Genetic variation among selected pure lines from Turkish barley landrace 'Tokak' in yield-related and malting quality traits

Keywords: principal component analysis, alpha amylase, diastatic power, diversity, malt beta glucanase, malt extract


Aim of study: Improvement of barley cultivars for malting traits suffers from narrow genetic pool in barley for these traits. Landraces are resources that could be used for this purpose. The present study was conducted to determine the variation for malting quality traits within a Turkish barley landrace.

Area of study: The study was undertaken in Tokat, a province in Black Sea Region of Turkey.

Material and methods: Twenty-five diverse lines, out of 42 unique genotypes previously identified in ‘Tokak’ landrace (PI 470281) based on DNA markers, were evaluated for malting quality traits along with the malting barley cv. ‘Tokak 157/37’ in four field trials. Thousand-seed weight, test weight, grain yield, lodging, malt extract percentage, diastatic power, alpha amylase and malt beta glucanase activities, malt protein and starch contents were determined.

Main results: Principal component analysis of malting quality traits revealed that thousand-seed weight, alpha amylase activity, beta glucanase activity and diastatic power were the most discriminatory traits for the lines. As the average of four trials, 15 of the 25 lines evaluated had higher grain yields and 10 of 25 lines had higher malt extract percentages than the standard cultivar ‘Tokak 157/37’. Malt extract was highest in Line 59 in all environments, and this line also had the highest values for beta glucanase activity and starch content. Line 215 had highest values for alpha amylase activity. Lines 59 and 215 clearly had superior malting quality.

Research highlights: These lines could harbor novel alleles for these traits to be used in malting barley improvement.


Download data is not yet available.


Abebe TD, Bauer AM, Léon J, 2010. Morphological diversity of Ethiopian barleys (Hordeum vulgare L.) in relation to geographic regions and altitudes. Hereditas 147: 154-164.

Akgun N, Topal A, Akcura M, 2012. Evaluation of central Anatolian barley landraces for crop improvement. Rom Agric Res 29: 87-93.

Akinci C, Yildirim M, 2009. Screening of barley landraces by direct selection for crop improvement. Acta Agr Scand B-Soil Plant Sci 59: 33-41.

Alemayehu F, Parlevliet JE, 1997. Variation between and within Ethiopian barley landraces. Euphytica 94: 183-189.

Amezrou R, Gyawali S, Belqadi L, Chao S, Arbaoui M, Mamidi S, et al., 2018. Molecular and phenotypic diversity of a worldwide ICARDA spring barley collection. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65: 255-269.

Augustinos AA, Petropoulos C, Karasoulou V, Bletsos F, Papasotiropoulos V, 2016. Assessing diversity among traditional Greek and foreign eggplant cultivars using molecular markers and morphometrical descriptors. Span J Agric Res 14: e0710.

Buckee GK, Baker CD, 1988. Collaborative trial on the determination of beta-glucanase in malt by viscometric and dye labelled method. J Inst Brew 96: 387-390.

Chalak L, Mzid R, Rizk W, Hmedeh H, Kabalan R, Breidy J, et al., 2015. Performance of 50 Lebanese barley landraces (Hordeum vulgare L. subsp. vulgare) in two locations under rainfed conditions. Ann Agri Sci 60: 325-334.

Demissie A, Bjornstad A, 1996. Phenotypic diversity of Ethiopian barleys in relation to geographical regions, altitudinal range and agro-ecological zones: as an aid to germplasm collection and conservation strategy. Hereditas 124: 17-29.

EBC, 1987. Analysis by the European Brewery Convention. Brauerei-und Getränke-rundschau, CH-8047 Zurich Switzerland.

Elakhdar A, Kumamaru T, Qualset CO, 2018. Assessment of genetic diversity in Egyptian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using SSR and SNP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65: 1937-1951.

Fernie AR, Tadmor Y, Zamir D, 2006. Natural genetic variation for improving crop quality. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 196-202.

Fox GP, Henry RJ, 1993. A rapid small-scale method for the determination of malt extract. J Ind Brew 99: 73-75.

Fox GP, Logue SJ, Harasymow S, Ratcliffe M, Taylor H, Tansing P, et al., 1999. Standardization of diastatic power method for barley breeding programs. Proc 9th Australia Barley Technical Symp, Melbourne, 12-16 Sept. pp: 2351-2355.

Freed R, Eisensmith SP, 1986. MSTAT - Statistical Software for Agronomists. Agronomy Abstract.

Fufa H, Baenziger PS, Beecher BS, Dweikat I, Graybosch RA, Eskridge KM, 2005. Comparison of phenotypic and molecular marker-based classifications of hard red winter wheat cultivars. Euphytica 145: 133-146.

Hagenblad J, Leino MW, Afonso GH, Morales DA, 2019. Morphological and genetic characterization of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in the Canary Islands. Genet Resour Crop Evol 66: 465-480.

Hamza S, Hamida BW, Rebai A, Harrabi M, 2004. SSR-based genetic diversity assessment among Tunisian winter barley and relationship with morphological traits. Euphytica 135: 107-118.

Hua W, Zhang X, Zhu J, Shang Y, Wang J, Jia Q, et al., 2015. A study of genetic diversity of colored barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62: 395-406.

IACC, 1960. ICC Standard No: 105. International Association for Cereal Chemistry.

Institute of Brewing Analysis Committee, 1969. Method for determination of alpha-amylase activity. J Inst Brew 75: 430-432.

Jaradat AA, Shahid M, Al-Maskri A. 2004. Genetic diversity in the Batini barley landrace from Oman: I. Spike and seed quantitative and qualitative traits. Crop Sci 44: 304-315.

Kandemir N, 2004. Determination of malting barley cultivars suitable for Tokat-Kazova conditions. J Agric Fac Gaziosmanpasa Univ 21: 94-100.

Kandemir N, Jones BL, Wesenberg DM, Ullrich SE, Kleinhofs A, 2000. Marker assisted analysis of three grain yield QTL in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using near isogenic lines. Mol Breed 6: 157-167.

Kandemir N, Yildirim A, Gunduz R, 2010. Determining the levels of genetic variation using SSR markers in three Turkish barley materials known as Tokak. Turk J Agric For 34: 17-23.

Kilian B, Ozkan H, Kohl J, von Haeseler A, Barale F, Deusch O, et al., 2006. Haplotype structure at seven barley genes: relevance to gene pool bottlenecks, phylogeny of ear type and site of barley domestication. Mol Genet Genomics 276: 230-241.

Lakew B, Semeane Y, Alemayehu F, Gebre H, Grando S, 1997. Exploiting the diversity of barley landraces in Ethiopia. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44: 109-116.

Langridge P, Waugh R, 2019. Harnessing the potential of germplasm collections. Nat Genet 51: 200-201.

Manjunatha T, Bisht IS, Bhat KV, Singh BP, 2007. Genetic diversity in barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare) landraces from Uttaranchal Himalaya of India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54: 5-65.

Mikić S, Zorić M, Stanisavljević D, Kondić-Špika A, Brbaklić L, Kobiljski B, et al., 2016. Agronomic and molecular evaluation of maize inbred lines for drought tolerance. Span J Agric Res 14: e0711.

Miller GH, 2019. Whisky science: A condensed distillation. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. 530 pp.

Muñoz-Amatriaín M, Xiong Y, Schmitt MR, Bilgic H, Budde AD, Chao S, Smith KP, Muehlbauer GJ, 2010. Transcriptome analysis of a barley breeding program examines gene expression diversity and reveals target genes for malting quality improvement. BMC Genom 11: 653.

Nei M, 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106: 283-292.

Pandey M, Wagner C, Friedt W, Ordon F, 2006. Genetic relatedness and population differentiation of Himalayan hulles barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) landraces inferred with SSR. Theor Appl Genet 113: 715-729.

Parzies HK, Spoor W, Ennos RA, 2000. Genetic diversity of barley landrace accessions (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) conserved for different lengths of time in ex situ gene banks. Heredity 84: 476-486.

Shakhatreh Y, Baum M, Haddad N, Alrababah M, Ceccarelli S, 2016. Assessment of genetic diversity among Jordanian wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) genotypes revealed by SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63: 813-822.

Sipahi H, Akar T, Ozkara R, Yildiz MA, Baspinar E, Sayim I, 2009. Determination of relationship between seed storage protein electrophrograms and malting quality in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Biotech Stud 18: 1-10.

Yadav RK, Gautam S, Palikhey E, Joshi BK, Ghimire KH, Gurung R, et al., 2018. Agro-morphological diversity of Nepalese naked barley landraces. Agr Food Secur 7: 86.

Yahiaoui S, Cuesta-Marcos A, Gracia MP, Medina B, Lasa JM, Casas AM, et al., 2014. Spanish barley landraces outperform modern cultivars at low-productivity sites. Plant Breeding 133: 218-226.

Yuksel S, Akcura M, 2012. Pattern analysis of multi-environment yield trials in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Turk J Agric For 36: 285-295.

Varshney RK, Baum M, Guo P, Grando S, Ceccarelli S, Graner A, 2010. Features of SNP and SSR diversity in a set of ICARDA barley germplasm collection. Mol Breed 26: 229-242.

von Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K, 2008. AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: III. Identification of exotic alleles for the improvement of malting quality in spring barley (H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum). Mol Breed 21: 81-93.

How to Cite
SaygiliI., SonmezogluO. A., YildirimA., & KandemirN. (2021). Genetic variation among selected pure lines from Turkish barley landrace ’Tokak’ in yield-related and malting quality traits. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(4), e0702.
Plant breeding, genetics and genetic resources