Valuation and importance of the extrinsic attributes of the product from the firms´ perspective in a Spanish wine protected designation of origin

  • M. Mar Garcia-Galan Dpt. Dirección de Empresas y Sociología, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Extremadura. Avda. de Elvas s/n, 06071 Badajoz
  • Alejandro del Moral-Agúndez Dpt. Dirección de Empresas y Sociología, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Extremadura. Avda. de Elvas s/n, 06071 Badajoz
  • Clementina Galera-Casquet Dpt. Dirección de Empresas y Sociología, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Extremadura. Avda. de Elvas s/n, 06071 Badajoz
Keywords: designation of origin, attributes, qualitative analysis, quality, origin


Designations of origin (DOs) are commercial brands of wide use in the agro-food sector. Its use in Spain has taken place for more than three decades and although wineries managers have incorporated these new forms of protection, little is known about their opinion and their point of view during the DO implementation process. In fact, the consumers’ point of view has been the one most often analyzed in the literature. In the present study we analyzed extrinsic attributes of a wine with DO from the company point of view. In particular, we analyzed brand, product, price, packaging and label, and origin of the product following a qualitative analysis on interviews carried out with winemakers of the DO wine Ribera del Guadiana during the last decade. The qualitative analysis of the interviews was performed using the software package ATLAS/ti, designed for this type of data analysis in the form of large blocks of text. The results indicated that winemakers consider that they offer a good product to the market, and try to promote their brands using the origin of the product as a marketing strategy. From the company point of view, this protected DO (PDO) has important opportunities for positioning to create a sustainable competitive advantage, focusing on quality and the territorial differentiation.


Download data is not yet available.


Agrawal J, Kamakura WA, 1999. Country of origin: a competitive advange? Int J Res Mark 16: 255-267.

Bontemps C, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Simioni M, 2013. Quality labels and firm survival: some first empirical evidence. Eur Rev Agric Econ 40: 413-419.

Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Chaaban J, 2010. Protected designation of origin revisited. J Agric Food Ind Org 8: 1-20.

Bruwer J, Johnson R, 2010. Place-based marketing and regional branding strategy perspectives in the California wine industry. J Cons Mark 27(1): 5–16.

Claret A, Guerrero L, Aguirre E, Rincón L, Hernández MD, Martínez I, Peleteiro JB, Grau A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C, 2012. Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Qual Pref 26: 259–266.

De Chernatony L, Harris F, Dall’Olmo Riley F, 2000. Added value: its nature, roles and sustainability. Eur J Mark 34: 39-56.

Dekhili S, d’Hauteville F, 2009. Effect of the region of origin on the perceived quality of olive oil: an experimental approach using a control group. Food Qual Pref 20: 525-532.

Deselnicu OC, Costanigro M, Souza-Monteiro DM, Thilmany McFadden D, 2013. A meta-analysis of geographical indication food valuation studies: What drives the premium for origin-based labels? J Agric Resour Econ 38(2): 204-219.

Dmitrovic T, Vida I, Reardon J, 2009. Purchase behavior in favor of domestic products in the West Balkans. Int Bus Rev 18(5): 523-535.

Felzensztein C, Hibbert S, Vong G, 2004. Is the country of origin the fifth element in the marketing mix of imported wine? A critical review of the literature. J Food Prod Mark 10: 73-84.

Font M, Realini C, Montossi F, Sa-udo C, Campo MM, Oliver MA, Nute GR, Guerrero L, 2011. Consumer's purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: a conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Qual Pref 22: 443-451.

Fotopoulus C, Krystallis A, 2003. Quality labels as a marketing advantage. The case of the PDO Zagoraa in the Greek market. Eur J Mark 37: 1350-1374.

García-Galán MM, del Moral-Agúndez A, Galera-Casquet C, 2012. Assessing the introduction and development of a designation of origin from the firm's perspective: The case of the Ribera del Guadiana wine PDO. Span J Agric Res 10(4): 890-900.

Glaser BG, Strauss A, 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Ed. Aldine, Chicago, USA.

Gluckman RL, 1990. A consumer approach to branded wines. Eur J Mark 24: 27-46.

Godey B, Pederzoli D, Aiello G, Donvito R, Chan P, Oh H, Singh R, Skorobogatykh II, Tsuchiya J, Weitz B, 2012. Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers' decision to purchase luxury products. J Bus Res 65(10): 1461-1470.

Grande I, 1992. Dirección de marketing. Fundamentos y software de aplicaciones. McGraw-Hill, Madrid.

Grande I, Abascal E, 2000. Fundamentos y técnicas de investigación comercial, 5th ed., ESIC, Madrid.

Grunert KG, 1997. What’s in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perceptions of beef. Food Qual Pref 8: 157-174.

Hellofs LL, Jacobson R, 1999. Market share and customers' perceptions of quality: when can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality? J Mark 63: 16-25.

Holm L, Kildevang H, 1996. Consumers´ views of food quality. A qualitative interview study. Appetite 27: 1-14.

Kirmani A, Rao AR, 2000. No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signalling unobservable product quality. J Mark 64: 66-79.

Lagerkvist CJ, Berthelsen T, Sundström K, Johansson H, 2014. Country of origin or EU/non-EU labelling of beef? Comparing structural reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments for measurement of consumer preferences for origin and extrinsic quality cues. Food Qual Pref 34: 50–61.

Lockshin L, Jarvis W, d'Hauteville F, Perrouty JP, 2006. Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Qual Pref 17(3-4): 166-178.

Louviere JJ, Woodworth GG, 1983. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. J Mark Res 20: 350-367.

Martínez MP, Jiménez AI, 2006. La potenciación del origen en las estrategias de marketing de productos agroalimentarios. Bol Econ ICE 2880: 13-29. [In Spanish].

Martinez-Carrasco L, Brugarolas M, Martinez-Poveda A, 2005. Quality wines and wines protected by a designation of origin: Identifying their consumption determinants. J Wine Res 16: 213-232.

Mora P, 2006. Key factor of success in today’s wine sector. Int J Wine 18: 139-149.

Olson JC, 1977. Price as an informational cue: effects in product evaluation. In: Consumer and Industrial Buying Behaviour (Woodside AG, Sheth JN & Bennet PD, eds), North-Holland Publ., NY, pp: 267-286.

Olson JC, Jacoby J, 1972. Cue utilisation in the quality perception process. Proc Third Annu Conf of the Association for Consumer Research (Venkatesan M, ed), Chicago, pp: 167-179.

Rabadán R, Ato M, 2003. Técnicas cualitativas para investigación de mercados. Ed. Pirámide, Madrid.

Ruiz JI, 1996. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

Sáenz-Navajas MP, Ballester J, Peyron D, Valentin D, 2014. Extrinsic attributes responsible for red wine quality perception: A cross-cultural study between France and Spain. Food Qual Pref 35: 70-85.

Selltiz C, 1976. An introduction to sampling. In: Research methods in social relations, 3rd edition (Selltiz C et al., eds.), Holt Rinehart, NY, USA. pp: 516-525.

Skuras D, Vakrou A, 2002. Consumers' willingness to pay for origin labelled wine. A Greek case study. Br Food J 104: 898-912.

Spawton AL, 1991. Grapes and wine seminar-prospering in the 1990s: changing your view of the consumer. Int Mark Rev 8: 32-42.

Steenkamp JB, 1989. Product quality: an investigation into the concept and how it is perceived by consumers. Thesis, Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, Holland.

Steenkamp JB, 1990. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. J Bus Res 21: 309-333.

Thode SF, Maskulka JM, 1998. Place-based marketing strategies, brand equity and vineyard valuation. J Prod Brand Manag 7: 379-399.

Van Ittersum K, Candel MJJM, Meulenberg MTG, 2003. The influence of the image of a product's region of origin on product evaluation. J Bus Res 56: 215-226.

Van Trijp HCM, Steenkamp JB, Candel M, 1997. Quality labeling as instrument to create product equity: the case of IKB in the Netherlands. In: Agricultural marketing and consumer behaviour in a changing world (Wierenga B, Van Tilburg A, Grunert KG, Steenkamp JB, Wedel M, eds), Kluwe Acad Publ, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp: 201-216.

Veale R, Quester P, 2009. Do consumer expectations match experience? Predicting the influence of price and country of origin on perceptions of product quality. Int Busin Rev 18: 134-144.

Yagüe MJ, Jimenéz AI, 2002. La denominación de origen en el desarrollo de estrategias de diferenciación: percepción y efectos de su utilización en las sociedades vinícolas de La Mancha y Valdepe-as. Rev Est Agro Pesq 197: 179-206 [In Spanish].

Zeithaml VA, 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52: 2-22.

How to Cite
Garcia-GalanM. M., del Moral-AgúndezA., & Galera-CasquetC. (2014). Valuation and importance of the extrinsic attributes of the product from the firms´ perspective in a Spanish wine protected designation of origin. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(3), 568-579.
Agricultural economics