fabiano Pacentchuk Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, PhD Program in Agronomy
  • Mikael Neumann Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, M.S Program in Veterinary Sciences Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Veterinary Medicine
  • Gabriela Garbossa Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Veterinary Medicine
Keywords: creep feeding, economic return, metabolic profile, sheep

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of two concentrate supplementation strategies on performance, metabolic profile and economic evaluation of suckling lambs and ewes in ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) pasture. Twenty-seven ewes and 45 lambs were divided into three groups: (1) ryegrass pasture without supplementation - control (CON); (2) CON plus supplemented ewes and lambs at 1% of live weight (SEL), and (3) CON plus creep feeding supplemented lambs at 1% of live weight (CSL). Concentrate use increased (p<0.05) average daily gain (ADG) by 19.95% over CON (21.6 and 18.3% for SEL and CSL, respectively). Concentrate use contributed to minimizing forage quality fluctuation and provided greater ADG stability, mainly when ryegrass nutritional content and digestibility decreased. Blood metabolites profiles did not differ between groups, with exception of phosphorus which was higher for CON than SEL, and calcium which was higher for CSL than CON (p<0.05). Compared to CON, stoking rate values were greater to SEL (p<0.05). Compared to CSL, ewe and total stocking rate were greater (p<0.05) to SEL. Considering the control group as break even feed investment, SEL strategy had a positive economic return, while CSL showed economic losses. Concentrate use increased ADG of lambs and decrease the impact of nutrient quality changes of forage on daily gains, but must be considered that supplemental strategy used could affect negatively economic return.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen MS, Bradford BJ, Oba M, 2009. The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. J Anim Sci 87: 3317-3334. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1779

AOAC, 1995. Official methods of analysis. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., Washington, D.C., 1094 pp.

Borburema JB, Cezar MF, Marques DD, Cunha MG, Pereira Filho JM, Sousa WH, Furtado DA, Costa RG, 2012. Effect of diet on the metabolic profile of Santa Inês sheep feedlot. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 64: 983-990. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000400027

Borges GDS, Macedo VDP, Baiffus FSB, Atoji K, Hill JAG, Batista R, Bianchi AE, Ortiz S, 2013. Performance in vivo and biometric of goatling infant with access creep feeding at different ages. Rev Bras Saúde Prod Anim 14: 745-754. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402013000400018

Cappelle ER, Valadares Filho SC, Silva JFC, Cecon PR, 2001. Estimates of the energy value from chemical characteristics of the feedstuffs. R Bras Zootec 30: 1837-1856. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982001000700022

Castro FAB, Ribeiro ELA, Mizubuti IY, Silva LDDF, Freitas Barbosa MAA, Marson B, Grandis FA, Fernandes Junior F, Pereira ES, 2013. Dietary energy in late pregnancy and during lactation and performance of Santa Inês sheep in an accelerated mating system. Semina 34: 4187-4202.

Chaturvedi OH, Mann JS, Karim SA, 2010. Effect of concentrate supplementation to ewes grazing on community rangeland during late gestation and early lactation. Ind J Small Rumin 16: 97-100.

Farinatti LHE, Rocha MG, Poli CHEC, Pires CC, Potter L, Silva JHS, 2006. Performance of sheep fed different supplements or only Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) pasture. R Bras Zootec 35: 527-534. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982006000200027

Fernandes SR, Freitas JA, Souza DF, Kowalski LH, Dittrich RL, Junior PR, Silva CJA, 2012. Serum lipid profile in the assessment of energy metabolism in ruminants. CAST 18: 21-32.

Frescura RBM, Pires CC, Rocha MG, Silva JHS, Müller L, 2005. Effects of feeding systems on production of lambs to be slaughtered at 28 kg. Rev Bras Zootec 34: 1267-1277. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000400023

Galvani DB, Pires CC, Hübner CH, Carvalho S, Wommer TP, 2014. Growth performance and carcass traits of early-weaned lambs as affected by the nutritional regimen of lactating ewes. Small Rumin Res 120: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.03.008

González FHD, Conceição TR, Siqueira AJS, La Rosa VL, 2000. Blood variations of urea, creatinin, albumin and phosphorus in bovine cattle in Rio Grande do Sul State. Hora Vet 20: 59-62.

Gordon HMCL, Whitlock HN, 1939. A new technique for counting nematode egg in sheep faeces. Aust J Sci Res 12: 50-52.

Kaneko JJ, 2008. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. Academic Press, San Diego. 896 pp.

Maak R, 1968. Geografia física do Estado do Paraná. Banco de Desenvolvimento do Estado do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil, 350 pp.

Malan FS, Van Wyk JA, Wessels CD, 2001. Clinical evaluation of anaemia in sheep: early trials. Onderstepoort J Vet 68: 165-174.

Marchesan R, Paris W, Tonion R, Martinello C, Molinete ML, Paula FLM, Rocha R, 2015. Nutritional value of ryegrass cultivars intercropped or not with oats under two waste. Rev Ciênc Agrovet 14: 254-263. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711432015254

Oliveira RPM, Assante RT, Silva AF, Oliveira FF, Cruz FGG, Rufino JPF, 2016. Evaluation of metabolic profile at different stages of peripartum of Santa Inês ewes in the Western Amazon. Rev Bras Saúde Prod Anim 17: 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402016000100004

Pacheco A, Quirino CR, 2008. Study of growth traits in ram. Pubvet 2: 1-11.

Ribeiro TMD, Monteiro ALG, Poli CHEC, Moraes AD, Silva ALP, Barros CS, 2009. Ryegrass pasture characteristics and lamb productivity in grazing. R Bras Zootec 38: 580-587. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000300025

Silva CJA, Monteiro ALG, Fernandes SR, Poli CHE, Prado OR, Souza DF, 2012. Effect of creep feeding and creep grazing on the characteristics of tifton and italian ryegrass pastures and on sheep performance. Ci Anim Bras 13: 165-174.

Soares AB, Pin EA, Possenti JC, 2013. Nutritive value of five cool-season forage species under four sowing dates. Ciênc Rural 43: 1-6.

Sousa DA, Selaive-Villarroel AB, Pereira ES, Silva EMC, Oliveira RL, 2016. Effect of the Dorper breed on the performance, carcass and meat traits of lambs bred from Santa Inês sheep. Small Rumin Res 145: 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.017

Tonetto CJ, Pires CC, Müller L, Rocha MG, Silva JHS, Neto D, 2004. Weight gain and carcass characteristics of lambs finished in a natural supplemented pasture, ryegrass pasture (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and feedlot. R Bras Zootec 33: 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000100026

Van Soest PJ, Roberttson JB, Lewis BA, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Vazant ES, Cochran RC, Titgemeyer EC, 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J Anim Sci 76: 2717-2729. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76102717x

Zundt M, Oliveira KPD, Ambiel AC, Rego FCDA, Castilho C, Firetti R, 2014. Performance crossbred lambs dorper males and females, in creep feeding fed pelleted diets at weaning. Colloquium Agrariae 10: 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5747/ca.2014.v10.n1.a097

Published
2018-04-26
How to Cite
Santos, S. K., Falbo, M. K., Sandini, I. E., Pacentchuk, F., Neumann, M., & Garbossa, G. (2018). Short communication: Concentrate supplementation strategies in ryegrass pasture for productive performance in lambs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(1), e06SC02. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20181614-11067
Section
Animal production