An insight into the influence of packaging and presentation format on consumer purchasing attitudes towards cheese: a qualitative study

  • Ali Eldesouky Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias. Universidad de Extremadura. Avda. Adolfo Suarez, s/n. 06007 Badajoz
  • Francisco Mesias Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias. Universidad de Extremadura. Avda. Adolfo Suarez, s/n. 06007 Badajoz
Keywords: qualitative research, focus group, food packaging

Abstract

Using packaging and presentation format to appeal to consumers and to communicate product benefits directly on the shelf is a competitive advantage in the food industry. Both packaging and presentation format can attract consumers’ attention and influence their perceptions and purchasing decisions. Therefore, the objective of this study is to obtain a preliminary insight into the main attributes and factors that most affect consumers’ purchase decisions regarding presentation and packaging of cheese products. To achieve this goal, we have used the focus group technique, because of its considerable potential as a mean to collect qualitative data within consumer research. The results showed that price, product quality, packaging, origin and brand are decisive factors in the purchase decision of food products. Although packaging and presentation of food have potential influence on the consumer’s choice and purchase, packaging colour and design are the most attractive factors during the purchase process. Thus, packaging format and colour may influence consumers prior to the purchase. These stimuli can be decisive when buying cheese and may also help producers to communicate the differentiation of their products to consumers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ares G, Deliza R, 2010. Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Qual Prefer 21(8): 930-937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.006

Ares G, Giménez A, Deliza R, 2010. Influence of three non-sensory factors on consumer choice of functional yogurts over regular ones. Food Qual Prefer 21: 361–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.09.002

Bar M, Neta M, 2006. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychol Sci 17(8): 645-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x

Barrena-Figueroa R, Garcia-Lopez-de-Meneses T, 2013. The effect of consumer innovativeness in the acceptance of a new food product. An application for the coffee market in Spain. Span J Agric Res 11(3): 578-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013113-3903

Becker L, van Rompay T, Schifferstein H, Galetzka M, 2011. Tough package strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Qual Prefer 22: 17-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.007

Berkowitz M, 1987. Product shape as a design innovation strategy. J Prod Innovat Manag 4: 274-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(87)90031-2

Bloch PH, 1995. Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J Marketing 59: 16-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252116

Bone PF, France KR, 2001. Package graphics and consumer product beliefs. J Bus Psychol 15(3): 467-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007826818206

Carneiro JDS, Minim VPR, Deliza R, Silva CHO, Carneiro JCS, Leao FP, 2005. Labelling effects on consumer intention to purchase for soybean oil. Food Qual Prefer 16: 275–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.004

Chambers S, Lobb A, Butler L, Harvey K, Traill WB, 2007. Local, national and imported foods: A qualitative study. Appetite 49: 208–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.003

Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL, 2005. The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J Prod Innovat Manag 22: 63-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x

Dantas M, Nakajima V, Rosa D, Andrade F, Canzian C, Martino H, 2011. Guava jam packaging determinant attributes in consumer buying decision. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment 31(3): 567-570.

Debucquet G, Cornet J, Adam I, Cardinal M, 2012. Perception of oyster-based products by French consumers. The effect of processing and role of social representations. Appetite 59: 844–852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.020

Deliza R, 1996. The effects of expectation on sensory perception and acceptance. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.

Deliza R, Macfie HJH, Hedderley D, 1999. An investigation on the package features affecting consumer perception of fruit juice using repertory grid and focus group methods. Braz J Food Technol 2: 63-71.

Deliza R, Rosenthal A, Silva ALS, 2003. Consumer attitude towards information on non conventional technology. Trends Food Sci Tech 14: 43-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00240-6

Di Monaco R, Cavella S, Torrieri E, Masi P, 2007. Consumer acceptability of vegetable soups. J Sens Stud 22: 81-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00097.x

Donoghue S, 2000. Projective techniques in consumer research. J Family Ecol Consum Sci 28: 47-53.

Dransfield E, Morrot G, Martin J, Ngapo T, 2004. The application of a text clustering statistical analysis to aid the interpretation of focus group interviews. Food Qual Prefer 15(5): 477-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.08.004

Draskovic N, 2010. Packaging convenience. Consumer packaging feature marketing tool? Int J Manage Cases 12(2): 267-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.5848/APBJ.2010.00061

Feng H, Feng J, Tian D, Weisong M, 2012. Consumers' perceptions of quality and safety for grape products: A case study in Zhejiang Province China. Brit Food J 114(11): 1587-1598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070701211273054

Flick U, 2002. An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, London, UK.

Holliday A, 2002. Doing and writing qualitative research. Sage, London, UK.

Galvez FC, Resurreccion AVA, 1992. Reliability of the focus group technique in determining the quality characteristics of mung bean noodles. J Sens Stud 7: 315-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1992.tb00197.x

Guerrero L, Guardia MD, Xicola J, Verbeke W, Vanhonacker B, Biemens SZ, Sajdakowska M, Rosse CS, Issanchou S, Contel M et al., 2009. Consumer driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods - A qualitative cross-cultural study. Appetite 52: 345-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.008

Jaeger SR, 2006. Non-sensory factors in sensory science research. Food Qual Prefer 17: 132-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.004

Kinnear TC, Taylor JR, 1993. Investigación de mercados. Un enfoque aplicado. McGraw-Hill Interamericana S.A., Bogotá, Colombia.

Krippendorff K, 2004. Reliability in content analysis: some common misconceptions and recommendations. Hum Commun Res 30(3): 411-433.

Krueger RA, 1988. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, USA.

Kuvykaite R, Dovaliene A, Navickiene L, 2009. Impact of package elements on consumers purchase decision. Econ Manage 14: 441-447.

Marshall C, Rossman GB, 1999. Designing qualitative research. Sage, London, UK.

Mizutani N, Okamoto M, Yamaguchi Y, Kusakabe Y, Dan I, Yamanaka T, 2010. Package images modulate flavor perception for orange juice. Food Qual Prefer 21(7): 867-872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.010

Moreno M, Tarrega A, Torrescasana E, Blanch C, 2012. Influence of label information on dark chocolate acceptability. Appetite 58: 665-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.12.005

Morgan DL, Krueger RA, 1998. The focus group. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Moskowitz HR, 1994. Food concepts and products. Just-in-time development. Food and Nutrition Press, Trumbull, USA.

Papanagiotou P, Kalogianni I, Melfou K, 2013. Consumer's expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat. Meat Sci 93(3): 449-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.024

Petzoldt M, Joiko C, Menrad K, 2008. Factors and their impacts for influencing food and safety in the value chains. University of Applied Science, Weihenstephan, Germany.

Puyares V, Ares G, Carrau F, 2010. Searching a specific bottle for Tannat wine using check-all-that apply question and conjoint analysis. Food Qual Prefer 21: 684-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.008

Roininen K, Arvola A, Lahteenmaki L, 2006. Exploring consumers' perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: laddering and word association. Food Qual Prefer 17: 20-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.04.012

Schifferstein HNJ, Kole APW, Mojet J, 1999. Asymmetry in the disconfirmation of expectations for natural yogurt. Appetite 32: 307-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0208

Silayoi P, Speece M, 2004. Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. Brit Food J 106(8): 607-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700410553602

Stewart B, Olson D, Goody C, Tinsley A, 1994. Converting focus group data on food choices into a quantitative instrument. J Nutr Educ 26: 34-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(12)80832-6

Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, 1990. Focus groups - Theory and practice. Sage, Newbury Park, USA.

USDA, 2011. Global food markets: international consumer and retail trends. USDA Economic Research Service. Available in http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/international-markets-trade/global-food-markets/international-consumer-retail-trends.aspx#.U2N1MFdGXME.

Vaca SI, Mesías FJ, 2014. Percepciones de los consumidores espa-oles hacia las frutas de Ecuador: un estudio preliminar cualitativo con técnicas proyectivas. ITEA 110(1): 89-101.

Vidal L, Ares G, Giménez A, 2013. Projective techniques to uncover consumer perception: Application of three methodologies to ready-to-eat salads. Food Qual Prefer 28: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.005

Wells LE, Farley H, Armstrong GA, 2007. The importance of packaging design for own-label food brands. Int J Retail Distrib Manage 35(9): 677-690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09590550710773237

Westerman SJ, Sutherland EJ, Gardner PH, Baig N, Critchley C, Hickey C, Mehigan S, Solway A, Zervos Z, 2013. The design of consumer packaging: effects of manipulations of shape orientation and alignment of graphical forms on consumers' assessments. Food Qual Prefer 27: 8-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.007

Published
2014-05-06
How to Cite
EldesoukyA., & MesiasF. (2014). An insight into the influence of packaging and presentation format on consumer purchasing attitudes towards cheese: a qualitative study. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(2), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014122-5520
Section
Agricultural economics