A participatory approach to design a toolbox to support forest management planning at regional level
Aim of the study: Forest management planning in a region typically involves multiple stakeholders. Decisions processes are idiosyncratic, driven by individual goals and supported by segmented forest-based information. Nevertheless, stakeholders’ decisions do impact one another leading to complex interaction networks where communication, cooperation and negotiation play a key role. This research addresses the need to develop decision tools to support these roles. Emphasis is on the integration of participatory planning tools and techniques in the architecture of a regional decision support toolbox.
Area of the study: The proposed approach was applied in the Chamusca County in Central Portugal although it is easily extended to other regions.
Material and methods: This research proposes an Enterprise Architecture methodological approach to design a toolbox that may address distinct stakeholders’ interests and decision processes, while enabling communication, cooperation, negotiation and information sharing among all those involved in the regional interactions network.
Main results: the proposed approach was tested in a regional network involving decision processes and information shared by 22 entities clustered into 13 stakeholders groups, including industrial owners, and non-industrial private forestland owners (NIPF) - acting individually or grouped into associations and federations -, national and regional offices of the forest authority, forest services providers, non-governmental organizations and research centers. Results suggest that the proposed approach may provide a toolbox that may effectively address stakeholders’ decision processes and goals and support the regional interaction network.
Key-words: forest management; multiple stakeholders; decision support systems; enterprise architecture; participatory process.
Ananda, J. and Herath, G. 2003. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics 45: 75-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00004-1
Baptista, F.O. and Santos, R. 2005. Os proprietários florestais: Resultados de un inquérito. Celta. Oeiras. 94 pp.
Borges, J.G., Hoganson, H.M. and Rose, D.W. 1999. Combining a decomposition strategy with dynamic programming to solve spatially constrained forest management scheduling problems. Forest Science 45: 201-212.
Constantino, M., Martins, I. and Borges, J.G. 2008. A New Mixed-Integer Programming Model for Harvest Scheduling Subject to Maximum Area Restrictions. Operations Research 56(3): 542-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0472
Costa, A., Oliveira, A.C., Vidas, F. and Borges, J.G. 2010. An approach to cork oak forest management planning in Southwestern Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research 129: 233-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0326-y
De Steiguer, J., Liberti, L., Schuler, A. and Hansen, B. 2003. Multi-Criteria Decision Models for Forestry and Natural Resources Management: An Annotated Bibliography, Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 32 pp.
Diaz-Balteiro, L. and Romero, C. 2008. Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 235: 3222–3241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.038
Falcão, A. and Borges, J.G. 2002. Combining random and systematic search heuristic procedures for solving spatially constrained forest management scheduling models. Forest Science 48(3): 608-621.
Falcão, A., Próspero dos Santos, M. and Borges, J.G. 2006. A real-time visualization tool for forest ecosystem management decision support. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 53: 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2006.03.003
Ferreira, L., Constantino, M. and Borges, J.G. 2011. Optimizing the management of Pinus pinaster stand, under risk of fire. An application in Portugal. Annals of Operational Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0845-z
Forsell, N., Wikström, P., Garcia, F., Sabbadin, R., Blennow, K. and Eriksson, L.O. 2009. Management of the risk of wind damage in forestry: a graph-based Markov decision process approach. Annals of Operations Research.
Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Pukkala, T., Borges, J.G. 2011. Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal. Annals of Operational Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0908-1
Grimble, R. and Wellard, K. 1997. Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: a Review of Principles, Contexts, Experiences and Opportunities. Agricultural systems 55(2): 173-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1
Hjorts, C.N. 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR - an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. European Journal of Operational Research. 152: 667-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00065-1
Kangas, A., Kangas, J. and Kurttila, M. 2008. Decision Support for Forest Management. In: Gadow K, Pukkala T, Tomé M (ed.s) Managing Forest Ecosystems Vol 16. Springer, 224 pp.
Korpela, J., Sierilä, P. and Tuominen, M. 2001. A GDSS-Based Approach to the Strategy Analysis of Forest Industries. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34), IEEE Computer Society.
Kurtilla, M. and Pukkala, T. 2003. Combining holding-level economic goals with spatial landscape-level goals in the planning of multiple ownership forestry. Landscape Ecology 18: 529–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026054227874
Marques, A.F., Borges, J.G., Sousa, P. and Pinho, A.M. 2010a. An enterprise architecture approach to forest management support systems design. An application to pulpwood supply management in Portugal. European Journal of Forest Research 130(6): 935-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0482-8
Marques, A.F., Borges, J.G., Sousa, P., Fonseca, M., Garcia, R. and Batista, G. 2010b. Applying Enterprise Architecture to the Design of the Integrated Forest Products Supply Chain Management System. In: Varajão et al (ed) Proceedings of CENTERIS 2010, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp: 32-40.
Marques, A.F., Borges, J.G., Sousa, P., Fonseca, M., Gonçalves, J. and Oliveira, J. 2012. Chapter 1: An Enterprise Architecture Approach for Designing an Integrated Wood Supply Management System. In: Varajão et al. (eds) Organizational Integration of Enterprise Systems and Resources: Advancements and Applications. IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1764-3.ch001
Martins, H. and Borges, J.G. 2007. Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 248(1-2): 107-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.039
Novais, A. and Canadas, M.J. 2010. Understanding the management logic of private forest owners: A new approach. Forest Policy and Economics (12): 173-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.010
Nieuwenhuis, M. and Tiernan, D. 2005. The Impact of the Introduction of Sustainable Forest Management Objectives on the Optimization of PC-Based Forest-Level Harvest Schedules. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (4): 689-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.019
Nordstrom, E-M., Romero, C., Eriksson, L.O. and Öhman, K. 2009. Aggregation of preferences in participatory forest planning with multiple criteria: an application to the urban forest in Lycksele, Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 39: 1979-1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/X09-107
Palahí, M. and Pukkala, T. 2003. Optimizing the management of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands in Spain based on individual-tree models. Annals of Forest Science 60: 105-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003002
Papinet. 2011. Global Standard for the Paper and Forest Products. PapiNet ISS tool user guide v2r20. [internet site]. Available at www.papinet.org [Cited 20 Jun 2011].
PMI. 2011. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). PMI Standards Committee, Project Management Institute. [internet site]. Available at www.pmi.org [Cited 20 Jun 2011].
Pukkala, T., Heinonen, T. and Kurttila, M. 2009. An application of a reduced cost approach to spatial forest planning. Forest Science 55 (1): 13-22.
Purnomo, H., Mendonza, G., Prabhu, R. and Yasmi, Y. 2005. Developing multi-stakeholder forest management scenarios:a multi-agent system simulation approach applied in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 7: 475– 491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.08.004
Ribeiro, R.P., Borges, J.G., Pereira, C., Sousa, P. and Lé, J. 2005. Designing an Integrated Forest Planning System for the forest industry: an application in Portugal. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Systems Analysis in Forest Resources, Stevenson, WA, USA.
Schmoldt, D., Kangas, J. and Mendoza, G. 2001. Basic Principles of Decision Making in Natural Resources and the Environment, In: Schmoldt D et al (ed) The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp: 1-13.
Sheppard, S. and Meitner, M. 2005. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualization for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecology and Management 207: 171–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032
Sousa, P. and Pereira, C. 2005. Enterprise Architecture: Business and IT Alignment. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing Archive, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Sousa, P., Pereira, C. and Alves Marques, J. 2005. Enterprise Architecture Alignment Heuristics. Microsoft Enterprise Architectural Journal.
Spewak, S. and Hill, S. 1992. Enterprise Architecture Planning: Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology, Wiley-QED Publication.
Tecle, A., Shrestha, B. and Ducksteins, L. 1998. A Multiobjective Decision Support System for Multiresource Forest Management. Group Decision and Negotiation 7: 23-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008671129325
Toth, S.F. and McDill, M.E. 2008. Promoting large, compact mature forest patches in harvest scheduling models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13(1): 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10666-006-9080-4
Vainio, P., Tokola, T., Palander, T. and Kangas, A. 2009. A GIS-based stand management system for estimating local energy wood supplies. Biomass Bioenergy 33: 1278-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.021
© CSIC. Manuscripts published are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
Forest Systems is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the license CC-by must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.