Active-passive and passive-passive configurations of combined tillage implements for improved tillage and tractive performance: A review

  • Pranay Sarkar Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Dept. Agricultural & Food Engineering, West Bengal 721302 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-9988
  • Ganesh Upadhyay CCS Haryana Agricultural University, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dept. Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Hisar, Haryana 125004
  • Hifjur Raheman Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Dept. Agricultural & Food Engineering, West Bengal 721302 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-7343
Keywords: Draft, Torque, Velocity ratio, soil compaction, agricultural mechanization, tractor-implement matching

Abstract

Proper selection of energy-efficient agricultural machinery helps to reduce drudgery, increase cropping intensity and reduce time required for field preparation. With conventional tillage implements, multiple passes are required to obtain desired seedbed which increase soil compaction due to repeated movement of tractor in field. With combined tillage implements two or more tillage implements are combined to reduce time and fuel energy required for seedbed preparation. In this paper, various researches on active-passive and passive-passive configurations of combined tillage implements have been discussed along with their working principles. It was found that these were associated with less draft, specific energy, and tire slippage compared to conventional implements which provides a sound basis for using them with suitable engine power to improve the power utilization of tractors. Hence, use of these implements could help to reduce soil compaction, labour, fuel cost as well as save time in preparing seedbed. More analytical studies and classical approaches are needed to predict energy requirements of these implements from the knowledge of individual energy requirements of conventional implements to help in proper matching of tractor-implement and also to develop decision support systems. Considering their promising outcomes, they will emerge as effective tools to improve agricultural mechanization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahaneku IE, Ogunjirin OA, 2005. Effect of tractor of forward speed on sandy loam soil physical conditions during tillage. Niger J Technol 24(1): 51-57.

Ahmadi I, 2016. Effect of soil, machine, and working state parameters on the required draft force of a subsoiler using a theoretical draft-calculating model. Soil Res 55(4): 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR16193

Ahmadi I, 2017a. A torque calculator for rotary tiller using the laws of classical mechanics. Soil Till Res 165: 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.009

Ahmadi I, 2017b. A power estimator for an integrated active-passive tillage machine using the laws of classical mechanics. Soil Till Res 171: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.04.006

Alakukku L, 1996. Persistence of soil compaction due to high axle load traffic. I. Short-term effects on the properties of clay and organic soils. Soil Till Res 37(4): 21l-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(96)01016-1

Alakukku L, 1997. Long-term soil compaction due to high axle load traffic (Ph.D. Thesis). Institute of Crop and Soil Science, Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Jokioinen, Finland.

Alakukku L, Elonen P, 1995. Long-term effects of a single compaction by heavy field traffic on yield and nitrogen uptake of annual crops. Soil Till Res 36(3-4): 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(95)00503-X

Alam A, 2000. Farm mechanization: Rising energy intensity. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture 181-191.

Alkhafaji AJ, 2020. Designing and testing of triple combination tillage implement. Plant Arch 20(1): 2363-2366.

Alkhafaji AJ, Almosawi AA, Alqazzaz KM, 2018. Performance of combined tillage equipment and it's effect on soil properties. Int J Environ Agr Biotech 3(3): 799-805. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/3.3.12

Anpat RM, Raheman H, 2017. Investigations on power requirement of active-passive combination tillage implement. Eng Agr Environ Food 10(1): 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2016.06.004

Batey T, 1975. Soil examination in the field. In: Soil physical conditions and crop growth. H.M.S.O. Tech Bull 29: 207.

Bernacki H, Haman J, Kanafojski Cz, 1972. Agricultural machines, theory and construction (Vol. I, pp. 812-821). Scientific Publications Foreign Co-operation Centre of the CISTEI, Warsaw, Poland.

Botta GF, Becerra AT, Tourn FB, 2009. Effect of the number of tractor passes on soil rut depth and compaction in two tillage regimes. Soil Till Res 103(2): 381-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.12.002

Bottam G, Jorajuria D, Balbuena R, Rosatto H, 2004. Mechanical and cropping behaviour of direct drilled soil under different traffic intensities: Effect on soybean (Glycine max L.) yields. Soil Till Res 78(1): 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.01.004

Chamen WCT, Cope RF, Patterson DE, 1979. Development and performance of a high output rotary digger. J Agric Eng Res 24(3): 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(79)90072-6

Choudhary S, Upadhyay G, Patel B, Naresh, Jain M, 2021. Energy requirements and tillage performance under different active tillage treatments in sandy loam soil. J Biosyst Eng 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-021-00112-y

Downs HW, 2003. Combination tillage tools. OSU Extension Facts No. 1222, Oklahoma State Coop Ext Serv, USA.

Emami M, Almassi M, Bakhoda H, Kalantari I, 2018. Agricultural mechanization, a key to food security in developing countries: Strategy formulating for Iran. Agr Food Secur 7(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0176-2

Ghosh BN, 1967. The power requirement of rotary cultivator. J Agric Eng Res 12(1): 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(67)80030-1

Ginoya CJ, Yadav R, Zilpilwar SR, Vagadia VR, Agrawat V, 2019. Development and optimization of mini tractor mounted clod crusher cum planker. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 8(1): 1822-1838. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.193

Gue'rif J, 1984. The influence of water-content gradient and structure anisotropy on soil compressibility. J Agric Eng Res 29(4): 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(84)90092-1

Hamza MA, Anderson WK, 2005. Soil compaction in cropping systems. A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Till Res 82(2): 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009

Hann MJ, Giessibl J, 1998. Force measurements on driven discs. J Agric Eng Res 69(2): 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0241

Hashemi A, Ahmad D, Othman J, Sulaiman S, 2014. The effect of comboplough on some soil physical properties of Universiti Putra Malaysia Research Park. Afr J Agr Res 9(2): 216-221. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.464

Hegazy R, Motalleb IA, 2008. Development and evaluation of combination tillage unit for sugar beet crop. In: Central theme, technology for all: sharing the knowledge for development. Proc Int Conf Agr Eng/ XXXVII Braz Congr Agr Eng/ Int Livestock Environ Symp-ILES VIII, Iguassu Falls City, Brazil, 31 Aug-4 Sept. CIGR, Institut fur Landtechnik.

Hensh S, Tewari VK, Upadhyay G, 2021a. An instrumentation system to measure the loads acting on the tractor PTO bearing during rotary tillage. J Terra 96: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.04.004

Hensh S, Tewari VK, Upadhyay G, 2021b. A novel wireless instrumentation system for measurement of PTO (power take-off) torque requirement during rotary tillage. Biosyst Eng 212: 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.10.015

Hoki M, Burkhardt TH, Wilkinson RH, Tanoue T, 1988. Study of P.T.O. driven powered disc tiller. Trans ASAE 31(5): 1355-1360. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30870

Horn R, Domzal H, Slowinska-Jurkiewicz A, van Quwerkerk C, 1995. Soil compaction processes and their effects on the structure of arable soils and the environment. Soil Till Res 35(1-2): 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(95)00479-C

Jaleta M, Baudron F, Krivokapic-Skoko B, Erenstein O, 2019. Agricultural mechanization and reduced tillage: antagonism or synergy? Int J Agr Sustain 17(3): 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1613742

Javadi A, Hajiahmad A, 2006. Effect of a new combined implement for reducing secondary tillage operation. Int J Agric Biol 8(6): 724-727.

Kailappan R, Manian R, Amuthan GN, Vijayaraghavan C, Duraisamy G, 2001. Combination tillage tool I (design and development of combination tillage tool). AMA 32(3): 19-22.

Kouchakzadeh A, Haghighi K, 2011. The effect of rototiller equipped with serrated blades on some soil properties. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 2(6): 209-215.

Loghavi M, Hosseinpoor A, 2002. Investigating the effect of attaching roller to moldboard plow on primary and secondary tillage operation. Proc II Nat Congr on Farm Machin Mechaniz, Karaj, Iran.

Manian R, Kathirvel K, 2001. Development and evaluation of an active-passive tillage machine. AMA 32(1): 9-18.

Manian R, Kathirvel K, Nagaiyan V, 1999. Development and evaluation of combination tillage-bed furrow-former. AMA 30(4): 22-29.

Mehta CR, Singh K, Selvan MM, 2011. A decision support system for selection of tractor-implement system used on Indian farms. J Terra 48(1): 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2010.05.002

Mehuys GR, 1984. Soil degradation of agricultural land in Quebec. A review and impact assessment. Science Council of Canada, Ottawa.

Mrema G, Soni P, Rolle RS, 2014. A regional strategy for sustainable agricultural mechanization: sustainable mechanization across agri-food chains in Asia and the Pacifc region. FAO, Bangkok.

Nalavade PP, Salokhe VM, Niyamapa T, Soni P, 2010. Performance of free rolling and powered tillage discs. Soil Till Res 109(2): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.05.004

Nataraj E, Sarkar P, Raheman H, Upadhyay G, 2021. Embedded digital display and warning system of velocity ratio and wheel slip for tractor operated active tillage implements. J Terra 97: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.003

Oni KC, Adeoti JS, 1986. Tillage effects on differently compacted soil and on cotton yield in Nigeria. Soil Till Res 8: 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(86)90325-9

Parmar RP, Gupta RA, 2016. Design and development of pulverizing attachment to cultivator. Polj Tehn 71-80.

Peerlkamp PK, DeBoodt M, Frese H, Low AJ, 1967. West European methods for soil structure determination II. The West-European Working group on Soil Structure of the International Soil Science Survey, Ghent, pp: 216-223.

Raheman H, Roul AK, 2013. Combination tillage implement for high horse power 2WD tractors. AMA 44(3): 75-79.

Raheman H, Behera A, 2018. A tractor drawn rota-cultivator: An active-passive combination tillage implement. Adv Agr Eng 2: 9-16.

Ranjbarian S, Askari M, Jannatkhah J, 2015. Performance of tractor and tillage implements in clay soil. J Saudi Soc Agr Sci 16(2): 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.05.003

Rátonyi T, Széles A, Harsányi E, 2015. Long-term effects of conventional and reduced tillage systems on soil condition and yield of maize. Geophys Res Abstr 17.

Sahu RK, 2005. Development and performance evaluation of combination tillage implements for 2WD tractors (Ph. D. Thesis). Agr Food Eng Dept, IIT-Kharagpur, India.

Schjønning P, Rasmussen KJ, 2000. Soil strength and soil pore characteristics for direct drilled and ploughed soils. Soil Till Res 57(1-2): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00149-5

Shah AN, Tanveer M, Shahzad B, Yang G, Fahad S, Ali S, et al., 2017. Soil compaction effects on soil health and cropproductivity: An overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24: 10056-10067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8421-y

Shibusawa S, 1993. Reverse- rotational rotary tiller for reduced power requirement in deep tillage. J Terra 30(3): 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(93)90007-K

Shinners KJ, Alcock R, Wilkes JM, 1990. Combining active and passive tillage elements to reduce draft requirements. Trans ASAE 33(2): 400-0404. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31343

Shinners KJ, Wilkes JM, England TD, 1993. Performance characteristics of a tillage machine with active-passive components. J Agric Eng Res 55(4): 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1993.1050

Smith CW, Johnston MA, Lorentz S, 1997. Assessing the compaction susceptibility of south African forestry soils. I. The effect of soil type, water content and applied pressure on uni-axial compaction. Soil Till Res 41(1-2): 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(96)01084-7

Srivastava AK, Goering CE, Rohrbach RP, 1993. Engineering principles of agricultural machines. ASAE Textbook No. 6, American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

Tullberg JN, 2000. Wheel traffic effects on tillage draught. J Agric Eng Res 75(4): 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0516

Ungureanu N, Vladut V, Biris S, Dan C, Vlăduț DI, Gheorghiță NE, et al., 2017. Influence of the number of passes on soil compaction - A review. 6th Int Conf Thermal Equip, Renew Energ Rural Dev (TE-RE-RD). Moieciu de Sus, Romania.

Upadhyay G, Raheman H, 2018. Performance of combined offset disc harrow (front active and rear passive set configuration) in soil bin. J Terra 78: 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.002

Upadhyay G, Raheman H, 2019. Comparative analysis of tillage in sandy clay loam soil by free rolling and powered disc harrow. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food 12(1): 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2018.11.001

Upadhyay G, Raheman H, 2020a. Effect of velocity ratio on performance characteristics of an active-passive combination tillage implement. Biosyst Eng 191: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.010

Upadhyay G, Raheman H, 2020b. Comparative assessment of energy requirement and tillage effectiveness of combined (active-passive) and conventional offset disc harrows. Biosyst Eng 198: 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.08.014

Upadhyaya SK, Williams TH, Kemble LJ, Collins NE, 1984. Energy requirements for chiseling in coastal plain soils. Trans ASAE 27(6): 1643-1649. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.33019

Upadhyay G, Raheman H, Rasool S, 2017. Three dimensional modelling and stress analysis of a powered single acting disc harrow using FEA. Curr. Agric. Res. J 5(2): 203-219. https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.5.2.08

Usaborisut P, Prasertkan K, 2018. Performance of combined tillage tool operating under four different linkage configurations. Soil Till Res 183: 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.06.004

Usaborisut P, Prasertkan K, 2019. Specific energy requirements and soil pulverization of a combined tillage implement. Heliyon 5(11): e02757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02757

Walton PG, Warboys IB, 1986. An investigation into the power requirements of an experimental wye double digger. J Agric Eng Res 35(4): 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(86)80059-2

Watts CW, Patterson DE, 1984. The development and assessment of high speed shallow cultivation equipment for autumn cereals. J Agric Eng Res 29(2): 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(84)90065-9

Weise G, 1993. Active and passive elements of a combined tillage machine: Interaction, draft requirement and energy consumption. J Agric Eng Res 56(4): 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1993.1080

Wilkes JM, Addai SH, 1988. The use of the 'Wye double digger' as an alternative the plow to reduce energy requirement per hectare and soil damage. Proc Int Conf Agr Eng, Paper No. 88-190.

Wismer RD, Wegsheid EL, Luth HJ, Roming BE, 1968. Energy applications in tillage and earth moving. SAE Trans 77(4): 2486-2494.

Published
2021-11-18
How to Cite
SarkarP., UpadhyayG., & RahemanH. (2021). Active-passive and passive-passive configurations of combined tillage implements for improved tillage and tractive performance: A review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(4), e02R01. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021194-18387
Section
Agricultural engineering