Short communication: Laboratory evaluation of nine highbush blueberry cultivars susceptibility to Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura, 1931) in the Southwestern Spain

  • José M. Molina IFAPA, Centro “Las Torres”, Laboratorio de Entomología. Crta. Sevilla-Cazalla de la Sierra, Km 12,2. 41200 Alcalá del Río (Sevilla) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5841-7368
  • Laura Avivar IFAPA, Centro “Las Torres”, Laboratorio de Entomología. Crta. Sevilla-Cazalla de la Sierra, Km 12,2. 41200 Alcalá del Río (Sevilla)
  • Sergio Pérez-Guerrero IFAPA, Centro “Las Torres”, Laboratorio de Entomología. Crta. Sevilla-Cazalla de la Sierra, Km 12,2. 41200 Alcalá del Río (Sevilla) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-9978
Keywords: spotted wing Drosophila, invasive pest, berry crops, pest-resistant, integrated pest management, sustainable agriculture

Abstract

Aim of study:  To determine how susceptible the most used Southern highbush blueberry (SHB) cultivars were to the spotted wing Drosophila (SWD), Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura, 1931) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) as well as those recently introduced to Southwestern Spain.

Area of study: Southwestern Spain (Huelva province).

Material and methods: Nine of the SHB cultivars which were recently introduced in Southwestern Spain and the most used ones were selected: ‘Arana’, ‘Camellia’, ‘Kirra’, ‘Mayra’, ‘Misty’, ‘O'Neal’, ‘Sharpblue’, ‘Star’ and ‘Ventura’. In order to determine how susceptible the cultivars were to SWD, no-choice tests were performed under laboratory conditions. In addition, berry size, berry firmness, ºBrix, and pH were recorded in order to assess what influence these variables had on oviposition preference by SWD.

Main results: Mean clutch size and mean number of emerged adults in ‘Star’ were significantly higher than in the other tested cultivars. ‘Mayra’, ‘Camellia’ and ‘Ventura’ received the lower clutch sizes and mean number of emerged adults. Mean developmental time (egg to adult) differed significantly among tested cultivars and were highest in ‘Camellia’ than in the other tested cultivars.  Only firmness and pH were correlated with SWD infestation as females tend to oviposit more eggs in softer fruits than in firmer fruits. Results also showed that a higher pH increased the emergence of adults and shortened the egg to adult developmental time.

Research highlights: Our results showed significant differences in the susceptibility of SHB to SWD. This information may help design IPM programs and in making recommendations for blueberry crops as planting of low-chill cultivars expands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGAPA, 2018. Sector Frutos Rojos. Arándano. Campaña 2017/18. Agencia de Gestión Agraria y Pesquera de Andalucía, Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Desarrollo Rural. Observatorio de Precios y Mercados. 2 pp. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/agriculturaypesca/observatorio/

Angeletti P, Castagnasso H, Miceli E, Terminiello L, Concellón A, Chaves A, Vicente AR, 2010. Effect of preharvest calcium applications on postharvest quality, softening and cell wall degradation of two blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) varieties. Postharvest Biol Technol 58: 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.05.015

Asplen MK, Anfora G, Biondi A, Choi DS, Chu D, Daane KM, Gibert P, Gutierrez AP, Hoelmer KA, Hutchinson WD, et al., 2015. Invasion biology of spotted wing Drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) a global perspective and future priorities. J Pest Sci 88: 469-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0681-z

Bañados MP, 2009. Expanding blueberry production into non-traditional production areas: Northern Chile and Argentina, Mexico and Spain. Acta Hort 810: 439-444. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.810.57

Baser N, Broutou O, Verrastro V, Porcelli F, Ioriatti C, Anfora G, Mazzoni V, Stacconi MVR, 2018. Susceptibility of table grape varieties grown in south-eastern Italy to Drosophila suzukii. J Appl Entomol 142: 465-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12490

Brevis PA, Bassil NV, Ballington JR, Hancock JF, 2008. Impact of wide hybridization on highbush blueberry breeding. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 133 (3): 427-437. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.133.3.427

Cini A, Ioriatti C, Anfora G, 2012. A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bull Insectol 65: 149-160.

Crawley MJ, 2005. Statistics: an introduction using R. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 327 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119941750

Ehlenfeldt MK, Martin RB, 2002. A survey of fruit firmness in highbush blueberry and species-introgressed blueberry cultivars. HortScience 37: 386-389. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.37.2.386

Forney CF, 2001. Horticultural and other factors affecting aroma volatile composition of small fruit. HortTechnology 11: 529-538. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.11.4.529

Gargani E, Tarchi F, Frosinini R, Mazza G, Simoni S, 2013. Notes on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera Drosophilidae): field survey in Tuscany and laboratory evaluation of organic products. Redia-Giornale di Zoologia 96: 85-90.

Gong X, Bräcker L, Bölke N, Plata C, Zeitlmayr S, Metzler D, Olbricht K, Gompel N, Parniske M, 2016. Strawberry accessions with reduced Drosophila suzukii emergence from fruits. Front Plant Sci 7: 1880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01880

Goodhue RE, Bolda M, Farnsworth D, Williams JC, Zalom FG, 2011. Spotted wing drosophila infestation of California strawberries and raspberries: Economic analysis of potential revenue losses and control costs. Pest Manage Sci 67: 1396-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2259

Hemer S, Briem F, Hecht A, Herzog K, Eben A, Vogt H, 2016. Variety-depending susceptibility of cherries to Drosophila suzukii according to fruit firmness and other ripening parameters. 9th Young Scientists Meeting, Quedlinburg, Germany, Nov 09-11, Berichte aus dem Julius Kühn-Institut 186. pp. 12.

Ioriatti C, Walton V, Dalton D, Anfora G, Grassi A, Maistri S, Mazzoni V, 2015. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and its potential impact to wine grapes during harvest in two cool climate wine grape production regions. J Econ Entomol 108: 1148-1155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov042

Kinjo H, Kunimi Y, Ban T, Nakai M, 2013. Oviposition efficacy of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera:Drosophilidae) on different cultivars of blueberry. J Econ Entomol 106: 1767-1771. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC12505

Lang GA, 1993. Southern highbush blueberries: Physiological and cultural factors important for optimal cropping of these complex hybrids. Acta Hortic 346: 72-80. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.346.9

Lee JC, Bruck DJ, Curry H, Edwards D, Haviland DR, Van Steenwyk RA, Yorgey BM, 2011. The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Manag Sci 67: 1358-1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2225

Lee JC, Dreves AJ, Cave AM, Kawai S, Isaacs R, Miller JC, Van Timmeren S, Bruck DJ, 2015. Infestation of wild and ornamental noncrop fruits by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 108: 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/sau014

Lee JC, Dalton DT, Swoboda-Bhattarai KA, Bruck DJ, Burrack HJ, Strik BC, Woltz JM, Walton VM, 2016. Characterization and manipulation of fruit susceptibility to Drosophila suzukii. J Pest Sci 89: 771-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-015-0692-9

Linder C, Martin C, Laboisse S, Chatelain PG, Kehrli P, 2014. Susceptibility of various grape cultivars to Drosophila suzukii and other vinegar flies. Integrated protection and production in Viticulture. IOBC-WPRS Bull 105: 219-224.

Little CM, Chapman TW, Moreau DL, Hillier NK, 2017. Susceptibility of selected boreal fruits and berries to the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Pest Manag Sci 73: 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4366

Little CM, Chapman TW, Hillier NK, 2018. Effect of color and contrast of highbush blueberries to host-finding behavior by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environ Entomol 47: 1242-1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvy102

Lobos GA, Hancock JF, 2015. Breeding blueberries for a changing global environment: a review. Front Plant Sci 6: 782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00782

Pelton E, Gratton C, Guédot C, 2017. Susceptibility of cold hardy grapes to Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Ent Appl 141: 644-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12384

Rodriguez-Saona C, Cloonan KR, Sanchez-Pedraza F, Zhou Y, Giusti MM, Benrey B, 2018. Differential susceptibility of wild and cultivated blueberries to an invasive frugivorous pest. J Chem Ecol 45 (3): 286-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-018-1042-1

Rodriguez-Saona C, Vincent C, Isaacs R, 2019. Blueberry IPM: past successes and future challenges Annu Rev Entomol 64: 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-112147

Scalzo J, Wright G, Boettiger S, 2016. Adaptability of blueberries to lower chill growing regions in Australia. Acta Hortic 1117: 45-48. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1117.8

Sharma HC, Ortiz R, 2002. Host plant resistance to insects: An eco-friendly approach for pest management and environment conservation. J Environ Biol 23 (2): 111-135.

Stringer SJ, Sampson BJ, Hummer KE, 2017. Screening small fruit germplasm for resistance to southern populations of invasive spotted wing drosophila, SWD (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Acta Hortic 1180: 45-52. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1180.7

Stückrath R, Quevedo R, de la Fuente L, Hernández A, Sepúlveda V, 2008. Effect of foliar application of calcium on the quality of blueberry fruits. J Plant Nutr 31: 1299-1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160802135076

Walsh DB, Bolda MP, Goodhue RE, Dreeves AJ, Lee JC, Bruck DJ, Walton VM, O'Neal SD, Zalom FG, 2011. Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): invasive pest of ripening soft fruit expanding its geographic range and damage potential. J Integr Pest Manage 1: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1603/IPM10010

Published
2020-09-22
How to Cite
MolinaJ. M., AvivarL., & Pérez-GuerreroS. (2020). Short communication: Laboratory evaluation of nine highbush blueberry cultivars susceptibility to Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura, 1931) in the Southwestern Spain. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 18(2), e10SC03. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020182-16100
Section
Plant protection