Input point distribution for regular stem form spline modeling

  • Karel Kuželka Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Praha.
  • Róbert Marušák Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Praha.


Aim of study: To optimize an interpolation method and distribution of measured diameters to represent regular stem form of coniferous trees using a set of discrete points.

Area of study: Central-Bohemian highlands, Czech Republic; a region that represents average stand conditions of production forests of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in central Europe.

Material and methods: The accuracy of stem curves modeled using natural cubic splines from a set of measured diameters was evaluated for 85 closely measured stems of Norway spruce  using five statistical indicators and compared to the accuracy of three additional models based on different spline types selected for their ability to represent stem curves. The optimal positions to measure diameters were identified using an aggregate objective function approach.

Main results: The optimal positions of the input points vary depending on the properties of each spline type. If the optimal input points for each spline are used, then all spline types are able to give reasonable results with higher numbers of input points. The commonly used natural cubic spline was outperformed by other spline types. The lowest errors occur by interpolating the points using the Catmull-Rom spline, which gives accurate and unbiased volume estimates, even with only five input points.

Research highlights: The study contributes to more accurate representation of stem form and therefore more accurate estimation of stem volume using data obtained from terrestrial imagery or other close-range remote sensing methods.

Key words: spline; stem curve; taper model; diameter position; Norway spruce.


Download data is not yet available.



Biging GS, 1984. Taper equations for second-growth mixed conifers of Northern California. For Sci 30, 1103-1117.

Demaerschalk JP, 1972. Converting volume equations to compatible taper equations. For Sci 18, 241-245.

Figueiredo-Filho A, Borders BE, Hitch KL, 1996. Number of diameters required to represent stem profiles using interpolated cubic splines. Can J For Res 26, 1113-1121.

Goulding CJ, 1979. Cubic spline curves and calculation of volume of sectionally measured trees. N Z J For Sci 9, 89-99.

Hapca A, Mothe F, Leban JM, 2007. A digital photographic method for 3D reconstruction of standing tree shape. Ann For Sci 64, 631-637.

Kochanek DHU, Bartels RH, 1984. Interpolating splines with local tension, continuity, and bias control. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 18, 33-41.

Koskela L, Nummi T, Wenzel S, Kivinen VP, 2006. On the analysis of cubic smoothing spline-based stem curve prediction for forest harvesters. Can J For Res 36, 2909-2919.

Kozak A, Munro DD, Smith JHG, 1969. Taper functions and their application in forest inventory. Forest Chron 45, 278-283.

Kublin E, Augustin NH, Lappi J, 2008. A flexible regression model for diameter prediction. Eur J For Res 127, 415-428.

Kublin E, Breidenbach J, Kändler G, 2013. A flexible stem taper and volume prediction method based on mixed-effects B-spline regression. Eur J For Res 132, 983-997.

Laasasenaho J, Melkas T, Aldén SA, 2005. Modelling bark thickness of Picea abies with taper curves. For Ecol Manage 206, 35-47.

Lahtinen A, 1988. On the construction of monotony preserving taper curves. Acta Forestalia Fennica 203, 1-34.

Lahtinen A, Laasasenaho J, 1979. On the construction of taper curves by using spline functions. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 95, 1-63.

Lappi J, 2006. A multivariate, nonparametric stem-curve prediction method. Can J For Res 36, 1017-1027.

Lee W-K, Seo J-H, Son Y-M, Lee K-H, von Gadow K, 2003. Modeling stem profiles for Pinus densiflora in Korea. For Ecol Manage 172, 69-77.

Liu CJ, 1980. Log volume estimation with spline approximation. For Sci 26, 361-369.

Lovell J, Jupp D, Newnham G, Culvenor D, 2011. Measuring tree stem diameters using intensity profiles from ground-based scanning lidar from a fixed viewpoint. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66, 46-55.

The MathWorks, Inc, 2012. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2012b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.

Max TA, Burkhart HE, 1976. Segmented polynomial regression applied to taper equations. For Sci 22, 283-289.

Nummi T, Möttönen J, 2004. Prediction of stem measurements of Scots pine. J Appl Stat 31, 105–114.

Piegl L, Tiller W, 1996. The NURBS Book. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

Rojo A, Perales X, Sánchez-Rodríguez F, Ávarez-González JG, von Gadow K, 2005. Stem taper functions for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Galicia (Northwestern Spain). Eur J Forest Res 124, 177-186.

Sloboda B, Gaffrey D, Matsumura N, 1998. Erfassung individueller Baumschaftformen und ihrer Dynamik durch Spline-Funktionen und Verallgemeinerung durch lineare Schaftformmodelle. Allg Forst Jagdztg 169, 29-39.

Sharma M, Parton J, 2009. Modeling stand density effects on taper for jack pine and black spruce plantations using dimensional analysis. For Sci 55, 268-282.

Smaltschinski T, 1983. Individuelle Baumschaftform und cubische Spline Interpolation. Allg Forst Jagdztg 155, 193-197.

Thomas CE, Parresol BR, 1991. Simple, flexible, trigonometric taper equations. Can J For Res 21, 1132-1137.

How to Cite
KuželkaK., & MarušákR. (2015). Input point distribution for regular stem form spline modeling. Forest Systems, 24(1), e008.
Research Articles