In vitro characterisation of the rumen fermentation pattern of the cell wall fraction from several fibrous sources

  • Ignacio R. Ortolani Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Dept. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, M. Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza
  • Zahia Amanzougarene Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Dept. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, M. Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza
  • Manuel Fondevila Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA, Dept. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, M. Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza
Keywords: neutral detergent fibre, gas production, non-forage fibrous sources


Aim of study: To isolate fibre effect from other factors when comparing fibrous sources, the rumen fermentation pattern of extracted cell walls was studied.

Material and methods: Cell wall fractions from soybean hulls (SH), sugarbeet pulp (BP), palm kernel cake (PK), oat hulls (OH), dehydrated alfalfa meal (DA) and barley straw (BS) were incubated in four 48 h series.

Main results: Cell wall extraction efficiency was ± 0.07 units over the neutral detergent fibre content, except for PK, which recovery was 0.20. Gas produced from BP and SH was higher (p<0.05) from 6 h. PK behaved similarly to SH from 6 to 24 h but maintained constant thereafter, whereas gas volume from OH was the lowest from 24 to 48 h (p<0.05). All substrates recorded a maximum rate of gas production at 12 h, except OH, for which fermentation was constant on time. The organic matter disappearance after 48 h incubation agreed with these results, being higher with BP and SH, whereas OH was the lowest (p<0.05). The proportion of methanein total gasproduced was higher in OH than BP at 36 and 48 h (p<0.05). The highest total VFA concentration was recorded with BP (p<0.05). Propionate proportion was enhanced from BP, BS and SH, and that of butyrate was higher with PK and OH, whereas no differences among substrates were recorded in acetate proportion.

Research highlights: Fermentation of the cell wall fraction of fibrous feeds is not directly linked to its chemical composition, not even to its lignin proportion. 


Download data is not yet available.


Amanzougarene Z, Fondevila M, 2018. Fitting of pH conditions for the study of concentrate feeds fermentation by the in vitro gas production technique. Anim Prod Sci 58: 1751-1757.

Analytical Software, 2010. Statistix 10 for Windows. Analytical Software, Tallahasee, FL, USA.

AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th ed., Horwitz W, Latimer GW (eds.), Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Armentano L, Pereira M, 1997. Measuring the effectiveness of fiber by animal response trials. J Dairy Sci 80: 1416-1425.

Bampidis VA, Robinson PH, 2006. Citrus by-products as ruminant feeds: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 128: 175-217.

Barrios Urdaneta A, Fondevila M, Balcells J, Dapoza C, Castrillo C, 2000. In vitro microbial digestion of straw cell wall polysaccharides in response to supplementation with different sources of carbohydrtes. Austr J Agric Res 51: 393-400.

Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O'Mara F, McAllister TA, 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Austr J Exp Agric 48: 21-27.

Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, Benchaar C, Holtshausen L, 2009. Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cow diets: Effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production. J Dairy Sci 92: 2118-2127.

Beuvink JM, Spoelstra SF, 1992. Interactions between substrate, fermentation end-products, buffering systems and gas production upon fermentation of different carbohydrates by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. Appl Microbiol Technol 37: 505-509.

BOE, 2013. Real Decreto 53/2013, de 1 de febrero, por el que se establecen las normas básicas aplicables para la protección de los animales utilizados en experimentación y otros fines científicos, incluyendo la docencia. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 34, 08/02/13.

Bradford BJ, Mullins CR, 2012. Invited review: strategies for promoting productivity and health of dairy cattle by feeding nonforage fiber sources. J Dairy Sci 95: 4735-4746.

Chesson A, 1993. Mechanistic model of forage cell wall degradation. In: Forage cell wall structure and digestibility; Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfield DR, Ralph J (eds); American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, WI, USA, pp: 347-376.

Chesson A, Gordon AH, Lomax JA, 1983. Substituent groups linked by alkali-labile bonds to arabinose and xylose residues of legume, grass and cereal straw cell walls and their fate during digestion by rumen microorganisms. J Sci Food Agric 34: 1330-1340.

Cone JW, van Gelder AH, 1999. Influence of protein fermentation on gas production profiles. Anim Feed Sci Technol 76: 251-264.

DePeters EJ, Fadel JG, Arosemena A, 1997. Digestion kinetics of neutral detergent fiber and chemical composition within some selected by-product feedstuffs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 67: 127-140.

Doreau M, Ferlay A, 1995. Effect of dietary lipids on nitrogen metabolism in the rumen: A review. Livest Prod Sci 43: 97-110.

Ertl P, Zebeli Q, Zollitsch W, Knaus W, 2015. Feeding of by-products completely replaced cereals and pulses in dairy cows and enhanced edible feed conversion ratio. J Dairy Sci 98: 1225-1233.

EU, 2010. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. 22 Sept 2013 [CELEX:32010L0063].

FEDNA, 2019. Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos, 4th ed.; de Blas C, et al. (eds.). Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, Madrid.

Ford CW, Elliot R, 1989. Biodegradability of grass cell walls in relation to chemical composition and rumen microbial activity. J Agr Sci, Camb, 108: 201-209.

Garleb KA, Bourquin LD, Hsu JT, Wagner GW, Schmidt SJ, Fahey Jr GC, 1991. Isolation and chemical analysis of nonfermented fiber fractions of oat hulls and cottonseed hulls. J Anim Sci 69: 1255-1271.

Gasa J, Castrillo C, Baucells MD, Guada JA, 1989. By-products from the canning industry as feedstuff for ruminants: Digestibility and its prediction from chemical composition and laboratory bioassays. Anim Feed Sci Technol 25: 67-77.

Getachew G, Blümmel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K, 1997. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 72: 261-281.

Getachew G, Robinson PH, dePeters EJ, Taylor SJ, 2004. Relationship between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 111: 57-71.

González Ronquillo M, Fondevila M, Barrios Urdaneta A, Newman Y, 1998. In vitro gas production from buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) fermentation in relation to the cutting interval, the level of nitrogen fertilisation and the season of growth. Anim Feed Sci Technol 72: 19-32.

Grant RJ, 1997. Interactions among forages and nonforage fiber sources. J Dairy Sci 80: 1438-1446.

Hindle V, Steg A, van Vuuren AM, Vroons-de Bruin J, 1995. Rumen degradation and post-ruminal digestion of palm-kernel by products in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol 51: 103-121.

Hsu JT, Faulkner DB, Garleb KA, Barclay GC, Fahey Jr GC, Berger LL, 1987. Evaluation of corn fiber, cottonseed hulls, oat hulls and soybean hulls as roughage sources for ruminants. J Anim Sci 65: 244-255.

Johnson KA, Johnson DE, 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73: 2483-92.

Jung HG, Deetz DA, 1993. Cell wall lignification and degradability. In: Forage cell wall structure and digestibility; Jung HG; Buxton DR, Hatfield RD, Ralph J (eds). p 315. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA.

Jung HG, Allen MS, 1995. Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J Anim Sci 73: 2774-2790.

Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT, McSweeney GS, 2003. Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27: 663-693.

Mertens DR, 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 85: 1217-1240.

Miron J, Yosef E, Ben-Ghedalia D, 2001. Composition and in vitro digestibility of monosaccharide constituents of selected byproduct feeds. J Agric Food Chem 49: 2322-2326.

Moss A, Jouany JP, Newbold J, 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Ann Zootech 49: 231-253.

Mould FL, Kliem KE, Morgan R, Mauricio RM, 2005. In vitro microbial inoculum: A review of its function and properties. Anim Feed Sci Technol 123-124: 31-50.

Münnich M, Khiaosa-ard R, Klevenhusen F, Hilpold A, Khol-Parisini A, Zebeli Q, 2017. A meta-analysis of feeding sugar beet pulp in dairy cows: Effects on feed intake, ruminal fermentation, performance, and net food production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 224: 78-89.

Okine EK, Mathison GW, Hardin RT, 1989. Effects of changes in frequency of reticular contractions on fluid and particulate passage rates in cattle. J Anim Sci 67: 3388-3396.

Ortolani IR, Amanzougarene Z, Fondevila M, 2020. In vitro estimation of the effect of grinding on rumen fermentation of fibrous feeds. Animals 10: 732.

Pardo G, Martín-García I, Arco A, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Moral R, del Prado A, 2016. Greenhouse-gas mitigation potential of agro-industrial by-products in the diet of dairy goats in Spain: a life-cycle perspective. Anim Prod Sci 56: 646-654.

Pereira MN, Garrett EF, Oetzel GR, Armentano LE, 1999. Partial replacement of forage with nonforage fiber sources in lactating cow diets. I. Performance and health. J Dairy Sci 82: 2716-2730.

Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ, 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In: The analysis of dietary fiber in foods; James WPT, Theander O (eds.), Marcel Dekker, NY, pp: 123-158.

Seo S, Lee SC, Lee SY, Seo JG, Ha JK, 2009. Degradation kinetics of carbohydrate fractions of feeds using automated gas production technique. Asian Austral J Anim Sci 22: 356-364.

Smith LW, Waldo DR, 1969. Method for sizing forage cell wall particles. J Dairy Sci 52: 2051-2053.

Theodorou MK, Williams BA, Dhanoa MS, McAllan AB, France J, 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 48: 185-197.

Thompson RK, Mustafa AF, Mckinnon JJ, Maenz D, Rossnagel B, 2000. Genotypic differences in chemical composition and ruminal degradability of oat hulls. Can J Anim Sci 80: 377-379.

Van Soest PJ, 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd ed. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, NY.

Wang K, Nan X, Chu K, Tong J, Yang L, Zheng S, Zhao G, Jiang L, Xiong B, 2018. Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro. Front Microbiol 9: 2764.

Wilson JR, 1994. Cell wall characteristics in relation to forage digestion by ruminants. J Agric Sci, Camb 122: 173-182.

Zhang Y, Gao W, Meng Q, 2007. Fermentation of plant cell walls by ruminal bacteria, protozoa and fungi and their interaction with fibre particle size. Arch Anim Nutr 61:

How to Cite
OrtolaniI. R., AmanzougareneZ., & FondevilaM. (2021). In vitro characterisation of the rumen fermentation pattern of the cell wall fraction from several fibrous sources. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(2), e0605.
Animal production