Structural analysis of a mounted moldboard plow using the finite element simulation method

Keywords: plow-soil interaction, frame, static analysis, safety factor

Abstract

Aim of study: Structural analysis of a mounted moldboard plow to redesign and optimise its frame.

Area of study: Shahrekord, Iran

Material and methods: In this study, a complete modeling of a three-bottom moldboard plow was conducted in Solid work 2016 and then, plow-soil interaction model developed in Abaqus 2018. The FEM-simulated draft was compared with the draft calculated by the analytical model.

Main results: The maximum stress and displacement in chassis were determined under different work conditions. The attachment points of the crossbar to the two-lower links of the three-point hitch, the middle of the bottom standard, the head points of the brace and the attachment point of the mast to the top link of the three-point hitch needed to be redesigned. As a result, higher safety factor ranging 2.5-3 is recommended for the mentioned unsafe places.

Research highlights: The obtained results could be used for further studies on the optimization of the moldboard plow frame.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abaqus, 2010. Abaqus user's manuals version 6.10.1. Abaqus Inc, Providence, RI, USA.

Agricultural Statistics, 2002-2017. Office of Statistics and Information Technology. Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Deputy of Planning and Economy, Office of Statistics and Information Technology, Tehran (In Farsi).

Azimi-Nejadian H, Karparvarfard SH, Naderi-Boldaji M, Rahmanian-Koushkaki H, 2019. Combined finite element and statistical models for predicting force components on a cylindrical moldboard plow. Biosyst Eng 186: 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.07.007

Bentaher H, Ibrahmi A, Hamza E, Hbaieb M, Kantchev G, Maalej A, Arnold W, 2013. Finite element simulation of moldboard-soil interaction. Soil Till Res 134: 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.07.002

Bernaki H, Hamman J, Canafoiski CZ, 1972. Agricultural machines, theory and construction. Vol. 1, published for USDA and NSF by the Foreign Cooperation Center of the Centr Inst for Sci, Tech Econ Inform, Warsaw, Poland.

Budynas RG, Nisbett JK, 2008. Shigley's mechanical engineering design, 8th ed. McGraw-Hill's.

Burr A, Cheatham J, 1995. Mechanical design and analysis, 2nd ed, section 5.2. Prentice-Hall.

Celik HK, Topakci M, Canakci M, Akinci I, 2008. Structural strength analysis of a subsoiler with finite element method. 5th Int Soil Conf, ISTRO Czech Branch, Brno.

Fielke JM, 1999. Finite element modelling of the interaction of the cutting edge of tillage implements with soil. J Agr Eng Res 74: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0440

Formato A, Faugno S, Paolillo G, 2005. Numerical simulation of soil-plow moldboard interaction. Biosyst Eng 93: 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.005

Ghanbarian D, 2009. Engineering principles of tillage machines. Shahrekord Univ Press. )In Farsi).

Godwin RJ, O'Dogherty MJ, Saunders C, Balafoutis AT, 2007. A force prediction model for moldboard plows incorporating the effects of soil characteristic properties, plow geometric factors and plowing speed. Biosyst Eng 97: 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.02.001

Gursel KT, Koftecioglu E, 2006. Structural analysis of elements of two-bottom moldboard plow. J Eng Nat Sci 3: 46-55.

Ibrahmi A, Bentaher H, Hbaieb M, Maalej A, Mouazen AM, 2015. Study the effect of tool geometry and operational conditions on moldboard plow forces and energy requirement: Part 1. Finite element simulation. Comput Electron Agr 117: 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.006

Ibrahmi A, Bentaher H, Hamza E, Maalej A, Mouazen AM, 2017. Advanced analytical method of moldboard plow's design. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 88(1-4): 781-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8806-y

Jafari R, TavakoliHashjin T, 2016. Performance evaluation of modified bentlegPlow using finite element approach. Iran Agr Res 35(1): 63-72) .In Farsi).

Karami MR, Hassan Beigi Bidgoli SR, Jafari A, Kianmehr MH, 2008. Evaluation of mechanical strength of standard and rectangular double-sided rotary plow by finite element simulation method. 5th Nat Congr of Agr Machin Eng Mech, Mashhad, Iran. (In Farsi).

Kerenyi G, Illes T, Jori I, Soos S, 2002. Comparative analysis of reversible plows's frames. ASAE Ann Int Meeting / CIGR XVth World Congress, 28-31 Jul. Chicago, ILL, USA, P N. 023001.

Li K, Li DQ, Liu Y, 2020. Meso-scale investigations on the effective thermal conductivity of multi-phase materials using the finite element method. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 151: 119383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119383

Naderi-Boldaji M, Alimardani R, Hemmat A, Sharifi A, Keyhani A, Tekeste M, Keler T, 2013. 3D finite element simulation of a single-tip horizontal penetrometer-soil interaction. Part I: Development of the model and evaluation of the model parameters. Soil Till Res 134: 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.08.002

Rahmatian M, Yeganeh R, Nematollahi MA, 2020. Modeling and predicting the forces on moldboard plow by using response surface and artificial neural network. J Agr Machin 10(2): 169-185 (In Farsi).

Suministrado DC, Koike M, Konaka T, Yuzawa S, Kuroishi I, 1990. Prediction of soil reaction forces on a moldboard plow surface. J Terramechanics 27(4): 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(90)90030-P

Published
2022-03-22
How to Cite
NazemosadatS. M. R., GhanbarianD., Naderi-BoldajiM., & NematollahiM. A. (2022). Structural analysis of a mounted moldboard plow using the finite element simulation method. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 20(2), e0204. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022202-18157
Section
Agricultural engineering