Carbon content of forest floor and mineral soil in Mediterranean Pinus spp. and Oak stands in acid soils in Northern Spain

  • Celia Herrero Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute. University of Valladolid-INIA. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. University of Valladolid, and CM Ingenieria Ambiental, S.L. Palencia.
  • María Belén Turrión Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute. University of Valladolid-INIA. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. University of Valladolid, and Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. Palencia.
  • Valentín Pando Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute. University of Valladolid-INIA. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. University of Valladolid, and Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. Palencia.
  • Felipe Bravo Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute. University of Valladolid-INIA. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. University of Valladolid, and Departamento de Producción Vegetal y Recursos Forestales. E.T.S. Ingenierías Agrarias. Palencia.
Keywords: C fixation, pine, Quercus pyrenaica, litter, metabolic quotient (qCO2).


Aim of study: The aim of the study was to determine the baseline carbon stock in forest floor and mineral soils in pine and oak stands in acid soils in Northern Spain.

Area of study: The study area is situated in northern Spain (42° N, 4° W) on “Paramos y Valles” region of Palencia

Material and methods: An extensive monitoring composed of 48 plots (31 in pine and 17 in oak stands) was carried out. Litter layers and mineral soil samples, at depths of 0-30 cm and 30-60 cm, were taken in each plot. An intensive monitoring was also performed by sampling 12 of these 48 plots selected taken in account species forest composition and their stand development stage. Microbial biomass C (CMB), C mineralization (CRB), and soil organic C balance at stand level were determined in surface soil samples of intensive monitoring.

Main results: No differences in soil C content were detected in the two forest ecosystems up to 60 cm depth (53.0±25.8 Mg C ha-1 in Pinus spp. plantations and 60.3±43.8 Mg C ha-1 in oak stands). However, differences in total C (CT), CMB and CRB were found in the upper 10 cm of the soils depending on the stand development stage in each species forest composition (Pinus nigra, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pyrenaica). Plots with high development stage exhibited significant lower metabolic quotient (qCO2), so, meant more efficient utilization of C by the microbial community. The C content in the forest floor was higher in pine stands (13.7±0.9 Mg C ha-1) than in oak stands (5.4±0.7 Mg C ha-1). A greater turnover time was found in pine ecosystems vs. oak stands. In contrast, forest floor H layer was nonexistent in oak stands.

Research highlights: Results about litterfall, forest floor and mineral soil dynamics in this paper can be used strategically to reach environmental goals in new afforestation programs and sustainable forest management approaches.

Keywords: C stocks; pine; Quercus pyrenaica; litter; metabolic quotient (qCO2).


Download data is not yet available.



Alef K, 1995. Soil respiration. In: Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry; Alef K, Nanipieri P (eds). pp: 214-222. Academic Press, London.

Anderson TH, 2003. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to assess soil quality. Agr Ecosyst Environ 98: 285-293.

Anderson TH, Domsch KH, 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25: 393-395.

Bascomb CL, 1964. Rapid method for the determination of the cation exchange capacity of calcareous and non-calcareous soils. J Sci Food Agr 15: 821–823.

Bernoux M, Carvalho MCS, Volkoff B, Cerri CC, 2002. Brazil's soil carbon stock. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 888– 896.

Blake GR, Hartge KH, 1986. Bulk Density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 - Physical and Mineralogical Methods Second Edition; Klute A (ed). pp: 363-375. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Bueis T, Bravo F, Pando V, Turrion MB, 2016. Relationship between environmental parameters and Pinus sylvestris L. site index in forest plantations in northern Spain acidic plateau iForest Biogeosciences and Forestry e1.

Cañellas I, San Miguel A, 1998. Litter fall and nutrient turnover in Kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) shrublands in Valencia (eastern Spain). Ann For Sci 55: 587-598.

Chiti T, Díaz-Pinés E, Rubio A, 2012. Soil organic carbon stocks of conifers, broadleaf and evergreen broadleaf forests of Spain. Biol Fertil Soils 48: 817–826.

Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J, 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263: 185-190.

Doblas-Miranda E. Rovira P. Brotons L. Martinez-Vilalta J. Retana J. Pla M. Vayreda J, 2013. Soil carbon stocks and their variability across the forests, shrublands and grasslands of peninsular Spain. Biogeosciences. 10: 8353-8361.

Eleftheriadis A, Turrión MB, 2014. Soil microbiological properties affected by land use, management and time since deforestations and crop establishment. Eur J Soil Biol 62: 138-144.

Forsee, 2005. Proyecto FORSEE (20) INTERREG III B Espacio atlántico:

Gallardo JF, González MI, 2004. Sequestration of C in a Spanish chestnut coppice. Invest Agrar: Sis Recur For. Fuera de serie, 108-113.

Gallardo A, Merino J, 1993. Leaf decomposition in two Mediterranean ecosystems of Southwest Spain: influence of substrate quality. Ecology 74(3): 152-161.

Herrero C, Bravo F, 2012. Can we get an operational indicator of forest carbon sequestration? A case study from two forest regions in Spain. Ecol Indic 17: 120–126.

Insam H, 1990. Are the soil microbial biomass and basal respiration governed by the climate regime? Soil Biol Biochem 22: 525–532.

Jandl R, Linder M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Minkkinen KA, 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137: 253–268.

JCyL, 1995. Mapa geológico de Castilla y León. Conserjería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio, Dirección General de Urbanismo y Calidad Ambiental. Junta de Castilla y León, Spain. 60 pp.

JCyL, 2013. Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León. ITACYL-AEMET. Junta de Castilla y León, Spain.

Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB, 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 10, 423–436.[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2

Joergensen RG, Scholle G, Wolters V, 1995. Die Bestimmung von Muraminsäure als Biomarker von Bakterien. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft 76: 627–630.

Jones JB, Wolf JB, Mills HA, 1991. Plant analysis handbook: a practical sampling, preparation, analysis and interpretation guide. Micro-Macro Publishing, Inc., Athens, Georgia, USA. 213 pp.

Kavvadias VA, Alifragis D, Tsiontsis A, Brofas G, Stamatelos G, 2001. Litterfall, litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece. For Ecol Manage 144: 113–127.

Lal R, Kimble J, Stewart BA, 1995. Towards soil management for mitigating the greenhouse effect. In: R. Lal etal (Eds). Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect. Adv. Soil Sci., Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton: 373-381.

Lal R, 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manage 220: 220–242.

Llorente M, Turrión MB, 2010. Microbiological parameters as indicators of soil organic carbon dynamics in relation to different land use management. Eur J For Res 129: 73-81.

Mahía J, Pérez-Ventura A, Cabaneiro A, Díaz-Raviña M, 2006. Soil microbial biomass under pine forests in the north-western Spain: influence of stand age, site index and parent material. Invest Agrar Sist Recur For 15: 152-159.

MAPA, 1994. Métodos oficiales de análisis. Tomo III. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid. Spain. 662 pp.

Mudrick DA, Hoosein M, Hicks Jr RR, Townsend EC, 1994. Decomposition of leaf litter in an Appalachian forest: effects of leaf species, aspect, slope position and time. For Ecol Manage 68: 231-250.

Mulas R, Lafuente F, Turrión MB, López O, Ruipérez C, 2015. Efectos de los cambios de uso y manejo del suelo sobre la calidad y cantidad de la materia orgánica edáfica. In: Proteção do Solo e Combate à Desertificação: oportunidade para as regiões transfronteiriças; Figueiredo T, Fonseca F, Nunes L (eds). pp: 15-27. Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Portugal.

Oliver GR, Beets PN, Garrett LG, Pearce SH, Kimberly MO, Ford-Robertson JB, Robertson KA, 2004. Variation in soil carbon in pine plantations and implications for monitoring soil carbon stocks in relation to land-use change and forest site management in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 203: 283–295.

Olson JS, 1963. Energy storage and balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322-331.

Oostra S, Majdi H, Olsson M, 2006. Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res V 21: 364–371.

Ordóñez JAB, de Jong BHJ, García-Oliva F, Aviña FL, Pérez JV, Guerrero G, Martínez R, Masera O, 2008. Carbon content in vegetation, litter, and soil under 10 different land-use and land-cover classes in the Central Highlands of Michoacan, Mexico. For Ecol Manage 255: 2074–2084.

Powlson DS, Brookes PC, Christensen BT, 1987. Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 159-164.

Rodríguez Murillo JC, 2001. Organic carbon content under different types of land use and soil in Peninsular Spain. Biol Fertil Soils 33: 53-61.

SAS Institute Inc., 2010. SAS/STATTM User's Guide, Release 9.1. Cary, N.C, USA.

Schulp CJE, Nabuurs GJ, Verburg PH, de Waal RW, 2008. Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories. For Ecol Manage 256: 482–490.

Smyth CE, Macey D, Trofymow JA, 2015. Long-term litter decay in Canadian forests and the influence of soil microbial community and soil chemistry. Soil Biol Biochem 80: 251-259.

Turner J, Lambert MJ, 2008. Nutrient cycling in age sequences of two Eucalyptus plantation species. For Ecol Manage 255: 1701–1712.

Turrión MB, Lafuente F, Mulas R, López O, Ruipérez C, Pando V, 2012. Effects on soil organic matter mineralization and microbiological properties of applying compost to burned and unburned soils. J Environ Manage 95: 245-249.

Turrión MB, Schneider K, Gallardo JF, 2009. Carbon accumulation in Umbrisols under Quercus pyrenaica forests: Effects of bedrock and annual precipitation. Catena 79: 1-8.

Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS, 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 703-707.

Vande Walle I, Mussche S, Samson R, Lust N, Lemeur R, 2001. The above- and belowground carbon pools of two mixed deciduous forest stands located in East-Flanders (Belgium). Ann For Sci 58: 507–517.

Vesterdal L, Clarke N, Sigurdsson BD, Gundersen P, 2013. Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests? Forest Ecol Manage. 309: 4-18.

von Lützow M, Leifeld J, Kainz M, Kögel-Knabner I, Munch JC, 2002. Indications for soil organic matter quality in soils under different management. Geoderma 105: 243–258.

Wardle DA, Ghani A, 1995. A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1601-1610.

Waring RH, Schlesinger WH. 1985. Forest ecosystems concepts and management. New York. Academic Press. 340 pp.

WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Report, 84. FAO, Rome, Italy. 88 pp.

Zou XM, Ruan HH, Fu Y, Uang XD, Sha LQ, 2005. Estimating soil labile organic carbon and potential turnover rates using a sequential fumigation–incubation procedure. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1923–1928.

How to Cite
HerreroC., TurriónM. B., PandoV., & BravoF. (2016). Carbon content of forest floor and mineral soil in Mediterranean Pinus spp. and Oak stands in acid soils in Northern Spain. Forest Systems, 25(2), e065.